The blueprint for prosperity

[danielpalos]

a lack of equal protection of the law

Except that that has literally never happened in the modern era. Oops.

Yes, it has, and it does. The rich get richer faster, as a result.

 

[P@triot]

a lack of equal protection of the law

Except that that has literally never happened in the modern era. Oops.

Yes, it has, and it does. The rich get richer faster, as a result.

Except that that has literally never happened in the modern era. Oops.

 

[danielpalos]

a lack of equal protection of the law

Except that that has literally never happened in the modern era. Oops.

Yes, it has, and it does. The rich get richer faster, as a result.

Except that that has literally never happened in the modern era. Oops.

it is happening now. the right wing merely likes to complain about problems, not solve problems.

 

[P@triot]

a lack of equal protection of the law

Except that that has literally never happened in the modern era. Oops.

Yes, it has, and it does. The rich get richer faster, as a result.

Except that that has literally never happened in the modern era. Oops.

it is happening now. the right wing merely likes to complain about problems, not solve problems.

It not only isn’t happening right now...it literally has never happened in the modern era. Repeating a lie doesn’t make it any more true.

 

[danielpalos]

a lack of equal protection of the law

Except that that has literally never happened in the modern era. Oops.

Yes, it has, and it does. The rich get richer faster, as a result.

Except that that has literally never happened in the modern era. Oops.

it is happening now. the right wing merely likes to complain about problems, not solve problems.

It not only isn’t happening right now...it literally has never happened in the modern era. Repeating a lie doesn’t make it any more true.

I don't need to resort to fallacy; unlike the right wing.

Yes, the rich are getting richer faster at the expense of the poor; and the right wing, is All for it.

 

[P@triot]

Yes, the rich are getting richer faster at the expense of the poor.

That’s as idiotic and immature as someone saying “the intelligent are getting wiser at the expense of the stupid”.

The poor doesn’t have anything to start with - and what little they do have - the wealthy sure as hell doesn’t need.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, the rich are getting richer faster at the expense of the poor.

That’s as idiotic and immature as someone saying “the intelligent are getting wiser at the expense of the stupid”.

The poor doesn’t have anything to start with - and what little they do have - the wealthy sure as hell doesn’t need.

financing government is simple income redistribution.

 

[P@triot]

financing government is simple income redistribution.

You literally have the IQ of a mosquito. That sentence doesn’t even make sense. Financing government is financing government. And wealth redistribution is wealth redistribution. Two distinctly different issues.

 

[danielpalos]

financing government is simple income redistribution.

You literally have the IQ of a mosquito. That sentence doesn’t even make sense. Financing government is financing government. And wealth redistribution is wealth redistribution. Two distinctly different issues.

sure; the rich get richer faster, and social services get cut for the poor.

 

[P@triot]

social services get cut for the poor.

The poor shouldn’t even have “social services”.

 

[danielpalos]

social services get cut for the poor.

The poor shouldn’t even have “social services”.

View attachment 193618

Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution. Our Constitution is our supreme law of the land.

 

[P@triot]

Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution.

Not it’s not. At least not in that context. If you want to play that game, ALL social legislation (welfare, Social Security, Medicaid, etc.) is null and void as Congress is not permitted to create legislation. It is in our U.S. Constituion.

“Congress shall make no law” - 1st Amendment

That clearly and indisputably states that Congress shall not make law. Thanks for playing, Daniel.

 

[danielpalos]

Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution.

Not it’s not. At least not in that context. If you want to play that game, ALL social legislation (welfare, Social Security, Medicaid, etc.) is null and void as Congress is not permitted to create legislation. It is in our U.S. Constituion.

“Congress shall make no law” - 1st Amendment

That clearly and indisputably states that Congress shall not make law. Thanks for playing, Daniel.

confusing the issue is a right wing specialty.

providing for the general welfare is a general power, not a common power; it says so in our Constitution.

 

[P@triot]

confusing the issue is a right wing specialty.

Getting owned with facts (and then crying about it) is a left-wing speciality.

 

[P@triot]

providing for the general welfare is a general power, not a common power; it says so in our Constitution.

“Providing for the General Welfare” isn’t a power at all (neither general nor common). It says so, right in the U.S. Constitution.

Nobody could be this ignorant. You’re clearly a paid Russian troll attempting to create conflict between the right and the left in this country. It’s no coincidence that your account just happened to be created at the time Russia under took that endeavor.

 

[danielpalos]

confusing the issue is a right wing specialty.

Getting owned with facts (and then crying about it) is a left-wing speciality.

non sequiturs are usually considered fallacies. thank Goodness, i like to work on my tolerance, for practice if not always for fun.

providing for the general welfare is a general power, not a common power; it says so in our Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

providing for the general welfare is a general power, not a common power; it says so in our Constitution.

“Providing for the General Welfare” isn’t a power at all (neither general nor common). It says so, right in the U.S. Constitution.

Nobody could be this ignorant. You’re clearly a paid Russian troll attempting to create conflict between the right and the left in this country. It’s no coincidence that your account just happened to be created at the time Russia under took that endeavor.

Yes, it is. It is a general power; it says so in the same sentence as the common power, for the common defense.

 

[P@triot]

Yes, it is. It is a general power; it says so in the same sentence as the common power, for the common defense.

It doesn’t matter how many times you repeat a lie, Russian troll. It doesn’t make it any less of a lie.

The U.S. Constituiton explicitly grants the federal government 18 enumerated powers and “provide for the general welfare” is not one of them. All one must do to see that is actually read the U.S. Constitution.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, it is. It is a general power; it says so in the same sentence as the common power, for the common defense.

It doesn’t matter how many times you repeat a lie, Russian troll. It doesn’t make it any less of a lie.

The U.S. Constituiton explicitly grants the federal government 18 enumerated powers and “provide for the general welfare” is not one of them. All one must do to see that is actually read the U.S. Constitution.

Yes, it is. It says so in the same sentence as the power for the Common defense, not the general defense.

 

[P@triot]

We have the blueprint for prosperity. It is indisputable. History has proven it time and time again.

In April, the U.S. economy added 164,000 jobs (slightly lower than experts’ predictions) and the unemployment rate reached its lowest level in over 17 years, at 3.9 percent. That’s down from 4.8 percent, the rate when President Donald Trump took office. In addition to this, the U.S. is setting employment records for African-Americans, women, Hispanics, and workers without high school diplomas.

All we need to do to continuously thrive is to ignore progressive propaganda.

Low Unemployment Rate Proves Pro-Growth Policies Work