The human race

[katsteve2012]

You have only answered part 1. That's why you can't repeat or quote your answer to part 2. By evading part 2 though, you are endorsing having people all assigned to one convenient race, which means that you really ARE ok with stripping all of us of our racial identities, along with the cultural history and achievements associated with them. Yep, you endorse the racist "human race" concept by evading answering part 2.

You have only answered part 1. That's why you can't repeat or quote your answer to part 2. By evading part 2 though, you are endorsing having people all assigned to one convenient race, which means that you really ARE ok with stripping all of us of our racial identities, along with the cultural history and achievements associated with them. Yep, you endorse the racist "human race" concept by evading answering part 2.

ROFL!
After "Part 2", there will be a "Part 3, and a "Part 4, you will just keep making up new questions to replace your first one.

The "woke power structure" conspiracy exists only in your troubled mind.

You're not normal.

 

[EvMetro]

ROFL!
After "Part 2", there will be a "Part 3, and a "Part 4, you will just keep making up new questions to replace your first one.

The "woke power structure" conspiracy exists only in your troubled mind.

You're not normal.

I predicted you would have trouble with answering both parts way back in post 75:

"katsteve2012 is looking for a way to claim that he doesn't want to strip people of their racial identities, but he also wants to lump everybody into one convenient race called "the human race." This calls for some crazy spin, I can't wait to see this."

Here is post 86:

"You still haven't come up with the spin you are looking for that explains how you don't want to strip people of their racial identities while still lumping us all into one convenient race. The problem here is that if you are trying to lump us all into one convenient race, you strip us of our racial identities."

 

[katsteve2012]

I predicted you would have trouble with answering both parts way back in post 75:

"katsteve2012 is looking for a way to claim that he doesn't want to strip people of their racial identities, but he also wants to lump everybody into one convenient race called "the human race." This calls for some crazy spin, I can't wait to see this.

See post #238.

Post in thread 'The human race' The human race

 

[EvMetro]

See post #238

Still no answer to part 2. Your evasion endorses assigning people who have been stripped of their racial identities into the single convenient race model, better known as the "human race".

 

[katsteve2012]

Still no answer to part 2. Your evasion endorses assigning people who have been stripped of their racial identities into the single convenient race model, better known as the "human race".

Having no interest or concern about how people identify racially, is equivalent to not endorsing anything that changes their preference.

Now, reinvent the question again, to avoid explaining who is part of the "woke power structure" that lives inside of your head.

Do "they" speak to you often?

 

[EvMetro]

Having no interest or concern about how people identify racially, is equivalent to not endorsing anything that changes their preference

See post 75 below, including the last sentence.

"katsteve2012 is looking for a way to claim that he doesn't want to strip people of their racial identities, but he also wants to lump everybody into one convenient race called "the human race." This calls for some crazy spin, I can't wait to see this."

 

[EvMetro]

Having no interest or concern about how people identify

Lol, there is the woke "identify as" bullshit. You are looking to make the argument that if men can identify as women and win all the sports events, then it is ok for whites to identify as blacks, right? And it was ok for pocahontas to identify as American Indian, right?

This thread is specifically about the "human race." Do you endorse the human race concept, the pocahontas concept, or the US Census concept?

 

[katsteve2012]

See post 75 below, including the last sentence.

"katsteve2012 is looking for a way to claim that he doesn't want to strip people of their racial identities, but he also wants to lump everybody into one convenient race called "the human race." This calls for some crazy spin, I can't wait to see this."

Trying to come up with "Part 3" to your 2 Part question that's been answered already?

Are the "woke power structure" voices telling you what to ask next?

 

[katsteve2012]

Lol, there is the woke "identify as" bullshit. You are looking to make the argument that if men can identify as women and win all the sports events, then it is ok for whites to identify as blacks, right? And it was ok for pocahontas to identify as American Indian, right?

This thread is specifically about the "human race." Do you endorse the human race concept, the pocahontas concept, or the US Census concept?

Even you can't really be this bat shit crazy.

You must be joking.

You have put up numerous posts referring to "racial identity" and it being "stripped" from various races by the "woke power structure".

I have made it clear to you that I am not interested nor do I care how people "INDENTIFY".

That includes how they identify "RACIALLY".
We are assigned a birth certificate at birth that designates race, we have a U.S. census that tracks the population of each race, upon death, a person's death certificate indicates their race.


Obviously race is assigned at birth and cannot be "stripped away"......by anyone.

Including the imaginary "woke power structure" that has obviously converted you into a conspiracy babbling loon.

Clear?

 

[Unkotare]

....a collective of big tech, big media, big billionaires, and big government.

Ah ~ so you're just a conspiracy nut. Why not take your little act to the Conspiracy Forum?

 

[EvMetro]

Obviously race is assigned at birth and cannot be "stripped away"......by anyone.

I'm pretty sure you are aware that this thread is not a debate about if race can or cannot be stripped away. Besides, you already claimed that you do not "want" to see us stripped of our races, as I asked in part 1. You STILL have not figured out a way to claim that you don't "want" to see us stripped of our races as you continue to defend the one convenient race concept known as the "human race".

There have been three possible ways to recognize race presented in this thread so far.

1. Identifying "as", like lefty male athletes identify as women and win all the woman's sports.

2. The "human race", which is one convenient race consisting of all races who are stripped of our races, where we pretend to not see the difference between Asians and Blacks.

3. As the five races the US Census recognizes, black, white, Pacific Islander, American Indian, Asian

Which one of these three concepts is yours?

 

[BackAgain]

The human race …​

WINS BY A NOSE!

 

[EvMetro]

The human race …​

WINS BY A NOSE!

Indeed, it is breath-taking how so many folks on this site can be so set in their racist ways. Even the forum administrators are for stripping us of our racial identities, along with the cultural history and achievements associated with them. In the past, forum staff used to crack down on racists. Now they ARE the racists, and they censor those who are the most vocal against racism. The racist history of Democrats is repeating itself the way history does. The racist Democrats who wore the white robes decades ago knew they were right, just like the "human race" supporters know it today. True racism runs deep in the soul.

 

[katsteve2012]

I'm pretty sure you are aware that this thread is not a debate about if race can or cannot be stripped away. Besides, you already claimed that you do not "want" to see us stripped of our races, as I asked in part 1. You STILL have not figured out a way to claim that you don't "want" to see us stripped of our races as you continue to defend the one convenient race concept known as the "human race".

There have been three possible ways to recognize race presented in this thread so far.

1. Identifying "as", like lefty male athletes identify as women and win all the woman's sports.

2. The "human race", which is one convenient race consisting of all races who are stripped of our races, where we pretend to not see the difference between Asians and Blacks.

3. As the five races the US Census recognizes, black, white, Pacific Islander, American Indian, Asian

Which one of these three concepts is yours?

None of your crackpot "concepts" are mine, but as opposed to fabricating new ways to ask the same stupid question over and over, try paying attention to your own thread.

Which one of your "concepts" did I refer to as how race is "defined"?

The Census.

Pay attention.

 

[Vastator]

Can bacteria, and viruses be racist? Yes. Or No
..

 

[EvMetro]

Can bacteria, and viruses be racist? Yes. Or No
..

You should start a thread about that. If you post that Asian ACE 2 receptors make it easier for Asians to get Sars cov 2 on this thread, lefty racists will have a new way to dodge the opening post.

 

[braalian]

we all know the difference between black people, white people, Asian people etc. and the cultural differences that come along with them. Pretending those difference don’t matter and we’re all just humans is naive.

But the problem with “race” is that it’s an attempt to apply biological/scientific standards to an idea that’s strictly a social construct.

The rules for who belongs to which race are capricious and vary based on when and who’s making the rules.

The US Latinos were widely considered white until relatively recently. Part of the reason the Ricky/Lucy sitcom marriage was so easily accepted back in the 1950s was because many Americans back then didn’t consider it much different than Lucy marrying, say, a Frenchman. Multicultural but not necessarily interracial.

South Africa added “Indian” to its apartheid race list because they came to consider south Asians as above blacks and colored but below whites and so had to create a niche for them.

Race can be a useful term for describing different cultures or ethnicities. But trying to make it into a scientific term based on biology is crackpot science, like phrenology.

​

 

[EvMetro]

we all know the difference between black people, white people, Asian people etc. and the cultural differences that come along with them. Pretending those difference don’t matter and we’re all just humans is naive.

But the problem with “race” is that it’s an attempt to apply biological/scientific standards to an idea that’s strictly a social construct.

The rules for who belongs to which race are capricious and vary based on when and who’s making the rules.

The US Latinos were widely considered white until relatively recently. Part of the reason the Ricky/Lucy sitcom marriage was so easily accepted back in the 1950s was because many Americans back then didn’t consider it much different than Lucy marrying, say, a Frenchman. Multicultural but not necessarily interracial.

South Africa added “Indian” to its apartheid race list because they came to consider south Asians as above blacks and colored but below whites and so had to create a niche for them.

Race can be a useful term for describing different cultures or ethnicities. But trying to make it into a scientific term based on biology is crackpot science, like phrenology.

​

What do you think about the single "human race" concept described in the opening post? Do you think we should be stripped of our racial identities, along with the associated cultural history and achievements? Obviously if we have a single convenient race, these things would be null, right?

 

[Unkotare]

The OP is seriously, deeply sick in the head.

 

[braalian]

What do you think about the single "human race" concept described in the opening post? Do you think we should be stripped of our racial identities, along with the associated cultural history and achievements? Obviously if we have a single convenient race, these things would be null, right?

These identities exist, but they are based on social constructs and historical differences. There is only one “human race”, and within it there’s many different cultures and ethnicities. These ethnicities can continue to be proud of their culture, history and achievements. And, yes, some ethnicities have contributed more to the human race than others, it’s naive to pretend otherwise. But it’s all cultural differences, not really biological ones beyond the obvious cosmetic differences.