Cool!!! More must be done to limit the power of the Executive Branch.
Quite frankly, the White House has too many outs to circumvent the Congress.
The snag is will the right be saying that when a republican is president. I think not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Cool!!! More must be done to limit the power of the Executive Branch.
Quite frankly, the White House has too many outs to circumvent the Congress.
If ot were Bush, you'd be demanding approval by 75% of the states for everything he did.
Cool!!! More must be done to limit the power of the Executive Branch.
Quite frankly, the White House has too many outs to circumvent the Congress.
The snag is will the right be saying that when a republican is president. I think not.
Im sure everything will be just fine.
What can Congress do to create jobs? Five Republican proposals. - REINS Act - CSMonitor.com
1. REINS Act
The signature jobs initiative for Republicans when Congress returns in September is an attempt to pass the REINS Act (Regulation from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny).
The REINS Act would require Congress to approve every major new regulation proposed by the White House before it takes effect. If Congress does not act within 70 days, the rule is void.
This would severely limit the power of the executive branch, since no regulations such as the Environmental Protection Agency's regulation of greenhouse gases could become effective without approval from both houses of Congress, a high bar. In this way, congressional Republicans are seeking to bring back to Congress the regulatory powers that have gradually devolved to the executive branch during the past 50 years.
Sponsors include Rep. Geoff Davis (R) of Kentucky and Sen. Rand Paul (R) of Kentucky. The bill is endorsed by business groups, including the US Chamber of Commerce, which is launching a summer regulation road show to boost public support.
Republicans and Democrats both back an overhaul to simplify the US tax code, but Republicans would use the savings from such a purge to lower the tax rate for business and the highest-income individuals to 25 percent, down from the current rate of 35 percent.
By comparison, tax rates for the highest-income earners were 69.1 percent in the first year of Ronald Reagan's presidency in 1981 and 94 percent the last year of World War II.
In addition, Republicans are calling for the extension of all the Bush tax cuts, including those for the highest-income brackets, now set to expire on Dec. 31. Republicans also favor allowing US corporations to repatriate profits earned overseas at a lower tax rate.
In a sharp disagreement with Democrats and the White House, Republicans say that the country spends too much, not taxes too little.
Same URL. COMPLETELY unhinged, the lot of 'em.
Cool!!! More must be done to limit the power of the Executive Branch.
Quite frankly, the White House has too many outs to circumvent the Congress.
The snag is will the right be saying that when a republican is president. I think not.
Republicans and Democrats both back an overhaul to simplify the US tax code, but Republicans would use the savings from such a purge to lower the tax rate for business and the highest-income individuals to 25 percent, down from the current rate of 35 percent.
By comparison, tax rates for the highest-income earners were 69.1 percent in the first year of Ronald Reagan's presidency in 1981 and 94 percent the last year of World War II.
In addition, Republicans are calling for the extension of all the Bush tax cuts, including those for the highest-income brackets, now set to expire on Dec. 31. Republicans also favor allowing US corporations to repatriate profits earned overseas at a lower tax rate.
In a sharp disagreement with Democrats and the White House, Republicans say that the country spends too much, not taxes too little.
Same URL. COMPLETELY unhinged, the lot of 'em.
Keeping in mind that this is an article on how the Republicans intend to create jobs. How do they think this will help?
Government DOES NOT CREATE LASTING JOBS.
Private business creates jobs.
Government needs to GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY WAY, LEAVE ME THE HELL ALONE.
And maybe, just maybe I will decide to hire someone.
If I want to.
NO ONE has a right to a job. A job is EARNED.
Damn right.Cool!!! More must be done to limit the power of the Executive Branch.
Quite frankly, the White House has too many outs to circumvent the Congress.
The snag is will the right be saying that when a republican is president. I think not.
Go ahead and read the US Constitution and then find where the Executive Branch has the power you believe it to have.What can Congress do to create jobs? Five Republican proposals. - REINS Act - CSMonitor.com
1. REINS Act
The signature jobs initiative for Republicans when Congress returns in September is an attempt to pass the REINS Act (Regulation from the Executive In Need of Scrutiny).
The REINS Act would require Congress to approve every major new regulation proposed by the White House before it takes effect. If Congress does not act within 70 days, the rule is void.
This would severely limit the power of the executive branch, since no regulations such as the Environmental Protection Agency's regulation of greenhouse gases could become effective without approval from both houses of Congress, a high bar. In this way, congressional Republicans are seeking to bring back to Congress the regulatory powers that have gradually devolved to the executive branch during the past 50 years.
Sponsors include Rep. Geoff Davis (R) of Kentucky and Sen. Rand Paul (R) of Kentucky. The bill is endorsed by business groups, including the US Chamber of Commerce, which is launching a summer regulation road show to boost public support.
freaking loons...
where are all the pretend constitutionalists talking about congress trying to usurp the power of the executive ... in violation of the constitution?
hmmmmmmm??
Same URL. COMPLETELY unhinged, the lot of 'em.Republicans and Democrats both back an overhaul to simplify the US tax code, but Republicans would use the savings from such a purge to lower the tax rate for business and the highest-income individuals to 25 percent, down from the current rate of 35 percent.
By comparison, tax rates for the highest-income earners were 69.1 percent in the first year of Ronald Reagan's presidency in 1981 and 94 percent the last year of World War II.
In addition, Republicans are calling for the extension of all the Bush tax cuts, including those for the highest-income brackets, now set to expire on Dec. 31. Republicans also favor allowing US corporations to repatriate profits earned overseas at a lower tax rate.
In a sharp disagreement with Democrats and the White House, Republicans say that the country spends too much, not taxes too little.
Keeping in mind that this is an article on how the Republicans intend to create jobs. How do they think this will help?
Probably couldn't tell you....Still living at home with the 'rents.So all your other points have been disproved so you latch on to another one?
[[ There's 5 on each side. You've only touched on a couple. Not a good batting average so far]]
What is your current tax rate?
If that number was lowered you would have more money in your pocket that you EARNED to spend how you wish.
This would stimulate production and the economy better than giving that money to a brain-dead, out-of-touch government to do it for us.
Government DOES NOT CREATE LASTING JOBS.
come Oct i will be on my Govt job 32 years....
So you've sucked on the tax payer tit for 32 years? When is enough enough?
come Oct i will be on my Govt job 32 years....
So you've sucked on the tax payer tit for 32 years? When is enough enough?
No. He WORKS for the government, you stupid fuckhead.
On an unrelated topic, I found a vid of what BDBoob looks like after a hard days work of cuting and pasting. Looks like it really takes a toll on her pretending like she knows whats going on and all that.
Family Guy - Meg Smokes Pot - YouTube
come Oct i will be on my Govt job 32 years....
So you've sucked on the tax payer tit for 32 years? When is enough enough?
were in the hell have you been dipshit?.....the PO has not relied on tax dollars since the 70's....
So you've sucked on the tax payer tit for 32 years? When is enough enough?
were in the hell have you been dipshit?.....the PO has not relied on tax dollars since the 70's....
They havent? Who keeps bailing them out? They lose billions every quarter.