Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Excluding children from having separate counsel briefing the various gay marriage/adoption hearings is against the law. Ginsburg advertising how she would cast a month before Obergefell is an impeachable offense. If your going to push an anal probe on judicial propriety, beware, it's a double edged sword.Lying under oath for SCOTUS confirmation is a crime.
“The idea of someone so flagrantly telling untruths to ascend to the highest legal position in the U.S. remains shocking, in addition to its being illegal.”
New York Magazine is laying out a case for the possible impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
The cover story, penned by former executive editor of The New York Times Jill Abramson, described Thomas’ rise to power and his apparent immunity to scrutiny during the height of the #MeToo movement. Citing conversations with three women who worked with Thomas, Abramson also detailed a history of lies told by the judge, beginning during his confirmation hearing.
His dishonesty, not the allegations of impropriety, “raise the possibility of impeachment.”
“Lying is, for lawyers, a cardinal sin. State disciplinary committees regularly institute proceedings against lawyers for knowingly lying in court, with punishments that can include disbarment. Since 1989, three federal judges have been impeached and forced from office for charges that include lying. The idea of someone so flagrantly telling untruths to ascend to the highest legal position in the U.S. remains shocking, in addition to its being illegal,” Abramson wrote.
Abramson is the co-author of “Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas,” a 1994 book about his controversial confirmation hearing. During the1991 hearing, former employee Anita Hill accused him of sexually harassing her. Hill alleged that Thomas talked about pornography in the workplace and regularly commented on the bodies of female coworkers.
Thomas claimed he never talked to Hill about porn or to other women who worked with him about risqué subject matter.
The hearing quickly turned into the epitome of a he-said, she-said, and despite the allegations, Thomas was later confirmed by a vote of 52-48. Since then, more women have come forward with similar claims about his behavior.
Read the full story at New York magazine.
More: New York Magazine Makes A Case For Impeaching Clarence Thomas
I watched his confirmation hearing live. He should never have been confirmed. The evidence against him was overwhelming. There were more women waiting to testify against Thomas, but his "high-tech" lynching comment scared the shit out of Biden and Kennedy. So the remaining women were never called. However, Anita Hill's testimony alone should have been enough to end his ascension to SCOTUS. She was extremely credible.
“The idea of someone so flagrantly telling untruths to ascend to the highest legal position in the U.S. remains shocking, in addition to its being illegal.”
New York Magazine is laying out a case for the possible impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
The cover story, penned by former executive editor of The New York Times Jill Abramson, described Thomas’ rise to power and his apparent immunity to scrutiny during the height of the #MeToo movement. Citing conversations with three women who worked with Thomas, Abramson also detailed a history of lies told by the judge, beginning during his confirmation hearing.
His dishonesty, not the allegations of impropriety, “raise the possibility of impeachment.”
“Lying is, for lawyers, a cardinal sin. State disciplinary committees regularly institute proceedings against lawyers for knowingly lying in court, with punishments that can include disbarment. Since 1989, three federal judges have been impeached and forced from office for charges that include lying. The idea of someone so flagrantly telling untruths to ascend to the highest legal position in the U.S. remains shocking, in addition to its being illegal,” Abramson wrote.
Abramson is the co-author of “Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas,” a 1994 book about his controversial confirmation hearing. During the1991 hearing, former employee Anita Hill accused him of sexually harassing her. Hill alleged that Thomas talked about pornography in the workplace and regularly commented on the bodies of female coworkers.
Thomas claimed he never talked to Hill about porn or to other women who worked with him about risqué subject matter.
The hearing quickly turned into the epitome of a he-said, she-said, and despite the allegations, Thomas was later confirmed by a vote of 52-48. Since then, more women have come forward with similar claims about his behavior.
Read the full story at New York magazine.
More: New York Magazine Makes A Case For Impeaching Clarence Thomas
I watched his confirmation hearing live. He should never have been confirmed. The evidence against him was overwhelming. There were more women waiting to testify against Thomas, but his "high-tech" lynching comment scared the shit out of Biden and Kennedy. So the remaining women were never called. However, Anita Hill's testimony alone should have been enough to end his ascension to SCOTUS. She was extremely credible.
“The idea of someone so flagrantly telling untruths to ascend to the highest legal position in the U.S. remains shocking, in addition to its being illegal.”
New York Magazine is laying out a case for the possible impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
The cover story, penned by former executive editor of The New York Times Jill Abramson, described Thomas’ rise to power and his apparent immunity to scrutiny during the height of the #MeToo movement. Citing conversations with three women who worked with Thomas, Abramson also detailed a history of lies told by the judge, beginning during his confirmation hearing.
His dishonesty, not the allegations of impropriety, “raise the possibility of impeachment.”
“Lying is, for lawyers, a cardinal sin. State disciplinary committees regularly institute proceedings against lawyers for knowingly lying in court, with punishments that can include disbarment. Since 1989, three federal judges have been impeached and forced from office for charges that include lying. The idea of someone so flagrantly telling untruths to ascend to the highest legal position in the U.S. remains shocking, in addition to its being illegal,” Abramson wrote.
Abramson is the co-author of “Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas,” a 1994 book about his controversial confirmation hearing. During the1991 hearing, former employee Anita Hill accused him of sexually harassing her. Hill alleged that Thomas talked about pornography in the workplace and regularly commented on the bodies of female coworkers.
Thomas claimed he never talked to Hill about porn or to other women who worked with him about risqué subject matter.
The hearing quickly turned into the epitome of a he-said, she-said, and despite the allegations, Thomas was later confirmed by a vote of 52-48. Since then, more women have come forward with similar claims about his behavior.
Read the full story at New York magazine.
More: New York Magazine Makes A Case For Impeaching Clarence Thomas
I watched his confirmation hearing live. He should never have been confirmed. The evidence against him was overwhelming. There were more women waiting to testify against Thomas, but his "high-tech" lynching comment scared the shit out of Biden and Kennedy. So the remaining women were never called. However, Anita Hill's testimony alone should have been enough to end his ascension to SCOTUS. She was extremely credible.
All you do is spread this tripe without adding a single word of your own comments?
Typical Leftist loser.
I watched his confirmation hearing live. He should never have been confirmed. The evidence against him was overwhelming. There were more women waiting to testify against Thomas, but his "high-tech" lynching comment scared the shit out of Biden and Kennedy. So the remaining women were never called. However, Anita Hill's testimony alone should have been enough to end his ascension to SCOTUS. She was extremely credible.
“The idea of someone so flagrantly telling untruths to ascend to the highest legal position in the U.S. remains shocking, in addition to its being illegal.”
New York Magazine is laying out a case for the possible impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
The cover story, penned by former executive editor of The New York Times Jill Abramson, described Thomas’ rise to power and his apparent immunity to scrutiny during the height of the #MeToo movement. Citing conversations with three women who worked with Thomas, Abramson also detailed a history of lies told by the judge, beginning during his confirmation hearing.
His dishonesty, not the allegations of impropriety, “raise the possibility of impeachment.”
“Lying is, for lawyers, a cardinal sin. State disciplinary committees regularly institute proceedings against lawyers for knowingly lying in court, with punishments that can include disbarment. Since 1989, three federal judges have been impeached and forced from office for charges that include lying. The idea of someone so flagrantly telling untruths to ascend to the highest legal position in the U.S. remains shocking, in addition to its being illegal,” Abramson wrote.
Abramson is the co-author of “Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas,” a 1994 book about his controversial confirmation hearing. During the1991 hearing, former employee Anita Hill accused him of sexually harassing her. Hill alleged that Thomas talked about pornography in the workplace and regularly commented on the bodies of female coworkers.
Thomas claimed he never talked to Hill about porn or to other women who worked with him about risqué subject matter.
The hearing quickly turned into the epitome of a he-said, she-said, and despite the allegations, Thomas was later confirmed by a vote of 52-48. Since then, more women have come forward with similar claims about his behavior.
Read the full story at New York magazine.
More: New York Magazine Makes A Case For Impeaching Clarence Thomas
I watched his confirmation hearing live. He should never have been confirmed. The evidence against him was overwhelming. There were more women waiting to testify against Thomas, but his "high-tech" lynching comment scared the shit out of Biden and Kennedy. So the remaining women were never called. However, Anita Hill's testimony alone should have been enough to end his ascension to SCOTUS. She was extremely credible.
Utter horseshit.He's generally thought of as the least qualified person to ever sit on SCOTUS.
He relies mostly on his staff to explain cases to him and write opinions.
Paid off bimbos. We've learned how the left operates.Gotta love it, a bunch of bimbos make insane allegations = he lied.
Good God Injun, wtf is wrong with you?
If you remove lawyers who lie, you’d have to remove all politicians even your beloved Dems.
Partisans are so silly.
Lying under oath for SCOTUS confirmation is a crime.
Angela Wright was a bigger liar than Anita Hill.
Let's be blunt. The Democrats couldn't make the argument that he was unqualified for the position, which he was, because that would involve making a lot of legal argument average Americans are too stupid to understand, anyway.
So they bring up these bullshit charges from coworkers. I promise you, if I talked to every person you ever worked with, I would be able to find two that would say bad stuff about you. Even be willing to lie.
The problem with Anita Hill is that her story didn't make any sense. If Thomas was such an awful boss, why did she follow him from DoEd to EEOC. If he was an awful boss, you do a happy dance on your desk that you are rid of him, you don't follow him to a new job at an agency they are openly talking about abolishing at the time.
Good God Injun, wtf is wrong with you?
If you remove lawyers who lie, you’d have to remove all politicians even your beloved Dems.
Partisans are so silly.
Lying under oath for SCOTUS confirmation is a crime.
Once confirmed a judge can't be removed except for misbehavior in office. From article 3 Section 1:
The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour,
Simply disagreeing with his decisions don't cut it.
.
“The idea of someone so flagrantly telling untruths to ascend to the highest legal position in the U.S. remains shocking, in addition to its being illegal.”
New York Magazine is laying out a case for the possible impeachment of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
The cover story, penned by former executive editor of The New York Times Jill Abramson, described Thomas’ rise to power and his apparent immunity to scrutiny during the height of the #MeToo movement. Citing conversations with three women who worked with Thomas, Abramson also detailed a history of lies told by the judge, beginning during his confirmation hearing.
His dishonesty, not the allegations of impropriety, “raise the possibility of impeachment.”
“Lying is, for lawyers, a cardinal sin. State disciplinary committees regularly institute proceedings against lawyers for knowingly lying in court, with punishments that can include disbarment. Since 1989, three federal judges have been impeached and forced from office for charges that include lying. The idea of someone so flagrantly telling untruths to ascend to the highest legal position in the U.S. remains shocking, in addition to its being illegal,” Abramson wrote.
Abramson is the co-author of “Strange Justice: The Selling of Clarence Thomas,” a 1994 book about his controversial confirmation hearing. During the1991 hearing, former employee Anita Hill accused him of sexually harassing her. Hill alleged that Thomas talked about pornography in the workplace and regularly commented on the bodies of female coworkers.
Thomas claimed he never talked to Hill about porn or to other women who worked with him about risqué subject matter.
The hearing quickly turned into the epitome of a he-said, she-said, and despite the allegations, Thomas was later confirmed by a vote of 52-48. Since then, more women have come forward with similar claims about his behavior.
Read the full story at New York magazine.
More: New York Magazine Makes A Case For Impeaching Clarence Thomas
I watched his confirmation hearing live. He should never have been confirmed. The evidence against him was overwhelming. There were more women waiting to testify against Thomas, but his "high-tech" lynching comment scared the shit out of Biden and Kennedy. So the remaining women were never called. However, Anita Hill's testimony alone should have been enough to end his ascension to SCOTUS. She was extremely credible.
You're insane if you buy any of this.
Why? Give some "credible" reasons. I totally buy it. Even Biden knows he screwed up.
Of course you buy it. And Biden's off his rocker.
Unless a third party can confirm the allegations, it is just he-said she-said.
