That’s where you and I disagree. I say it is universal and exists independent of man. I say this based upon reason and not faith.The wolf and sheep have very different views of how they are treated. You may think you are morally justified in killing me but I think I'm morally justified in defending myself. There is no single morality, it is transactional.Not about the morality of his actions. He’s just a wolf eating a sheep.You're right, once he kills me I can’t say jack shit about it. Until then I'd have a lot to say about it.Which means they can be anything any human wants them to be. So if some guy robs and kills you for his own good he would be morally justified as the wolf who eats the sheep and you can’t say jack shit about it.
You can’t have it both ways.
An atheist should never have an expectation for fairness because an atheist does not accept a universal truth or a universal right and wrong. To an atheist there is only pleasure and pain.
That is the logical conclusion of their beliefs. But they can’t accept that. They want to be more. They literally can’t help themselves because they are more even though they deny it.