So we can all agree that both parties support wild out of control spending?
That'd be a great start.
6 trillion in 8 years versus 5 trillion in 4, I would suggest the dems and Obama are much more willing to spend out of Control.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So we can all agree that both parties support wild out of control spending?
That'd be a great start.
So we can all agree that both parties support wild out of control spending?
That'd be a great start.
6 trillion in 8 years versus 5 trillion in 4, I would suggest the dems and Obama are much more willing to spend out of Control.
two wars which obama continued for the three years
whats your point?
Which compares the explosion in spending on TWO wars under Bush, how?
Are you dumb enough to think we can simply wind down both wars the INSTANT Obama took office? That point being said, I completely disagreed with Obama's "doubling down" on Afghanistan while he has been in office. The overriding point is that the OP was attempting to compare costs of a chef and parties against TRILLIONS of dollars Bush spent on his two unwinnable wars.
So we can all agree that both parties support wild out of control spending?
That'd be a great start.
6 trillion in 8 years versus 5 trillion in 4, I would suggest the dems and Obama are much more willing to spend out of Control.
That wasn't the question.
You could make the same comparison to Reagan spending far more than Carter and Bush spending far more than Clinton.
Has nothing to do with party, the next guy always outspends and expands gov't more than the one before him.
6 trillion in 8 years versus 5 trillion in 4, I would suggest the dems and Obama are much more willing to spend out of Control.
That wasn't the question.
You could make the same comparison to Reagan spending far more than Carter and Bush spending far more than Clinton.
Has nothing to do with party, the next guy always outspends and expands gov't more than the one before him.
Wrong, we were told 6 trillion in 8 years was SUPER bad. And that it was all the Presidents fault. SO Obama spending TWICE as fast should be TWICE as bad, but you lefties don't even care.
We were also told Gitmo was bad, until Obama approved it. That 2 wars were bad until Obama approved them and created 2 more. We were told recess appointments were bad until Obama made one illegally while Congress was still in session.
IS there any thing from Bush's Presidency that is still bad as Obama double downs on it all?
6 trillion in 8 years versus 5 trillion in 4, I would suggest the dems and Obama are much more willing to spend out of Control.
That wasn't the question.
You could make the same comparison to Reagan spending far more than Carter and Bush spending far more than Clinton.
Has nothing to do with party, the next guy always outspends and expands gov't more than the one before him.
Wrong, we were told 6 trillion in 8 years was SUPER bad. And that it was all the Presidents fault. SO Obama spending TWICE as fast should be TWICE as bad, but you lefties don't even care.
We were also told Gitmo was bad, until Obama approved it. That 2 wars were bad until Obama approved them and created 2 more. We were told recess appointments were bad until Obama made one illegally while Congress was still in session.
IS there any thing from Bush's Presidency that is still bad as Obama double downs on it all?
IF you realy believe what you posted, then you are simply:
1)stupid as a rock
2) high as a kite
if you are joking thats fine.
if you are serious? you need to be in a diaper, in a rubber room somewhere.
The sources are in my signature. Second and third link. See for yourself.
From '00-08, Bush rose government spending to 3.2 trillion a year.
From '08-'11, the spending increased to 3.8 trillion a year. However, 3.2 trillion of that was still a result of Bush's policies. Which means Obama's contribution was only 800 billion extra per year. Not only that, but under Obama, spending began to decrease in 2011.
However, government spending is not the only thing that exploded the deficit. It was also a lack of government revenue which decreased significantly under Obama. That, I think, can be blamed on both Obama and Republicans. Obama for extending the Bush tax cuts, and Republicans for refusing to raise taxes.
A general overview:
In end big debt and super duper bailouts were the results which does not seem to bother Republicans, as long as they are in power.
In fact, by the time the second Bush left office, the national debt had grown to $12.1 trillion:
* Over half of that amount had been created by Bush’s tax cuts for the very wealthy.
* Another 30% of the national debt had been created by the tax cuts for the wealthy under Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush.
• Fully 81% of the national debt was created by just these three Republican Presidents.
Social Security Q&A | Dollars & Sense
From '00-08, Bush rose government spending to 3.2 trillion a year.
From '08-'11, the spending increased to 3.8 trillion a year. However, 3.2 trillion of that was still a result of Bush's policies. Which means Obama's contribution was only 800 billion extra per year. Not only that, but under Obama, spending began to decrease in 2011.
However, government spending is not the only thing that exploded the deficit. It was also a lack of government revenue which decreased significantly under Obama. That, I think, can be blamed on both Obama and Republicans. Obama for extending the Bush tax cuts, and Republicans for refusing to raise taxes.
Wars congress authorized, unlike the action in Libya that Obama stuck his nose in.obama gives more lavish parties paid for on the taxpayer's dime. How much did the Halloween bash cost? Johnny Depp didn't fly in from France to be part of the fun. Bush never had a special pizza chef flown in from Chicago once a week for family pizza night.
It's surprising that democrats don't much mind the sound of flushing tax money down the toilet.
Which compares the explosion in spending on TWO wars under Bush, how?
From '00-08, Bush rose government spending to 3.2 trillion a year.
From '08-'11, the spending increased to 3.8 trillion a year. However, 3.2 trillion of that was still a result of Bush's policies. Which means Obama's contribution was only 800 billion extra per year. Not only that, but under Obama, spending began to decrease in 2011.
However, government spending is not the only thing that exploded the deficit. It was also a lack of government revenue which decreased significantly under Obama. That, I think, can be blamed on both Obama and Republicans. Obama for extending the Bush tax cuts, and Republicans for refusing to raise taxes.
Bush spent 4 trillion in 8 years, obama spent over 5 trillion in less than three years. Besides, you dont spend more money and blame it on policies, if policies are bad you end the policies and stop funding them. There is no excuse for obamas reckless spending. None that will sway voters anyways. Republicans promised not to raise taxes, at least they are keeping there promise, unlike all the promises that came from the democrats in 2006 and 2008 that never came to fruition.
The difference between Bush and Obama in government spending?
From '00-08, Bush rose government spending to 3.2 trillion a year.
From '08-'11, the spending increased to 3.8 trillion a year. However, 3.2 trillion of that was still a result of Bush's policies. Which means Obama's contribution was only 800 billion extra per year. Not only that, but under Obama, spending began to decrease in 2011.
However, government spending is not the only thing that exploded the deficit. It was also a lack of government revenue which decreased significantly under Obama. That, I think, can be blamed on both Obama and Republicans. Obama for extending the Bush tax cuts, and Republicans for refusing to raise taxes.
Did anything oh say $8 trillion in REAL property, stock market losses occur due to :
1) Dot.com BUST.. $5 trillion loss!
2) Geez didn't 9/11 occur $2 trillion losses
3) And of course EVERYONE should know that the WORST hurricane SEASONS!! in history occurred that caused $1 trillion in LOSSES!
ole Billybob thinks we should give ALL our money to the Obama Guberment cause they know what to do with it better than we do.
Yeah, Steph, that's it.