The March for Science....explained by Andrew Klavan....he nails it...

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,834
52,098
2,290
Yep, the March for Science is really Orwell having a party....

 
Cliff Clavin said it better

# ” CLIFF: ” It’s a little known fact that smartest animal is a pig. Scientists say if pigs had thumbs and a language, they could be trained to do simple manual labor. They give you 20-30 years of loyal service and then at their retirement dinner you can eat them.
 
Yep, the March for Science is really Orwell having a party....



Yes , God created you and Noah really had a ark full of animals. Oh boy, one more science denier. Hey move to Mars, we can't trust there is no air there, just in case bring some 02 and a canteen. Science is for people that never took never took chemistry, microbiology, anatomy, physiology or algebra. They have read the Bible though, so they know everything they need to.
PS: Why is Oklahoma having so many earthquakes? Ask the nerd.
 
Yep, the March for Science is really Orwell having a party....


It sure is Orwellian with lots of Facism added in. If you disagree with them, you are anti science and worthy of silencing.

The really sad thing is the number of useful idiots that go along with the stupidity.
 
If you think science isn't worth doing then throw your computer in the trash, drive your car into the river and go find yourself a nice cave.

We'll be a third world country if you get your way and you think you're so much better then the taliban? lol....

Funny how you fight wars against them thinking you're better then turn around wishing you were them.
 
So how come the left says that we must believe in science when it comes to global warming as described by some scientists, but not believe in science when medical scientists say transgenderism is a mental illness?
 
If you think science isn't worth doing then throw your computer in the trash, drive your car into the river and go find yourself a nice cave.

We'll be a third world country if you get your way and you think you're so much better then the taliban? lol....

Funny how you fight wars against them thinking you're better then turn around wishing you were them.
Speaking of useful idiots.
 
And the name Gipper comes to mind. LOL

Did any of your assholes ever take in science in high school? Do any of you do anything more useful than flipping burgers? LOL
 
So how come the left says that we must believe in science when it comes to global warming as described by some scientists, but not believe in science when medical scientists say transgenderism is a mental illness?

Maybe because its not.
 
So how come the left says that we must believe in science when it comes to global warming as described by some scientists, but not believe in science when medical scientists say transgenderism is a mental illness?

Odd. The American Psychiatric Association doesn't say that at all. Answers to Your Questions About Transgender People, Gender Identity, and Gender Expression

Of course that is obvious when you consider gender reassignment surgery happens. They would not do the surgery if it was classified as a mental illness.

Just because you think so doesn't make it true.
 
And the name Gipper comes to mind. LOL

Did any of your assholes ever take in science in high school? Do any of you do anything more useful than flipping burgers? LOL
You have nothing in common with the political elites and the 1%. So, why do you allow them to dupe you repeatedly?
 
And the name Gipper comes to mind. LOL

Did any of your assholes ever take in science in high school? Do any of you do anything more useful than flipping burgers? LOL
You have nothing in common with the political elites and the 1%. So, why do you allow them to dupe you repeatedly?

So I should reject truth because I don't have something in common with the 1%. By that theory I should reject everything from philosophy to civil behavioral standards. Why limit myself to rejecting science?
 
So how come the left says that we must believe in science when it comes to global warming as described by some scientists, but not believe in science when medical scientists say transgenderism is a mental illness?

Maybe because its not.
With all due respect ma'am, it's not that we just disagree, what all of us cons really want is to go back to the wild wild west. Really.
 
And the name Gipper comes to mind. LOL

Did any of your assholes ever take in science in high school? Do any of you do anything more useful than flipping burgers? LOL
You have nothing in common with the political elites and the 1%. So, why do you allow them to dupe you repeatedly?

So I should reject truth because I don't have something in common with the 1%. By that theory I should reject everything from philosophy to civil behavioral standards. Why limit myself to rejecting science?
The problem is it is NOT Truth.

Clearly the man-made AGW movement is NOT science, it is politics....but dummies can't see it.
 
Last edited:
2i7agyx.jpg
 
Bill Nye the lying guy.


His show on Netflix.....from the parts I have heard from it....pretty disturbing....how long before we see this guy perp walked out of his home on some unpleasant criminal activity?
 
Bill Nye the lying guy.


His show on Netflix.....from the parts I have heard from it....pretty disturbing....how long before we see this guy perp walked out of his home on some unpleasant criminal activity?
It amazes me that Americans still buy into the AGW bullshit, even after so many predictions by the enviro whackos has been proven wrong....are they stupid?

PROOF!!!!!

18 Spectacularly Wrong Prophecies from the First Earth Day
Here are 18 examples of the spectacularly wrong predictions made around 1970 when the “green holy day” (aka Earth Day) started:

1. Harvard biologist George Wald estimated that “civilization will end within 15 or 30 years unless immediate action is taken against problems facing mankind.”

2. “We are in an environmental crisis which threatens the survival of this nation, and of the world as a suitable place of human habitation,” wrote Washington University biologist Barry Commoner in the Earth Day issue of the scholarly journal Environment.

3. The day after the first Earth Day, the New York Times editorial page warned, “Man must stop pollution and conserve his resources, not merely to enhance existence but to save the race from intolerable deterioration and possible extinction.”

4. “Population will inevitably and completely outstrip whatever small increases in food supplies we make,” Paul Ehrlich confidently declared in the April 1970 Mademoiselle. “The death rate will increase until at least 100-200 million people per year will be starving to death during the next ten years.”

5. “Most of the people who are going to die in the greatest cataclysm in the history of man have already been born,” wrote Paul Ehrlich in a 1969 essay titled “Eco-Catastrophe! “By…[1975] some experts feel that food shortages will have escalated the present level of world hunger and starvation into famines of unbelievable proportions. Other experts, more optimistic, think the ultimate food-population collision will not occur until the decade of the 1980s.”

6. Ehrlich sketched out his most alarmist scenario for the 1970 Earth Day issue of The Progressive, assuring readers that between 1980 and 1989, some 4 billion people, including 65 million Americans, would perish in the “Great Die-Off.”

7. “It is already too late to avoid mass starvation,” declared Denis Hayes, the chief organizer for Earth Day, in the Spring 1970 issue of The Living Wilderness.

8. Peter Gunter, a North Texas State University professor, wrote in 1970, “Demographers agree almost unanimously on the following grim timetable: by 1975 widespread famines will begin in India; these will spread by 1990 to include all of India, Pakistan, China and the Near East, Africa. By the year 2000, or conceivably sooner, South and Central America will exist under famine conditions….By the year 2000, thirty years from now, the entire world, with the exception of Western Europe, North America, and Australia, will be in famine.”

9. In January 1970, Life reported, “Scientists have solid experimental and theoretical evidence to support…the following predictions: In a decade, urban dwellers will have to wear gas masks to survive air pollution…by 1985 air pollution will have reduced the amount of sunlight reaching earth by one half….”

10. Ecologist Kenneth Watt told Time that, “At the present rate of nitrogen buildup, it’s only a matter of time before light will be filtered out of the atmosphere and none of our land will be usable.”

11. Barry Commoner predicted that decaying organic pollutants would use up all of the oxygen in America’s rivers, causing freshwater fish to suffocate.

12. Paul Ehrlich chimed in, predicting in 1970 that “air pollution…is certainly going to take hundreds of thousands of lives in the next few years alone.” Ehrlich sketched a scenario in which 200,000 Americans would die in 1973 during “smog disasters” in New York and Los Angeles.

13. Paul Ehrlich warned in the May 1970 issue of Audubon that DDT and other chlorinated hydrocarbons “may have substantially reduced the life expectancy of people born since 1945.” Ehrlich warned that Americans born since 1946…now had a life expectancy of only 49 years, and he predicted that if current patterns continued this expectancy would reach 42 years by 1980, when it might level out.

14. Ecologist Kenneth Watt declared, “By the year 2000, if present trends continue, we will be using up crude oil at such a rate…that there won’t be any more crude oil. You’ll drive up to the pump and say, `Fill ‘er up, buddy,’ and he’ll say, `I am very sorry, there isn’t any.'”

15. Harrison Brown, a scientist at the National Academy of Sciences, published a chart in Scientific American that looked at metal reserves and estimated that humanity would totally run out of copper shortly after 2000. Lead, zinc, tin, gold, and silver would be gone before 1990.
16. Sen. Gaylord Nelson wrote in Look that, “Dr. S. Dillon Ripley, secretary of the Smithsonian Institute, believes that in 25 years, somewhere between 75 and 80 percent of all the species of living animals will be extinct.”

17. In 1975, Paul Ehrlich predicted that “since more than nine-tenths of the original tropical rainforests will be removed in most areas within the next 30 years or so, it is expected that half of the organisms in these areas will vanish with it.”

18. Kenneth Watt warned about a pending Ice Age in a speech. “The world has been chilling sharply for about twenty years,” he declared. “If present trends continue, the world will be about four degrees colder for the global mean temperature in 1990, but eleven degrees colder in the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us into an ice age.”

EconomicPolicyJournal.com: 18 Spectacularly Wrong Prophecies from the First Earth Day
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top