The Truth about the Flynn event today, for you lefties before you hurt yourselves celebrating....

[Windparadox]

`
`
The OP's article is an "opinion piece", not necessarily a factual statement.

 

[August West]

President Trump and General Flynn ..may both be Blessed

If one goes the other goes too

Neither of them will go...

America is protecting BOTH of them

So

Help General Flynn now Mr President.

Flynn has not committed as many crimes as Clintons, that's whom FBI and DOJ should have started questioning a year ago at least but they both are still free. Justice has not been created to hunt Trump and his people only!

How many decades have you been stalking the Clintons and coming up empty?

 

[JimBowie1958]

How many decades have you been stalking the Clintons and coming up empty?

Lol, what makes you think anyone has come up empty, genius?

Did Hillary receive her coronation as planned or not?

 

[August West]

How many decades have you been stalking the Clintons and coming up empty?

Lol, what makes you think anyone has come up empty, genius?

Did Hillary receive her coronation as planned or not?

Only a moron could still be spiking the ball over treasonous Trump`s election and no one connected to the Clinton campaign has pleaded guilty or is under house arrest. Your ship is sinking fast. Look for Kushner and/or the crooked Trump brats to fall next.

 

[GreenBean]

It is far more than just that. Tough to be Trumpettes tooting their little horns.

I asked you Jake to lay out the laws Trump has broken and you have yet to even try.

You can't debate with that shit on a stick jake starkey, he's clueless and pompous, no matter how bad he gets beat down he prances around pounding his chest like he won something - yet he never wins ---- ever.

You guys can argue with Mueller and Flynn. All of what you write is meaningless.

All of what Mueller has done is meaningless ........

 

[GreenBean]

How many decades have you been stalking the Clintons and coming up empty?

Lol, what makes you think anyone has come up empty, genius?

Did Hillary receive her coronation as planned or not?

Only a moron could still be spiking the ball over treasonous Trump`s election and no one connected to the Clinton campaign has pleaded guilty or is under house arrest. Your ship is sinking fast. Look for Kushner and/or the crooked Trump brats to fall next.

No one in the Third Reich plead guilty or was convicted of anything till after the war either .... you're a funny little shicklegruber

 

[JakeStarkey]

Godwin Schicklegruber GreenBean is losing it.

 

[2aguy]

It looked like Mueller badly needed a show for liberals to justify his "work" to dig out something bad about Trump during the whole year with ZERO result.

Notice that he released the Flynn deal the day the Republicans were going to vote for the first big Trump legislative win....this whole thing is a fraud.....

Charge Against Flynn Is More Evidence that Mueller Has Nothing

That’s it, after a year of huffing and puffing. Nothing about the election, nothing about the long-awaited “collusion” between the Trump campaign and Russia. I have no idea why Flynn apparently lied to an FBI agent, assuming that he did. But the communications described in the information are exactly the sorts of contacts that a national security advisor to an incoming president should be having with foreign powers.

In short, the allegations against Flynn suggest that Robert Mueller has nothing significant against President Trump or other members of his administration.

 

[2aguy]

`
`
The OP's article is an "opinion piece", not necessarily a factual statement.

By an actual, successful, federal prosecutor, the man who convicted the Blind Sheik, the terrorist who attacked the World Trade Center the first time......it is more than just an opinion...

Mueller Investigation: Politics, Not Law Enforcement or Counterintelligence

It is difficult to come to any other conclusion based on the guilty plea that Mueller just pried out of Michael Flynn. Let’s think about what has happened here. The Justice Department did not, as the pertinent special-counsel regulations require, identify specific crimes it suspected had been committed by Trump-campaign officials. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein disclosed no factual predicate calling for a criminal investigation from which Trump’s Justice Department would be ethically required to recuse itself.

Instead, Mueller’s investigation was rationalized by the need to conduct a counterintelligence inquiry into Russia’s “cyber-espionage” meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

Though there was no probable cause to believe Trump-campaign officials had participated in Russia’s hacking (and remember: the FBI and Obama Justice Department had been investigating for months before the special counsel was appointed), Mueller was encouraged to focus on whether Trump-campaign officials somehow “coordinated” in Russia’s perfidy.

Mueller’s investigation was not a criminal investigation. It started out as a fishing expedition, under the vaporous heading of “collusion,” into “contacts” between Russian officials and Trump associates — notwithstanding that collusion is not conspiracy and that it was perfectly legal for Trump associates to have contacts with Russia (just like Clinton associates did). It was to be expected that the Trump campaign and transition would have such contacts once it was apparent that Trump could well become — and did in fact become — the next president of the United States.

Only one conceivable crime could have arisen out of the “collusion” that was the pretext for Mueller’s probe: the knowing complicity of Trump associates in Russia’s hacking of Democratic email accounts. Of course, there was never evidence of such a scheme . . . but why should that matter?


The point here was to have the theater of an investigation run by a prosecutor — the rest is just details. See, we’re not following the normal rules, in which a prosecutor is assigned only after evidence of an actual crime has emerged. We’re in the wooly realm of counterintelligence, where anything goes. And in the event our aggressive prosecutor can’t find any crimes — which would be no surprise, since the investigation was not triggered by a crime — no matter: The special counsel is encouraged to manufacture crimes through the investigative process. Misleading assertions by non-suspects made to investigators probing non-crimes can be charged as felony false statements.

 

[2aguy]

How many decades have you been stalking the Clintons and coming up empty?

Lol, what makes you think anyone has come up empty, genius?

Did Hillary receive her coronation as planned or not?

Only a moron could still be spiking the ball over treasonous Trump`s election and no one connected to the Clinton campaign has pleaded guilty or is under house arrest. Your ship is sinking fast. Look for Kushner and/or the crooked Trump brats to fall next.

Your tears of rage and anger will taste the best.....

 

[JakeStarkey]

How many decades have you been stalking the Clintons and coming up empty?

Lol, what makes you think anyone has come up empty, genius?

Did Hillary receive her coronation as planned or not?

Only a moron could still be spiking the ball over treasonous Trump`s election and no one connected to the Clinton campaign has pleaded guilty or is under house arrest. Your ship is sinking fast. Look for Kushner and/or the crooked Trump brats to fall next.

Your tears of rage and anger will taste the best.....

That's you, little buddy.

 

[2aguy]

How many decades have you been stalking the Clintons and coming up empty?

Lol, what makes you think anyone has come up empty, genius?

Did Hillary receive her coronation as planned or not?

Only a moron could still be spiking the ball over treasonous Trump`s election and no one connected to the Clinton campaign has pleaded guilty or is under house arrest. Your ship is sinking fast. Look for Kushner and/or the crooked Trump brats to fall next.

Your tears of rage and anger will taste the best.....

That's you, little buddy.

Yes.....better alert President hilary that Flynn plead guilty to lying to the FBI....

 

[MindWars]

Of course we know ABC lied at this point ..
ABC Makes “Epic Mistake”, Retracts Bombshell Flynn Story


Having caused chaos in financial markets briefly, set the liberal media on fire with ‘I told you so’s, and sparked a renewed round of #ImpeachTrump demands, ABC News issued a ‘clarification’ to their bombshell Flynn report that not only negates the entire story but provides President Trump with another round of ammunition to fire against the ‘fake news’ media.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Infowars? There you go again, MindWars.

The clarification strengthens the entire story and the IW article gives the mainstream reality news media another entire round of ammo to fire at the the alt right fake news media.

 

[Old Rocks]

2aguy is going to be threatening mass shootings when his treasonous fat senile old orange clown goes down. Then he will go down to the basement, get drunk out of his mind, pet his arsenal, and forget the whole thing. LOL Such marshmallows these fringe right 'Conservatives' are.

 

[percysunshine]

Here is an actual prosecutor, Andrew Mccarthy, who convicted the blind sheik......and his take on what happened.......


What the Flynn Plea Means

Mueller has charged Flynn with falsely telling FBI agents that he did not ask the ambassador “to refrain from escalating the situation” in response to the sanctions. In being questioned by the agents on January 24, 2017, Flynn also lied when he claimed he could not recall a subsequent conversation with Kislyak, in which the ambassador told Flynn that the Putin regime had “chosen to moderate its response to those sanctions as a result of [Flynn’s] request.” 00:45Trump attacks UK's Theresa May over far-right tweets

urthermore, a week before the sanctions were imposed, Flynn had also spoken to Kislyak, asking the ambassador to delay or defeat a vote on a pending United Nations resolution. The criminal information charges that Flynn lied to the FBI by denying both that he’d made this request and that he’d spoken afterward with Kislyak about Russia’s response to it. Thus, in all, four lies are specified in the one count. The potential sentence is zero to five years’ imprisonment. Assuming Flynn cooperates fully with Mueller’s investigators, there will be little, if any, jail time. Obviously, it was wrong of Flynn to give the FBI false information; he could, after all, have simply refused to speak with the agents in the first place. That said, as I argued early this year, it remains unclear why the Obama Justice Department chose to investigate Flynn. There was nothing wrong with the incoming national-security adviser’s having meetings with foreign counterparts or discussing such matters as the sanctions in those meetings. Plus, if the FBI had FISA recordings of Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak, there was no need to ask Flynn what the conversations entailed. Flynn, an early backer of Donald Trump and a fierce critic of Obama’s national-security policies, was generally despised by Obama administration officials. Hence, there has always been cynical suspicion that the decision to interview him was driven by the expectation that he would provide the FBI with an account inconsistent with the recorded conversation — i.e., that Flynn was being set up for prosecution on a process crime.

--------

Nevertheless, as I explained in connection with George Papadopoulos (who also pled guilty in Mueller’s investigation for lying to the FBI), when a prosecutor has a cooperator who was an accomplice in a major criminal scheme, the cooperator is made to plead guilty to the scheme. This is critical because it proves the existence of the scheme. In his guilty-plea allocution (the part of a plea proceeding in which the defendant admits what he did that makes him guilty), the accomplice explains the scheme and the actions taken by himself and his co-conspirators to carry it out. This goes a long way toward proving the case against all of the subjects of the investigation.

That is not happening in Flynn’s situation. Instead, like Papadopoulos, he is being permitted to plead guilty to a mere process crime.

A breaking report from ABC News indicates that Flynn is prepared to testify that Trump directed him to make contact with the Russians — initially to lay the groundwork for mutual efforts against ISIS in Syria. That, however, is exactly the sort of thing the incoming national-security adviser is supposed to do in a transition phase between administrations. If it were part of the basis for a “collusion” case arising out of Russia’s election meddling, then Flynn would not be pleading guilty to a process crime — he’d be pleading guilty to an espionage conspiracy.

Spoilsport.

I am enjoying watching the lefties celebrate.

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

Here is an actual prosecutor, Andrew Mccarthy, who convicted the blind sheik......and his take on what happened.......


What the Flynn Plea Means

Mueller has charged Flynn with falsely telling FBI agents that he did not ask the ambassador “to refrain from escalating the situation” in response to the sanctions. In being questioned by the agents on January 24, 2017, Flynn also lied when he claimed he could not recall a subsequent conversation with Kislyak, in which the ambassador told Flynn that the Putin regime had “chosen to moderate its response to those sanctions as a result of [Flynn’s] request.” 00:45Trump attacks UK's Theresa May over far-right tweets

urthermore, a week before the sanctions were imposed, Flynn had also spoken to Kislyak, asking the ambassador to delay or defeat a vote on a pending United Nations resolution. The criminal information charges that Flynn lied to the FBI by denying both that he’d made this request and that he’d spoken afterward with Kislyak about Russia’s response to it. Thus, in all, four lies are specified in the one count. The potential sentence is zero to five years’ imprisonment. Assuming Flynn cooperates fully with Mueller’s investigators, there will be little, if any, jail time. Obviously, it was wrong of Flynn to give the FBI false information; he could, after all, have simply refused to speak with the agents in the first place. That said, as I argued early this year, it remains unclear why the Obama Justice Department chose to investigate Flynn. There was nothing wrong with the incoming national-security adviser’s having meetings with foreign counterparts or discussing such matters as the sanctions in those meetings. Plus, if the FBI had FISA recordings of Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak, there was no need to ask Flynn what the conversations entailed. Flynn, an early backer of Donald Trump and a fierce critic of Obama’s national-security policies, was generally despised by Obama administration officials. Hence, there has always been cynical suspicion that the decision to interview him was driven by the expectation that he would provide the FBI with an account inconsistent with the recorded conversation — i.e., that Flynn was being set up for prosecution on a process crime.

--------

Nevertheless, as I explained in connection with George Papadopoulos (who also pled guilty in Mueller’s investigation for lying to the FBI), when a prosecutor has a cooperator who was an accomplice in a major criminal scheme, the cooperator is made to plead guilty to the scheme. This is critical because it proves the existence of the scheme. In his guilty-plea allocution (the part of a plea proceeding in which the defendant admits what he did that makes him guilty), the accomplice explains the scheme and the actions taken by himself and his co-conspirators to carry it out. This goes a long way toward proving the case against all of the subjects of the investigation.

That is not happening in Flynn’s situation. Instead, like Papadopoulos, he is being permitted to plead guilty to a mere process crime.

A breaking report from ABC News indicates that Flynn is prepared to testify that Trump directed him to make contact with the Russians — initially to lay the groundwork for mutual efforts against ISIS in Syria. That, however, is exactly the sort of thing the incoming national-security adviser is supposed to do in a transition phase between administrations. If it were part of the basis for a “collusion” case arising out of Russia’s election meddling, then Flynn would not be pleading guilty to a process crime — he’d be pleading guilty to an espionage conspiracy.

When is that POS Mueller going to charge those who illegally wiretapped and leaked the content of Flynn's phone conversations using proven DNC Oppo Research that came from the FSB and was funded by the FBI as the basis for the FISA warrant?

Mueller is compromised by Uranium One.

 

[JakeStarkey]

2aguy is going to be threatening mass shootings when his treasonous fat senile old orange clown goes down. Then he will go down to the basement, get drunk out of his mind, pet his arsenal, and forget the whole thing. LOL Such marshmallows these fringe right 'Conservatives' are.

Simply report him to the feebs.

 

[Old Rocks]

Uranium One? Another fart in the wind by you 'Conservatives'. You have been screaming about that for a couple of years now, and are unable to prove anything at all. Shep Smith even outlined the reasons for your failure on Fox News.

 

[Postmodernism Sux]

2aguy is going to be threatening mass shootings when his treasonous fat senile old orange clown goes down. Then he will go down to the basement, get drunk out of his mind, pet his arsenal, and forget the whole thing. LOL Such marshmallows these fringe right 'Conservatives' are.

The only one that is going down is the former affirmative action POTUS and the rape supporting whore Hillary who thought she could fuck her way into political power.