The Oceans are Warming Faster than Previously Thought; Rate of Heat Build-up Accelerating

[Billy_Bob]

The Oceans are Warming Faster than Previously Thought; Rate of Heat Build-up Accelerating

So we keep hearing this phrase in the sciences — faster than we thought. In the context of global warming, it’s not a phrase we want to hear. And when the world’s largest heat sink — the oceans — are warming up faster than we thought, that’s kind of a big deal.

******

According to new research published today in Science Advances, the world’s oceans are warming up at an overall rate that is 13% faster than previously thought. Study authors used a new methodology to gain a more refined picture of overall ocean warming. And the results were unfortunately stark. For in addition to the oceans having gained more heat, the study also found that the rate of ocean warming is accelerating.

(Total ocean heat gain in the top 2000 meters as found in Improved estimates of ocean heat content from 1960 to 2015.)

The American taliban ignores the reality of it but it just keeps on proving them as idiots!

Bring it on !!!

More warm beaches for everyone !!!!!

Nope! Sorry, you foolish little retard, but the consequent rising sea levels means no more beaches for anyone.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for February 2016 was the highest for February in the 137-year period of record, at 1.21°C (2.18°F) above the 20th century average of 12.1°C (53.9°F).

Karl Et AL manufactured grade A bull shit.

And the more accurate satellite measurements say NO!

 

[RollingThunder]

The combined average temperature over global land and ocean surfaces for February 2016 was the highest for February in the 137-year period of record, at 1.21°C (2.18°F) above the 20th century average of 12.1°C (53.9°F).

Karl Et AL manufactured grade A bull shit.

And the more accurate satellite measurements say NO!

Your bogus denier cult myths are as stupidly fraudulent as ever, you poor delusional retard.

In the real world of science....

Study drives a sixth nail into the global warming 'pause' myth | John Abraham | Environment | The Guardian
Nov 24, 2015 - Perhaps the best-known myth is the so-called “pause” or “hiatus” in global warming. This year, six... warming trend. Now, with six nails in this coffin of this myth, are any more needed?
***
Conservative media can't stop denying there was no global warming 'pause' | Dana Nuccitelli | Environment | The Guardian
Jan 10, 2017 - In fact, by late 2015, at least six papers had been published debunking this myth. The record-shattering hot temperatures of 2015 and 2016 were simply more nails in its coffin. It's a coffin with ...

 

[Crick]

Karl Et AL manufactured grade A bull shit.
View attachment 116542
And the more accurate satellite measurements say NO!

Why would you go to Spencer & Christy's bullshit graph to illustrate satellite data? Are you thinking Karl et al's data is a CMIP5 model run? Did you want your readers to think that? Let's have a look at some other versions of UAH's satellite data - satellite data that, globally, is nothing but lower tropospheric data. It ignores your urban heat islands. It ignores the deep oceans (thread topic, remember?).

Here's a somewhat dated comparison between University of Alabama at Huntsville (UAH) vs Remote Sensing Systems (RSS). They both show temperatures climbing

Here's another. This one clearly showing that lower troposphere is lower than surface combined.

Here's a nice graph directly from UAH. You'd think it would be difficult for denier folks like Billy to continue claiming these data show no warming, but they do keep on, do they not?

[/QUOTE]

 

[Crick]

Meanwhile, OHC has been climbing at an accelerating pace. It's not as if this should have surprised anyone.

Remember Balmaseda, Kallen and Trenberth?

This old chestnut from the boys at Skeptical Science?

The boys at Yale?

Hamilton at NOAA

 

[Crick]

Now Same Shit will tell us that the ocean shows us all that heat because it is cooling. After all, how does something cool off save by giving off heat? Right? Makes perfect sense and he ALWAYS deals with the facts.

 

[Old Rocks]

[QUOTE="

So, he's no climate scientist, but then no one ever said he was, particularly him. However, he's smarter than you and I and he's been interested in the topic for nigh on 40 years. How long have you been into it? Prepared yourself for any public speaking on the topic? Written any papers? Books?

Then why don't you try talking about issues instead of taking easy (because they're false) potshots at celebrities working a good cause?

Asshole.

/--- Goreball Warming nuts attack Rush Limbaugh because he doesn't have a degree in Climate Change and in the same breath quote Al Gore who doesn't have a degree in Climate Change. Go figure.
And I've been following this scam since 1978 when you Libtards were screeching about Global Cooling and the next ice age hitting in 1985. That's how long.[/QUOTE]
Look, asshole, Gore quotes scientists, that obese junkie pulls 'facts' out of his asshole. You can go to the articles that Gore gets his information from, you go to Limpbaugh's crap, and you find posiers with no degrees in any science. Fake British Lords, ect.

 

[Old Rocks]

[QUOTE="

So, he's no climate scientist, but then no one ever said he was, particularly him. However, he's smarter than you and I and he's been interested in the topic for nigh on 40 years. How long have you been into it? Prepared yourself for any public speaking on the topic? Written any papers? Books?

Then why don't you try talking about issues instead of taking easy (because they're false) potshots at celebrities working a good cause?

Asshole.

/--- Goreball Warming nuts attack Rush Limbaugh because he doesn't have a degree in Climate Change and in the same breath quote Al Gore who doesn't have a degree in Climate Change. Go figure.
And I've been following this scam since 1978 when you Libtards were screeching about Global Cooling and the next ice age hitting in 1985. That's how long.[/QUOTE]
And why are you lying about what was being said concerning the 'cooling' in the '70's. The majority of scientists that published at that time predicted warming.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Global cooling - Wikipedia[/URL]
Global cooling was a conjecture during the 1970s of imminent cooling of the Earth's surface and atmosphere culminating in a period of extensive glaciation.
‎Introduction: general ... · ‎Physical mechanisms · ‎Concern in the 1920s and 1930s

 

[Crick]

So, he's no climate scientist, but then no one ever said he was, particularly him. However, he's smarter than you and I and he's been interested in the topic for nigh on 40 years. How long have you been into it? Prepared yourself for any public speaking on the topic? Written any papers? Books?

Then why don't you try talking about issues instead of taking easy (because they're false) potshots at celebrities working a good cause?

Asshole.

/--- Goreball Warming nuts attack Rush Limbaugh because he doesn't have a degree in Climate Change and in the same breath quote Al Gore who doesn't have a degree in Climate Change. Go figure.
And I've been following this scam since 1978 when you Libtards were screeching about Global Cooling and the next ice age hitting in 1985. That's how long.

Look, asshole, Gore quotes scientists, that obese junkie pulls 'facts' out of his asshole. You can go to the articles that Gore gets his information from, you go to Limpbaugh's crap, and you find posiers with no degrees in any science. Fake British Lords, ect.

Rocks, I think you've got your quotes mixed up with this lot.

 

[Crick]

The time axes on all three are unlabeled you overboiled egotistical buffoon.

Learn how to read fool

Radiance vs Wavenumber.

SO color of the wave and its spectral wave length... Still doesn't prove anything about AGW as it can not identify what the receiving mass will do with the energy..

How did you GET so stupid?

It PROVES, by direct-FUCKING-measurement, that back radiation exists and that it originates with the previously identified GHG components in the Earth's atmosphere.

What a fucking TWIT you are.

Ps: your attempt to restate the value of the two axes on that graph failed. Why don't you try again.

Hint: color, wavelength and frequency are all the same thing.

 

[SSDD]

The time axes on all three are unlabeled you overboiled egotistical buffoon.

Learn how to read fool

Radiance vs Wavenumber.

SO color of the wave and its spectral wave length... Still doesn't prove anything about AGW as it can not identify what the receiving mass will do with the energy..

How did you GET so stupid?

It PROVES, by direct-FUCKING-measurement, that back radiation exists and that it originates with the previously identified GHG components in the Earth's atmosphere.

What a fucking TWIT you are.

Ps: your attempt to restate the value of the two axes on that graph failed. Why don't you try again.

Hint: color, wavelength and frequency are all the same thing.

Idiot...that measurement was made with an instrument cooled to at least -80 degrees ...try making such measurement with an instrument at ambient temperature and you won't get anything because back radiation does not exist...

 

[miketx]

I see you're still calling names to those who disagree with your cave drawing science.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The time axes on all three are unlabeled you overboiled egotistical buffoon.

Learn how to read fool

Radiance vs Wavenumber.

SO color of the wave and its spectral wave length... Still doesn't prove anything about AGW as it can not identify what the receiving mass will do with the energy..

How did you GET so stupid?

It PROVES, by direct-FUCKING-measurement, that back radiation exists and that it originates with the previously identified GHG components in the Earth's atmosphere.

What a fucking TWIT you are.

Ps: your attempt to restate the value of the two axes on that graph failed. Why don't you try again.

Hint: color, wavelength and frequency are all the same thing.

You really don't have a fucking clue... not going to waste my time further..

 

[SSDD]

All bullshit all the time with you warmers...

 

[mamooth]

All bullshit all the time with you warmers...

Geez, three mystery graphs? Even for you, that's pathetic.

It's unlcear whether this is fakery-fraud on your part, or cherrypicking-fraud. Given it's you, we definitely know it's fraud of some sort.

So, does your cult reward you for lying with such fervor? They should. Just look at you. You do nothing but spend your entire existence here, proudly lying for your cult. They should at least give you a stipend for the alcohol you plalinly consume in mass quantities. I suppose you have to dull the pain of your constant humiliation somehow.

 

[miketx]

Us warmers? I'm a pot holder.

 

[Old Rocks]

All bullshit all the time with you warmers...

No source, no validity.

 

[Old Rocks]

A paleo-perspective on ocean heat content: Lessons from the Holocene and Common Era

• Yair Rosenthala, , ,
• Julie Kalanskyb, ,
• Audrey Morleyc, ,
• Braddock Linsleyd,

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2016.10.017


Abstract
The ocean constitutes the largest heat reservoir in the Earth's energy budget and thus exerts a major influence on its climate. Instrumental observations show an increase in ocean heat content (OHC) associated with the increase in greenhouse emissions. Here we review proxy records of intermediate water temperatures from sediment cores and corals in the equatorial Pacific and northeastern Atlantic Oceans, spanning 10,000 years beyond the instrumental record. These records suggests that intermediate waters were 1.5–2 °C warmer during the Holocene Thermal Maximum than in the last century. Intermediate water masses cooled by 0.9 °C from the Medieval Climate Anomaly to the Little Ice Age. These changes are significantly larger than the temperature anomalies documented in the instrumental record. The implied large perturbations in OHC and Earth's energy budget are at odds with very small radiative forcing anomalies throughout the Holocene and Common Era. We suggest that even very small radiative perturbations can change the latitudinal temperature gradient and strongly affect prevailing atmospheric wind systems and hence air-sea heat exchange. These dynamic processes provide an efficient mechanism to amplify small changes in insolation into relatively large changes in OHC. Over long time periods the ocean's interior acts like a capacitor and builds up large (positive and negative) heat anomalies that can mitigate or amplify small radiative perturbations as seen in the Holocene trend and Common Era anomalies, respectively. Evidently the ocean's interior is more sensitive to small external forcings than the global surface ocean because of the high sensitivity of heat exchange in the high-latitudes to climate variations.

A paleo-perspective on ocean heat content: Lessons from the Holocene and Common Era

So, what this seems to be saying is that the deep oceans are a lot more sensitive to small forcing than we previously realized.

 

[SSDD]

You, the dead cat lady and crick must have taken the same graph reading class.. Fucking morons..

Completely unbelievable...isn't it? How do they manage to get out of bed and dress themselves in the mornings?...government paid nurse maids?