Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
1) It had nothing to do with the REP party
2) It is an unsubstantiated claim by a fucking BLOG
Um, yes it was. It is a self-proclaimed "right to life" organization. Did you notice what the blog IS? It's Wisconsin voters blogging about their experience with these calls. Moron.
Democrats allege robocalls, 'dirty tricks' - JSOnline
Will you accept the Wisconsin Journal Sentinel?
We'll see if it's true or not.
"Journal Sentinel reporters have been asking voters since Tuesday for a recording of the robocall, either from voicemail or from a person who has recorded the call. No one has been able to provide a copy."
No.. idiot
"Journal Sentinel reporters have been asking voters since Tuesday for a recording of the robocall, either from voicemail or from a person who has recorded the call. No one has been able to provide a copy."
No.. idiot
We'll see. Why would voters make this up?
"to weed non-citizens off the rolls of the states voters"
I don't care where the demographic falls.. non-citizens, felons, and the dead should be off the voter rolls and unable to vote... I don't care if they are REP, DEM, IND, black, white, purple, gay, straight, asexual, male, female, hermaphroditic, bald, tattooed, pierced, albino, old, young, or whatever
Seems pretty damn simple to me
Great, you dont care. I dont either but why does the majority or the people questioned by one political party belong to the other political party?
Seems pretty damn simple to me whats going on
No.. you are drawing a conclusion from both your hyper-partisan agenda and the opinion given by the author and their reliance on a biased 'expert'
Great, you dont care. I dont either but why does the majority or the people questioned by one political party belong to the other political party?
Seems pretty damn simple to me whats going on
No.. you are drawing a conclusion from both your hyper-partisan agenda and the opinion given by the author and their reliance on a biased 'expert'
If you read it you'd know that what you just said is wrong. The Miami Herald looked at the rolls. Not one "expert" as you cliam.
What is this shit? You dont read the article, dont know what it says but you've concluded that it's accurate or inaccurate based on whether you like the title or not.
Your 'link' is a partisan opinion piece. Hope that helps.
How so, Its from the Miami Herald? Did you read it? Care to question the authenticity or will you wait for a rebuttal to be posted on Drudge to have an answer?
... "politically progressive African American commentator..."
Leonard Pitts - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Does that give you a clue? Idiot.
No.. you are drawing a conclusion from both your hyper-partisan agenda and the opinion given by the author and their reliance on a biased 'expert'
If you read it you'd know that what you just said is wrong. The Miami Herald looked at the rolls. Not one "expert" as you cliam.
What is this shit? You dont read the article, dont know what it says but you've concluded that it's accurate or inaccurate based on whether you like the title or not.
The conclusions on the 'threat' were drawn by the 'expert'.... it is right here, in the article...
Nice try.... almost as nice as you trying to only take the number from Dade as the total found ineligible for the whole state
Again.. .I don't care if people are red, blue, black, white, old, young, male, female, DEM, REP, CON, GRE, IND, tall, short, fat, thin, or whatever else... ineligible is ineligible no matter how the %'s lay
The leaps in the article are nothing more than fucking opinion...
If you read it you'd know that what you just said is wrong. The Miami Herald looked at the rolls. Not one "expert" as you cliam.
What is this shit? You dont read the article, dont know what it says but you've concluded that it's accurate or inaccurate based on whether you like the title or not.
The conclusions on the 'threat' were drawn by the 'expert'.... it is right here, in the article...
Now you're being a weasel. I'm talking about the voter rolls while you are focused on that guys OPINION. Fuck his Opinion...the rolls are still the same and you cant talk about it.
It is also an OPINION piece...
I also researched into the affiliation of the expert, something YOU did not do...
What expert? The Miami Herald?
Nice try.... almost as nice as you trying to only take the number from Dade as the total found ineligible for the whole state
Again.. .I don't care if people are red, blue, black, white, old, young, male, female, DEM, REP, CON, GRE, IND, tall, short, fat, thin, or whatever else... ineligible is ineligible no matter how the %'s lay
The leaps in the article are nothing more than fucking opinion...
Yep it's Opinion, but fuck his opinion and you still have a majority of Dems on this list. Why are you ignoring that fact? You researched who? The Author? Did you Research the voter rolls or it's percentages of political affiliation? No, right? You're witch hunting but it's cool, now.
The party that is questioning these people belong to the other party. I think If the shoe was on the other foot that would be the only way you would see an issue...oh and a issue it would be! Hell, 2 black panthers were at a voting station and you havent shut up about it for 4 years!
The conclusions on the 'threat' were drawn by the 'expert'.... it is right here, in the article...
Now you're being a weasel. I'm talking about the voter rolls while you are focused on that guys OPINION. Fuck his Opinion...the rolls are still the same and you cant talk about it.
What expert? The Miami Herald?
Nice try.... almost as nice as you trying to only take the number from Dade as the total found ineligible for the whole state
Again.. .I don't care if people are red, blue, black, white, old, young, male, female, DEM, REP, CON, GRE, IND, tall, short, fat, thin, or whatever else... ineligible is ineligible no matter how the %'s lay
The leaps in the article are nothing more than fucking opinion...
Yep it's Opinion, but fuck his opinion and you still have a majority of Dems on this list. Why are you ignoring that fact? You researched who? The Author? Did you Research the voter rolls or it's percentages of political affiliation? No, right? You're witch hunting but it's cool, now.
The party that is questioning these people belong to the other party. I think If the shoe was on the other foot that would be the only way you would see an issue...oh and a issue it would be! Hell, 2 black panthers were at a voting station and you havent shut up about it for 4 years!
The conclusions are the entire basis for the objection... hence relevant
Which expert? Tova Wang.. maybe if you read, you would have noticed that
.
But the threat is very nearly non-existent. Tova Wang, an expert in election law, told U.S. News and World Report in April that the number of people who have been prosecuted successfully for voter fraud is ridiculously low.
The Herald recently analyzed the list and found it dominated by Democrats, independents and Hispanics. Republicans and non-Hispanic whites were least likely to have their voting rights challenged.
Now you're being a weasel. I'm talking about the voter rolls while you are focused on that guys OPINION. Fuck his Opinion...the rolls are still the same and you cant talk about it.
What expert? The Miami Herald?
Yep it's Opinion, but fuck his opinion and you still have a majority of Dems on this list. Why are you ignoring that fact? You researched who? The Author? Did you Research the voter rolls or it's percentages of political affiliation? No, right? You're witch hunting but it's cool, now.
The party that is questioning these people belong to the other party. I think If the shoe was on the other foot that would be the only way you would see an issue...oh and a issue it would be! Hell, 2 black panthers were at a voting station and you havent shut up about it for 4 years!
The conclusions are the entire basis for the objection... hence relevant
Which expert? Tova Wang.. maybe if you read, you would have noticed that
.
Another lie, here is the only mention of Tova Wang:
But the “threat” is very nearly non-existent. Tova Wang, an expert in election law, told U.S. News and World Report in April that the number of people who have been prosecuted successfully for voter fraud is “ridiculously low.”
Once again, I am not talking about the "threat" she's talking about I'm talking about the voter rolls that was reviewed by the Miami Herald. Here is the part of the article I keep drawing your eyes to:
The Herald recently analyzed the list and found it dominated by Democrats, independents and Hispanics. Republicans and non-Hispanic whites were least likely to have their voting rights challenged.
Now that its posted and seemed to manage to miss it after reading the article. What say you? The Herald didnt do it? Tova hypnotized them? Whats your new excuse?
"to weed non-citizens off the rolls of the states voters"
I don't care where the demographic falls.. non-citizens, felons, and the dead should be off the voter rolls and unable to vote... I don't care if they are REP, DEM, IND, black, white, purple, gay, straight, asexual, male, female, hermaphroditic, bald, tattooed, pierced, albino, old, young, or whatever
Seems pretty damn simple to me
Great, you dont care. I dont either but why does the majority or the people questioned by one political party belong to the other political party?
Seems pretty damn simple to me whats going on
No.. you are drawing a conclusion from both your hyper-partisan agenda and the opinion given by the author and their reliance on a biased 'expert'
Coincidence does not equate to causation....
If the result is X% REPs, and X+10%DEMs, so fucking what?? If it is X% 'white' and X+20% hispanic, so fucking what. It is about getting non-citizens off the voter rolls where they do not fucking belong in the first place
The voter rolls are dominated by dems and Hispanics. Nothing you say will change that fact. Notice you never question the rolls just the opinion.
Fuck the guys opinion, look at the voter rolls that were reviewed by the Herald. You won't and cannot dispute it.
The voter rolls are dominated by dems and Hispanics. Nothing you say will change that fact. Notice you never question the rolls just the opinion.
Fuck the guys opinion, look at the voter rolls that were reviewed by the Herald. You won't and cannot dispute it.
Again.. .for the stupid
Coincidence does not equate to causation....
If the result is X% REPs, and X+10%DEMs, so fucking what?? If it is X% 'white' and X+20% hispanic, so fucking what. It is about getting non-citizens off the voter rolls where they do not fucking belong in the first place
Back in 2000, state Attorney General Katherine Harris stripped tens of thousands of legal Democratic voters of their right to vote in Florida on the bogus assertion that they were felons. This, in an election which was decided by only a few hundred votes.
In 2002, the purge continued, with the company charged to maintain the list claiming that as many as 91,000 of the 94,000 names on the list were not illegal voters. Florida promised to clean up the list.
Jump to 2004. Guess what? The voter purge list was still alive, this time even more flawed than ever, andlike all of its iterationsit accidentally purged decisively against Democratic voters. Whoopsie! How could that have possibly happened?
Fast-forward to 2008, and we see the techniques to purge Democratic voters continued, albeit in a milder form: meaningless small typos and variations in how names were written (with a middle initial or full name, for example) purged tens of thousands of voters.
The GOP, demographics and voter suppression - Leonard Pitts Jr. - MiamiHerald.com
Reading this story I fond this little gem
Florida claimed roughly 180,000 were possible noncitizens. That number was eventually whittled way down to about 2,600 people. In Miami-Dade County, where the largest number of them live, 385 have been verified as citizens. Ten 10! have admitted they are ineligible or asked to be removed from the rolls.
The Herald recently analyzed the list and found it dominated by Democrats, independents and Hispanics. Republicans and non-Hispanic whites were least likely to have their voting rights challenged.
Just a coincidence right? Shouldnt be a problem for citizens to prove they are citizens right? So why is the list dominated with Dems?
Nope nothing to see here
The voter rolls are dominated by dems and Hispanics. Nothing you say will change that fact. Notice you never question the rolls just the opinion.
Fuck the guys opinion, look at the voter rolls that were reviewed by the Herald. You won't and cannot dispute it.
Again.. .for the stupid
Coincidence does not equate to causation....
If the result is X% REPs, and X+10%DEMs, so fucking what?? If it is X% 'white' and X+20% hispanic, so fucking what. It is about getting non-citizens off the voter rolls where they do not fucking belong in the first place
Yeah, just so happens that the list is dominated by Dems. I understand why you dont care but when the tables are turned dont cry about it.
All just a coincidence huh. One that happens over and over and over.
Back in 2000, state Attorney General Katherine Harris stripped tens of thousands of legal Democratic voters of their right to vote in Florida on the bogus assertion that they were felons. This, in an election which was decided by only a few hundred votes.
In 2002, the purge continued, with the company charged to maintain the list claiming that as many as 91,000 of the 94,000 names on the list were not illegal voters. Florida “promised” to clean up the list.
Jump to 2004. Guess what? The voter purge list was still alive, this time even more flawed than ever, and–like all of its iterations–it “accidentally” purged decisively against Democratic voters. Whoopsie! How could that have possibly happened?
Fast-forward to 2008, and we see the techniques to purge Democratic voters continued, albeit in a milder form: meaningless small typos and variations in how names were written (with a middle initial or full name, for example) purged tens of thousands of voters.
Happens every year and by accident...Coincidence, it targets dems heavily. If you were honest you would notice a pattern. You're not tho
