Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I enjoy pointing out the incredible gullibility of Trump's Chumps.Donald Trump has magical powers. He will stop alcoholic truck drivers with no connections to ISIS from driving into crowds.
He will stop repressed homosexual Muslims with no connections to ISIS from shooting up night clubs.
Yeah. He's the Magic anti_Negro we've been waiting for.
He will be the first President where no one will die on his watch.
Don't ask him how he will do these things. It's a secret! He doesn't want to tip his hand to the terrorists. BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!
Dude, what is wrong with you? You start threads freaking out over shit that yourself deem of no consequence.
This is not rational behavior.
I enjoy pointing out the incredible gullibility of Trump's Chumps.Donald Trump has magical powers. He will stop alcoholic truck drivers with no connections to ISIS from driving into crowds.
He will stop repressed homosexual Muslims with no connections to ISIS from shooting up night clubs.
Yeah. He's the Magic anti_Negro we've been waiting for.
He will be the first President where no one will die on his watch.
Don't ask him how he will do these things. It's a secret! He doesn't want to tip his hand to the terrorists. BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!
Dude, what is wrong with you? You start threads freaking out over shit that yourself deem of no consequence.
This is not rational behavior.
Just because they never stop to think about the impossibility of his incredible claims doesn't mean I shouldn't point them out!
More blood on Obamas hands....Let's not discuss Obama putting thousands of American combat troops back into Iraq to fight the JV team.I listened to some of the GOP convention yesterday. The pants shitting was non-stop.
Wow, how timely, and irrelevant.
"Are you scared? I'm scared, too! You SHOULD be scared! EEK! Herr Drumpf will make us feel SAFE!"
(applause)
I thought this was an ISIS thread?
Yes...yes....we noticed Obama surrendered....More blood on Obamas hands....Let's not discuss Obama putting thousands of American combat troops back into Iraq to fight the JV team.I listened to some of the GOP convention yesterday. The pants shitting was non-stop.
Wow, how timely, and irrelevant.
"Are you scared? I'm scared, too! You SHOULD be scared! EEK! Herr Drumpf will make us feel SAFE!"
(applause)
I thought this was an ISIS thread?
BS. President Obama is still cleaning up after President Bushes blunderous invasion, occupation and withdrawal that not only shifted the balance of power but threatens a regional war now as well. But of course he is doing it without putting in combat troops, using air support for US trained allies who are taking back the territory..
Yes...yes....we noticed Obama surrendered....More blood on Obamas hands....Let's not discuss Obama putting thousands of American combat troops back into Iraq to fight the JV team.I listened to some of the GOP convention yesterday. The pants shitting was non-stop.
"Are you scared? I'm scared, too! You SHOULD be scared! EEK! Herr Drumpf will make us feel SAFE!"
(applause)
I thought this was an ISIS thread?
BS. President Obama is still cleaning up after President Bushes blunderous invasion, occupation and withdrawal that not only shifted the balance of power but threatens a regional war now as well. But of course he is doing it without putting in combat troops, using air support for US trained allies who are taking back the territory..
There was no forcing of anyone.Yes...yes....we noticed Obama surrendered....More blood on Obamas hands....Let's not discuss Obama putting thousands of American combat troops back into Iraq to fight the JV team.I thought this was an ISIS thread?
BS. President Obama is still cleaning up after President Bushes blunderous invasion, occupation and withdrawal that not only shifted the balance of power but threatens a regional war now as well. But of course he is doing it without putting in combat troops, using air support for US trained allies who are taking back the territory..
You mean the Bush Bug Out? Where the President of the United States was forced to negotiate a SOFA by the end of 2008 or be forced to pull all our troops out by then.
Who went into Egypt to start a revolution that saw the Muslim Brotherhood terrorists to take power?BS. President Obama is still cleaning up after President Bushes blunderous invasion, occupation and withdrawal that not only shifted the balance of power but threatens a regional war now as well. But of course he is doing it without putting in combat troops, using air support for US trained allies who are taking back the territory..
ISIS. What a bunch of pussies.
ISIS has lost half their territory in the past year. Al Qaeda managed to conquer an entire country.
ISIS managed to pull off an attack in Paris and killed 138 people, and injured 368. AQ pulled off the Madrid train bombing which killed 192 people and injured around 2,000. AQ also pulled off the London Underground attack, killing 52 people and over 700 injured.
Since the Paris attack, ISIS hasn't done shit. There have been some losers who were not members of ISIS who have done some lone wolf attacks, including an alcoholic truck driver who lost his job and went crazy. Now some loser with an ax, and ISIS is taking credit.
Really? A guy with an ax? This is a sure sign of a JV team.
Compare that to taking down the World Trade Center and hitting the Pentagon.
So why are so many people curled up on the floor in the fetal position, shitting their pants over the JV team?
Of course the left won't be talking about mass murdering Muslims in 10 years. You don't talk about them now.EEK! BE AFRAID!ISIS. What a bunch of pussies.
How many Americans have to die before you don't consider ISIS a threat fool? If they killed your family would that make a difference or would you go on spinning for the left? I think we all know the answer.
ISIS is small potatoes. We won't even be talking about them in ten years.
Yep, 7 1/2 years later, still Bush's fault. Well, the bad stuff, but hey, its almost all bad anyway. Obama, smartest guy ever to become resident, gets nothing accomplished. All Bush's fault.
\There was no forcing of anyone.
We were the conquerors, fuck the UN vermin.\There was no forcing of anyone.
Uh, yeah there was. They only worked on the SOFA all of 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/world/middleeast/25military.html?_r=0
Lacking an Accord On Troops, U.S. and Iraq Seek a Plan B
One possibility is an extension of the United Nations mandate that expires at the end of the year. That would require a Security Council vote that both governments believe could be complicated by Russia or others opposed to the U.S.-led war. Another alternative would amount to a simple handshake agreement between Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and President Bush to leave things as they are until a new deal, under a new U.S. administration, can be negotiated.
Negotiators have been stuck for months on the question of legal jurisdiction over U.S. troops and immunity for possible crimes. But even if the sides reach a deal in the next few days or weeks, it is not clear that a formal status-of-forces agreement could be approved by the end of the year. Maliki has pledged to submit an accord to Iraq's divided parliament before he signs it -- a promise he reaffirmed last week during a visit to Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, Iraq's most influential Shiite cleric. Sistani has said he will not endorse any document without the support of Iraq's population and political factions.
If the parliament refuses, Maliki would have "no choice" but to request a U.N. extension "because the American forces will lose their legal cover on Dec. 31," he told the Times of London in a weekend interview. "If that happens, according to international law, Iraqi law and American law, the U.S. forces will be confined to their bases and have to withdraw from Iraq," Maliki said.
Who went into Egypt to start a revolution that saw the Muslim Brotherhood terrorists to take power?BS. President Obama is still cleaning up after President Bushes blunderous invasion, occupation and withdrawal that not only shifted the balance of power but threatens a regional war now as well. But of course he is doing it without putting in combat troops, using air support for US trained allies who are taking back the territory..
Who started a war with Libya?
Who started a war with Syria?
Who fast tracked the worlds leading sponsor of terrorism in building nukes?
Pro West Iranians attempted a revolution in 2009.Who went into Egypt to start a revolution that saw the Muslim Brotherhood terrorists to take power?BS. President Obama is still cleaning up after President Bushes blunderous invasion, occupation and withdrawal that not only shifted the balance of power but threatens a regional war now as well. But of course he is doing it without putting in combat troops, using air support for US trained allies who are taking back the territory..
Who started a war with Libya?
Who started a war with Syria?
Who fast tracked the worlds leading sponsor of terrorism in building nukes?
Egyptians, Libyans, Syrians, and finally no international accord they could have one within the decade.
We were the conquerors, fuck the UN vermin.\There was no forcing of anyone.
Uh, yeah there was. They only worked on the SOFA all of 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/world/middleeast/25military.html?_r=0
Lacking an Accord On Troops, U.S. and Iraq Seek a Plan B
One possibility is an extension of the United Nations mandate that expires at the end of the year. That would require a Security Council vote that both governments believe could be complicated by Russia or others opposed to the U.S.-led war. Another alternative would amount to a simple handshake agreement between Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and President Bush to leave things as they are until a new deal, under a new U.S. administration, can be negotiated.
Negotiators have been stuck for months on the question of legal jurisdiction over U.S. troops and immunity for possible crimes. But even if the sides reach a deal in the next few days or weeks, it is not clear that a formal status-of-forces agreement could be approved by the end of the year. Maliki has pledged to submit an accord to Iraq's divided parliament before he signs it -- a promise he reaffirmed last week during a visit to Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, Iraq's most influential Shiite cleric. Sistani has said he will not endorse any document without the support of Iraq's population and political factions.
If the parliament refuses, Maliki would have "no choice" but to request a U.N. extension "because the American forces will lose their legal cover on Dec. 31," he told the Times of London in a weekend interview. "If that happens, according to international law, Iraqi law and American law, the U.S. forces will be confined to their bases and have to withdraw from Iraq," Maliki said.
We were the conquerors, fuck the UN vermin.\There was no forcing of anyone.
Uh, yeah there was. They only worked on the SOFA all of 2008
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/25/world/middleeast/25military.html?_r=0
Lacking an Accord On Troops, U.S. and Iraq Seek a Plan B
One possibility is an extension of the United Nations mandate that expires at the end of the year. That would require a Security Council vote that both governments believe could be complicated by Russia or others opposed to the U.S.-led war. Another alternative would amount to a simple handshake agreement between Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki and President Bush to leave things as they are until a new deal, under a new U.S. administration, can be negotiated.
Negotiators have been stuck for months on the question of legal jurisdiction over U.S. troops and immunity for possible crimes. But even if the sides reach a deal in the next few days or weeks, it is not clear that a formal status-of-forces agreement could be approved by the end of the year. Maliki has pledged to submit an accord to Iraq's divided parliament before he signs it -- a promise he reaffirmed last week during a visit to Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, Iraq's most influential Shiite cleric. Sistani has said he will not endorse any document without the support of Iraq's population and political factions.
If the parliament refuses, Maliki would have "no choice" but to request a U.N. extension "because the American forces will lose their legal cover on Dec. 31," he told the Times of London in a weekend interview. "If that happens, according to international law, Iraqi law and American law, the U.S. forces will be confined to their bases and have to withdraw from Iraq," Maliki said.
President Bush went to the UN for a Mandate on the occupation of Iraq. He got one. It was renewed every year. Every year the Iraqis asked the UNSC not to renew it. Finally in 2008 the mandate was no longer going to be renewed.
Conquests are against the UN Charter.
