Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And you would fit right in on a thread where everyone sticks their fingers in their ears and go LA LA LA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU! Why won't any of you try to refute anything, or even read it? And don't trot out that BS about the source. The article made scientific claims. Can you refute them?You really shouldn't post links that you don't understand.The earth is only a few thousand years old. That’s a fact, plainly revealed in God’s Word. So we should expect to find plenty of evidence for its youth. And that’s what we find—in the earth’s geology, biology, paleontology, and even astronomy.
The 10 Best Evidences from Science that Confirm a Young Earth Answers in Genesis
You're all a bunch on gutless cowards.
Now, Mr. right, I am sure that there is a thread somewhere where you would fit right in, and people would be of an intelligence level where you would be accepted, and even generate a conversation.Maybe a thread like, 'Was Jesus an alien from Kyrpton?" I just don't think that will happen here.
The Black Right...'It's just a flesh wound.'You're all a bunch on gutless cowards.
The Author refuted them, you batshit looney!And you would fit right in on a thread where everyone sticks their fingers in their ears and go LA LA LA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU! Why won't any of you try to refute anything, or even read it? And don't trot out that BS about the source. The article made scientific claims. Can you refute them?
This belongs in the CT forum – it's actually too stupid to be in religion and 'ethics,' which is quite an accomplishment.The earth is only a few thousand years old. That’s a fact, plainly revealed in God’s Word. So we should expect to find plenty of evidence for its youth. And that’s what we find—in the earth’s geology, biology, paleontology, and even astronomy.
The 10 Best Evidences from Science that Confirm a Young Earth Answers in Genesis
Most never took him seriously since he got here.Wow, I'm going to have a hard time taking Mr. Young Earth seriously from here on out.
LULZ.
Mutation rates vary and some don't even change (Crocodile, Ceolocanth, Tuatara...etc) Different genetic variants within a species are referred to as alleles, and so a new mutation is said to create a new allele. In population genetics, each allele is characterized by a selection coefficient, which measures the expected change in an allele's frequency over time. The selection coefficient can either be negative, corresponding to an expected decrease, positive, corresponding to an expected increase, or zero, corresponding to no expected change.They were shocked that the bacteria’s DNA was very similar to modern bacterial DNA. If the modern bacteria were the result of 250 million years of evolution, its DNA should be very different from the Lazarus bacteria (based on known mutation rates).
Who ever said a million years. Again different organisms have different rates.In addition, the scientists were surprised to find that the DNA was still intact after the supposed 250 million years. DNA normally breaks down quickly, even in ideal conditions. Even evolutionists agree that DNA in bacterial spores (a dormant state) should not last more than a million years. Their quandary is quite substantial.
Theory on the evolution of mutation rates identifies three principal forces involved: the generation of more deleterious mutations with higher mutation, the generation of more advantageous mutations with higher mutation, and the metabolic costs and reduced replication rates that are required to prevent mutations. Different conclusions are reached based on the relative importance attributed to each force. The optimal mutation rate of organisms may be determined by a trade-off between costs of a high mutation rate,[10] such as deleterious mutations, and the metabolic costs of maintaining systems to reduce the mutation rate (such as increasing the expression of DNA repair enzymes.[11] or, as reviewed by Bernstein et al.[12] having increased energy use for repair, coding for additional gene products and/or having slower replication). Second, higher mutation rates increase the rate of beneficial mutations, and evolution may prevent a lowering of the mutation rate in order to maintain optimal rates of adaptation.[13] Finally, natural selection may fail to optimize the mutation rate because of the relatively minor benefits of lowering the mutation rate, and thus the observed mutation rate is the product of neutral processes
seriously doodThe earth is only a few thousand years old. That’s a fact, plainly revealed in God’s Word. So we should expect to find plenty of evidence for its youth. And that’s what we find—in the earth’s geology, biology, paleontology, and even astronomy.
The 10 Best Evidences from Science that Confirm a Young Earth Answers in Genesis
and he's trolled my butt posting that he has me on ignoreWhat a low IQ uneducated loon
It seems that the author of your silly young earth article is also associated with Ken Ham's even sillier creation museum.Then you shouldn't have any problem refuting my evidence. Assuming you actually read it. Which I sincerely doubt.So please, there isn't a fucking thing supporting young earth. It is no surprise that someone that is anti-science would post such bullcrap.
And you would fit right in on a thread where everyone sticks their fingers in their ears and go LA LA LA, I CAN'T HEAR YOU! Why won't any of you try to refute anything, or even read it? And don't trot out that BS about the source. The article made scientific claims. Can you refute them?You really shouldn't post links that you don't understand.The earth is only a few thousand years old. That’s a fact, plainly revealed in God’s Word. So we should expect to find plenty of evidence for its youth. And that’s what we find—in the earth’s geology, biology, paleontology, and even astronomy.
The 10 Best Evidences from Science that Confirm a Young Earth Answers in Genesis
You're all a bunch on gutless cowards.
Now, Mr. right, I am sure that there is a thread somewhere where you would fit right in, and people would be of an intelligence level where you would be accepted, and even generate a conversation.Maybe a thread like, 'Was Jesus an alien from Kyrpton?" I just don't think that will happen here.
He has me on ignore tooand he's trolled my butt posting that he has me on ignoreWhat a low IQ uneducated loon
This is exactly the response I expected from you atheist fools. Now, how about trying to refute what I posted? It might fool someone Into thinking you have some intelligence.
