Windparadox
Gold Member
`
`
The OP's article is an "opinion piece", not necessarily a factual statement.
`
The OP's article is an "opinion piece", not necessarily a factual statement.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How many decades have you been stalking the Clintons and coming up empty?Flynn has not committed as many crimes as Clintons, that's whom FBI and DOJ should have started questioning a year ago at least but they both are still free. Justice has not been created to hunt Trump and his people only!President Trump and General Flynn ..may both be Blessed
If one goes the other goes too
Neither of them will go...
America is protecting BOTH of them
So
Help General Flynn now Mr President.
How many decades have you been stalking the Clintons and coming up empty?
Only a moron could still be spiking the ball over treasonous Trump`s election and no one connected to the Clinton campaign has pleaded guilty or is under house arrest. Your ship is sinking fast. Look for Kushner and/or the crooked Trump brats to fall next.How many decades have you been stalking the Clintons and coming up empty?
Lol, what makes you think anyone has come up empty, genius?
Did Hillary receive her coronation as planned or not?
All of what Mueller has done is meaningless ........You guys can argue with Mueller and Flynn. All of what you write is meaningless.You can't debate with that shit on a stick jake starkey, he's clueless and pompous, no matter how bad he gets beat down he prances around pounding his chest like he won something - yet he never wins ---- ever.I asked you Jake to lay out the laws Trump has broken and you have yet to even try.It is far more than just that. Tough to be Trumpettes tooting their little horns.
No one in the Third Reich plead guilty or was convicted of anything till after the war either .... you're a funny little shicklegruberOnly a moron could still be spiking the ball over treasonous Trump`s election and no one connected to the Clinton campaign has pleaded guilty or is under house arrest. Your ship is sinking fast. Look for Kushner and/or the crooked Trump brats to fall next.How many decades have you been stalking the Clintons and coming up empty?
Lol, what makes you think anyone has come up empty, genius?
Did Hillary receive her coronation as planned or not?
It looked like Mueller badly needed a show for liberals to justify his "work" to dig out something bad about Trump during the whole year with ZERO result.
`
`
The OP's article is an "opinion piece", not necessarily a factual statement.
Only a moron could still be spiking the ball over treasonous Trump`s election and no one connected to the Clinton campaign has pleaded guilty or is under house arrest. Your ship is sinking fast. Look for Kushner and/or the crooked Trump brats to fall next.How many decades have you been stalking the Clintons and coming up empty?
Lol, what makes you think anyone has come up empty, genius?
Did Hillary receive her coronation as planned or not?
That's you, little buddy.Only a moron could still be spiking the ball over treasonous Trump`s election and no one connected to the Clinton campaign has pleaded guilty or is under house arrest. Your ship is sinking fast. Look for Kushner and/or the crooked Trump brats to fall next.How many decades have you been stalking the Clintons and coming up empty?
Lol, what makes you think anyone has come up empty, genius?
Did Hillary receive her coronation as planned or not?
Your tears of rage and anger will taste the best.....
That's you, little buddy.Only a moron could still be spiking the ball over treasonous Trump`s election and no one connected to the Clinton campaign has pleaded guilty or is under house arrest. Your ship is sinking fast. Look for Kushner and/or the crooked Trump brats to fall next.How many decades have you been stalking the Clintons and coming up empty?
Lol, what makes you think anyone has come up empty, genius?
Did Hillary receive her coronation as planned or not?
Your tears of rage and anger will taste the best.....
Here is an actual prosecutor, Andrew Mccarthy, who convicted the blind sheik......and his take on what happened.......
What the Flynn Plea Means
Mueller has charged Flynn with falsely telling FBI agents that he did not ask the ambassador “to refrain from escalating the situation” in response to the sanctions. In being questioned by the agents on January 24, 2017, Flynn also lied when he claimed he could not recall a subsequent conversation with Kislyak, in which the ambassador told Flynn that the Putin regime had “chosen to moderate its response to those sanctions as a result of [Flynn’s] request.” 00:45Trump attacks UK's Theresa May over far-right tweets
urthermore, a week before the sanctions were imposed, Flynn had also spoken to Kislyak, asking the ambassador to delay or defeat a vote on a pending United Nations resolution. The criminal information charges that Flynn lied to the FBI by denying both that he’d made this request and that he’d spoken afterward with Kislyak about Russia’s response to it. Thus, in all, four lies are specified in the one count. The potential sentence is zero to five years’ imprisonment. Assuming Flynn cooperates fully with Mueller’s investigators, there will be little, if any, jail time. Obviously, it was wrong of Flynn to give the FBI false information; he could, after all, have simply refused to speak with the agents in the first place. That said, as I argued early this year, it remains unclear why the Obama Justice Department chose to investigate Flynn. There was nothing wrong with the incoming national-security adviser’s having meetings with foreign counterparts or discussing such matters as the sanctions in those meetings. Plus, if the FBI had FISA recordings of Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak, there was no need to ask Flynn what the conversations entailed. Flynn, an early backer of Donald Trump and a fierce critic of Obama’s national-security policies, was generally despised by Obama administration officials. Hence, there has always been cynical suspicion that the decision to interview him was driven by the expectation that he would provide the FBI with an account inconsistent with the recorded conversation — i.e., that Flynn was being set up for prosecution on a process crime.
--------
Nevertheless, as I explained in connection with George Papadopoulos (who also pled guilty in Mueller’s investigation for lying to the FBI), when a prosecutor has a cooperator who was an accomplice in a major criminal scheme, the cooperator is made to plead guilty to the scheme. This is critical because it proves the existence of the scheme. In his guilty-plea allocution (the part of a plea proceeding in which the defendant admits what he did that makes him guilty), the accomplice explains the scheme and the actions taken by himself and his co-conspirators to carry it out. This goes a long way toward proving the case against all of the subjects of the investigation.
That is not happening in Flynn’s situation. Instead, like Papadopoulos, he is being permitted to plead guilty to a mere process crime.
A breaking report from ABC News indicates that Flynn is prepared to testify that Trump directed him to make contact with the Russians — initially to lay the groundwork for mutual efforts against ISIS in Syria. That, however, is exactly the sort of thing the incoming national-security adviser is supposed to do in a transition phase between administrations. If it were part of the basis for a “collusion” case arising out of Russia’s election meddling, then Flynn would not be pleading guilty to a process crime — he’d be pleading guilty to an espionage conspiracy.
Here is an actual prosecutor, Andrew Mccarthy, who convicted the blind sheik......and his take on what happened.......
What the Flynn Plea Means
Mueller has charged Flynn with falsely telling FBI agents that he did not ask the ambassador “to refrain from escalating the situation” in response to the sanctions. In being questioned by the agents on January 24, 2017, Flynn also lied when he claimed he could not recall a subsequent conversation with Kislyak, in which the ambassador told Flynn that the Putin regime had “chosen to moderate its response to those sanctions as a result of [Flynn’s] request.” 00:45Trump attacks UK's Theresa May over far-right tweets
urthermore, a week before the sanctions were imposed, Flynn had also spoken to Kislyak, asking the ambassador to delay or defeat a vote on a pending United Nations resolution. The criminal information charges that Flynn lied to the FBI by denying both that he’d made this request and that he’d spoken afterward with Kislyak about Russia’s response to it. Thus, in all, four lies are specified in the one count. The potential sentence is zero to five years’ imprisonment. Assuming Flynn cooperates fully with Mueller’s investigators, there will be little, if any, jail time. Obviously, it was wrong of Flynn to give the FBI false information; he could, after all, have simply refused to speak with the agents in the first place. That said, as I argued early this year, it remains unclear why the Obama Justice Department chose to investigate Flynn. There was nothing wrong with the incoming national-security adviser’s having meetings with foreign counterparts or discussing such matters as the sanctions in those meetings. Plus, if the FBI had FISA recordings of Flynn’s conversations with Kislyak, there was no need to ask Flynn what the conversations entailed. Flynn, an early backer of Donald Trump and a fierce critic of Obama’s national-security policies, was generally despised by Obama administration officials. Hence, there has always been cynical suspicion that the decision to interview him was driven by the expectation that he would provide the FBI with an account inconsistent with the recorded conversation — i.e., that Flynn was being set up for prosecution on a process crime.
--------
Nevertheless, as I explained in connection with George Papadopoulos (who also pled guilty in Mueller’s investigation for lying to the FBI), when a prosecutor has a cooperator who was an accomplice in a major criminal scheme, the cooperator is made to plead guilty to the scheme. This is critical because it proves the existence of the scheme. In his guilty-plea allocution (the part of a plea proceeding in which the defendant admits what he did that makes him guilty), the accomplice explains the scheme and the actions taken by himself and his co-conspirators to carry it out. This goes a long way toward proving the case against all of the subjects of the investigation.
That is not happening in Flynn’s situation. Instead, like Papadopoulos, he is being permitted to plead guilty to a mere process crime.
A breaking report from ABC News indicates that Flynn is prepared to testify that Trump directed him to make contact with the Russians — initially to lay the groundwork for mutual efforts against ISIS in Syria. That, however, is exactly the sort of thing the incoming national-security adviser is supposed to do in a transition phase between administrations. If it were part of the basis for a “collusion” case arising out of Russia’s election meddling, then Flynn would not be pleading guilty to a process crime — he’d be pleading guilty to an espionage conspiracy.
Simply report him to the feebs.2aguy is going to be threatening mass shootings when his treasonous fat senile old orange clown goes down. Then he will go down to the basement, get drunk out of his mind, pet his arsenal, and forget the whole thing. LOL Such marshmallows these fringe right 'Conservatives' are.
2aguy is going to be threatening mass shootings when his treasonous fat senile old orange clown goes down. Then he will go down to the basement, get drunk out of his mind, pet his arsenal, and forget the whole thing. LOL Such marshmallows these fringe right 'Conservatives' are.