The Two-State Delusion,’ by Padraig O’Malley

pbel

Gold Member
Feb 26, 2012
5,653
449
130
Every one knows that Israel is a country full of connivers who have friends who own the Mass Media, the New York Times is no exception...

The truth be known about a brutal Israeli occupation where even trees are an enemy!

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/books/review/the-two-state-delusion-by-padraig-omalley.html?_r=0
Padraig O’Malley’s “The Two-State Delusion” is an impressive and frustrating book. It’s impressive because O’Malley, a professor at the University of Massachusetts at Boston who has written extensively on South Africa and Northern Ireland, has done a tremendous amount of research about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He’s not only delved deeply into its literature; he’s also interviewed dozens of participants on both sides. The result is a book so packed with information that it will reward even the reader so dedicated that she consumes the Israel-Palestine stories buried on Page A17 of The Times.


...O’Malley is not only knowledgeable; he’s also honest. He vividly captures the brutality of Israel’s occupation of the West Bank. According to pro-Palestinian activists, Israel has cut down more than 800,000 Palestinian olive trees since 1967, which, O’Malley observes, is “the equivalent of razing all of the 24,000 trees in New York City’s Central Park 33 times.” And according to the Israeli human rights group Yesh Din, he tells us, 90 percent of Palestinian complaints against Israelis in the West Bank never result in an indictment, and in the rare circumstances “when convictions are made, Israeli citizens involved in such violent acts are handed light sentences...”
 
Fuck the Paliturdians.

Israel was founded by the yids, so as far as I'm concerned the muzbots can go fuck themselves in mecca.


 
Every one knows that Israel is a country full of connivers who have friends who own the Mass Media, the New York Times is no exception...

The truth be known about a brutal Israeli occupation where even trees are an enemy!

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/books/review/the-two-state-delusion-by-padraig-omalley.html?_r=0
Padraig O’Malley’s “The Two-State Delusion” is an impressive and frustrating book. It’s impressive because O’Malley, a professor at the University of Massachusetts at Boston who has written extensively on South Africa and Northern Ireland, has done a tremendous amount of research about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He’s not only delved deeply into its literature; he’s also interviewed dozens of participants on both sides. The result is a book so packed with information that it will reward even the reader so dedicated that she consumes the Israel-Palestine stories buried on Page A17 of The Times.


...O’Malley is not only knowledgeable; he’s also honest. He vividly captures the brutality of Israel’s occupation of the West Bank. According to pro-Palestinian activists, Israel has cut down more than 800,000 Palestinian olive trees since 1967, which, O’Malley observes, is “the equivalent of razing all of the 24,000 trees in New York City’s Central Park 33 times.” And according to the Israeli human rights group Yesh Din, he tells us, 90 percent of Palestinian complaints against Israelis in the West Bank never result in an indictment, and in the rare circumstances “when convictions are made, Israeli citizens involved in such violent acts are handed light sentences...”

You are so funny. You & your ilk bitch about Israel's treatment of the Palestinians but never a word on Jordan's Black September. Down with Nutandyahoo & his Zionists. When will Israel ever learn from Jordan how to establish a lasting peace from Palestinians? LET THERE BE PEACE ALREADY!
 
Every one knows that Israel is a country full of connivers who have friends who own the Mass Media, the New York Times is no exception...

The truth be known about a brutal Israeli occupation where even trees are an enemy!

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/books/review/the-two-state-delusion-by-padraig-omalley.html?_r=0
Padraig O’Malley’s “The Two-State Delusion” is an impressive and frustrating book. It’s impressive because O’Malley, a professor at the University of Massachusetts at Boston who has written extensively on South Africa and Northern Ireland, has done a tremendous amount of research about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He’s not only delved deeply into its literature; he’s also interviewed dozens of participants on both sides. The result is a book so packed with information that it will reward even the reader so dedicated that she consumes the Israel-Palestine stories buried on Page A17 of The Times.


...O’Malley is not only knowledgeable; he’s also honest. He vividly captures the brutality of Israel’s occupation of the West Bank. According to pro-Palestinian activists, Israel has cut down more than 800,000 Palestinian olive trees since 1967, which, O’Malley observes, is “the equivalent of razing all of the 24,000 trees in New York City’s Central Park 33 times.” And according to the Israeli human rights group Yesh Din, he tells us, 90 percent of Palestinian complaints against Israelis in the West Bank never result in an indictment, and in the rare circumstances “when convictions are made, Israeli citizens involved in such violent acts are handed light sentences...”

You are so funny. You & your ilk bitch about Israel's treatment of the Palestinians but never a word on Jordan's Black September. Down with Nutandyahoo & his Zionists. When will Israel ever learn from Jordan how to establish a lasting peace from Palestinians? LET THERE BE PEACE ALREADY!
15 years of posting same stupid reply, are you sure you're Jewish MJ? Most Jews I know are a lot more refined intellectually, are you a convert?
 
When one of the board's more excitable Joooooooo haters prefaces a long, tedious cut and paste with "Every one knows.....", I fully expect a steaming pant load.
 
Every one knows that Israel is a country full of connivers who have friends who own the Mass Media, the New York Times is no exception...

The truth be known about a brutal Israeli occupation where even trees are an enemy!

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/books/review/the-two-state-delusion-by-padraig-omalley.html?_r=0

Not surprisingly, neither the review you linked of O'Malley's book nor the book itself supports your conclusion. How do you explain your 2+2=5 logic?
Instead, as the review notes, O'Malley writes: “Israeli Jews have a right to question whether a free-standing Palestinian state with an ‘end of claims’ agreement is not the end of the conflict but the beginning of Palestinian preparation for the next phase of ‘liberating’ all of Palestine and that given Hamas's position the Israelis "are perfectly justified in hesitating before embracing a two-state solution.”
O'Malley, who claims to have done "a tremendous amount of research," offers no alternative to what he calls the "two-state delusion" because the bi-national option is no option at all. In other words, the two-state solution or the current situation seem the only possibilities. Which do you prefer?
 
When one of the board's more excitable Joooooooo haters prefaces a long, tedious cut and paste with "Every one knows.....", I fully expect a steaming pant load.

And as if not to disappoint, that is precisely what Pbel delivered. The link he provided did not in any way support his conclusions. Surprised?
 
When one of the board's more excitable Joooooooo haters prefaces a long, tedious cut and paste with "Every one knows.....", I fully expect a steaming pant load.
Hollow name calling from Hollow Hollie...
 
When one of the board's more excitable Joooooooo haters prefaces a long, tedious cut and paste with "Every one knows.....", I fully expect a steaming pant load.

And as if not to disappoint, that is precisely what Pbel delivered. The link he provided did not in any way support his conclusions. Surprised?
Every one knows that Israel is a country full of connivers who have friends who own the Mass Media, the New York Times is no exception...

The truth be known about a brutal Israeli occupation where even trees are an enemy!

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/books/review/the-two-state-delusion-by-padraig-omalley.html?_r=0

Not surprisingly, neither the review you linked of O'Malley's book nor the book itself supports your conclusion. How do you explain your 2+2=5 logic?
Instead, as the review notes, O'Malley writes: “Israeli Jews have a right to question whether a free-standing Palestinian state with an ‘end of claims’ agreement is not the end of the conflict but the beginning of Palestinian preparation for the next phase of ‘liberating’ all of Palestine and that given Hamas's position the Israelis "are perfectly justified in hesitating before embracing a two-state solution.”
O'Malley, who claims to have done "a tremendous amount of research," offers no alternative to what he calls the "two-state delusion" because the bi-national option is no option at all. In other words, the two-state solution or the current situation seem the only possibilities. Which do you prefer?
Of course Israel should be concerned that a real peace means no attack from the Palestinians who have no army...What is your fear O Sniffer, a camel charge?

You are indeed a moron!
 
Every one knows that Israel is a country full of connivers who have friends who own the Mass Media, the New York Times is no exception...

The truth be known about a brutal Israeli occupation where even trees are an enemy!

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/books/review/the-two-state-delusion-by-padraig-omalley.html?_r=0
Padraig O’Malley’s “The Two-State Delusion” is an impressive and frustrating book. It’s impressive because O’Malley, a professor at the University of Massachusetts at Boston who has written extensively on South Africa and Northern Ireland, has done a tremendous amount of research about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. He’s not only delved deeply into its literature; he’s also interviewed dozens of participants on both sides. The result is a book so packed with information that it will reward even the reader so dedicated that she consumes the Israel-Palestine stories buried on Page A17 of The Times.


...O’Malley is not only knowledgeable; he’s also honest. He vividly captures the brutality of Israel’s occupation of the West Bank. According to pro-Palestinian activists, Israel has cut down more than 800,000 Palestinian olive trees since 1967, which, O’Malley observes, is “the equivalent of razing all of the 24,000 trees in New York City’s Central Park 33 times.” And according to the Israeli human rights group Yesh Din, he tells us, 90 percent of Palestinian complaints against Israelis in the West Bank never result in an indictment, and in the rare circumstances “when convictions are made, Israeli citizens involved in such violent acts are handed light sentences...”




You islamonazi propagandists are not everyone, so care to alter your opening line to
Very few people outside of islamonazi groups think that Israel.

There you go fixed.

Now on to the book and the review says it all really According to pro-Palestinian activists so no first hand accounts just the LIES of a very biased group of ultra left wing terrorist supporters
 
When one of the board's more excitable Joooooooo haters prefaces a long, tedious cut and paste with "Every one knows.....", I fully expect a steaming pant load.

And as if not to disappoint, that is precisely what Pbel delivered. The link he provided did not in any way support his conclusions. Surprised?
Every one knows that Israel is a country full of connivers who have friends who own the Mass Media, the New York Times is no exception...

The truth be known about a brutal Israeli occupation where even trees are an enemy!

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/books/review/the-two-state-delusion-by-padraig-omalley.html?_r=0

Not surprisingly, neither the review you linked of O'Malley's book nor the book itself supports your conclusion. How do you explain your 2+2=5 logic?
Instead, as the review notes, O'Malley writes: “Israeli Jews have a right to question whether a free-standing Palestinian state with an ‘end of claims’ agreement is not the end of the conflict but the beginning of Palestinian preparation for the next phase of ‘liberating’ all of Palestine and that given Hamas's position the Israelis "are perfectly justified in hesitating before embracing a two-state solution.”
O'Malley, who claims to have done "a tremendous amount of research," offers no alternative to what he calls the "two-state delusion" because the bi-national option is no option at all. In other words, the two-state solution or the current situation seem the only possibilities. Which do you prefer?
Of course Israel should be concerned that a real peace means no attack from the Palestinians who have no army...What is your fear O Sniffer, a camel charge?

You are indeed a moron!




They have an armed militia that attacks them constantly from hiding, usually behind women and children. They have tried talking peace and it did not work because the Palestinians don't want peace they want Israel
 
When one of the board's more excitable Joooooooo haters prefaces a long, tedious cut and paste with "Every one knows.....", I fully expect a steaming pant load.

And as if not to disappoint, that is precisely what Pbel delivered. The link he provided did not in any way support his conclusions. Surprised?
Every one knows that Israel is a country full of connivers who have friends who own the Mass Media, the New York Times is no exception...

The truth be known about a brutal Israeli occupation where even trees are an enemy!

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/books/review/the-two-state-delusion-by-padraig-omalley.html?_r=0

Not surprisingly, neither the review you linked of O'Malley's book nor the book itself supports your conclusion. How do you explain your 2+2=5 logic?
Instead, as the review notes, O'Malley writes: “Israeli Jews have a right to question whether a free-standing Palestinian state with an ‘end of claims’ agreement is not the end of the conflict but the beginning of Palestinian preparation for the next phase of ‘liberating’ all of Palestine and that given Hamas's position the Israelis "are perfectly justified in hesitating before embracing a two-state solution.”
O'Malley, who claims to have done "a tremendous amount of research," offers no alternative to what he calls the "two-state delusion" because the bi-national option is no option at all. In other words, the two-state solution or the current situation seem the only possibilities. Which do you prefer?
Of course Israel should be concerned that a real peace means no attack from the Palestinians who have no army...What is your fear O Sniffer, a camel charge?

You are indeed a moron!

I think many of Palestinians prefer it this way...
 
When one of the board's more excitable Joooooooo haters prefaces a long, tedious cut and paste with "Every one knows.....", I fully expect a steaming pant load.

And as if not to disappoint, that is precisely what Pbel delivered. The link he provided did not in any way support his conclusions. Surprised?
Every one knows that Israel is a country full of connivers who have friends who own the Mass Media, the New York Times is no exception...

The truth be known about a brutal Israeli occupation where even trees are an enemy!

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/books/review/the-two-state-delusion-by-padraig-omalley.html?_r=0

Not surprisingly, neither the review you linked of O'Malley's book nor the book itself supports your conclusion. How do you explain your 2+2=5 logic?
Instead, as the review notes, O'Malley writes: “Israeli Jews have a right to question whether a free-standing Palestinian state with an ‘end of claims’ agreement is not the end of the conflict but the beginning of Palestinian preparation for the next phase of ‘liberating’ all of Palestine and that given Hamas's position the Israelis "are perfectly justified in hesitating before embracing a two-state solution.”
O'Malley, who claims to have done "a tremendous amount of research," offers no alternative to what he calls the "two-state delusion" because the bi-national option is no option at all. In other words, the two-state solution or the current situation seem the only possibilities. Which do you prefer?
Of course Israel should be concerned that a real peace means no attack from the Palestinians who have no army...What is your fear O Sniffer, a camel charge?

You are indeed a moron!

I am afraid as far as morons go, you have filled that position.
Palestine has no intention of stopping until Israel is gone. They teach their children a map with no Israel. They do not teach them a two party state.
As for an army, they have Iran's. As for terror, what you are suggesting is no different than living in New York, and handing New Jersey over to ISIS. Comfy?

And until we hand over half of Washington DC to Syria, don't expect Israel to be that stupid either.
 
When one of the board's more excitable Joooooooo haters prefaces a long, tedious cut and paste with "Every one knows.....", I fully expect a steaming pant load.

And as if not to disappoint, that is precisely what Pbel delivered. The link he provided did not in any way support his conclusions. Surprised?
Every one knows that Israel is a country full of connivers who have friends who own the Mass Media, the New York Times is no exception...

The truth be known about a brutal Israeli occupation where even trees are an enemy!

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/23/books/review/the-two-state-delusion-by-padraig-omalley.html?_r=0

Not surprisingly, neither the review you linked of O'Malley's book nor the book itself supports your conclusion. How do you explain your 2+2=5 logic?
Instead, as the review notes, O'Malley writes: “Israeli Jews have a right to question whether a free-standing Palestinian state with an ‘end of claims’ agreement is not the end of the conflict but the beginning of Palestinian preparation for the next phase of ‘liberating’ all of Palestine and that given Hamas's position the Israelis "are perfectly justified in hesitating before embracing a two-state solution.”
O'Malley, who claims to have done "a tremendous amount of research," offers no alternative to what he calls the "two-state delusion" because the bi-national option is no option at all. In other words, the two-state solution or the current situation seem the only possibilities. Which do you prefer?
Of course Israel should be concerned that a real peace means no attack from the Palestinians who have no army...What is your fear O Sniffer, a camel charge?

You are indeed a moron!

Did your comrades have an army when they attacked the US on 9/11/2001? Did they use a "camel charge," Idiot?
 

Forum List

Back
Top