Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And the money shot:Rand Paul just endorsed a man who is deeply hostile to human liberty.
Perhaps that’s Rand’s idea of playing politics? Come to the table, strike a deal, get what you can. Trouble is, it’s tough striking a good deal when the guy on the other side of the table believes that the government should be allowed to claim — without having to produce any evidence whatsoever — that certain people are terrorists, and therefore should be detained indefinitely without any kind of due process.
That’s textbook tyranny.
But Mitt Romney’s stances on these issues seem much, much, much closer to Barack Obama than they do to Ron Paul. In fact, he might as well have endorsed Obama for President. And the Ron Paul supporters are noticing: Rand has probably burnt most bridges to his Father’s supporters now
Oh, STFU...It's not like you socialist dickweeds are any great defenders of the individual.Scary that rw voters think its okay to vote for some twit who "kisses asses" to make money and enforce an agenda that we ALL know "is deeply hostile to human liberty".
Why is the rw so willing to vote away "human liberty???
Then, just in case you want to throw up some more -
tp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/09/rand-paul-obama-scott-walker_n_1583372.html
It's called politics.
Tea Party guys already in ofice, like Rand Paul, is going to have to do a little kissing of Vinnie Vitalis's ass, if they have any chance of getting the agenda signed on to.
I think this is a good description of Mitt Romney.
"When the Mitt hits the fan, Paul libertarians--especially the young and idealistic--will NOT back Romney. He is, after all, a champion of everything repellent the US State does overseas and at home. He is a despicable statist, a junior oligarch, and a proponent of perpetual war, bank bailouts, torture, murder, camps, drones, the police state, redistribution, and the empire. I could go on."
Politico Gets It Wrong | Lew Rockwell's Political Theatre
Regardless, I think this situation is being way overblown. This has absolutely no effect on my opinion of Rand Paul.
Yeah....Politics.It's called politics.
Tea Party guys already in ofice, like Rand Paul, is going to have to do a little kissing of Vinnie Vitalis's ass, if they have any chance of getting the agenda signed on to.
It's also called not cutting off your nose to spite your face. He's a passionate guy who has had the opportunity to get up close and personal to the true workings of the political game...he made a choice to concede some of what he'd want to get some of what he hopes for, rather than take a stand that would show no results in the end.
I think this is a good description of Mitt Romney.
"When the Mitt hits the fan, Paul libertarians--especially the young and idealistic--will NOT back Romney. He is, after all, a champion of everything repellent the US State does overseas and at home. He is a despicable statist, a junior oligarch, and a proponent of perpetual war, bank bailouts, torture, murder, camps, drones, the police state, redistribution, and the empire. I could go on."
Politico Gets It Wrong | Lew Rockwell's Political Theatre
Regardless, I think this situation is being way overblown. This has absolutely no effect on my opinion of Rand Paul.
True that we all know these things about Mittens but for some reason, the rw's just don't see these factors as being important. Its as though they like him for being anti-liberty, anti-Constitution. They know he is and they don't mind.
But, hey, he's not black, now is he.
... He is, after all, a champion of everything repellent the US State does overseas and at home. He is a despicable statist, a junior oligarch, and a proponent of perpetual war, bank bailouts, torture, murder, camps, drones, the police state, redistribution, and the empire...
Scary that rw voters think its okay to vote for some twit who "kisses asses" to make money and enforce an agenda that we ALL know "is deeply hostile to human liberty".
Why is the rw so willing to vote away "human liberty???
Yeah....Politics.It's called politics.
Tea Party guys already in ofice, like Rand Paul, is going to have to do a little kissing of Vinnie Vitalis's ass, if they have any chance of getting the agenda signed on to.
It's also called not cutting off your nose to spite your face. He's a passionate guy who has had the opportunity to get up close and personal to the true workings of the political game...he made a choice to concede some of what he'd want to get some of what he hopes for, rather than take a stand that would show no results in the end.
Yeah....Politics.It's also called not cutting off your nose to spite your face. He's a passionate guy who has had the opportunity to get up close and personal to the true workings of the political game...he made a choice to concede some of what he'd want to get some of what he hopes for, rather than take a stand that would show no results in the end.
No.
Its sell your soul to line your pockets.
Its the Republican way.l
Deny it if you want but we all know its true.
Even rw's know its true.
They won't admit it but they DO know it.
I think this is a good description of Mitt Romney.
"When the Mitt hits the fan, Paul libertarians--especially the young and idealistic--will NOT back Romney. He is, after all, a champion of everything repellent the US State does overseas and at home. He is a despicable statist, a junior oligarch, and a proponent of perpetual war, bank bailouts, torture, murder, camps, drones, the police state, redistribution, and the empire. I could go on."
Politico Gets It Wrong | Lew Rockwell's Political Theatre
Regardless, I think this situation is being way overblown. This has absolutely no effect on my opinion of Rand Paul.
I heard this and said what the fuck Rand. He lost any chance of getting my vote even for dog catcher.I'ms STILL trying to figure out just what he was thinking?
Guest Post: The Trouble with Rand Paul | ZeroHedge
And the money shot:Rand Paul just endorsed a man who is deeply hostile to human liberty.
Perhaps thats Rands idea of playing politics? Come to the table, strike a deal, get what you can. Trouble is, its tough striking a good deal when the guy on the other side of the table believes that the government should be allowed to claim without having to produce any evidence whatsoever that certain people are terrorists, and therefore should be detained indefinitely without any kind of due process.
Thats textbook tyranny.
But Mitt Romneys stances on these issues seem much, much, much closer to Barack Obama than they do to Ron Paul. In fact, he might as well have endorsed Obama for President. And the Ron Paul supporters are noticing: Rand has probably burnt most bridges to his Fathers supporters now
I think this is a good description of Mitt Romney.
"When the Mitt hits the fan, Paul libertarians--especially the young and idealistic--will NOT back Romney. He is, after all, a champion of everything repellent the US State does overseas and at home. He is a despicable statist, a junior oligarch, and a proponent of perpetual war, bank bailouts, torture, murder, camps, drones, the police state, redistribution, and the empire. I could go on."
Politico Gets It Wrong | Lew Rockwell's Political Theatre
Regardless, I think this situation is being way overblown. This has absolutely no effect on my opinion of Rand Paul.
I think this is a good description of Mitt Romney.
"When the Mitt hits the fan, Paul libertarians--especially the young and idealistic--will NOT back Romney. He is, after all, a champion of everything repellent the US State does overseas and at home. He is a despicable statist, a junior oligarch, and a proponent of perpetual war, bank bailouts, torture, murder, camps, drones, the police state, redistribution, and the empire. I could go on."
Politico Gets It Wrong | Lew Rockwell's Political Theatre
Regardless, I think this situation is being way overblown. This has absolutely no effect on my opinion of Rand Paul.
It's almost like you don't know that obama bailed out the banks, authorized a domestic drone operation, wants to shift the war to Pakistan, Yemen and Syria, kept Gitmo open and is fully implementing redistribution in accordance with occupy goals.
I think this is a good description of Mitt Romney.
"When the Mitt hits the fan, Paul libertarians--especially the young and idealistic--will NOT back Romney. He is, after all, a champion of everything repellent the US State does overseas and at home. He is a despicable statist, a junior oligarch, and a proponent of perpetual war, bank bailouts, torture, murder, camps, drones, the police state, redistribution, and the empire. I could go on."
Politico Gets It Wrong | Lew Rockwell's Political Theatre
Regardless, I think this situation is being way overblown. This has absolutely no effect on my opinion of Rand Paul.
True that we all know these things about Mittens but for some reason, the rw's just don't see these factors as being important. Its as though they like him for being anti-liberty, anti-Constitution. They know he is and they don't mind.
But, hey, he's not black, now is he.
Of course we all know that these things apply equally to Barack Obama as well.
Yeah....Politics.It's called politics.
Tea Party guys already in ofice, like Rand Paul, is going to have to do a little kissing of Vinnie Vitalis's ass, if they have any chance of getting the agenda signed on to.
It's also called not cutting off your nose to spite your face. He's a passionate guy who has had the opportunity to get up close and personal to the true workings of the political game...he made a choice to concede some of what he'd want to get some of what he hopes for, rather than take a stand that would show no results in the end.
Scary that rw voters think its okay to vote for some twit who "kisses asses" to make money and enforce an agenda that we ALL know "is deeply hostile to human liberty".
Why is the rw so willing to vote away "human liberty???
You tell me. You're voting for Obama.
