Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Interesting. I wonder if there are any measurements of the isostaticy involved in the earlier ice loss?
http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/Asia_front_pgs.pdf
Measuring any isostasy in the Himalya would be problematic. The region is rising at around 1 inch per year due to oceanic plate/continental collision.
Repeating your bullshit and lies over and over won't magically make them come true, LaDumbshit.Thanks for the latest FUDGE chart overdose.
Meanwhile, 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica keeps growing, and Crick's pals lost on that issue in Court in 2007, and were TOO CHICKEN to appeal...
But, unfortunately for a parrot, being proven wrong comes easily, doesn't it...
You should know, LaDumbshit, since every bit of lying bullshit you have ever just made up yourself or copied from some fraudulent denier cult blog and posted here has been proved wrong
For a Himalayan comment, Old Rocks post from the first page, which I've reproduced below, is really overwhelming. This thread's OP is simply crap.
The Karakoram
The Karakoram is the one range where a mix of expansion and retreat is seen. The anomalous expansions are confined to the highest relief glaciers and appeared suddenly and sporadically (Hewitt, 2005). After decades of decline, glaciers in the highest parts of the central Karakoram expanded, advanced, and thickened in the late 1990s. Many of the largest glaciers in the Karakoram are still retreating, including the largest Baltoro, Panmah and Biafo Glacier, albeit slowly (Hewitt, 2011). Measurements indicate a possible mass-gain from 2002-2006 with a decrease thereafter (Bolch et al, 2012), (Cogley, 2012); the estimated contribution of the glaciers of the Karakoram to sea level rise is lower than previously suggested (Gardelle et al, 2012).
Looks as if the overall picture is one of increasing melt.
For a Himalayan comment, Old Rocks post from the first page, which I've reproduced below, is really overwhelming. This thread's OP is simply crap.
The Karakoram
The Karakoram is the one range where a mix of expansion and retreat is seen. The anomalous expansions are confined to the highest relief glaciers and appeared suddenly and sporadically (Hewitt, 2005). After decades of decline, glaciers in the highest parts of the central Karakoram expanded, advanced, and thickened in the late 1990s. Many of the largest glaciers in the Karakoram are still retreating, including the largest Baltoro, Panmah and Biafo Glacier, albeit slowly (Hewitt, 2011). Measurements indicate a possible mass-gain from 2002-2006 with a decrease thereafter (Bolch et al, 2012), (Cogley, 2012); the estimated contribution of the glaciers of the Karakoram to sea level rise is lower than previously suggested (Gardelle et al, 2012).
Looks as if the overall picture is one of increasing melt.
Virtually every glacier that is getting shorter is also getting thinner. I really don't know why Mr. Flacaltenn would make that comment. The USGS has many pictures of how the glaciers have receded, and in every case, you can see that not only has the glacier receded, it has also dramatically thinned.
Obviously......the Himalayan's don't count to the alarmists. Whats up what that dynamic with these people........its like they don't even acknowledge the original premise of the thread. Just conveniently ignored.........how is that not fascinating?!!
The knobby cucumber has been poking these folks in recent years........all this stuff going on that doesn't fit the established narrative. Ten years ago we were being told that the Himalayans would soon be ice free on its peaks. So......they change the subject like any good progressive does with fluency.
Know what that is?