The Midwest Blizzard Superstorm, Al Gore's "Global Winter 3.0" ? Caused By Warming ?

[bripat9643]

Once I posted to an article about higher levels of evaporation due to more energy entering the rain and snow cycles. One right wingers wrote about that "WILD" liberal theory of "evaporation".

Isn't that hilarious. Some right wingers believing "evaporation" is a "wild liberal theory"?

"Evaporation" is just the latest warmist incantation to scare away contradictory facts like blizzards and record cold temperatures.

 

[Old Rocks]

Pattycake, you are an poster child for willfull ignorance and stupidity.

 

[Old Rocks]

Ah yes, that pinko Commie, Joseph Fourier was looking ahead to dissing the Teabaggers and other true blue patriots when he published his observations concerning the albedo and radiation from the surface of the Earth. He concluded that something in the atmosphere was absorbing the reflected and re-radiated energy. Otherwise the oceans would be frozen nearly to the equator. Obviously a Marxist dupe.

Then there was that guy, Tyndall. Obviously a pinko dupe with his spectrascopes. I mean what else could you extpect of one of those British Socialists in 1858? And then the Swede, Arnnhenius, quantifying the effects of GHGs. One of them there Swedish Socialists for sure.

Lordy, lordy, you 'Conservatives' are such a fucked up stupid bunch, it is hard to understand how you survive the normal day to day decisions in life;

 

[Old Rocks]

Obviously Global Warming alarmism is a far Left Socialist political movement. I don't see how anyone can deny that. Like i said earlier,if it wasn't about politics why do all the Global Warming Alarmists post their Global Warming threads in the Politics section of this Board? They usually have to be moved like this one was. It's all Politics now. Can't even trust Scientists anymore. What a shame.

Hey Pauly, how come not a single Scientific Society, not a single National Academy of Science, not a single major University has disagreed with the fact of AGW.

You are rapidly revealing yourself to be very ignorant, a little sheep parroting talking points. Here is the history of the investigation of GHGs. From the American Institute of Physics, not an obeses drug addict.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

 

[bripat9643]

Pattycake, you are an poster child for willfull ignorance and stupidity.

translation: I don't swallow left-wing horseshit.

 

[bripat9643]

Ah yes, that pinko Commie, Joseph Fourier was looking ahead to dissing the Teabaggers and other true blue patriots when he published his observations concerning the albedo and radiation from the surface of the Earth. He concluded that something in the atmosphere was absorbing the reflected and re-radiated energy. Otherwise the oceans would be frozen nearly to the equator. Obviously a Marxist dupe.

When did he state that man was causing the earth to warm? Oh, yeah . . . . he didn't.

Then there was that guy, Tyndall. Obviously a pinko dupe with his spectrascopes. I mean what else could you extpect of one of those British Socialists in 1858? And then the Swede, Arnnhenius, quantifying the effects of GHGs. One of them there Swedish Socialists for sure.

When did either one of them state that man was causing the earth to warm? Oh, yeah . . . . they didn't.

Lordy, lordy, you 'Conservatives' are such a fucked up stupid bunch, it is hard to understand how you survive the normal day to day decisions in life;

"Fucked up" means you don't leap to conclusions about complex natural phenomena based on a couple of theorems. Apparently only gullible drones who believe whatever they are fed by propagandists on the government payroll aren't "fucked up."

 

[bripat9643]

Obviously Global Warming alarmism is a far Left Socialist political movement. I don't see how anyone can deny that. Like i said earlier,if it wasn't about politics why do all the Global Warming Alarmists post their Global Warming threads in the Politics section of this Board? They usually have to be moved like this one was. It's all Politics now. Can't even trust Scientists anymore. What a shame.

Hey Pauly, how come not a single Scientific Society, not a single National Academy of Science, not a single major University has disagreed with the fact of AGW.

Simple: They are all sucking on the government tit.

You are rapidly revealing yourself to be very ignorant, a little sheep parroting talking points. Here is the history of the investigation of GHGs. From the American Institute of Physics, not an obeses drug addict.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

We already know the whole sordid history of massaging the data, stifling skeptics and downright lying.

 

[konradv]

I don't see how you can say that being a newb to the topic. The fact that this is in 'Politics' is unusual and I don't feel making thre conclusion you did has any validity. If it's a political question, it's because the skeptics/deniers have been saying things like "Obviously Global Warming alarmism is a far Left Socialist political movement" since Day 1 and then hypocritically saying anyone challenging those statements has a political agenda.

Your definition of "making it political" means someone dared to question the abracadabra spewing from the warmist cult. The fact that no one is disputing something doesn't mean it isn't "political." When you use a claim to push an agenda, then it's political. The warmist cult members have been using the excuse of global warming to push socialism and huge tax increases on the developed countries from the start. The fact is undeniable.

What's undeniable is that you're willing to say anything, true or not.

 

[konradv]

Ah yes, that pinko Commie, Joseph Fourier was looking ahead to dissing the Teabaggers and other true blue patriots when he published his observations concerning the albedo and radiation from the surface of the Earth. He concluded that something in the atmosphere was absorbing the reflected and re-radiated energy. Otherwise the oceans would be frozen nearly to the equator. Obviously a Marxist dupe.

When did he state that man was causing the earth to warm? Oh, yeah . . . . he didn't.

Then there was that guy, Tyndall. Obviously a pinko dupe with his spectrascopes. I mean what else could you extpect of one of those British Socialists in 1858? And then the Swede, Arnnhenius, quantifying the effects of GHGs. One of them there Swedish Socialists for sure.

When did either one of them state that man was causing the earth to warm? Oh, yeah . . . . they didn't.

Lordy, lordy, you 'Conservatives' are such a fucked up stupid bunch, it is hard to understand how you survive the normal day to day decisions in life;

"Fucked up" means you don't leap to conclusions about complex natural phenomena based on a couple of theorems. Apparently only gullible drones who believe whatever they are fed by propagandists on the government payroll aren't "fucked up."

Where's the CO2 coming from, if not for man? Wy can't you deal with that question?

 

[Old Rocks]

Ah yes, that pinko Commie, Joseph Fourier was looking ahead to dissing the Teabaggers and other true blue patriots when he published his observations concerning the albedo and radiation from the surface of the Earth. He concluded that something in the atmosphere was absorbing the reflected and re-radiated energy. Otherwise the oceans would be frozen nearly to the equator. Obviously a Marxist dupe.

When did he state that man was causing the earth to warm? Oh, yeah . . . . he didn't.

Then there was that guy, Tyndall. Obviously a pinko dupe with his spectrascopes. I mean what else could you extpect of one of those British Socialists in 1858? And then the Swede, Arnnhenius, quantifying the effects of GHGs. One of them there Swedish Socialists for sure.

When did either one of them state that man was causing the earth to warm? Oh, yeah . . . . they didn't.

Lordy, lordy, you 'Conservatives' are such a fucked up stupid bunch, it is hard to understand how you survive the normal day to day decisions in life;

"Fucked up" means you don't leap to conclusions about complex natural phenomena based on a couple of theorems. Apparently only gullible drones who believe whatever they are fed by propagandists on the government payroll aren't "fucked up."

You fucking dummy. Arrnhenious made very definate predictions concerning how much the earth would heat up from the doubling of CO2.

Pattycake, you are one ignorant puke.

 

[skookerasbil]

Ah yes, that pinko Commie, Joseph Fourier was looking ahead to dissing the Teabaggers and other true blue patriots when he published his observations concerning the albedo and radiation from the surface of the Earth. He concluded that something in the atmosphere was absorbing the reflected and re-radiated energy. Otherwise the oceans would be frozen nearly to the equator. Obviously a Marxist dupe.

When did he state that man was causing the earth to warm? Oh, yeah . . . . he didn't.



When did either one of them state that man was causing the earth to warm? Oh, yeah . . . . they didn't.

Lordy, lordy, you 'Conservatives' are such a fucked up stupid bunch, it is hard to understand how you survive the normal day to day decisions in life;

"Fucked up" means you don't leap to conclusions about complex natural phenomena based on a couple of theorems. Apparently only gullible drones who believe whatever they are fed by propagandists on the government payroll aren't "fucked up."

Where's the CO2 coming from, if not for man? Wy can't you deal with that question?

LOL.......s0n..........its 2011. You might as well be a naked man standing in the middle of the Siberian tundra screaming, "FIRE!!". Thats how tuned in the public is to the question of "Where is CO2 coming from?". Go check any poll on issues Americans are concerned about. It doesnt even rate top 15 material...............yet still the nutters knock themselves out fighting a battle that has been decidedly lost in the court of public opinion and thankfully, thats all that matters. Indeed.......as soon as the public took a closer look at what the alarmists agenda would cost them, they couldnt have run away fast enough..........not to mention, the hyper-exuberance of the alarmist k00ks led to them going to the well far too many times with the scare tactics. This is so typical of the far left over the decades..........they fcukk everything up in the end because they just cant help themselves from telling the rest of the world how it should live.


And frankly..........fcukk them......... Im nothing less than thrilled that these "Climate Summits" have become meetings for irrelevant OCD oddballs with severe social deficits!! Even groups on the far left are beyond pissed that they have made zero progress on their stated agenda...........all of which means...........the OCD climate bomb throwers are losing in epic fashion.

My wallet is very thankful s0ns!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Old Rocks]

Pattycake, you are an poster child for willfull ignorance and stupidity.

translation: I don't swallow left-wing horseshit.

Translation, you flap yap and have zero knowledge on the subject.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

2011. Started with a very strong La Nina. Low total solar irradiance. Went to a neutral ENSO state in the summer, then back into a weak La Nina for the rest of this year. Yet, with all of that, it will come in at 11th to 9th warmest on record. Not 11th to 9th coldest, but 11th to 9th warmest.

You silly asses continue to be full of shit. You are willfully ignorant, and proud of it.

Show us one repeatable experiment that demonstrates how a 100PPM increase in CO2 raises temperature, acidifies the oceans and does ANY of the things you allege.

Then show us how the incremental increases cause any of that, was it the last 2PPM CO2?

Id send all you lying EnviroMarxists Fuckers to North Korea to live the carbon footprint of your dreams

 

[Old Rocks]

Been done. Many times this Earth has experianced rapid rises in the GHGs, CO2 and CH4. And that is what happened, rapid warming and an ocean that increased in acidity enough to kill many of the species there.

NOAA Paleoclimatology Program - Perspective on Abrupt climate Change

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Been done. Many times this Earth has experianced rapid rises in the GHGs, CO2 and CH4. And that is what happened, rapid warming and an ocean that increased in acidity enough to kill many of the species there.

NOAA Paleoclimatology Program - Perspective on Abrupt climate Change

Do the words "repeatable experiment" mean anything at all to you?

Oh now we add "Abrupt Climate change" to the mix

 

[konradv]

Where's the CO2 coming from, if not for man? Wy can't you deal with that question?

LOL.......s0n..........its 2011. You might as well be a naked man standing in the middle of the Siberian tundra screaming, "FIRE!!". Thats how tuned in the public is to the question of "Where is CO2 coming from?"

All the more reason to keep talking about it, right? Are you saying minorities should just shut up? The fact that many don't care, doesn't mean squat with regard to the central questions.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Been done. Many times this Earth has experianced rapid rises in the GHGs, CO2 and CH4. And that is what happened, rapid warming and an ocean that increased in acidity enough to kill many of the species there.

NOAA Paleoclimatology Program - Perspective on Abrupt climate Change

But without real scientific experiments all you have is phrenology, astrology, AGW and alchemy

 

[konradv]

Been done. Many times this Earth has experianced rapid rises in the GHGs, CO2 and CH4. And that is what happened, rapid warming and an ocean that increased in acidity enough to kill many of the species there.

NOAA Paleoclimatology Program - Perspective on Abrupt climate Change

Do the words "repeatable experiment" mean anything at all to you?

Oh now we add "Abrupt Climate change" to the mix

Repeatable experiment: Frank posting and hoping it makes sense this time!

Adrupt Climate Change: When Frank comes home after a night out with the boys.

 

[IanC]

Where's the CO2 coming from, if not for man? Wy can't you deal with that question?

LOL.......s0n..........its 2011. You might as well be a naked man standing in the middle of the Siberian tundra screaming, "FIRE!!". Thats how tuned in the public is to the question of "Where is CO2 coming from?"

All the more reason to keep talking about it, right? Are you saying minorities should just shut up? The fact that many don't care, doesn't mean squat with regard to the central questions.

seems to me that it was the CAGW sceptics that were in the minority when 'The Inconvenient Truth' was being force fed to school children and the mantra of 'settled science' and 'concensus' was being broadcast over the media worldwide. the only people that have been told to 'shut up', and in no uncertain terms, is the sceptics.

now that the public has realized that the emperor is naked, they understandably have turned away from a fruitless and exspensive self imposed wealth redistribution system that offered little results for great amounts of money. windmills and electric cars are just for show by those that can afford it. sailboats may get their power for free but that is the only thing about them that is cheap, and I wouldnt want to pull a log boom with one.

 

[daveman]

Once I posted to an article about higher levels of evaporation due to more energy entering the rain and snow cycles. One right wingers wrote about that "WILD" liberal theory of "evaporation".

Isn't that hilarious. Some right wingers believing "evaporation" is a "wild liberal theory"?

Then you shouldn't have any trouble linking a rightwinger saying that.

Pony up. Now.