The Trump-Carroll Case is Blatantly the Greatest Miscarriage of Justice in Modern American History

Yeah. I anticipated you would want to avoid addressing your attempt to conceal the source of your cutting and pasting
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ah, Hollie, Hollie, Hollie.....you are just trying too hard, gurlfriend.
Settle down.
Calm yourself.
Breathe.
And re-read what Jim Hoft posted. And you quoted.

He gave credit to Ms. Carroll for helping ---with thousands of other advocates for victims of sexual abuse .....for helping get laws enacted that better served the victims and reduced the loopholes that have allowed predatory sexual behavior to occur.

Trust me, prolific poster Hollie, THAT is a good thing.

I am mildly convinced that you really should know that and be gladdened that abuse victims....most of them women ..... now have increased protections. Why ain't you happy for that?
 
Fact: There was no evidence presented.

Yes there was.

Testimony is evidence.

1706471394475.png


WW
 
Nice try but no it isn't.

👆👆👆👆👆

See, some of us tried to tell ya'll.

Trump was literally found in a court of law to have committed sexual assault on 5th Avenue and his supporters wouldn't care.

(And yes, Bergdorf Goodman is on 5th Avenue in Manhattan.)
.
.
.
1706472727126.png



For for normal people out there. Ya, testimony is evidence.

WW
 
Last edited:
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ah, Hollie, Hollie, Hollie.....you are just trying too hard, gurlfriend.
Settle down.
Calm yourself.
Breathe.
And re-read what Jim Hoft posted. And you quoted.

He gave credit to Ms. Carroll for helping ---with thousands of other advocates for victims of sexual abuse .....for helping get laws enacted that better served the victims and reduced the loopholes that have allowed predatory sexual behavior to occur.

Trust me, prolific poster Hollie, THAT is a good thing.

I am mildly convinced that you really should know that and be gladdened that abuse victims....most of them women ..... now have increased protections. Why ain't you happy for that?

You’re getting quite frantic. So much so that you copied and pasted, without attribution, a blog post that didn’t help your case.

Trust me. The timing and circumstances of the change in law allowing the charges against Trump by the corrupt Dems / Marxists was never intended to help anyone but corrupt Dems / Marxists. These are the same corrupt politicians who are erasing women’s sports. Why would you flail your pom poms for corrupt Dems / Socialists?
 
👆👆👆👆👆

See, some of us tried to tell ya'll.

Trump was literally found in a court of law to have committed sexual assault on 5th Avenue and his supporters wouldn't care.

(And yes, Bergdorf Goodman is on 5th Avenue in Manhattan.)
.
.
.
View attachment 894378


For for normal people out there. Ya, testimony is evidence.

WW
I win and you lose again.
 
Why would you flail your pom poms for corrupt Dems / Socialists?

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are you against more protections for victims of sexual abuse?
What's up with that?
Do we have a misogyny issue here?

You posted: "So much so that you copied and pasted, without attribution, a blog post ......"

Umm, I know, poster Hollie. I know.
It was my own post I copied.

ps....you are trying too hard, gf. Calm yourself. Settle down. Breathe.
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Why are you against more protections for victims of sexual abuse?
What's up with that?
Do we have a misogyny issue here?

You posted: "So much so that you copied and pasted, without attribution, a blog post ......"

Umm, I know, poster Hollie. I know.
It was my own post I copied.

ps....you are trying too hard, gf. Calm yourself. Settle down. Breathe.

I’m not against protections for victims of sexual abuse.

Why are you in favor of changing laws that are intended to selectively target specific individuals?

Maybe try a nice hot cup of tea and a coma. I think you will feel better.

Do you know it’s in good form to add attribution to material you cut and paste?
 
There was no evidence and false testimony.
Others articulately said: 'Yes, it is'. And showed a pretty good citation defining it.
But Blaster still says: No it isn't.

So that settles it. Blaster says.
What other proof, validation, verification ......do we need?

Blaster says.
That's money in MAGA-istan.
 
Do you know it’s in good form to add attribution to material you cut and paste?
Oh, sure. And I'm OK with that.
But we're pals here, Hollie.
I know your confident I've got the goods for back up.
Thanx for your vote.
 

Forum List

Back
Top