They Were Just in the Way | Indian Removal

[IM2]

lol why read that idiot crap when we have plenty of real history to go by? lol

But you don't have real history. That's the problem.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Disingenuous bs. Try again.

Face your history like the man you claim you are.

You can't dodge it. The buffalo soldier forced indians off their lands. You're just as dirty as the white man.

 

[IM2]

Yes. Blacks get far lighter sentences despite all the repeat offenses they commit. Good point. See gun thug George Floyd's record for a prime example. He shouldn't have been on the streets at all.

Incorrect. And look at the white man you want to be president. His record of criminal behavior far exceeds what you falsely claim about Floyd.

 

[IM2]

You can't dodge it. The buffalo soldier forced indians off their lands. You're just as dirty as the white man.

You can't dodge that Buffalo soldiers acted up command of whites.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

You can't dodge that Buffalo soldiers acted up command of whites.

They didn't have to do it. But they loved doing it

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Whites also used Indian scouts during their acts of aggression. Dishonest whites can say that Native Americans owned slaves too. But what whites who keep trying to dodge what they have done need to do is stop pointing fingers at everybody else and accept your history. Because blacks and Native Americans fought together against what whites were doing far more than the few instances dishonestly used to dodge. Native Americans in many cases purchased runaway slaves to save them from being murdered. The great John Horse was a black Seminole who led revolts against whites. So talking about Buffalo soldiers acting on orders by whites is disingenuous. And when all you have is disingenuous bs to argue with, you lose.

No, it is not. It is filling in the history of blacks, indigenous peoples, Euro-American whites, etc., on issues of race and slavery and culture. You are being too rigid to consider your rigid argument seriously.

 

[IM2]

No, it is not. It is filling in the history of blacks, indigenous peoples, Euro-American whites, etc., on issues of race and slavery and culture. You are being too rigid to consider your rigid argument seriously.

Yes it is, because instead of understanding that the Buffalo Soldiers were members of the U.S. military acting upon the command of whites, and had they disobeyed those orders, they would have been tried for treason and killed, we get how Buffalo soldiers moved Native Americans off their land as if they did so independently and willingly. The truth is not flexible.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Yes it is, because instead of understanding that the Buffalo Soldiers were members of the U.S. military acting upon the command of whites, and had they disobeyed those orders, they would have been tried for treason and killed, we get how Buffalo soldiers moved Native Americans off their land as if they did so independently and willingly. The truth is not flexible.

I am not arguing that at all. It is a common fact that we had a slavery holocaust and an indigenous genocide as part of our history. Yes, that's true.

 

[AZrailwhale]

THIS THREAD IS ABOUT THE INDIAN REMOVAL POLICY, AND NOT WHITE RACIST OPINIONS OF ME OR ANYONE ELSE WHO IS BLACK.

We have the same low opinion of you that you have of anyone who dares to disagree with you. And we have the same right to express it. If you don’t like our opinions, all you have to do is put us on ignore. But then you’d only have four posters to rant to. That’s a damned small echo chamber. Face it, nobody likes you except the other racists that agree with you.

 

[DudleySmith]

Incorrect. And look at the white man you want to be president. His record of criminal behavior far exceeds what you falsely claim about Floyd.

lol you're just poorly educated. See, when they gave you those 310 points so you could warm a seat in college, they didn't really believe you were competent, they just wanted the money they could get for meeting quotas, is all.

 

[DudleySmith]

I am not arguing that at all. It is a common fact that we had a slavery holocaust and an indigenous genocide as part of our history. Yes, that's true.

You savages drinking yourselves to death wasn't a' genocide', it was just savages being savages is all.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Whites also used Indian scouts during their acts of aggression. Dishonest whites can say that Native Americans owned slaves too. But what whites who keep trying to dodge what they have done need to do is stop pointing fingers at everybody else and accept your history. Because blacks and Native Americans fought together against what whites were doing far more than the few instances dishonestly used to dodge. Native Americans in many cases purchased runaway slaves to save them from being murdered. The great John Horse was a black Seminole who led revolts against whites. So talking about Buffalo soldiers acting on orders by whites is disingenuous. And when all you have is disingenuous bs to argue with, you lose.

A FEW blacks fought with one or two tribes. And it wasn’t about slavery, it was about keeping whites out of the swamps where they were hiding, as I said in another post, Francis Marion did a lot more, with a lot fewer personnel in those same swamps.

 

[DudleySmith]

Yes it is, because instead of understanding that the Buffalo Soldiers were members of the U.S. military acting upon the command of whites, and had they disobeyed those orders, they would have been tried for treason and killed, we get how Buffalo soldiers moved Native Americans off their land as if they did so independently and willingly. The truth is not flexible.

lol they weren't drafted, asshole. They know what they were going to be doing. Sucks to be you, having to lie about your history and hoping it helps line your pockets off the backs of slaves 150 years ago.

 

[AZrailwhale]

You can't dodge that Buffalo soldiers acted up command of whites.

The Buffalo Soldiers could have gotten out of the army at any time if they cared to. They weren’t slaves, or even draftees. They were all volunteers in a very small army. I know because one of my ancestors was in the cavalry in the west, got out and married a Comanche woman.

 

[DudleySmith]

But you don't have real history. That's the problem.

lol sure we do; it's those courses that were too hard for you so you went with 'African Studies' instead. Easy grades, AA hires for 'professors', no homework, a classroom full of your fellow racists

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The Buffalo Soldiers could have gotten out of the army at any time if they cared to. They weren’t slaves, or even draftees. They were all volunteers in a very small army. I know because one of my ancestors was in the cavalry in the west, got out and married a Comanche woman.

Not at "any time", no, sir. That's not how it works.

 

[Meathead]

Count on it, bro. I’m retiring next week and moving out west to help my people in any way I can.

Bring lotsa firewater.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Not at "any time", no, sir. That's not how it works.

Any time after their enlistments expired. They were professional soldiers. No one forced them to re-up.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Any time after their enlistments expired. They were professional soldiers. No one forced them to re-up.

Thank you for agreeing.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Thank you for agreeing.

I was clarifying my earlier statement. I never meant that they could just quit. But most, like my great, great grandfather reupped several times.