The Oceans are Warming Faster than Previously Thought; Rate of Heat Build-up Accelerating

ScienceRocks

Democrat all the way!
Mar 16, 2010
59,455
6,793
1,900
The Good insane United states of America
The Oceans are Warming Faster than Previously Thought; Rate of Heat Build-up Accelerating
So we keep hearing this phrase in the sciences — faster than we thought. In the context of global warming, it’s not a phrase we want to hear. And when the world’s largest heat sink — the oceans — are warming up faster than we thought, that’s kind of a big deal.

******

According to new research published today in Science Advances, the world’s oceans are warming up at an overall rate that is 13% faster than previously thought. Study authors used a new methodology to gain a more refined picture of overall ocean warming. And the results were unfortunately stark. For in addition to the oceans having gained more heat, the study also found that the rate of ocean warming is accelerating.



(Total ocean heat gain in the top 2000 meters as found in Improved estimates of ocean heat content from 1960 to 2015.)

The American taliban ignores the reality of it but it just keeps on proving them as idiots!
 
The Oceans are Warming Faster than Previously Thought; Rate of Heat Build-up Accelerating
So we keep hearing this phrase in the sciences — faster than we thought. In the context of global warming, it’s not a phrase we want to hear. And when the world’s largest heat sink — the oceans — are warming up faster than we thought, that’s kind of a big deal.

******

According to new research published today in Science Advances, the world’s oceans are warming up at an overall rate that is 13% faster than previously thought. Study authors used a new methodology to gain a more refined picture of overall ocean warming. And the results were unfortunately stark. For in addition to the oceans having gained more heat, the study also found that the rate of ocean warming is accelerating.



(Total ocean heat gain in the top 2000 meters as found in Improved estimates of ocean heat content from 1960 to 2015.)

The American taliban ignores the reality of it but it just keeps on proving them as idiots!
/---- That's great news. I hate swimming in cold water.
 
The Oceans are Warming Faster than Previously Thought; Rate of Heat Build-up Accelerating
So we keep hearing this phrase in the sciences — faster than we thought. In the context of global warming, it’s not a phrase we want to hear. And when the world’s largest heat sink — the oceans — are warming up faster than we thought, that’s kind of a big deal.

******

According to new research published today in Science Advances, the world’s oceans are warming up at an overall rate that is 13% faster than previously thought. Study authors used a new methodology to gain a more refined picture of overall ocean warming. And the results were unfortunately stark. For in addition to the oceans having gained more heat, the study also found that the rate of ocean warming is accelerating.



(Total ocean heat gain in the top 2000 meters as found in Improved estimates of ocean heat content from 1960 to 2015.)

The American taliban ignores the reality of it but it just keeps on proving them as idiots!


Your post and your graph prove nothing. Your "scientists" have an extremely limited data set to work with, and in terms of planetary age, it falls way short.
 
The Oceans are Warming Faster than Previously Thought; Rate of Heat Build-up Accelerating
So we keep hearing this phrase in the sciences — faster than we thought. In the context of global warming, it’s not a phrase we want to hear. And when the world’s largest heat sink — the oceans — are warming up faster than we thought, that’s kind of a big deal.

******

According to new research published today in Science Advances, the world’s oceans are warming up at an overall rate that is 13% faster than previously thought. Study authors used a new methodology to gain a more refined picture of overall ocean warming. And the results were unfortunately stark. For in addition to the oceans having gained more heat, the study also found that the rate of ocean warming is accelerating.



(Total ocean heat gain in the top 2000 meters as found in Improved estimates of ocean heat content from 1960 to 2015.)

The American taliban ignores the reality of it but it just keeps on proving them as idiots!


Your post and your graph prove nothing. Your "scientists" have an extremely limited data set to work with, and in terms of planetary age, it falls way short.
its amazing how many racist swamp people have degrees in climate science
 
The Oceans are Warming Faster than Previously Thought; Rate of Heat Build-up Accelerating
So we keep hearing this phrase in the sciences — faster than we thought. In the context of global warming, it’s not a phrase we want to hear. And when the world’s largest heat sink — the oceans — are warming up faster than we thought, that’s kind of a big deal.

******

According to new research published today in Science Advances, the world’s oceans are warming up at an overall rate that is 13% faster than previously thought. Study authors used a new methodology to gain a more refined picture of overall ocean warming. And the results were unfortunately stark. For in addition to the oceans having gained more heat, the study also found that the rate of ocean warming is accelerating.



(Total ocean heat gain in the top 2000 meters as found in Improved estimates of ocean heat content from 1960 to 2015.)

The American taliban ignores the reality of it but it just keeps on proving them as idiots!


Your post and your graph prove nothing. Your "scientists" have an extremely limited data set to work with, and in terms of planetary age, it falls way short.
its amazing how many racist swamp people have degrees in climate science
/---- I've never met any racist swamp people so I wouldn't know. So where is Al Gore's degree in Climate Change? And your's for that matter.
 
The Oceans are Warming Faster than Previously Thought; Rate of Heat Build-up Accelerating
So we keep hearing this phrase in the sciences — faster than we thought. In the context of global warming, it’s not a phrase we want to hear. And when the world’s largest heat sink — the oceans — are warming up faster than we thought, that’s kind of a big deal.

******

According to new research published today in Science Advances, the world’s oceans are warming up at an overall rate that is 13% faster than previously thought. Study authors used a new methodology to gain a more refined picture of overall ocean warming. And the results were unfortunately stark. For in addition to the oceans having gained more heat, the study also found that the rate of ocean warming is accelerating.



(Total ocean heat gain in the top 2000 meters as found in Improved estimates of ocean heat content from 1960 to 2015.)

The American taliban ignores the reality of it but it just keeps on proving them as idiots!


Your post and your graph prove nothing. Your "scientists" have an extremely limited data set to work with, and in terms of planetary age, it falls way short.
its amazing how many racist swamp people have degrees in climate science
/---- I've never met any racist swamp people so I wouldn't know. So where is Al Gore's degree in Climate Change? And your's for that matter.
I dont have one? I just listen to people that do.... unlike you angry racist swamp people
/---- Yeah me too. Here's a partial list of the scientist I listen to:
Scientists questioning the accuracy of IPCC climate projections
These scientists have said that it is not possible to project global climate accurately enough to justify the ranges projected for temperature and sea-level rise over the next century. They may not conclude specifically that the current IPCC projections are either too high or too low, but that the projections are likely to be inaccurate due to inadequacies of current global climate modeling.
David Bellamy, botanist.[19][20][21][22]
Lennart Bengtsson, meteorologist, Reading University.[23][24]
Piers Corbyn, owner of the business WeatherAction which makes weather forecasts.[25][26]
Judith Curry, Professor and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology.[27][28][29][30]
Freeman Dyson, professor emeritus of the School of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study; Fellow of the Royal Society.[31][32]
Ivar Giaever, Norwegian–American physicist and Nobel laureate in physics (1973).[33]
Steven E. Koonin, theoretical physicist and director of the Center for Urban Science and Progress at New York University.[34][35]
Richard Lindzen, Alfred P. Sloan emeritus professor of atmospheric science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and member of the National Academy of Sciences.[36][37][38][39]
Craig Loehle, ecologist and chief scientist at the National Council for Air and Stream Improvement.[40][41][42][43][44][45][46]
Ross McKitrick, Professor of Economics and CBE Chair in Sustainable Commerce, University of Guelph.[47][48]
Patrick Moore, former president of Greenpeace Canada.[49][50][51]
Nils-Axel Mörner, retired head of the Paleogeophysics and Geodynamics Department at Stockholm University, former chairman of the INQUA Commission on Sea Level Changes and Coastal Evolution (1999–2003).[52][53]
Garth Paltridge, retired chief research scientist, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research and retired director of the Institute of the Antarctic Cooperative Research Centre, visiting fellow Australian National University.[54][55]
Roger A. Pielke, Jr., professor of environmental studies at the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research at the University of Colorado at Boulder.[56][57]
Tom Quirk, corporate director of biotech companies and former board member of the Institute of Public Affairs, an Australian conservative think-tank.[58]
Denis Rancourt, former professor of physics at University of Ottawa, research scientist in condensed matter physics, and in environmental and soil science.[59][60][61][62]
Harrison Schmitt, geologist, Apollo 17 Astronaut, former U.S. Senator.[63]
Peter Stilbs, professor of physical chemistry at Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.[64][65]
Philip Stott, professor emeritus of biogeography at the University of London.[66][67]
Hendrik Tennekes, retired director of research, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.[68][69]
Anastasios Tsonis, distinguished professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.[70][71]
Fritz Vahrenholt, German politician and energy executive with a doctorate in chemistry.[72][73]
Scientists arguing that global warming is primarily caused by natural processes

Graph showing the ability with which a global climate model is able to reconstruct the historical temperature record, and the degree to which those temperature changes can be decomposed into various forcing factors. It shows the effects of five forcing factors: greenhouse gases, man-made sulfate emissions, solar variability, ozone changes, and volcanic emissions.[74]
These scientists have said that the observed warming is more likely to be attributable to natural causes than to human activities. Their views on climate change are usually described in more detail in their biographical articles.
Khabibullo Abdusamatov, astrophysicist at Pulkovo Observatory of the Russian Academy of Sciences[75][76]
Sallie Baliunas, retired astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics[77][78][79]
Timothy Ball, historical climatologist, and retired professor of geography at the University of Winnipeg[80][81][82]
Ian Clark, hydrogeologist, professor, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa[83][84]
Chris de Freitas, associate professor, School of Geography, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Auckland[85][86]
David Douglass, solid-state physicist, professor, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester[87][88]
Don Easterbrook, emeritus professor of geology, Western Washington University[89][90]
William Happer, physicist specializing in optics and spectroscopy; emeritus professor, Princeton University[91][92]
Ole Humlum, professor of geology at the University of Oslo[93][94]
Wibjörn Karlén, professor emeritus of geography and geology at the University of Stockholm.[95][96]
William Kininmonth, meteorologist, former Australian delegate to World Meteorological Organization Commission for Climatology[97][98]
David Legates, associate professor of geography and director of the Center for Climatic Research, University of Delaware[99][100]
Anthony Lupo, professor of atmospheric science at the University of Missouri[101][102]
Tad Murty, oceanographer; adjunct professor, Departments of Civil Engineering and Earth Sciences, University of Ottawa[103][104]
Tim Patterson, paleoclimatologist and professor of geology at Carleton University in Canada.[105][106]
Ian Plimer, professor emeritus of mining geology, the University of Adelaide.[107][108]
Arthur B. Robinson, American politician, biochemist and former faculty member at the University of California, San Diego[109][110]
Murry Salby, atmospheric scientist, former professor at Macquarie University and University of Colorado[111][112]
Nicola Scafetta, research scientist in the physics department at Duke University[113][114][115]
Tom Segalstad, geologist; associate professor at University of Oslo[116][117]
Nir Shaviv, professor of physics focusing on astrophysics and climate science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem[118][119]
Fred Singer, professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia[120][121][122][123]
Willie Soon, astrophysicist, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics[124][125]
Roy Spencer, meteorologist; principal research scientist, University of Alabama in Huntsville[126][127]
Henrik Svensmark, physicist, Danish National Space Center[128][129]
George H. Taylor, retired director of the Oregon Climate Service at Oregon State University[130][131]
Jan Veizer, environmental geochemist, professor emeritus from University of Ottawa[132][133]
Scientists arguing that the cause of global warming is unknown
These scientists have said that no principal cause can be ascribed to the observed rising temperatures, whether man-made or natural.
Syun-Ichi Akasofu, retired professor of geophysics and founding director of the International Arctic Research Center of the University of Alaska Fairbanks.[134][135]
Claude Allègre, French politician; geochemist, emeritus professor at Institute of Geophysics (Paris).[136][137]
Robert Balling, a professor of geography at Arizona State University.[138][139]
Pål Brekke, solar astrophycisist, senior advisor Norwegian Space Centre.[140][141]
John Christy, professor of atmospheric science and director of the Earth System Science Center at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, contributor to several IPCC reports.[142][143][144]
Petr Chylek, space and remote sensing sciences researcher, Los Alamos National Laboratory.[145][146]
David Deming, geology professor at the University of Oklahoma.[147][148]
Vincent R. Gray, New Zealand physical chemist with expertise in coal ashes[149][150]
Keith E. Idso, botanist, former adjunct professor of biology at Maricopa County Community College District and the vice president of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change[151][152]
Antonino Zichichi, emeritus professor of nuclear physics at the University of Bologna and president of the World Federation of Scientists.[153][154]
Kary Mullis, 1993 Nobel Laureate in Chemistry.[155]
Scientists arguing that global warming will have few negative consequences
These scientists have said that projected rising temperatures will be of little impact or a net positive for society or the environment.
Indur M. Goklany, science and technology policy analyst for the United States Department of the Interior[156][157][158]
Craig D. Idso, faculty researcher, Office of Climatology, Arizona State University and founder of the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change [159][160]
Sherwood B. Idso, former research physicist, USDA Water Conservation Laboratory, and adjunct professor, Arizona State University[161][162]
Patrick Michaels, senior fellow at the Cato Institute and retired research professor of environmental science at the University of Virginia[163][164]
 
Richard Lindzen? Patrick Moore? William Happer? Nils-Axel Mörner? Roger Pielke (surely you meant Sr)? Harrison Schmitt? Sallie Bailunas? Tim Ball? Don Easterbrook? Nicola Scaffeta? Ian Plimer? Fred Singer? Craig Idso? Willie Soon? Roy Spencer? David Legates!?!?

An impressive list. Did you note the unusual number of times the terms "Emeritus" and "Retired" showed up? I'll bet you the average for citatons/paper among this group can be counted with no more than the 'fingers' of a cloven hoof.

You listen to these people because of what they say, not why they say it. You've rejected the very idea of "follow the evidence" or "follow the science". And to be so open and honest about it. Impressive as well.

That's an interesting take on getting your daily dose.
 
Last edited:
Your post and your graph prove nothing. Your "scientists" have an extremely limited data set to work with, and in terms of planetary age, it falls way short.

Matthew's paper is talking about something that is happening NOW. Your "it's not ancient" bullshit simply has no bearing here (not that it has any bearing outside a museum).
 
I've never met any racist swamp people so I wouldn't know.

You've met them, you just didn't notice because they didn't seem at all different.

So where is Al Gore's degree in Climate Change? And your's for that matter.

First, no one has talked about Al Gore in several years (except deniers just getting into the conversation or complete morons). Gore has a degree in government from Harvard and a law degree from Vanderbilt. He served voluntarily in Vietnam.

Second from Wikipedia:
Gore has been involved with environmental issues since 1976, when as a freshman congressman, he held the "first congressional hearings on the climate change, and co-sponsor[ed] hearings on toxic waste and global warming."[59][60] He continued to speak on the topic throughout the 1980s,[61] and is still prevalent in the environmental community. He was known as one of the Atari Democrats, later called the "Democrats' Greens, politicians who see issues like clean air, clean water and global warming as the key to future victories for their party."[62][207]

In 1990, Senator Gore presided over a three-day conference with legislators from over 42 countries which sought to create a Global Marshall Plan, "under which industrial nations would help less developed countries grow economically while still protecting the environment."[208] In the late 1990s, Gore strongly pushed for the passage of the Kyoto Protocol, which called for reduction in greenhouse gas emissions.[209][210] He was opposed by the Senate, which passed unanimously (95–0) the Byrd–Hagel Resolution (S. Res. 98),[96] which stated the sense of the Senate was that the United States should not be a signatory to any protocol that did not include binding targets and timetables for developing as well as industrialized nations or "would result in serious harm to the economy of the United States".[211]

In 2004, he co-launched Generation Investment Management, a company for which he serves as Chair. A few years later, Gore also founded The Alliance for Climate Protection, an organization which eventually founded the We Campaign. Gore also became a partner in the venture capital firm, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers, heading that firm's climate change solutions group.[2][3] He also helped to organize the Live Earth benefit concerts.[212]

In 2013, Gore became a vegan.[213] He had earlier admitted that "it's absolutely correct that the growing meat intensity of diets across the world is one of the issues connected to this global crisis -- not only because of the [carbon dioxide] involved, but also because of the water consumed in the process"[214] and some speculate that his adoption of the new diet is related to his environmentalist stance.[214] In a 2014 interview, Gore said "Over a year ago I changed my diet to a vegan diet, really just to experiment to see what it was like. ... I felt better, so I've continued with it and I'm likely to continue it for the rest of my life."[215]

At the 2017 Sundance Film Festival, Gore released An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power, a sequel to his 2006 film, An Inconvenient Truth, which documents his continuing efforts to battle climate change.[216]

A "Climate and Health Summit" which was originally going to be held by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, was cancelled without warning in late January, 2017.[217] A few days later, Gore revived the summit, which he will hold without the CDC.[218]


So, he's no climate scientist, but then no one ever said he was, particularly him. However, he's smarter than you and I and he's been interested in the topic for nigh on 40 years. How long have you been into it? Prepared yourself for any public speaking on the topic? Written any papers? Books?

Then why don't you try talking about issues instead of taking easy (because they're false) potshots at celebrities working a good cause?

Asshole.
 
Last edited:
Your post and your graph prove nothing. Your "scientists" have an extremely limited data set to work with, and in terms of planetary age, it falls way short.

Matthew's paper is talking about something that is happening NOW. Your "it's not ancient" bullshit simply has no bearing here (not that it has any bearing outside a museum).
Yes, and all of you keep deflecting my meaning, which is you don't have enough data to come to a conclusion.
 
I've never met any racist swamp people so I wouldn't know.

You've met them, you just didn't notice because they didn't seem at all different.

So where is Al Gore's degree in Climate Change? And your's for that matter.

First, no one has talked about Al Gore in several years (except deniers just getting into the conversation or complete morons). Gore has a degree in government from Harvard and a law degree from Vanderbilt. He served voluntarily in Vietnam.

.
Several years??? How about December 2016?
Playback: Carson and Gore meets Trump
12/06/16 01:44 PM EST
161205_al_gore_ivanka_trump_getty_1160.jpg
Gore praises Ivanka Trump on climate policy after meeting
By CRISTIANO LIMA 12/05/16 10:09 PM EST
Comments 50
Al Gore meet with Trump View Gallery
Al Gore meet with Trump
12/05/16 01:31 PM EST
Presidential concession speeches View Gallery
Presidential concession speeches
11/07/16 11:18 PM EST
Al Gore: This election means the world View Gallery
Al Gore: This election means the world
11/07/16 09:29 PM EST
Al Gore: This election means the world
Gore: 'Take it from me, every vote counts'
By YOUSEF SABA 11/07/16 07:22 PM EST
Al Gore
 
[QUOTE="

So, he's no climate scientist, but then no one ever said he was, particularly him. However, he's smarter than you and I and he's been interested in the topic for nigh on 40 years. How long have you been into it? Prepared yourself for any public speaking on the topic? Written any papers? Books?

Then why don't you try talking about issues instead of taking easy (because they're false) potshots at celebrities working a good cause?

Asshole.[/QUOTE]
/--- Goreball Warming nuts attack Rush Limbaugh because he doesn't have a degree in Climate Change and in the same breath quote Al Gore who doesn't have a degree in Climate Change. Go figure.
And I've been following this scam since 1978 when you Libtards were screeching about Global Cooling and the next ice age hitting in 1985. That's how long.
 
Crick said:
So, he's no climate scientist, but then no one ever said he was, particularly him. However, he's smarter than you and I and he's been interested in the topic for nigh on 40 years. How long have you been into it? Prepared yourself for any public speaking on the topic? Written any papers? Books?

Then why don't you try talking about issues instead of taking easy (because they're false) potshots at celebrities working a good cause?

Asshole.

Goreball Warming nuts attack Rush Limbaugh because he doesn't have a degree in Climate Change and in the same breath quote Al Gore who doesn't have a degree in Climate Change. Go figure.

Rush Limbaugh? I can guarantee you that Rush Limbaugh is not a big voice in the global warming debate.

And I've been following this scam since 1978 when you Libtards were screeching about Global Cooling and the next ice age hitting in 1985. That's how long.

The odds are extremely high that you have not. If you'd been following the debate, you certainly wouldn't be talking about Al Gore and Rush Limbaugh for gods sake.[/QUOTE]
 
The Oceans are Warming Faster than Previously Thought; Rate of Heat Build-up Accelerating
So we keep hearing this phrase in the sciences — faster than we thought. In the context of global warming, it’s not a phrase we want to hear. And when the world’s largest heat sink — the oceans — are warming up faster than we thought, that’s kind of a big deal.

******

According to new research published today in Science Advances, the world’s oceans are warming up at an overall rate that is 13% faster than previously thought. Study authors used a new methodology to gain a more refined picture of overall ocean warming. And the results were unfortunately stark. For in addition to the oceans having gained more heat, the study also found that the rate of ocean warming is accelerating.



(Total ocean heat gain in the top 2000 meters as found in Improved estimates of ocean heat content from 1960 to 2015.)

The American taliban ignores the reality of it but it just keeps on proving them as idiots!
Bwhaaaaaaaaa a chart in Joules made to look scary... but in reality it measures just 0.007 deg C.. Tell me again how much the temps have risen vs the manipulations of water intakes of ships..

The breathless Mathew posting up pure conjecture... no surprise here.
 
All fake news all the time with you warmer wackos...you would think given the current political climate you would try to at least act like honest people instead of going off the deep end and doubling down on every lie that you have told for the past 3 decades.

Guess it hard to think what with all the chanting.
 
Richard Lindzen? Patrick Moore? William Happer? Nils-Axel Mörner? Roger Pielke (surely you meant Sr)? Harrison Schmitt? Sallie Bailunas? Tim Ball? Don Easterbrook? Nicola Scaffeta? Ian Plimer? Fred Singer? Craig Idso? Willie Soon? Roy Spencer? David Legates!?!?

An impressive list. Did you note the unusual number of times the terms "Emeritus" and "Retired" showed up? I'll bet you the average for citatons/paper among this group can be counted with no more than the 'fingers' of a cloven hoof.

You listen to these people because of what they say, not why they say it. You've rejected the very idea of "follow the evidence" or "follow the science". And to be so open and honest about it. Impressive as well.

That's an interesting take on getting your daily dose.
/---- QUICK send Al Bore more $$$$$$ - the sky is falling The sky is falling. EYIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
 
All fake news all the time with you warmer wackos...you would think given the current political climate you would try to at least act like honest people instead of going off the deep end and doubling down on every lie that you have told for the past 3 decades.

Guess it hard to think what with all the chanting.
Did you note the proportional distribution at all levels? Total bullshit!! No other way to describe it. It violates the laws of thermal conduction through thermolines.. Just one more paper that is AGW fantasy BS..
 
Last edited:
The Oceans are Warming Faster than Previously Thought; Rate of Heat Build-up Accelerating
So we keep hearing this phrase in the sciences — faster than we thought. In the context of global warming, it’s not a phrase we want to hear. And when the world’s largest heat sink — the oceans — are warming up faster than we thought, that’s kind of a big deal.

******

According to new research published today in Science Advances, the world’s oceans are warming up at an overall rate that is 13% faster than previously thought. Study authors used a new methodology to gain a more refined picture of overall ocean warming. And the results were unfortunately stark. For in addition to the oceans having gained more heat, the study also found that the rate of ocean warming is accelerating.



(Total ocean heat gain in the top 2000 meters as found in Improved estimates of ocean heat content from 1960 to 2015.)

The American taliban ignores the reality of it but it just keeps on proving them as idiots!

Lets tear apart Robert Scribbler's work or should I say fantasy.. Lets start with the graph you posted up from his site:
upload_2017-3-12_11-37-26.png

In violation of the laws of physics and the laws of thermal conduction across thermolines it is NEVER equally distributed due to mass, depth, and salinity.. EVER! Your own graph shows this with their fantasy projection on the end..

The paper and his work are pure conjecture. Another Hokey Schtick..
 
Last edited:
^ If you look at that graph and squint your eyes, it looks like monster eyes. But on the topic, no one really knows what the Earths climate is going to do long range, because the data set we use to come to premature conclusions is far far too limited to conclude from. One can only hope they are still recording factual data for the future.
 
^ If you look at that graph and squint your eyes, it looks like monster eyes. But on the topic, no one really knows what the Earths climate is going to do long range, because the data set we use to come to premature conclusions is far far too limited to conclude from. One can only hope they are still recording factual data for the future.
It never ceases to amaze me how many times they try this parlor trick.
 

Forum List

Back
Top