The Midwest Blizzard Superstorm, Al Gore's "Global Winter 3.0" ? Caused By Warming ?

[konradv]

Also,Global Warming is not necessarily bad. Now pollution on the other hand? Stopping pollution is a very worthy cause to get behind. Global Warming will hardly be the end of us.

Not to us in this generation, but if it's not talked about, like other things, it can be ignored until it's too late. Estimates I've seen show that substantially more than half the world's population could be effected by sea rise, because of large populations that live near seas, major rivers and low lying parts of continents, like the Midwest.

 

[daveman]

Cowards only put up one side of the story. Who's bankrolling the skeptics/deniers?

Cowards put up only one side of the story?

Oh, then you can link for me where you posted where the AGW crowd is getting their money, then, right?

Oh, wait. You can't because you never have.

By your own ludicrous definition (if leftists couldn't redefine words, they'd never have an argument at all), you're a coward.

Quit your whining. You're the ones that only believe in natural cycles when it serves your purpose, talk about snowstorms when it's temps we're concerned with, ignore centuries old data on how GHGs work, call everyone socialists and then say the proponents are being poltical, etc., etc., etc. Maybe cowardice isn't the word for your position, "intellectual dishonesty" works better. Everyone knows where the academics' money comes from, that's a matter of public record. Care to be "intellectually honest" about where the other side gets theirs and how much they're getting in comparison, taking into consideration that most of the scientists' money goes to doing experiments, while the other side just stuffs the money in their pockets?!?!

Oooh, you turn into a little bitch when your own standards are applied to you, don't you?

You really are driven by nothing but emotion.

 

[daveman]

Also,Global Warming is not necessarily bad. Now pollution on the other hand? Stopping pollution is a very worthy cause to get behind. Global Warming will hardly be the end of us.

Not to us in this generation, but if it's not talked about, like other things, it can be ignored until it's too late. Estimates I've seen show that substantially more than half the world's population could be effected by sea rise, because of large populations that live near seas, major rivers and low lying parts of continents, like the Midwest.

That explains why the Patron Saint of Global Warming bought a beach house.

 

[bripat9643]

It's not in our interest to fund propaganda and psuedo-science. The taxpayers pay the bills, but bureaucrats decide who gets the money, and only those "scientists" who produce the results that bureaucrats want get the money. If private money corrupts a scientist, then why doesn't government money corrupt equally well? Warmist cult members always run away when it comes to answering that question.

Sorry, we've been "running away", but I assumed you understood how the money is distributed. Bureaucrats don't decide who gets it, their fellow working scientists do.

You mean the scientists who have prevented skeptics from getting published in scientific journals make the decision? Yeah, that sure gives one confidence in the honesty of the process.

Furthermore, that's wrong. Government employees make the ultimate decision.

The "running away" charge works both ways. Why do the skeptics/deniers keep running away from revealing who's funding the other side, what they're doing for the money and how much is spent? The amount scientists on grants get, is a matter of public record and must be spent on experiments, reasonable salaries and some travel. Not so for the other side!!! There's no evidence they ever do a single experiment for their money. Must be nice to get as much or more than the someone else and only have to talk about how bad their data is without ever having to present any proof of one's own!

Where the money comes from simply isn't a scientific issue. Warmist turds try to make it an issue because they haven't got the facts on their side. When you have no facts, attack your opponent. That trick is as old as the legal profession.

The evidence either stands or falls on its own merit. It doesn't matter who paid for it. Making an issue about the funding of the research the purest example of the ad hominem fallacy there is. However, if it wasn't for logical fallacies, liberals wouldn't have any arguments at all.

 

[bripat9643]

Not to us in this generation, but if it's not talked about, like other things, it can be ignored until it's too late. Estimates I've seen show that substantially more than half the world's population could be effected by sea rise, because of large populations that live near seas, major rivers and low lying parts of continents, like the Midwest.

That explains why the Patron Saint of Global Warming bought a beach house.

half the world's population would be affected only if you accept Algore's idiotic claim that sea level will rise 20 ft. The IPCC's maximum projected rise is only 18 inches over the next 100 years. That might require you to move your beach blanket and umbrella a few feet inland.

 

[daveman]

Not to us in this generation, but if it's not talked about, like other things, it can be ignored until it's too late. Estimates I've seen show that substantially more than half the world's population could be effected by sea rise, because of large populations that live near seas, major rivers and low lying parts of continents, like the Midwest.

That explains why the Patron Saint of Global Warming bought a beach house.

half the world's population would be affected only if you accept Algore's idiotic claim that sea level will rise 20 ft. The IPCC's maximum projected rise is only 18 inches over the next 100 years. That might require you to move your beach blanket and umbrella a few feet inland.

You mean, the left is relying on fear-mongering? Gasp! I thought only conservatives did that.

 

[paulitician]

Also,Global Warming is not necessarily bad. Now pollution on the other hand? Stopping pollution is a very worthy cause to get behind. Global Warming will hardly be the end of us.

Not to us in this generation, but if it's not talked about, like other things, it can be ignored until it's too late. Estimates I've seen show that substantially more than half the world's population could be effected by sea rise, because of large populations that live near seas, major rivers and low lying parts of continents, like the Midwest.

Living so close to water is and always has been a bad idea. But humans never learn. They like to be near water. I suggest not living so close to major bodies of water. But Global Warming really wont be the end of us. Now pollution on the other hand? We all need to get behind getting it under control. Pollution is a very very serious problem.

 

[Old Rocks]

Not to us in this generation, but if it's not talked about, like other things, it can be ignored until it's too late. Estimates I've seen show that substantially more than half the world's population could be effected by sea rise, because of large populations that live near seas, major rivers and low lying parts of continents, like the Midwest.

That explains why the Patron Saint of Global Warming bought a beach house.

half the world's population would be affected only if you accept Algore's idiotic claim that sea level will rise 20 ft. The IPCC's maximum projected rise is only 18 inches over the next 100 years. That might require you to move your beach blanket and umbrella a few feet inland.

Again, what a dumb fuck you are, Pattycake. Gore claim was the rise due to the melt of the Greenland Cap, and had no time period attached to it.

On the other hand, the present rate of rise makes the IPCC estimate look a bit low. And this summers methane emissions looks to be the precursor of something that would make the present 'alarmists' look like the most opitimistic of Pollyannas in retorspect.

But that involves real science, and is something of which you have not a clue, Pattycake.

 

[Old Rocks]

Also,Global Warming is not necessarily bad. Now pollution on the other hand? Stopping pollution is a very worthy cause to get behind. Global Warming will hardly be the end of us.

Not to us in this generation, but if it's not talked about, like other things, it can be ignored until it's too late. Estimates I've seen show that substantially more than half the world's population could be effected by sea rise, because of large populations that live near seas, major rivers and low lying parts of continents, like the Midwest.

Living so close to water is and always has been a bad idea. But humans never learn. They like to be near water. I suggest not living so close to major bodies of water. But Global Warming really wont be the end of us. Now pollution on the other hand? We all need to get behind getting it under control. Pollution is a very very serious problem.

Have you any understanding at all of the science behind AGW? Have you even bothered ever to read the history of that science?

 

[Sunshine]

Be it man or Mother Nature, my arthritis thanks whomever is responsible for global warming!