The only people who have lived continuously in Palestine since Old Testament times

[westwall]

The rabbinical Pharisees held power over the Jews under Rome. They were traitors.

In AD 70, perhaps thirty-five years after the death of Jesus, all fell to pieces. The confusion and disorder in Judea were incurable and Rome stepped in. The Pharisees, who had originally invited Roman intervention and were supreme in Judea under the Romans, remained passive.

Jesus was a Galilean, not a Jew.

Other peoples of Palestine, and most especially the Galileans, would not submit to Rome and after many risings and campaigns the Romans entered and razed Jerusalem. Judea was declared conquered territory and the name vanished from the map.

Samaritans are the only people indigenous to Palestine.

For long periods during the next nineteen hundred years no Jews at all lived in Jerusalem (the Samaritans, a tiny remnant of whom have survived all the persecutions, are the only people who have lived continuously in Palestine since Old Testamentary times).

https://www.unz.com/book/douglas_reed__the-controversy-of-zion/#p_11_8:39-80

Jesus was, CLEARLY, a pharisee jew. There have always been jews in the land that the
Romans renamed "palestine" Your sunday school whore lied.

Actually. I think there is more evidence that he was an Essene.

 

[westwall]

I don’t care who lived there the longest. A nation has to be able to defend itself or it goes out of existence. The Palestinians and Arabs have gotten their asses kicked for the last 100 years there. There are consequences to losing wars, like you don’t get to keep your lands.

Sounds good, but how do you explain native Americans? Canada's first people?

We lost. Either assimilate, or die. Eventually, the native people's will either retake what was lost, or be bred out of existence like the Belgae, the Brigantes, and the Jutes in England.

It's the nature of man.

 

[irosie91]

The rabbinical Pharisees held power over the Jews under Rome. They were traitors.

In AD 70, perhaps thirty-five years after the death of Jesus, all fell to pieces. The confusion and disorder in Judea were incurable and Rome stepped in. The Pharisees, who had originally invited Roman intervention and were supreme in Judea under the Romans, remained passive.

Jesus was a Galilean, not a Jew.

Other peoples of Palestine, and most especially the Galileans, would not submit to Rome and after many risings and campaigns the Romans entered and razed Jerusalem. Judea was declared conquered territory and the name vanished from the map.

Samaritans are the only people indigenous to Palestine.

For long periods during the next nineteen hundred years no Jews at all lived in Jerusalem (the Samaritans, a tiny remnant of whom have survived all the persecutions, are the only people who have lived continuously in Palestine since Old Testamentary times).

https://www.unz.com/book/douglas_reed__the-controversy-of-zion/#p_11_8:39-80

Jesus was, CLEARLY, a pharisee jew. There have always been jews in the land that the
Romans renamed "palestine" Your sunday school whore lied.

No, we are taught in Sunday School that it is wrong to lie. It is your religion that says it's ok to lie, so, perhaps you have been lied to just to keep you enslaved in your Talmudic prison

oh gee----the sunday whore ALSO taught you DA JOOOOS LIE

 

[irosie91]

The rabbinical Pharisees held power over the Jews under Rome. They were traitors.

In AD 70, perhaps thirty-five years after the death of Jesus, all fell to pieces. The confusion and disorder in Judea were incurable and Rome stepped in. The Pharisees, who had originally invited Roman intervention and were supreme in Judea under the Romans, remained passive.

Jesus was a Galilean, not a Jew.

Other peoples of Palestine, and most especially the Galileans, would not submit to Rome and after many risings and campaigns the Romans entered and razed Jerusalem. Judea was declared conquered territory and the name vanished from the map.

Samaritans are the only people indigenous to Palestine.

For long periods during the next nineteen hundred years no Jews at all lived in Jerusalem (the Samaritans, a tiny remnant of whom have survived all the persecutions, are the only people who have lived continuously in Palestine since Old Testamentary times).

https://www.unz.com/book/douglas_reed__the-controversy-of-zion/#p_11_8:39-80

Jesus was, CLEARLY, a pharisee jew. There have always been jews in the land that the
Romans renamed "palestine" Your sunday school whore lied.

Actually. I think there is more evidence that he was an Essene.

lots of the ideas held by some of the early christians---like Paul, certainly
seem ESSENE-like. But as far as I can tell "ESSENE" does not constitute \
a PEOPLE ----more like a school of thought amongst PHARISEES. Essenes
were also "anti-rome"-----but then, they were anti just about everything