- Dec 8, 2013
- 22,675
- 16,877
- 2,415
Just curious here. For believers, it is understood that the Bible is the eternal word. Meaning it has an eternal PURPOSE. Right?
Especially the gospels. I mean why would the Holy Spirit document what Christ said, if not for an eternal purpose?
Is that true? This is what I believe anyway. I also know there are many different interpretations of the Bible. I was once confronted by a Baptist preacher (I think he was a Baptist.) Anyway, he told me that unless it is written in the KJV version, that it is not the true word of God. I asked him if he can point out where it says that in the KJV. He looked at me perplexed. I think he thought it was a rude question, but I was making a point and he knew it.
He acknowledged of course that what he said, is not written in there, and it was ridiculous question. I said it was a rhetorical question. It was meant to make a point, and all of us hate it when we are challenged. I said the bottom line is YOU TOLD ME that if it is not written in the KJV version, that it is not of God. I said what he said was NOT written in there. Not in any way. Not one prophetic statement by any prophet inspired by the Holy Spirit that said the ONLY TRUE VERSION of the ETERNAL WORD would be written in the year 1611. I asked since ALL Christianity is based on the TRUE WORD and since the ONLY TRUE VERSION of that ETERNAL WORD was not written until 1611, why wouldn't ONE PROPHET have stated such a thing? Not even a hint. Nothing.
I told him he feels fortunate that he is able to get access to the ONLY TRUE VERSION, since so many Christians for 1611 years did not really have that ONLY TRUE VERSION? I pointed out too that the ORIGINAL KJV had the 7 books of the apocrypha that some refer to as the deuterocanonicals.
Anyway, is the Bible the eternal WORD and everything recorded that Jesus spoke had an eternal purpose? Is that the truth we are to accept as believers? .
Especially the gospels. I mean why would the Holy Spirit document what Christ said, if not for an eternal purpose?
Is that true? This is what I believe anyway. I also know there are many different interpretations of the Bible. I was once confronted by a Baptist preacher (I think he was a Baptist.) Anyway, he told me that unless it is written in the KJV version, that it is not the true word of God. I asked him if he can point out where it says that in the KJV. He looked at me perplexed. I think he thought it was a rude question, but I was making a point and he knew it.
He acknowledged of course that what he said, is not written in there, and it was ridiculous question. I said it was a rhetorical question. It was meant to make a point, and all of us hate it when we are challenged. I said the bottom line is YOU TOLD ME that if it is not written in the KJV version, that it is not of God. I said what he said was NOT written in there. Not in any way. Not one prophetic statement by any prophet inspired by the Holy Spirit that said the ONLY TRUE VERSION of the ETERNAL WORD would be written in the year 1611. I asked since ALL Christianity is based on the TRUE WORD and since the ONLY TRUE VERSION of that ETERNAL WORD was not written until 1611, why wouldn't ONE PROPHET have stated such a thing? Not even a hint. Nothing.
I told him he feels fortunate that he is able to get access to the ONLY TRUE VERSION, since so many Christians for 1611 years did not really have that ONLY TRUE VERSION? I pointed out too that the ORIGINAL KJV had the 7 books of the apocrypha that some refer to as the deuterocanonicals.
Anyway, is the Bible the eternal WORD and everything recorded that Jesus spoke had an eternal purpose? Is that the truth we are to accept as believers? .
