Loss of the Ice Mass in Antarctica. Increasing Sea Level Rise

No it's not you loser, it shows no data in the lower hemisphere In the 1900s which I have been saying for 10 years
You've been suckered, as you were intended to be suckered, into thinking that no daily recorded data means no data.


Then you don't know science how can you have no southern hemisphere data and just average northern average and call it a GLOBAL AVERAGE.



Then compare it till today's, you hack?
 
When Antarctica loses its glaciers, what are you going to say then?

The most recent gathering of scientists at the American Geophysical Union in Washington, DC, brought deeply troubling news about the Antarctic.


Jeremy Shakun, a paleoclimatologist at Boston College, told Science that the large increase in the loss of ice mass in Antarctica in the last decade or two could already be the beginning stage of the process of collapse of the Western Antarctic Ice Sheet.

Ice loss in the Antarctic has tripled in just the last decade alone, and is currently losing 219 billion metric tons of ice annually. That number is up from 73 billion metric tons per year as of a decade ago.
Climate change is not a debatable issue.

Eastern Antarctica has always been seen as a place virtually impervious to melting, and has often been referred to as the “last bastion” of stable ice on the planet.

However, recent data has shown that a group of glaciers covering 13 percent of the coastline of that side of the frozen continent are melting from below due to warming oceans.


Why get all angst about it s0n? Nobody else is....well except perhaps a handful of those who tend to the hysterical in this forum. Everybody else is worrying about real stuff s0n.....its the human condition.

The hysterical among us need some real responsibilities in life.....then they wouldnt be worried about st00pid stuff!:hello77:
 
You can't win
Invincible ignorance is invincible, I concede that.


Says the guy who doesn't know what local temperature is and what global temperature is..



indicator8_2014_tempgraph.PNG


^^^^^^





A big fat lie






Image995_shadow-1024x979.png




400px-GHCN_Temperature_Stations.png
 
Then you don't know science how can you have no southern hemisphere data and just average northern average and call it a GLOBAL AVERAGE.
Only one invincibly ignorant can ignore southern hemisphere data when it's staring him in the face.

Only a sucker would accept that daily recorded data of a certain category over a certain time span is the only data that counts.

Luckily you are both.
 
Last edited:
Can any climate change doomsday parrot explain how many vehicles were needed to be run continuously to change the climate during the last ice age? Surely we must know that.
How many factories were responsible for the little ice age in the medieval period?
Since that came after the great warming period how many coal plants were needed?

At one time the earth was a solid mass of ice and snow. At one time Wyoming was a swamp with ferns. Weather has changed for millions of years without mans interaction. It has changed during times when man had no way to impact it.

Man maybe able to alter the climate slightly but not by much. No one can say that the sun and its output does not have a much larger affect then man could ever have. For that matter Mount St.Helen had a bigger impact then man on weather.
 
Says the guy who doesn't know what local temperature is and what global temperature is..
You are the one convinced US data is the only data that counts. I don't know why that is. I suppose it's a result of invincible ignorance.
 
Why are the solutions for Man Made Climate Change ALWAYS Economic, and always require the masses to PAY government, and change their lifestyle while the elite fly around in carbon spewing private jets, have huge mansions, and drive in caravans of gas guzzling SUV's. If the threat were real, they'd change their lifestyles FIRST!
 
How many factories were responsible for the little ice age in the medieval period?
As though that was a global phenomenon.
It was a global phenomenon. At least the same warming period and cooling period was recorded in Europe and China. We have no real records from the Americas but if it affected that wide of a range it is a safe bet that it was global.

My point is that it is crazy to assume that man has that large of an impact.
The sun and and the earth have a much larger impact.
Unless you know of some plan to stop the earths rotation, the tilt, or move it closer to the sun.

Climate has been going on for millions of years and it has changed many times during that period. Man has just recently been able to have an affect of perhaps a degree or two. In the history of the planet it has seen many changes in high and low temperatures. The single second that man has been able to affect anything amounts to nothing.

Prove to me that the temperature of the earth would not be changing if man were not involved.
There were those that said we would be fighting to keep back ice sheets. There were those that claimed we would be missing parts of Florida by now.
We like to think that we are all powerful and all knowing but we are not even close.
 
Why are the solutions for Man Made Climate Change ALWAYS Economic,
To make the heads of dumb fuck rightards explode.

Lol....the economics of fighting climate change no workie. Never will......which us why no climate change action of any significance has happened in the past 20 years.

Check the thread MORE PROOF THE SKEPTICS ARE WINNING......about 4 billion links that explain it to the confused.:113::113::113:
 
Only one invincibly ignorant can ignore southern hemisphere data when it's staring him in the face.

Only a sucker would accept that daily recorded data of a certain category over a certain time span is the only data that counts.

Luckily you are both.
Arguing against climate change is as stupid as arguing gravity plays no role in plane crashes.

That dude is nothing but a troll.
 
Only one invincibly ignorant can ignore southern hemisphere data when it's staring him in the face.

Only a sucker would accept that daily recorded data of a certain category over a certain time span is the only data that counts.

Luckily you are both.
Arguing against climate change is as stupid as arguing gravity plays no role in plane crashes.

That dude is nothing but a troll.


We are not taking climate change, but you already knew that.

.
 

Forum List

Back
Top