The evolution of a dangerous farce

Youch

Senior Member
Aug 10, 2014
670
121
45
First, the libs forced "man-made global warming" on us as a way to control human activity and behavior (and advancing government control and power). The most effective tool in doing so were "scientists" bought and paid for by, wait for it, by government grants. Salivating all over the hand that fed them, they pushed the agenda as far as they could until, whoops, the infamous hockey stick was denounced and exposed as a fraud (plant food spikes pre-dated the Industrial Revolution, darn...). Gosh, for some reason, actual warming data was difficult to prove....partly due to global cooling.

Then the libs, forever posturing themselves against the citizen, changed the message and called it just "global warming," leaving out the mysterious "man-made" marketing angle. But alas, still, they could not find global warming during our current cooling cycle. Thus, the liberal need for a new marketing strategy.

Now we have the marketing strategy of "climate change deniers." Of course, they now use this term without ANY EVIDENCE THAT ANYONE DENIES THAT CLIMATE, OF COURSE, ALWAYS CHANGES." And this is, for now, an effective tool to control behavior and advocate for more government (power), as spoiled western humans are rife and riddles with guilt.

This is so freaking obvious. Am I the only one that sees it?

And the libs only argument against this is to pretend that their opposition doesn't understand the difference between weather and climate. Don't fall for that insult....throw it back in their face!!! I'm ready....
 
Well, well, another abysmally stupid person displays their ignorance for all to see. Of course, the fact that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger means nothing. All those scientists from every culture and political system on earth are in on a grand conspiracy just to fool little old you.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect
 
First, the libs forced "man-made global warming" on us as a way to control human activity and behavior (and advancing government control and power). The most effective tool in doing so were "scientists" bought and paid for by, wait for it, by government grants. Salivating all over the hand that fed them, they pushed the agenda as far as they could until, whoops, the infamous hockey stick was denounced and exposed as a fraud (plant food spikes pre-dated the Industrial Revolution, darn...). Gosh, for some reason, actual warming data was difficult to prove....partly due to global cooling.

Then the libs, forever posturing themselves against the citizen, changed the message and called it just "global warming," leaving out the mysterious "man-made" marketing angle. But alas, still, they could not find global warming during our current cooling cycle. Thus, the liberal need for a new marketing strategy.

Now we have the marketing strategy of "climate change deniers." Of course, they now use this term without ANY EVIDENCE THAT ANYONE DENIES THAT CLIMATE, OF COURSE, ALWAYS CHANGES." And this is, for now, an effective tool to control behavior and advocate for more government (power), as spoiled western humans are rife and riddles with guilt.

This is so freaking obvious. Am I the only one that sees it?

And the libs only argument against this is to pretend that their opposition doesn't understand the difference between weather and climate. Don't fall for that insult....throw it back in their face!!! I'm ready....
Not hardly. Intelligent people and independent thinkers reject it. The only people I know who believe that crap also believe in most conspiracy theories. The easily led. You know, dumb liberals.
 
First, the libs forced "man-made global warming" on us as a way to control human activity and behavior (and advancing government control and power). The most effective tool in doing so were "scientists" bought and paid for by, wait for it, by government grants. Salivating all over the hand that fed them, they pushed the agenda as far as they could until, whoops, the infamous hockey stick was denounced and exposed as a fraud (plant food spikes pre-dated the Industrial Revolution, darn...). Gosh, for some reason, actual warming data was difficult to prove....partly due to global cooling.

Then the libs, forever posturing themselves against the citizen, changed the message and called it just "global warming," leaving out the mysterious "man-made" marketing angle. But alas, still, they could not find global warming during our current cooling cycle. Thus, the liberal need for a new marketing strategy.

Now we have the marketing strategy of "climate change deniers." Of course, they now use this term without ANY EVIDENCE THAT ANYONE DENIES THAT CLIMATE, OF COURSE, ALWAYS CHANGES." And this is, for now, an effective tool to control behavior and advocate for more government (power), as spoiled western humans are rife and riddles with guilt.

This is so freaking obvious. Am I the only one that sees it?

And the libs only argument against this is to pretend that their opposition doesn't understand the difference between weather and climate. Don't fall for that insult....throw it back in their face!!! I'm ready....

AGW is not science, it is politics. That is why nearly all on the Left, believe AGW.

AGW is all about growing the power and size of government...like everything the Left advocates.
 
Well, well, another abysmally stupid person displays their ignorance for all to see. Of course, the fact that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger means nothing. All those scientists from every culture and political system on earth are in on a grand conspiracy just to fool little old you.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Weak and baseless ad hominems, and citing the very government funded organizations to which I referred, does not prove your case nor does it effectively argue against my point. Simply pointing to "these functionaries said so, and so as a drone I must believe" doesn't impress, and does not prove.

But more to the point, you think "government" is the answer? Of course you do. And because you have no other solution/answer to appease your false fears, you are left with insulting a person about whom you know absofreakinglylootly not a wit. Kinda makes you look bad, don't ya think? Oh wait, I just inserted the word think....sorry. Don't ya feel?
 
First, the libs forced "man-made global warming" on us as a way to control human activity and behavior (and advancing government control and power). The most effective tool in doing so were "scientists" bought and paid for by, wait for it, by government grants. Salivating all over the hand that fed them, they pushed the agenda as far as they could until, whoops, the infamous hockey stick was denounced and exposed as a fraud (plant food spikes pre-dated the Industrial Revolution, darn...). Gosh, for some reason, actual warming data was difficult to prove....partly due to global cooling.

Then the libs, forever posturing themselves against the citizen, changed the message and called it just "global warming," leaving out the mysterious "man-made" marketing angle. But alas, still, they could not find global warming during our current cooling cycle. Thus, the liberal need for a new marketing strategy.

Now we have the marketing strategy of "climate change deniers." Of course, they now use this term without ANY EVIDENCE THAT ANYONE DENIES THAT CLIMATE, OF COURSE, ALWAYS CHANGES." And this is, for now, an effective tool to control behavior and advocate for more government (power), as spoiled western humans are rife and riddles with guilt.

This is so freaking obvious. Am I the only one that sees it?

And the libs only argument against this is to pretend that their opposition doesn't understand the difference between weather and climate. Don't fall for that insult....throw it back in their face!!! I'm ready....

AGW is not science, it is politics. That is why nearly all on the Left, believe AGW.

AGW is all about growing the power and size of government...like everything the Left advocates.

Indeed!
 
Well, well, another abysmally stupid person displays their ignorance for all to see. Of course, the fact that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger means nothing. All those scientists from every culture and political system on earth are in on a grand conspiracy just to fool little old you.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Bullshit

Two things contribute the most to temperatures on Earth:

The relationship the Earth has with the Sun
The amount of H2O in the atmosphere
 
Well, well, another abysmally stupid person displays their ignorance for all to see. Of course, the fact that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger means nothing. All those scientists from every culture and political system on earth are in on a grand conspiracy just to fool little old you.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

How many times are you going to post this bunk?

3GreenhouseGasPotential_lg.jpg


People are never told that the most powerful greenhouse gases by orders of magnitude is water vapor and clouds. When only human emitted CO2 is considered, less than one percent of the greenhouse gas potential comes from human activity. Yet, all the global warming is supposed to be attributed to it. Water vapor plays a huge role in keeping the earth warm; 70 times more powerful than the CO2 emitted by human activity. When clouds are added, CO2 becomes even less important. However, clouds not only trap heat, low elevation clouds also reflect much of the incoming solar radiation, so the sun's heat never reaches the earth's surface which cools the earth. It is this mechanism that a growing number of scientists believe is one of the primary mechanisms warming and cooling the earth.
 
Well, well, another abysmally stupid person displays their ignorance for all to see. Of course, the fact that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger means nothing. All those scientists from every culture and political system on earth are in on a grand conspiracy just to fool little old you.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

How many times are you going to post this bunk?

3GreenhouseGasPotential_lg.jpg


People are never told that the most powerful greenhouse gases by orders of magnitude is water vapor and clouds. When only human emitted CO2 is considered, less than one percent of the greenhouse gas potential comes from human activity. Yet, all the global warming is supposed to be attributed to it. Water vapor plays a huge role in keeping the earth warm; 70 times more powerful than the CO2 emitted by human activity. When clouds are added, CO2 becomes even less important. However, clouds not only trap heat, low elevation clouds also reflect much of the incoming solar radiation, so the sun's heat never reaches the earth's surface which cools the earth. It is this mechanism that a growing number of scientists believe is one of the primary mechanisms warming and cooling the earth.

it's on the list of his links to use to outsmart us. you know we bad bad guys that actually had the nerve to question GAWD!!!!!!! We are bad because we don't fall into line and march like a good k00ks army does. The fact that this dude actually believes the stuff is as laughable as anything posted by him and his peers.
 
Well, well, another abysmally stupid person displays their ignorance for all to see. Of course, the fact that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger means nothing. All those scientists from every culture and political system on earth are in on a grand conspiracy just to fool little old you.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Bullshit

Two things contribute the most to temperatures on Earth:

The relationship the Earth has with the Sun
The amount of H2O in the atmosphere

And the radiation fields the sun creates...
 
Well, well, another abysmally stupid person displays their ignorance for all to see. Of course, the fact that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger means nothing. All those scientists from every culture and political system on earth are in on a grand conspiracy just to fool little old you.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Bullshit

Two things contribute the most to temperatures on Earth:

The relationship the Earth has with the Sun
The amount of H2O in the atmosphere

And the radiation fields the sun creates...

to which there isn't any experiment to show how warm that radiation field gets if at all. So, again, where is the experiment that shows how warm 120 PPM of CO2 is?
 
Well, well, another abysmally stupid person displays their ignorance for all to see. Of course, the fact that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger means nothing. All those scientists from every culture and political system on earth are in on a grand conspiracy just to fool little old you.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

every major University states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger means nothing.

Real? Okay.

Clear and present danger? You can't prove it.
 
First, the libs forced "man-made global warming" on us as a way to control human activity and behavior (and advancing government control and power).

If the data didn't contradict you, you wouldn't have to manufacture such a convoluted loony conspiracy theory. However, the data does contradict you, hence the conspiracy theory is all you've got.

Mainstream AGW science is accepted by all political types all across the globe, because it's real science, and therefore non-political. Your denialist cult, however, is restricted to the kook right fringe of a few nations dominated by a nutty conservative English-speaking mainstream media. Outside of the USA/Canada/UK/Australia, the cult just doesn't exist. Denialism, of course, is not itself the cult. Denialism is just one of the many reality-defying bizarre beliefs mandated by the kook right fringe political cult.
 
First, the libs forced "man-made global warming" on us as a way to control human activity and behavior (and advancing government control and power).

If the data didn't contradict you, you wouldn't have to manufacture such a convoluted loony conspiracy theory. However, the data does contradict you, hence the conspiracy theory is all you've got.

Mainstream AGW science is accepted by all political types all across the globe, because it's real science, and therefore non-political. Your denialist cult, however, is restricted to the kook right fringe of a few nations dominated by a nutty conservative English-speaking mainstream media. Outside of the USA/Canada/UK/Australia, the cult just doesn't exist. Denialism, of course, is not itself the cult. Denialism is just one of the many reality-defying bizarre beliefs mandated by the kook right fringe political cult.

What data are you referring to? See sir you have no proof, so you having any data is laughable. LoSiNg................
 
First, the libs forced "man-made global warming" on us as a way to control human activity and behavior (and advancing government control and power).

If the data didn't contradict you, you wouldn't have to manufacture such a convoluted loony conspiracy theory. However, the data does contradict you, hence the conspiracy theory is all you've got.

Mainstream AGW science is accepted by all political types all across the globe, because it's real science, and therefore non-political. Your denialist cult, however, is restricted to the kook right fringe of a few nations dominated by a nutty conservative English-speaking mainstream media. Outside of the USA/Canada/UK/Australia, the cult just doesn't exist. Denialism, of course, is not itself the cult. Denialism is just one of the many reality-defying bizarre beliefs mandated by the kook right fringe political cult.


It isn't real science.
It's Government funded Grants.
Look into how government grants work.
If you don't come up with the theory they want, you don't get that grant the next year.
 
Last edited:
Well, well, another abysmally stupid person displays their ignorance for all to see. Of course, the fact that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger means nothing. All those scientists from every culture and political system on earth are in on a grand conspiracy just to fool little old you.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Bullshit

Two things contribute the most to temperatures on Earth:

The relationship the Earth has with the Sun
The amount of H2O in the atmosphere

And the radiation fields the sun creates...

That goes without saying.....:eusa_shifty:
 
Well, well, another abysmally stupid person displays their ignorance for all to see. Of course, the fact that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger means nothing. All those scientists from every culture and political system on earth are in on a grand conspiracy just to fool little old you.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Weak and baseless ad hominems, and citing the very government funded organizations to which I referred, does not prove your case nor does it effectively argue against my point. Simply pointing to "these functionaries said so, and so as a drone I must believe" doesn't impress, and does not prove.

But more to the point, you think "government" is the answer? Of course you do. And because you have no other solution/answer to appease your false fears, you are left with insulting a person about whom you know absofreakinglylootly not a wit. Kinda makes you look bad, don't ya think? Oh wait, I just inserted the word think....sorry. Don't ya feel?

Gee whiz, you are certainly a stupid bastard. That site is from the American Institute of Physics. And I can post policy statements for the American Geophysical Union, the Geological Society of America, and the Royal Society of Great Britain that say the same.

And I am supposed to believe your drivel? Cite some real evidence. From peer reviewed scientfic journals, not obese junkies on the radio, or undegreed ex-TV weathermen.
 
Well, well, another abysmally stupid person displays their ignorance for all to see. Of course, the fact that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University states that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger means nothing. All those scientists from every culture and political system on earth are in on a grand conspiracy just to fool little old you.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

In order to claim a clear and present danger, one must have clear and unambiguous evidence to support the claim. Lets see it. What's that? You don't have any to show? Not to worry, none was expected.

Tell you what, in lieu of any evidence that would support the claim of "clear and present danger", lets see the peer reviewed study that quantifies the greenhouse effect that the claim of a clear and present danger is based upon. Can you do that for us bucky?
 

Forum List

Back
Top