Mrs. M.
Man Feed Guest Writer
- Nov 2, 2015
- 739
- 393
- 940
- Thread starter
- #21
Yeah, I've heard this story, unfortunately, without video or corroboration, it is impossible to verify.
There are other tell tale signs.
Shallow emotions
Normal people will also show a clear skin conductance response produced by sweat gland activity. In psychopathic subjects, however, this brain network showed no activity and no skin conductance responses were emitted (Birbaumer et al., 2012).
What Is a Psychopath?
Hillary mystery: Why doesn’t she ever sweat?
There are a studio full of eye witnesses including the NBC Executive who saw Mrs. Clinton in full meltdown mode and came forward to tell what she heard and saw. That is better than a audio tape because Clinton would deny it's authenticity (the liar that she is)! Those testimonies would surely hold up in court should Lauer decide to bring a lawsuit against her (he should).
In any case, my prayers have been answered. I prayed specifically that God would expose Clinton for who she really is before the election and He's done it. God is good.
Listen, I do a lot of research, and I keep my ear to the ground on a lot of this stuff.
I TRIED to source the origins of this rumor, and the point of fact is, the source of this rumor goes back to a journalist that has inside connections to other journalists. That said, unless OTHER journalists are willing to go ON RECORD, and the email can be sourced, it doesn't amount to anything but gossip. The email has to be produced, and the folks that were there have to go on record. As it stands, I can find no one that has been willing to back up this story. No one will go on record.
I'm not saying the story isn't true, I'm just saying there isn't anyone that is willing to go against the power of Hell. There is too much fear of reprisal. After this all happened, Matt Lauer was crucified in the NYT and other media outlets. Of course Hillary's control of the media demolished him.
For a Second Day, New York Times Pummels Matt Lauer As a 'Loser,' a 'Disaster'
The Daily 202: Matt Lauer’s widely panned performance shows the perils for debate moderators
Matt Lauer Gets Pummeled Over His Questions, or Lack Thereof, at Commander-in-Chief Forum
Here is the original video, with his sources. I have checked them out. Check out his show notes for yourself.
Bill Still is a former newspaper editor and publisher. He has written for USA Today, The Saturday Evening Post, the Los Angeles Times Syndicate, OMNI magazine, and has also produced the syndicated radio program, Health News.
It's an old story, this video is from ten days ago. . .
Let's go back and review this for a moment.
1. - The video I posted is the same as yours, Misterbeale. The title is different - otherwise - it appears to be the same video - same story.
2. - the narrator of the video was the recipient of the email. Therein the email exists because this man is not going public with a story that was created out of some figment of his imagination.
3. - The fact that he received the email from a source that wishes to remain anonymous does not invalidate the content. In the old days - that is how it was done. The identity of the Whistleblower was protected. Who is protecting the identify of the Whistleblower? The man in the video who has possession of the email. He's not going to give up his source because the Clinton's have a record for taking revenge on those who cross them which leads me to my next point...
4. - The evidence is in the actions that took place after Hillary Clinton's meltdown at the studio. The email states that the others at MSM were told to criticize Matt Lauer and the reports prove that afterward they did so. The email states a call was made to certain news media including someone at Twitter (exact sources and Twitter contact is in the OP) and I checked to see if those stories ever emerged. Indeed they did. The attack on Matt Lauer was so vicious in the stories after that night - it is clear that Clinton's war on Lauer was a full on attack. Again - this confirms the story that the man in video received from his anonymous source. I find this story so fascinating (10 days is not old when it's dynamite and THIS is dynamite - look at how long Benghazi news continued.....) I intend to do another Op-ed on it. Perhaps even two or three. Matt Lauer is a hero. Let's straighten out the facts here and get that on record.
5th you say that no one wants to go up against the powers of hell. I disagree. There are people who go up against the powers of hell every day. Donald Trump is going up against the power of hell (Hillary serves Lucifer). Donald Trump knows who works for that studio and who was there that night. He knows more than you think he knows because he is in a position to find these things out. They have to tell someone because after that email and the video that followed, Clinton's people know someone talked. We also have the silence of Brazile, NBC and Comcast. No one is denying it didn't happen - and if they deny it later - the question remains why didn't you deny it earlier?
How to fix this. Bring it out into the daylight.
Donna Brazile needs to contact Donald Trump and go public on a major news network station - and tell the world how Hillary Clinton acted that night and how she was treated. She needs to tell the American people that she made a mistake taking a job for this woman and she has too much of a conscience to remain silent while Hillary Clinton attempts to make her way to the White House. I'll be praying she does it and if she doesn't, I pray the NBC Executive will go to Matt Lauer and say, Let's go to Donald Trump and take this story to the American people.
That is what real news reporting / journalism is all about. You put the truth out there. If you don't have the backbone to stand up for the truth and face the "powers of hell" (as you put it) you have no business in the business of journalism. It is what it is.
Last edited: