"The Religion of Peace" Strikes Again

Roudy

Diamond Member
Mar 16, 2012
59,224
17,519
2,180
What can one say about this barbarism. All because innocent kids are getting an education?!

29 Boys Killed as Boko Haram Attacks Boarding School in Nigeria

DAMATURU, Nigeria - Gunmen from Islamist group Boko Haram stormed a boarding school in Nigeria overnight and killed 29 pupils, police and the military said on Tuesday.

Many of the victims died as the school was burned to the ground.

"Some of the students' bodies were burned to ashes," Police Commissioner Sanusi Rufai said of the attack on the Federal Government college of Buni Yadi, a secondary school in Yobe state in the country's northeast.

Boko Haram, whose struggle for an Islamic state in northern Nigeria has killed thousands, are increasingly preying on the civilian population.

The militant group, whose name means "Western education is sinful" in the northern Hausa language, have frequently attacked schools in the past. A similar attack in June in the village of Mamudo left 22 students dead.

*ANIMALS*
 
Yep those love and peace Muslims at it again.
If only those parents wouldn't be stupid enough to send their kids to get an education, Islamist animals wouldn't be forced to barbeque those kids.
 
Students in Nigeria should not live in fear because they want to pursue an education and better themselves!

A religion of Peace, as Islam calls itself, should not kill in the name of religion!

Middle Ages savages!
 
Well until people are willing to stand and fight with us they're on their own. That's just the way it should be.
 
Is this more anti Muslim porn? OK, here is a question Muslims and the rest of us humans should ask: Is Humanity better off WITHOUT Islam? that derivative offshoot of Judaism? If the answer is yes, that might lead to the ultimate question: is Humanity better off WITHOUT religion? I vote YES on both questions.
 
The thread title seems a bit distasteful seeing as how many of the dead are Muslim and they obviously don't follow the same beliefs that the Boko Haram do. This conflict isn't an Islam vs. Nigeria thing, it is a Boko Haram vs. Nigeria issue.
 
The thread title seems a bit distasteful seeing as how many of the dead are Muslim and they obviously don't follow the same beliefs that the Boko Haram do. This conflict isn't an Islam vs. Nigeria thing, it is a Boko Haram vs. Nigeria issue.
Right. Sure. The article says, ISLAMISTS killed the kids because they didn't want them to get a Western education. I know your job here is to take Islam out of the picture and make it look like something it isn't.
 
Hard for me to imagine that there are millions of people who are Muslim
and they seem to be fine with with the murders.
Even Muslims on this board seem fine with it.
 
Right. Sure. The article says, ISLAMISTS killed the kids because they didn't want them to get a Western education. I know your job here is to take Islam out of the picture and make it look like something it isn't.

I am merely pointing out that it is also Muslims who are trying to fight for their right to an education. They don't see their religion conflicting with education or with living within a democratic state like Nigeria. Hate Muslims all you want, but it is dishonest to paint all of Nigeria's Muslims in the light of the Boko Haram and highly disrespectful to the dead.
 
Right. Sure. The article says, ISLAMISTS killed the kids because they didn't want them to get a Western education. I know your job here is to take Islam out of the picture and make it look like something it isn't.

I am merely pointing out that it is also Muslims who are trying to fight for their right to an education. They don't see their religion conflicting with education or with living within a democratic state like Nigeria. Hate Muslims all you want, but it is dishonest to paint all of Nigeria's Muslims in the light of the Boko Haram and highly disrespectful to the dead.
This is not about Boko Haram it is about Islamists imposing their will through violence and terror. This kind of shit has been happening all over the Muslim world. Pay attention, nobody is saying "all Muslims" oppose education, clearly those who follow strict Islam aka Islamists have a problem with any Western style decent education taught to their kids. Obviously, the parents of those who sent their kids to that school wanted their children to have an education, other than brainwashing at the mosque madrasah. So do the parents of girls in Afghanistan who are sending their girls to school for the first time in two decades, despite the threats of the Islamists, thanks to the USA.

You of course don't seem as upset about the fact that Muslims keep killing children only for the crime of getting an education, and more about the "title" of this thread. More of this fake Muslim phony baloney outrage. :cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
Boko Haram means "western education is a sin." Boko Haram is an Islamist Jihadist movement.
Imams, Mullahs and Ayatollahs prefer their flocks to be ignorant of all things except the quran, thus ensuring their domination of the flocks.
The quran specifically instructs its followers to convert or kill the non-believing infidels and continue doing so until all worship "allah."
Their founder Muhammad was a primitive, tribal warrior, thief and murderer, as well as a raging pedophile. His followers deny he was a pedophile but simple research shows otherwise.
The religion and its devout followers have to go. They create violence in many non-islamic nations.
 
Mohammed wasn't a pedophile. At least not in the clinical sense. Most of his wives were older, Aisha was the one and only exception. But he had no preference for such young partners. And it's not like he sought her out for marriage. She was 'gifted' to him by her parents. Back then, women were property. And a big part of arab culture even today is manners. Someone gives you a gift, you accept it lest you greatly offend the giver.

While I have no love for Islam, I have even less for lies and distortions of facts.
 
Mohammed wasn't a pedophile. At least not in the clinical sense. Most of his wives were older, Aisha was the one and only exception. But he had no preference for such young partners. And it's not like he sought her out for marriage. She was 'gifted' to him by her parents. Back then, women were property. And a big part of arab culture even today is manners. Someone gives you a gift, you accept it lest you greatly offend the giver.

While I have no love for Islam, I have even less for lies and distortions of facts.
So you're saying that Mohammad had "no choice" but to accept a six year old into his house? Poor guy, I feel sorry for him, he couldn't control himself.

Secondly, the accounts do not confirm your claim. Mohammad saw Aisha in his "dreams" and then went and asked for Aisha's hand in marriage:

"The Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) asked Abu Bakr for Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said: "But I am your brother." The Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) said: "You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.""

"Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him), and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Apostle (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) would call them to join and play with me."

Mohammad's marriage to Aisha is the reason that child brides are legal throughout much of the Muslim world.
 
Last edited:
Mohammed wasn't a pedophile. At least not in the clinical sense. Most of his wives were older, Aisha was the one and only exception. But he had no preference for such young partners. And it's not like he sought her out for marriage. She was 'gifted' to him by her parents. Back then, women were property. And a big part of arab culture even today is manners. Someone gives you a gift, you accept it lest you greatly offend the giver.

While I have no love for Islam, I have even less for lies and distortions of facts.
So you're saying that Mohammad had "no choice" but to accept a six year old into his house? Poor guy, I feel sorry for him, he couldn't control himself.

Secondly, the accounts do not confirm your claim. Mohammad saw Aisha in his "dreams" and then went and asked for Aisha's hand in marriage:

"The Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) asked Abu Bakr for Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said: "But I am your brother." The Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) said: "You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry.""

"Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) narrated: I used to play with the dolls in the presence of the Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him), and my girl friends also used to play with me. When Allah’s Apostle (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) used to enter (my dwelling place) they used to hide themselves, but the Prophet (may the blessing and peace of Allah be upon him) would call them to join and play with me."

Mohammad's marriage to Aisha is the reason that child brides are legal throughout much of the Muslim world.

Aisha didn't live with him until age 9. None too much better, but as an inaccuracy it calls into question your subsequent claims. Which by the way don't substantiate his being a pedophile. A 'dirty old man' certainly, but that's a far-cry from making points about him or Islam. By FAR, American pedophiles are Christians (over 80%)

Though yes, her young age at the time of marriage (age 6) is cited in modern Islamic countries as justification for such contemporary marriages. Recall an Egpytian politician before their revolution saying something to the effect of, "If Mohammed can marry Aisha as a six year old, that should be good enough for us." (loosely paraphrased)
 
Hi Roudy:
My first impression was your msg reminds me of people
who blame America for aborting millions of babies.

If you want to start blaming a 'collective group' where does it stop?

Do you want to blame "ALL MEN" for the wars, rapes, slavery and trafficking in the world,
since most of the oppression and violence IS DONE BY MEN.

Why don't you start there?

But no, if you go through the trouble to MAKE A DISTINCTION between men who rape and men who don't, then please also make a distinction between WHICH PEOPLE commit violence abusing religion for political genocide tactics, and WHICH PEOPLE DON'T.

how is blaming "Islam" for all this atrocity different from blaming "all men."

if you are going to make a blanket generalization, and not distinguish the guilty from the innocent but throw them all under one label to blame,
where does it stop, Roudy?

Why not just blame "all humanity" so at least all people are held equally responsible?

What can one say about this barbarism. All because innocent kids are getting an education?!

29 Boys Killed as Boko Haram Attacks Boarding School in Nigeria

DAMATURU, Nigeria - Gunmen from Islamist group Boko Haram stormed a boarding school in Nigeria overnight and killed 29 pupils, police and the military said on Tuesday.

Many of the victims died as the school was burned to the ground.

"Some of the students' bodies were burned to ashes," Police Commissioner Sanusi Rufai said of the attack on the Federal Government college of Buni Yadi, a secondary school in Yobe state in the country's northeast.

Boko Haram, whose struggle for an Islamic state in northern Nigeria has killed thousands, are increasingly preying on the civilian population.

The militant group, whose name means "Western education is sinful" in the northern Hausa language, have frequently attacked schools in the past. A similar attack in June in the village of Mamudo left 22 students dead.

*ANIMALS*

you could say that of MEN or of HUMAN BEINGS in general.
if you are going to make a collective statement, why stop at just blaming Islam?

NOTE: statistically you would be MORE ACCURATE by blaming "all Men" than blaming "all Muslims"
Right? think of the ratio of violent crimes committed by MALES vs. females, then compare
to the ratio of violent crimes committed by Muslims vs. nonmuslims.

Imagine a dart board with all the incidents committed by humanity, and throwing a dart to hit any one of these.
What are your chances of the instance you land on being committed by a MAN vs. a MUSLIM?
More likely a MAN, right?

And Roudy, if you blamed "human beings" collectively for deliberate violations of human rights in the world,
you'd be right 100%. Every instance of criminal violence you hit with a dart would be done by a human being.

If you were going for 100% accuracy, you might hold all people equally suspect.
Equally capable of committing atrocities and imposing injustice on our neighbors.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top