BookShaka
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #61
Very impressed of those who can see this article is biased... I happen to agree with this person’s assessment, so fucking sue me. Of course it’s biased—so what? Do ya’ll see the unhinged shit some anti-Trumpers post here and ya’ll can’t handle a biased article that challenges your beliefs? I’m more reasonable than many of the Trumpers here and I put this in the CDZ so we could have a discussion about it. I won’t respond to whiners and those who won’t even try to see from others’ POV.
If you have a problem with this article, I see that as evidence you want to keep whining and bitching and HATING on Trump in the face of evidence maybe you should have hated other presidents just as much. Let’s not forget who was president when this alleged “meddling” took place.
What is to discuss? The OP is frankly just bullshit.
There is no 'hysteria'- that is just an invention of the author.
My disagreeing with the idiocy written by the author of the article you quote is not because I hate Don the Con- I don't hate anyone- or even because I disagree with the lying Don the Con. I disagree with the idiocy of the OP because there is no 'hysteria'.
Let me respond to one specific quote:
— for which there is still no evidence — that Donald Trump's campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 presidential election, and the absurdity that President Trump works for Russian President Vladimir Putin.
What media is saying that Trump's campaign DID collude with the Russian government?
What is being discussed in the media- is the ongoing investigation into the Russian meddling in the 2016 election that Don the Con alternately disputes and then doesn't dispute.
Certainly there is discussion- here and elsewhere as to the possibility that there was collusion- but that is reasonable considering both Trump's own actions and the odd facts that do keep trickling out.
And no one in the media is saying that Trump works for Putin- the hysteria in that statement is the authors alone. Again- there are posters here who will say that Trump is working for Putin- but this is not a widespread media claim.
What is being discussed in the media is Trump's reluctance to confront Putin about Russia's meddling in America's president election- not just the media of course- but a wide range of elected officials- Democrat and Republican.
Trump does want to call everything that is happening to him a 'witch hunt'- and the 'worst witch hunt in history'- and the OP does a good job of parroting Trump's basic premise.
And nothing else.
I stopped reading after “there is no hysteria.” The definition of hysteria is “exaggerated or uncontrollable emotion of excitement, especially among a group of people”
So let’s take a look at this “no hysteria.”
View attachment 207031
View attachment 207033
View attachment 207035
I’m sure I can find more, and correct me if I’m wrong, but it looks like this last example of people screaming at the sky encompasses the definition of hysteria perfectly.
And that is 'hysteria' how?
Kathy Griffin posting an image?
People posted nasty images about President Obama for 8 years.
Somehow you didn't consider that 'hysteria' then.
I disagree with any images of any person that suggest violence- but the rest- are free speech and free expression.
Which the far right does support- when it comes to condemnation of Obama or Clinton.
Back to the OP:
that Donald Trump's campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 presidential election, and the absurdity that President Trump works for Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Not a single one of your images of 'hysteria' was related to accusations of collusion between Trump and Russia.
You appear to confuse legitimate criticism of our President- with mass hysteria.
So a bunch of adults screaming helplessly at the sky isn’t considered hysteria. Gotcha. It’s a waste of my time to go over how the media has lied bc people like you never see what’s right in front of your face, just like you somehow don’t see anti-Trump hysteria even though it’s painfully obvious.
This isn’t about Obama (nice try to deflect) and I’m vehemently against unhinged attacks on him as well.