Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I don't mean to fight with you. I'm totally on the side of panspermia. I believe Jesus was a human on earth, and he had great philosophies to follow. I just don't believe the religion that was created 400 years later.I think a higher being, (totally possible in the universe) deposited DNA on earth. Jesus was a person on earth. Religious or not he was. The scriptures occured.
Considering that light refraction could not have existed before Noah (no rainbows) I wonder how the eye worked back then?
That's correct. The atmosphere was different then and would not produce a rainbow..
Your religion is reliant on incest and molestation. Very nice! High five!That's how it started, right?
There couldn't be evolution. We can tell your brain is smaller than a monkey and today we see it never developed, but regressed.
Considering that light refraction could not have existed before Noah (no rainbows) I wonder how the eye worked back then?
That's correct. The atmosphere was different then and would not produce a rainbow..
Your religion is reliant on incest and molestation. Very nice! High five!That's how it started, right?
There couldn't be evolution. We can tell your brain is smaller than a monkey and today we see it never developed, but regressed.
Why are you talking about religion in a science forum? I talked about the science behind it and how science backs up the Bible. Where is the evolution? I showed using you as an example of de-evolution.
Are you saying there were people who didn't trace their ancestry back to Adam and Eve?Considering that light refraction could not have existed before Noah (no rainbows) I wonder how the eye worked back then?
That's correct. The atmosphere was different then and would not produce a rainbow..
You still haven't answered my question and explained your claim. You don't know anything about science , so why are you here?
>>Every person on the planet could trace his ancestry directly back to Adam and Eve. They all had the same genes.<<
Why don't you explain your claims?
Uh...the explanation is the theory of evolution...tell me how we came into being from an one cell organism in the sea again
Uh...the explanation is the theory of evolution...tell me how we came into being from an one cell organism in the sea again
Your religion is reliant on incest and molestation. Very nice! High five!That's how it started, right?
There couldn't be evolution. We can tell your brain is smaller than a monkey and today we see it never developed, but regressed.
Why are you talking about religion in a science forum? I talked about the science behind it and how science backs up the Bible. Where is the evolution? I showed using you as an example of de-evolution.
He's talking about religion in this forum because you're talking about it in this forum, dumbass.
Uh...the explanation is the theory of evolution...tell me how we came into being from an one cell organism in the sea again
Uh...the explanation is the theory of evolution...tell me how we came into being from an one cell organism in the sea againYour religion is reliant on incest and molestation. Very nice! High five!That's how it started, right?
There couldn't be evolution. We can tell your brain is smaller than a monkey and today we see it never developed, but regressed.
Why are you talking about religion in a science forum? I talked about the science behind it and how science backs up the Bible. Where is the evolution? I showed using you as an example of de-evolution.
He's talking about religion in this forum because you're talking about it in this forum, dumbass.
. Everyone now knows you are the dumbass here who cannot explain his own claims and statements. You do not present any evidence, such as the mountain of facts that is evolution or ToE. Tut tut, not microevolution, because everyone knows that is part of creation science and Alfred Russel Wallace came up with it first. I've explained creation science or real science here and RWS had to put his head in a hole in the ground. It's really his arsehole, but we want to keep this an under R-rated forum.
It is RWS who discusses religion while I discussed the Bible theory and how science backs up the Bible. I cannot help it if you cannot get it past your unscientific brain with only a HS education. I would think Fort Fun Indiana is the spokesmodel for both of you. You are barely above Taz who has been banned .
Other than your brain-damaged coreligionists, who claims the whale walked up the Himalayas?Uh...the explanation is the theory of evolution...tell me how we came into being from an one cell organism in the sea again
. Like the part where the whale walked up the Himalayas to die is a fairy tale.
World's oldest whale is found in the Himalayas
Still does not beat the Milky Way is the center of the universe claim, though it is close.Considering that light refraction could not have existed before Noah (no rainbows) I wonder how the eye worked back then?
That's correct. The atmosphere was different then and would not produce a rainbow..
Still does not beat the Milky Way is the center of the universe claim, though it is close.
Uh...the explanation is the theory of evolution...tell me how we came into being from an one cell organism in the sea againYour religion is reliant on incest and molestation. Very nice! High five!There couldn't be evolution. We can tell your brain is smaller than a monkey and today we see it never developed, but regressed.
Why are you talking about religion in a science forum? I talked about the science behind it and how science backs up the Bible. Where is the evolution? I showed using you as an example of de-evolution.
He's talking about religion in this forum because you're talking about it in this forum, dumbass.
. Everyone now knows you are the dumbass here who cannot explain his own claims and statements. You do not present any evidence, such as the mountain of facts that is evolution or ToE. Tut tut, not microevolution, because everyone knows that is part of creation science and Alfred Russel Wallace came up with it first. I've explained creation science or real science here and RWS had to put his head in a hole in the ground. It's really his arsehole, but we want to keep this an under R-rated forum.
It is RWS who discusses religion while I discussed the Bible theory and how science backs up the Bible. I cannot help it if you cannot get it past your unscientific brain with only a HS education. I would think Fort Fun Indiana is the spokesmodel for both of you. You are barely above Taz who has been banned .
So when you are discussing "Bible theory," you aren't discussing religion?