These Are The 5 Democrats Who Will Be On The Benghazi Committee

Witch Hunt

Do you think Republicans can keep it going till the November elections? they kept WhiteWater going for seven years

05-151807080_10.jpg


"Witches? No. No witches, only dead Americans"

Like this?

9-11-attack.jpg
 
You know, when you far RWers admit that you KNOW it's a waste of time and money, you're not making a good argument for your cause.

I predict that this thing will not turn out well...for you.

I've never advocated another panel or in-vain investigation
Sorry to disappoint, but we've seen any and all information regarding that day that we're going to see

Maybe it's time to focus on something that's doable.

Like fixing the VA.

That's already underway.

Boehner says Dayton VA is ?worst of government? | www.daytondailynews.com

Too bad your side has to be shamed into doing something.

What did Obama know about the VA hospital scandal and when? - CBS News
Obama Was Warned About VA 'Death Panels' 5 Years Ago During Transition - Investors.com
 
Those dead Americans are just "Bumps in the road"

Seems to me they're now political pawns
What's so sad about this is is the fact that RW Republicans have taken a tragedy and tried to turn it into a scandal. Using the deaths of 4 Americans solely for political reasons.

Sad, very sad.

*SMH*



what you see here is classic projection by democrats; who ignored a bad security situation and that resulted in the deaths. but obama was in the middle of his POLITICAL CAMPAINGN; and what happened at Benghazi didnt fit the POLITICAL narrative of his re-election campaign.

so a COVER-UP was started; to hide a TERRORIST ATTACK; and tried to pin the blame on AMERICANS who hold Christian beliefs; who had made an obscure cideo
 

Maybe you should have read it before you linked to it?

"Findings

I. In assessing military posture in anticipation of the September 11 anniversary, White
House officials failed to comprehend or ignored the dramatically deteriorating security
situation in Libya and the growing threat to U.S. interests in the region. Official public
statements seem to have exaggerated the extent and rigor of the security assessment
conducted at the time.

II. U.S. personnel in Benghazi were woefully vulnerable in September 2012 because a.) the
administration did not direct a change in military force posture, b.) there was no
intelligence of a specific “imminent” threat in Libya, and c.) the Department of State,
which has primary responsibility for diplomatic security, favored a reduction of
Department of Defense security personnel in Libya before the attack.

III. Defense Department officials believed nearly from the outset of violence in Benghazi
that it was a terrorist attack rather than a protest gone awry, and the President
subsequently permitted the military to respond with minimal direction...."
 
Dim # 1- It was the video

Dim # 2- Move along... nothing to see here

Dim # 3- Phony scandal

Dim # 4- But Booooosh!

Dim # 5- What difference does it make?

Dim# 6- Fox says this is the worst terrorist attack in history so it must be true

Dim# 7- Even though there was nothing we could do about it, we should still do it

Dim# 8- When the economy improves and Obamacare start working time to dust off the Benghazi investigations
 

Forum List

Back
Top