The Himalayas and nearby peaks have lost no ice in past 10 years

Meanwhile, 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica has added at least 80 billion tons of ice every year since Algore first started lying about CO2...

so if 90% of Earth ice is growing, why are so many sub humans whining about melting???
 
Global_Glacier_Mass_Change.gif


image%25255B1%25255D.png


WGMS_glacier_mass_balance.gif
 
Thanks for the latest FUDGE chart overdose.

Meanwhile, 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica keeps growing, and Crick's pals lost on that issue in Court in 2007, and were TOO CHICKEN to appeal...
 
Thanks for the latest FUDGE chart overdose.

Meanwhile, 90% of Earth ice on Antarctica keeps growing, and Crick's pals lost on that issue in Court in 2007, and were TOO CHICKEN to appeal...
Repeating your bullshit and lies over and over won't magically make them come true, LaDumbshit.
 
But, unfortunately for a parrot, being proven wrong comes easily, doesn't it...

THE DATA - Antarctica adding at least 80 billion tons of ice every year

NASA Study: Mass Gains of Antarctic Ice Sheet Greater than Losses

The VERDICT = Algore LOST

Court Identifies Eleven Inaccuracies in Al Gore’s ‘An Inconvenient Truth’


  • The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting, the evidence was that it is in fact increasing.
  • The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 causes temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over that period the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2000 years.


Now, parrot, why didn't your side APPEAL if all the FUDGE you parrot is true????
 
But, unfortunately for a parrot, being proven wrong comes easily, doesn't it...

You should know, LaDumbshit, since every bit of lying bullshit you have ever just made up yourself or copied from some fraudulent denier cult blog and posted here has been proved wrong. Like Crick just did in post #42 to your moronic post #41.
 
For a Himalayan comment, Old Rocks post from the first page, which I've reproduced below, is really overwhelming. This thread's OP is simply crap.

Bolch2012Fig3C.jpg


The Karakoram
The Karakoram is the one range where a mix of expansion and retreat is seen. The anomalous expansions are confined to the highest relief glaciers and appeared suddenly and sporadically (Hewitt, 2005). After decades of decline, glaciers in the highest parts of the central Karakoram expanded, advanced, and thickened in the late 1990s. Many of the largest glaciers in the Karakoram are still retreating, including the largest Baltoro, Panmah and Biafo Glacier, albeit slowly (Hewitt, 2011). Measurements indicate a possible mass-gain from 2002-2006 with a decrease thereafter (Bolch et al, 2012), (Cogley, 2012); the estimated contribution of the glaciers of the Karakoram to sea level rise is lower than previously suggested (Gardelle et al, 2012).

Looks as if the overall picture is one of increasing melt.
 
Funny as hell....

All of Cricks so called evidence conveniently STOPS in 2003 as the now cooling trend began... Now why would a group of alarmists omit the current data which shows increase?

You cant debate a fool who is dead set in his position and ignores facts..
 
You should know, LaDumbshit, since every bit of lying bullshit you have ever just made up yourself or copied from some fraudulent denier cult blog and posted here has been proved wrong

"Proof" apparently means you got huffy and posted a bunch of 4 letter words....

Apparently, the warmer cult now denies there was a court case in 2007.... decide for yourself...

Google

Al Gore's 'nine Inconvenient Untruths'

U.K. Judge Rules Gore's Climate Film Has 9 Errors

BBC NEWS | UK | Education | Gore climate film's nine 'errors'


Now, just because the left wing liar side of the FRAUD in the media deliberately tried to hide a few of the 11 actual inconsistencies... the minor ones... like Antarctic ice growth... well, as I've said a zillion times here, they KNOW it is a FRAUD, and they KNOW that a ruling of Antarctic ice growth blows away the entire "the ice is melting" moronic parroting. They don't want that. The FRAUD was too CHICKEN to appeal, because the FRAUD prefers the friendly PRO FRAUD confines of the Israeli owned "US media..."
 
For a Himalayan comment, Old Rocks post from the first page, which I've reproduced below, is really overwhelming. This thread's OP is simply crap.

Bolch2012Fig3C.jpg


The Karakoram
The Karakoram is the one range where a mix of expansion and retreat is seen. The anomalous expansions are confined to the highest relief glaciers and appeared suddenly and sporadically (Hewitt, 2005). After decades of decline, glaciers in the highest parts of the central Karakoram expanded, advanced, and thickened in the late 1990s. Many of the largest glaciers in the Karakoram are still retreating, including the largest Baltoro, Panmah and Biafo Glacier, albeit slowly (Hewitt, 2011). Measurements indicate a possible mass-gain from 2002-2006 with a decrease thereafter (Bolch et al, 2012), (Cogley, 2012); the estimated contribution of the glaciers of the Karakoram to sea level rise is lower than previously suggested (Gardelle et al, 2012).

Looks as if the overall picture is one of increasing melt.

I see that Old Rocks' data goes to 2012 with accelerating melt in almost every case.
 
For a Himalayan comment, Old Rocks post from the first page, which I've reproduced below, is really overwhelming. This thread's OP is simply crap.

Bolch2012Fig3C.jpg


The Karakoram
The Karakoram is the one range where a mix of expansion and retreat is seen. The anomalous expansions are confined to the highest relief glaciers and appeared suddenly and sporadically (Hewitt, 2005). After decades of decline, glaciers in the highest parts of the central Karakoram expanded, advanced, and thickened in the late 1990s. Many of the largest glaciers in the Karakoram are still retreating, including the largest Baltoro, Panmah and Biafo Glacier, albeit slowly (Hewitt, 2011). Measurements indicate a possible mass-gain from 2002-2006 with a decrease thereafter (Bolch et al, 2012), (Cogley, 2012); the estimated contribution of the glaciers of the Karakoram to sea level rise is lower than previously suggested (Gardelle et al, 2012).

Looks as if the overall picture is one of increasing melt.

Hey Dumbo -- glacial EXTENT is not = total Ice Mass... This science stuff demands you pay attention to details..
 
Hey, Dumbo, do you have any data that supports the OP?

And what, exactly, are you envisioning here? All the world's glaciers are getting shorter but thicker?
 
Virtually every glacier that is getting shorter is also getting thinner. I really don't know why Mr. Flacaltenn would make that comment. The USGS has many pictures of how the glaciers have receded, and in every case, you can see that not only has the glacier receded, it has also dramatically thinned.
 
Obviously......the Himalayan's don't count to the alarmists. Whats up what that dynamic with these people........its like they don't even acknowledge the original premise of the thread. Just conveniently ignored.........how is that not fascinating?!!

The knobby cucumber has been poking these folks in recent years........all this stuff going on that doesn't fit the established narrative. Ten years ago we were being told that the Himalayans would soon be ice free on its peaks. So......they change the subject like any good progressive does with fluency.

Know what that is?


:gay::gay::gay::gay::bye1:
 
Virtually every glacier that is getting shorter is also getting thinner. I really don't know why Mr. Flacaltenn would make that comment. The USGS has many pictures of how the glaciers have receded, and in every case, you can see that not only has the glacier receded, it has also dramatically thinned.


Except, of course, that 90% of total Earth ice piece called Antarctica, which has added at least 80 billion tons of ice every year since Algore started lying about CO2...

Funny, how the "the ice is melting" crap gets outed by THE VERY FIRST DATA POINT to be checked...
 
Got it...

THE ICE IS MELTING.... never mind the 90% of Earth ice chunk on Antarctica that is GROWING...
 
Obviously......the Himalayan's don't count to the alarmists. Whats up what that dynamic with these people........its like they don't even acknowledge the original premise of the thread. Just conveniently ignored.........how is that not fascinating?!!

The knobby cucumber has been poking these folks in recent years........all this stuff going on that doesn't fit the established narrative. Ten years ago we were being told that the Himalayans would soon be ice free on its peaks. So......they change the subject like any good progressive does with fluency.

Know what that is?


:gay::gay::gay::gay::bye1:

Skook, where is the data showing no ice loss in the Himalayas?
 

Forum List

Back
Top