Now address what the payer claims.The payee has stated the disbursed funds were election expenses.
She didn't work for the campaign, it doesn't matter what she claims
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Now address what the payer claims.The payee has stated the disbursed funds were election expenses.
She didn't work for the campaign, it doesn't matter what she claims
"Determined ignorance". I've been calling it willful blindness for years.These Republicans refuse to believe it. I told them about the shell companies and they say it's a lie, that there were no shell companies, they attacked the links.
It's called "determined ignorance" and they refuse to accept the news of the day.
Meghan McCain compares Obama's campaign finance fines with Trump's felonies.
Trump was in the room during hush money discussions with tabloid publisher
So there was a meeting to discuss the illegal hush money payments to Trump's whores. Pecker was there (he owns the Inquirer/AMI) and of course Cohen was there...
And it turns out the third man in the room was none other than Donald J Trump.
He knows he was there. He knows that Mueller knows he was there.
And he knows he's cooked
Wow, a publisher decided to buy a story, STOP THE FUCKING PRESSES. LMAO
.
What part of "it isn't a crime" do you morons not understand..... hush money is not illegal you moron..... Congress has a slush fund that has paid out 17 million dollars for "hush Money" for the women the members of congress have molested, as in sexually assualted......not casual sex....... tax dollars...you asshat......
The purpose and payee of that expense needed to be reported. This is not rocket science. The payee has stated the disbursed funds were election expenses.
So all of the Congress people who paid off mistresses, etc are also criminals?? Hmm
Congress passed a self serving law protecting themselves from sexual harrassment prosecution.
But this does not protect them from the media, or the court of public opinion
~S~
Trump was in the room during hush money discussions with tabloid publisher
So there was a meeting to discuss the illegal hush money payments to Trump's whores. Pecker was there (he owns the Inquirer/AMI) and of course Cohen was there...
And it turns out the third man in the room was none other than Donald J Trump.
He knows he was there. He knows that Mueller knows he was there.
And he knows he's cooked
Wow, a publisher decided to buy a story, STOP THE FUCKING PRESSES. LMAO
.
There was a bit more to it than that. It's called "capture and kill". It is where a publisher will buy the exclusive rights to a persons story (meaning no other publication can publish it), and then, when they have the exclusive rights, they put the story in a box in the storage room and forget about it, ensuring the story never sees the light of day.
It is when you do it in regards to a campaign.Trump was in the room during hush money discussions with tabloid publisher
So there was a meeting to discuss the illegal hush money payments to Trump's whores. Pecker was there (he owns the Inquirer/AMI) and of course Cohen was there...
And it turns out the third man in the room was none other than Donald J Trump.
He knows he was there. He knows that Mueller knows he was there.
And he knows he's cooked
Wow, a publisher decided to buy a story, STOP THE FUCKING PRESSES. LMAO
.
There was a bit more to it than that. It's called "capture and kill". It is where a publisher will buy the exclusive rights to a persons story (meaning no other publication can publish it), and then, when they have the exclusive rights, they put the story in a box in the storage room and forget about it, ensuring the story never sees the light of day.
Or they save it for a later date, either way, it's not illegal.
.
Trump has denied any knowledge of wrongdoing
Evidence of his wrongdoing is starting to leak out
It is when you do it in regards to a campaign.Trump was in the room during hush money discussions with tabloid publisher
So there was a meeting to discuss the illegal hush money payments to Trump's whores. Pecker was there (he owns the Inquirer/AMI) and of course Cohen was there...
And it turns out the third man in the room was none other than Donald J Trump.
He knows he was there. He knows that Mueller knows he was there.
And he knows he's cooked
Wow, a publisher decided to buy a story, STOP THE FUCKING PRESSES. LMAO
.
There was a bit more to it than that. It's called "capture and kill". It is where a publisher will buy the exclusive rights to a persons story (meaning no other publication can publish it), and then, when they have the exclusive rights, they put the story in a box in the storage room and forget about it, ensuring the story never sees the light of day.
Or they save it for a later date, either way, it's not illegal.
.
You've been lied to and you're repeating those lies
From what I understand AMI had done this before, so if there is a pattern that was established before the campaign, it would kill the theory that it was only for the campaign, rather to protect Trumps brand, reputation and family. But you're free to ignore history and remain ignorant.
Invincible ignorance is invincible..."Determined ignorance". I've been calling it willful blindness for years.These Republicans refuse to believe it. I told them about the shell companies and they say it's a lie, that there were no shell companies, they attacked the links.
It's called "determined ignorance" and they refuse to accept the news of the day.
Meghan McCain compares Obama's campaign finance fines with Trump's felonies.
Dead right. Except for AMI's admissions.From what I understand AMI had done this before, so if there is a pattern that was established before the campaign, it would kill the theory that it was only for the campaign, rather to protect Trumps brand, reputation and family. But you're free to ignore history and remain ignorant.
Ahhh but it is. In fact Cohen just pled guilty to it and will serve time for it.Trump was in the room during hush money discussions with tabloid publisher
So there was a meeting to discuss the illegal hush money payments to Trump's whores. Pecker was there (he owns the Inquirer/AMI) and of course Cohen was there...
And it turns out the third man in the room was none other than Donald J Trump.
He knows he was there. He knows that Mueller knows he was there.
And he knows he's cooked
What part of "it isn't a crime" do you morons not understand..... hush money is not illegal you moron..... Congress has a slush fund that has paid out 17 million dollars for "hush Money" for the women the members of congress have molested, as in sexually assualted......not casual sex....... tax dollars...you asshat......
But keep dreaming...
Bank fraud...conspiracy...illegal campaign contributions.
All Trump had to do was pay her directly with his own money and report it and it WOULD have been legal...but then he never would have gotten elected if he did that....would he?
'
From what I understand AMI had done this before, so if there is a pattern that was established before the campaign, it would kill the theory that it was only for the campaign, rather to protect Trumps brand, reputation and family. But you're free to ignore history and remain ignorant.
The original conspiracy meeting was in 2015. Is that what you are referring to because it doesn't save you..it hurts you
If the NY Slimes says it, it must be true, right?For the better part of two decades, Mr. Pecker had ordered his staff at American Media to protect Mr. Trump from troublesome stories, in some cases by buying up stories about him and filing them away.
National Enquirer Had Decades of Trump Dirt. He Wanted to Buy It All.
Ffs!If the NY Slimes says it, it must be true, right?
Ffs!If the NY Slimes says it, it must be true, right?
AMI have admitted it was for election purposes in their non-prosecution agreement !
WTF is going on here? Can no one read?
I keep forgetting...They
Don't
Care.
They
Are
Lying
Trump fluffers will fluff Trump. Fair enough. I suppose next you'll assert their attorneys advised against signing.Right, I wonder what incentivized them to say that. Oh right, the non-prosecution agreement. I bet it saved them millions in attorneys fees.
Trump fluffers will fluff Trump. Fair enough. I suppose next you'll assert their attorneys advised against signing.Right, I wonder what incentivized them to say that. Oh right, the non-prosecution agreement. I bet it saved them millions in attorneys fees.