- Banned
- #221
Why do companies ask for your resume ? And why when you go to a doctor with a serious problem, do they want to know your medical history ?What does NIXON have to do with TODAY's negro criminals?This statement from a former Nixon insider ought to be enough to convince anyone except a stupid racist prick like you.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I’m saying,” Ehrlichman continued.
“We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”
John Erlichman
bgrouse said:So...how did they make blacks drive around high on illegal drugs with said illegals drugs with them?
Read the fuggin' statement ya dumb sumbyatch! The key word is "associate." Blacks didn't have to actually be using drugs but the government created a nexus by vilifying their communities night after night on the evening news as drug infested ghettoes. The phrase, "Raiding their homes," stood out for me in that statement but your bigoted glazed eyes missed it. And the last two sentences says it all... Erlichman admitted they lied about the drugs... Well if thats the case, many of those arrests for drugs must have been contrived in some way. Planting drugs on people had to be a part of that strategy just as Mark Furhman planted blood on OJ's socks. But most black activists of the day couldn't afford Johny Cochran or Melvin Belli. But the real deal came during sentencing where Blacks are likely to be incarcerated at 5 times the rate Euro-Peons are.
Drug arrests skyrocketed after Nixon's War on Drugs was implemented. Most of those arrested were African Americans; however, contrary to your stupid assessment, Blacks weren't doing anything differently than they had before W.O.D. task forces targeted their neighborhoods. And without lawyers to marshal a good defense, Blacks were at the mercy of lying, corrupt, racist, badge and gun toting fucks who think and look like YOU.YOUR WAFFLING CONTINUES:
The only thing I agreed with you on was that not all arrests or judicial proceedings are the same but the agreeing stopped there.
Allow me to clarify that. The differences in how each arrest is handled or processed is race based and inextricably connected to
Nixons war on Drugs. Nixon started it but every president since then, except Obama, has kept the pressure on black communities.
bgrouse said:That's your unproven premise. It doesn't change the fact that sentences are based on numerous things. For example, say you have a country with 100 whites and 100 blacks. Drug possession for the first offense carries a fine and for the second offense carries prison time. Let's say all 100 whites committed possession once and then stopped. They all got fined, none went to prison. Only one of the 100 blacks committed the offense, but committed it twice. He went to prison.
The stats would read: 100% of whites used drugs vs 1% of blacks, but the prison population is 100% black.
Just an example with simple numbers intended to make you see how your stats could be the way they are without racism. Given how negroes are allergic to personal responsibility and fail to learn from their errors (can't learn if you don't accept it's your fault), I'm not surprised negroes are overrepresented in prison.
In the face of Erlichman's confession you still can't bring yourself to accept what he said. He completely destroyed your myth. Like a beheaded snake you are still trying to wriggle away from the blade of truth, to no avail.
bgrouse said:]And it appears to be your assumption that they are handled differently due to racism vs the numerous other potential reasons, as I already told you but you keep ignoring.
Erlichman has given us all good reason to ignore your bullshit assumptions.. And reports from the sentencing project supports his insider confession.
To drive the last nail in the coffin of a fool (YOU) here is proof positive of the racial disparity in drug enforcement.
“How these policies evolve in the first place, and the connection with race, seems very stark,” said Marc Mauer, executive director of the Sentencing Project, which examines racial issues in the criminal justice system.
Still, he and other experts said, a broad consensus seems to be emerging: The drug problem will not be solved by arrests alone, but rather by treatment.
***Parents like the Griffins say that while they recognize the racial shift in heroin use, politicians and law enforcement are responding in this new way because “they realized what they were doing wasn’t working.”
“They’re paying more attention because people are screaming about it,” Mr. Griffin said. “I work with 100 people every day — parents, people in recovery, addicts — who are invading the statehouse, doing everything we can to make as much noise as we can to try to save these kids.”
**Yeah,,but that's a matter of perspective... When Blacks were "alleged" to be using heroin or crack it was working like a charm to fulfill a nefarious agenda to keep incarceration rates high.
So, you are now dismissed idiot.
Nixon is long gone, you idiot. Typical negro, blaming the 1960/70's for negro actions today.
It shows that particular person's experience and ability to craft a document. Today's young negro criminals were not alive under Nixon.