The Midwest Blizzard Superstorm, Al Gore's "Global Winter 3.0" ? Caused By Warming ?

If the Global Warming issue isn't about Politics,why do most posters on this subject post on it in the Politics section of this Board? The reality is,this is all about Politics now. Very little real science involved anymore. It's a Socialist Globalist Movement. Look at who the people are who are always pushing Global Warming? Once you find that out,you'll have all your answers. The earth warms,the Earth cools. So just chill out everyone. Life is just way too short to live everyday freaking out over Global Warming. Just get out and live life. You're really not here very long.

Really, really stupid. Science has been studying this since the 1820's. The basic cause for the GHGs warming the earth was published by Tyndall in 1861. Nobody has disproved any of his work on the absorption bands of the GHGs.

Arnnhenious of Sweden quantified the effects in 1896. And the work since has been on recording the rather obvouis effects of global warming. And trying to get a handle on a model that will give us an accurate prediction of what the expect and when.

You want to put this all to politics, it is you and the rest of the lying deniers that are playing politics with a scientific subject. There is not a Scientific Society in the world that denies the validity of AGW. Not a National Academy of Science, not a single major University.

After reading this demonstration of willfull ignorance on your part, I cannot give any credulance to anything that you post.
It's funny when people who pretend to be smart say stupid things.

credulance
The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search bar above.

credence
clairaudience
Coeur d'Alene
cardinalate
creatinine
chlordane
credulous

After reading this demonstration of willfull ignorance on your part, I cannot give any credulosityness to anything that you post. :rofl:
 
If the Global Warming issue isn't about Politics,why do most posters on this subject post on it in the Politics section of this Board? The reality is,this is all about Politics now. Very little real science involved anymore. It's a Socialist Globalist Movement. Look at who the people are who are always pushing Global Warming? Once you find that out,you'll have all your answers. The earth warms,the Earth cools. So just chill out everyone. Life is just way too short to live everyday freaking out over Global Warming. Just get out and live life. You're really not here very long.

Really, really stupid. Science has been studying this since the 1820's. The basic cause for the GHGs warming the earth was published by Tyndall in 1861. Nobody has disproved any of his work on the absorption bands of the GHGs.

Arnnhenious of Sweden quantified the effects in 1896. And the work since has been on recording the rather obvouis effects of global warming. And trying to get a handle on a model that will give us an accurate prediction of what the expect and when.

You want to put this all to politics, it is you and the rest of the lying deniers that are playing politics with a scientific subject. There is not a Scientific Society in the world that denies the validity of AGW. Not a National Academy of Science, not a single major University.

After reading this demonstration of willfull ignorance on your part, I cannot give any credulance to anything that you post.
It's funny when people who pretend to be smart say stupid things.

credulance
The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search bar above.

credence
clairaudience
Coeur d'Alene
cardinalate
creatinine
chlordane
credulous

After reading this demonstration of willfull ignorance on your part, I cannot give any credulosityness to anything that you post. :rofl:

:lol: Loon Neg-Repped me. It's funny though. Thanks for the laugh.
 
Really, really stupid. Science has been studying this since the 1820's. The basic cause for the GHGs warming the earth was published by Tyndall in 1861. Nobody has disproved any of his work on the absorption bands of the GHGs.

Arnnhenious of Sweden quantified the effects in 1896. And the work since has been on recording the rather obvouis effects of global warming. And trying to get a handle on a model that will give us an accurate prediction of what the expect and when.

You want to put this all to politics, it is you and the rest of the lying deniers that are playing politics with a scientific subject. There is not a Scientific Society in the world that denies the validity of AGW. Not a National Academy of Science, not a single major University.

After reading this demonstration of willfull ignorance on your part, I cannot give any credulance to anything that you post.
It's funny when people who pretend to be smart say stupid things.

credulance
The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search bar above.

credence
clairaudience
Coeur d'Alene
cardinalate
creatinine
chlordane
credulous

After reading this demonstration of willfull ignorance on your part, I cannot give any credulosityness to anything that you post. :rofl:

:lol: Loon Neg-Repped me. It's funny though. Thanks for the laugh.
Thanks. Yeah, Roxy is a pretty emotional short. Long on "We're all gonna DIE!!" hysterics, short on logic. Y' know -- typical leftist.
 
The committed warmer scientists will come up with some kind of theory that fits in with the alarmist model.:D:D:D


But thats ok because....................



NOBODY CARES ABOUT THE SCIENCE
 
Last edited:
It's funny when people who pretend to be smart say stupid things.

credulance
The word you've entered isn't in the dictionary. Click on a spelling suggestion below or try again using the search bar above.

credence
clairaudience
Coeur d'Alene
cardinalate
creatinine
chlordane
credulous

After reading this demonstration of willfull ignorance on your part, I cannot give any credulosityness to anything that you post. :rofl:

I neg repped Old Rocks for being a stupid asshole. Too bad I can't do that to everything he posts.
 
If the Global Warming issue isn't about Politics,why do most posters on this subject post on it in the Politics section of this Board? The reality is,this is all about Politics now. Very little real science involved anymore. It's a Socialist Globalist Movement. Look at who the people are who are always pushing Global Warming? Once you find that out,you'll have all your answers. The earth warms,the Earth cools. So just chill out everyone. Life is just way too short to live everyday freaking out over Global Warming. Just get out and live life. You're really not here very long.

It's about politics because the skeptics/deniers have made it so. The so-called "Climategate" emails were at least partially a response to that. The other side then quite hypocritically acted as if AGW proponents started it all. You're right, it is politics now, wrong about why.
 
If the Global Warming issue isn't about Politics,why do most posters on this subject post on it in the Politics section of this Board? The reality is,this is all about Politics now. Very little real science involved anymore. It's a Socialist Globalist Movement. Look at who the people are who are always pushing Global Warming? Once you find that out,you'll have all your answers. The earth warms,the Earth cools. So just chill out everyone. Life is just way too short to live everyday freaking out over Global Warming. Just get out and live life. You're really not here very long.

Really, really stupid. Science has been studying this since the 1820's. The basic cause for the GHGs warming the earth was published by Tyndall in 1861. Nobody has disproved any of his work on the absorption bands of the GHGs.

Arnnhenious of Sweden quantified the effects in 1896. And the work since has been on recording the rather obvouis effects of global warming. And trying to get a handle on a model that will give us an accurate prediction of what the expect and when.

You want to put this all to politics, it is you and the rest of the lying deniers that are playing politics with a scientific subject. There is not a Scientific Society in the world that denies the validity of AGW. Not a National Academy of Science, not a single major University.

After reading this demonstration of willfull ignorance on your part, I cannot give any credulance to anything that you post.


Self-preservation drives much in life in terms of motivation............

Most people grew up thinking that people who were drawn to science did it purely out of committment to discovery and research. I think the origninal group of scientists had good intentions.............felt they were onto something. Very honorable in my estimation.

What you realize is that everybody ends up trying to find a niche in life and some people are quite the entrepreneurs. A few decades ago, some purely brilliant people figured it'd be an almost foolproof idea to hijack the profoundly uncertain nature of the climate and assign certainties..........and heres the brilliant part..........based upon a genuine curiosity most people have with severe weather. In this manner, virtually every weather anomoly could be paired with the concept of "global warming", and the scientists knew there would be a new weather anomoly coming along virtually every single day. BRILLIANT!!!:rock: SERIOUSLY..........THESE PEOPLE WERE NOTHING SHORT OF BRILLIANT!!!!!!!!!! Indeed..........scare the fcukk out of people and get lots of government grants..............write lots of books.........go on the lecture tour. YOU GOT A CAREER s0ns!!!!!:eusa_clap: And everybody has to make a living:D:D. Its just like the folks who come up with 1,000 different diet idea's for people to spend money on. Knowing there are million to be easily duped and subsequently taken advantage of, you gotta give these people props. WHy should science be different? Think about it. Do we really think the field of science is 100% honorable? C'mon............wake up and smell the maple nut crunch.....we all gotta find a niche in life. Now....... ya gotta give guys like Al Gore credit. I dont at all hold it against him that he's been able to dupe many in a whole generation and make a billion off of it. Good for him.........he deserves every single penny.

As long as I am not forced to pay doubled electricity rates due to some hairbrain idea like Cap and Trade, God Bless these folks profiting off of warming alarmism. But make no mistake..........most of these people in this movement..........the ones driving it, are profiteers. Are they driving Ferarri's? Most likely not.........but everybody has to find a living and lets face it, most scientists are a bit challenged in the social skills area making it virtually impossible to work in the human services area's, or alot of other area's for that matter. ( anybody who doesnt get this is a tad short in the area of reasoned judgment and/or life experience). It is a matter of self-preservation in perpetuating the hoax........perfectly understandable to me.
 
Last edited:
If the Global Warming issue isn't about Politics,why do most posters on this subject post on it in the Politics section of this Board? The reality is,this is all about Politics now. Very little real science involved anymore. It's a Socialist Globalist Movement. Look at who the people are who are always pushing Global Warming? Once you find that out,you'll have all your answers. The earth warms,the Earth cools. So just chill out everyone. Life is just way too short to live everyday freaking out over Global Warming. Just get out and live life. You're really not here very long.

It's about politics because the skeptics/deniers have made it so. The so-called "Climategate" emails were at least partially a response to that. The other side then quite hypocritically acted as if AGW proponents started it all. You're right, it is politics now, wrong about why.
It's political because every single solution proposed to solve the "problem" is political, and involves massive wealth redistribution.
 
These right wingers. Always talking about things they know nothing about. Next, they'll be telling us science is a "faith" and evolution a "lie".

Oh......that's right......oops.
 
It's about politics because the skeptics/deniers have made it so. The so-called "Climategate" emails were at least partially a response to that. The other side then quite hypocritically acted as if AGW proponents started it all. You're right, it is politics now, wrong about why.

Wrong.

The warmist true believers obviously started it all. The whole thing is nothing but a huge con designed to delude the public into voting for massive tax increases and turning over massive control over the economy to the federal government. All the skeptics did is reveal the truth.

It has always been nothing but politics from the start. In fact, it's worse than politics. It's just a flat out lie.
 
It's about politics because the skeptics/deniers have made it so. The so-called "Climategate" emails were at least partially a response to that. The other side then quite hypocritically acted as if AGW proponents started it all. You're right, it is politics now, wrong about why.

Wrong.

The warmist true believers obviously started it all. The whole thing is nothing but a huge con designed to delude the public into voting for massive tax increases and turning over massive control over the economy to the federal government. All the skeptics did is reveal the truth.

It has always been nothing but politics from the start. In fact, it's worse than politics. It's just a flat out lie.

What's obvious about who started it? How could this have started out political? It didn't become political until the opponents started crying that cleaning things up would cost money. Then they started making any disagreements look like someone was lying. It's just hypocritical to think that the victims of this attack were the ones that started it. It's just more of the BIG LIE, that would have us believe that scientists were at the bottom of this, when REAL monied interests were bankrolling the opposition. "Follow the money", is a common theme here. I say it works both ways and we need to look more carefully at those with the deep pockets. They're the ones trying to protect their own pocketbooks, the earth be damned, NOT scientists.
 
These right wingers. Always talking about things they know nothing about. Next, they'll be telling us science is a "faith" and evolution a "lie".

Oh......that's right......oops.
Hey, I bet I can find a picture of a polluted Chinese river you can claim is in Texas. Will that make you feel better?
 
It's about politics because the skeptics/deniers have made it so. The so-called "Climategate" emails were at least partially a response to that. The other side then quite hypocritically acted as if AGW proponents started it all. You're right, it is politics now, wrong about why.

Wrong.

The warmist true believers obviously started it all. The whole thing is nothing but a huge con designed to delude the public into voting for massive tax increases and turning over massive control over the economy to the federal government. All the skeptics did is reveal the truth.

It has always been nothing but politics from the start. In fact, it's worse than politics. It's just a flat out lie.

What's obvious about who started it? How could this have started out political? It didn't become political until the opponents started crying that cleaning things up would cost money. Then they started making any disagreements look like someone was lying. It's just hypocritical to think that the victims of this attack were the ones that started it. It's just more of the BIG LIE, that would have us believe that scientists were at the bottom of this, when REAL monied interests were bankrolling the opposition. "Follow the money", is a common theme here. I say it works both ways and we need to look more carefully at those with the deep pockets. They're the ones trying to protect their own pocketbooks, the earth be damned, NOT scientists.

Yes, let's follow the money.
Well, in situations like this... I like to follow the money. Who has the most to lose if Man Made Climate Change is the reality?

Those of you on the right... Use your critical thinking skills. Your side has blamed "libruls" and Obama for a hell of a lot less damning evidence. Oh that's right... You only have Critical thinking skills when it comes to "gubmint".
Yeah, let's follow the money, shall we?

Remarks at opening of Climate Vulnerable Forum
In Durban I expect that countries will make the clarification on the future of the Kyoto Protocol. They have to launch the Green Climate Fund and they have to have a clarification on the short term and longer term climate change financing, as President Figueres has just said. There was a 30 billion dollar promise in Copenhagen. We have identified only 27 billion dollars. We have to make it happen and we have to have clear understanding and agreement on how the developed world will generate 100 billion dollars per year by 2020. That was a promise made in Copenhagen three years ago.​

Last year more than $28 billion was traded worldwide in carbon credits*-*Carbon Currency Foundation - English

NASA Scientist Accused Of Using Celeb Status Among Environmental Groups To Enrich Himself | Fox News

Funny how you cultists never seem to want to follow that money, innit?
 
Obviously Global Warming alarmism is a far Left Socialist political movement. I don't see how anyone can deny that. Like i said earlier,if it wasn't about politics why do all the Global Warming Alarmists post their Global Warming threads in the Politics section of this Board? They usually have to be moved like this one was. It's all Politics now. Can't even trust Scientists anymore. What a shame.
 
Once I posted to an article about higher levels of evaporation due to more energy entering the rain and snow cycles. One right wingers wrote about that "WILD" liberal theory of "evaporation".

Isn't that hilarious. Some right wingers believing "evaporation" is a "wild liberal theory"?
 
Obviously Global Warming alarmism is a far Left Socialist political movement. I don't see how anyone can deny that. Like i said earlier,if it wasn't about politics why do all the Global Warming Alarmists post their Global Warming threads in the Politics section of this Board? They usually have to be moved like this one was. It's all Politics now. Can't even trust Scientists anymore. What a shame.

I don't see how you can say that being a newb to the topic. The fact that this is in 'Politics' is unusual and I don't feel making thre conclusion you did has any validity. If it's a political question, it's because the skeptics/deniers have been saying things like "Obviously Global Warming alarmism is a far Left Socialist political movement" since Day 1 and then hypocritically saying anyone challenging those statements has a political agenda.
 
Once I posted to an article about higher levels of evaporation due to more energy entering the rain and snow cycles. One right wingers wrote about that "WILD" liberal theory of "evaporation".

Isn't that hilarious. Some right wingers believing "evaporation" is a "wild liberal theory"?


Yup......the "right wingers" that are decimating the left on the issue of the future of energy........its not even a debate anymore. Nobody cares about "evaporation" anymore or any of the other wild assertions by the alarmists.


Heres a recent article by two hyper-stop the global warming advocates. Read it closely. These assholes know they are losing and are pissed that "justice is not being served". They are appalled at the lack of progress at the recent climate summit in South Africa.

Climate Justice - Desmond Tutu and Mary Robinson - Project Syndicate

Indeed.......Desmond Tutu is pisssed because he's not winning.


Like I said.........nobody fcukking cares about evaporation or any of this other alarmist shit anymore. And I couldnt be happier.:D


Write it down......the k00ks are going to have fracking rammed up their ass from sea to shining sea after next November.............FTMFW
 
Last edited:
I don't see how you can say that being a newb to the topic. The fact that this is in 'Politics' is unusual and I don't feel making thre conclusion you did has any validity. If it's a political question, it's because the skeptics/deniers have been saying things like "Obviously Global Warming alarmism is a far Left Socialist political movement" since Day 1 and then hypocritically saying anyone challenging those statements has a political agenda.

Your definition of "making it political" means someone dared to question the abracadabra spewing from the warmist cult. The fact that no one is disputing something doesn't mean it isn't "political." When you use a claim to push an agenda, then it's political. The warmist cult members have been using the excuse of global warming to push socialism and huge tax increases on the developed countries from the start. The fact is undeniable.
 

Forum List

Back
Top