Texas Judge Opens The Door For Medicare To Replace The ACA

[skews13]

In the next few days Republicans will be screaming that they’ll protect pre-existing conditions, and you’ll hear a series of lies about new plans that offer everything and will cost almost nothing.

And the Democrats will now be emboldened to do what they’ve been trying to do since Harry Truman, real universal health care for all.

Texas Judge Opens The Door For Medicare To Replace The ACA.

 

[Oddball]

Another tree-fiddy to you from the propagandists at Kos!

 

[SassyIrishLass]

LOL @ The Daily Kook

 

[WillowTree]

How solvent is Medicare?

 

[skews13]

Another tree-fiddy to you from the propagandists at Kos!

That's funny. This piece over at Politico seems to have Republicans in a not so happy mood over the decision.

GOP feels heat in wake of Obamacare ruling: 'It's all the downsides'

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Another tree-fiddy to you from the propagandists at Kos!

That's funny. This piece over at Politico seems to have Republicans in a not so happy mood over the decision.

GOP feels heat in wake of Obamacare ruling: 'It's all the downsides'

You better reread your own link, a Republican called for bipartisanship on it. Thats it other than some Politico blather

 

[Wyatt earp]

In the next few days Republicans will be screaming that they’ll protect pre-existing conditions, and you’ll hear a series of lies about new plans that offer everything and will cost almost nothing.

And the Democrats will now be emboldened to do what they’ve been trying to do since Harry Truman, real universal health care for all.

Texas Judge Opens The Door For Medicare To Replace The ACA.

Another stupid article, the Republicans sure didn't lose the house because of Obama care .

 

[nat4900]

Actually I DO want for the right wingers to repeal the ACA........As Napoleon is reported to have said......."When your enemy is about to commit suicide.... don't get in his way."

 

[Lesh]

How solvent is Medicare?

It'll be a lot more solvent with a Medicare Buy In

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

How solvent is Medicare?

It'll be a lot more solvent with a Medicare Buy In

There are a lot of doctors out there who won’t even take Medicare patients

 

[nat4900]

There are a lot of doctors out there who won’t even take Medicare patients

It sure hives new meaning to that old Hippocratic Oath, doesn't it?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

“Could a federal judge in Texas be the catalyst that finally brings down the Affordable Care Act, a law that has withstood countless assaults from Republicans in Congress and two Supreme Court challenges?

On the morning after Judge Reed O’Connor’s startling ruling that struck down the landmark health law, legal scholars were doubtful.

Lawyers on both sides of previous A.C.A. battles said the reasoning behind this one was badly flawed, notably in its insistence that the entire 2010 law must fall because one of its provisions may have been rendered invalid by the 2017 tax overhaul legislation. Had Congress meant to take such radical action, they said, it would have said so at the time.

Legal experts also noted that the Supreme Court, where most people believe the case is headed, historically has been reluctant to strike down federal laws, particularly those that have become ingrained in the lives of millions of citizens.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/health-law-could-be-hard-to-knock-down-despite-judge

In fact, it’s unlikely the case will heard by the Supreme Court if the appellate court’s ruling has the effect of upholding the Act.

 

[OKTexas]

In the next few days Republicans will be screaming that they’ll protect pre-existing conditions, and you’ll hear a series of lies about new plans that offer everything and will cost almost nothing.

And the Democrats will now be emboldened to do what they’ve been trying to do since Harry Truman, real universal health care for all.

Texas Judge Opens The Door For Medicare To Replace The ACA.

That's got to be one of the funniest things I've heard on this forum. 3.2 Trillion dollars a year, who the hell is going to pay for it, Mexico?

.

 

[OKTexas]

“Could a federal judge in Texas be the catalyst that finally brings down the Affordable Care Act, a law that has withstood countless assaults from Republicans in Congress and two Supreme Court challenges?

On the morning after Judge Reed O’Connor’s startling ruling that struck down the landmark health law, legal scholars were doubtful.

Lawyers on both sides of previous A.C.A. battles said the reasoning behind this one was badly flawed, notably in its insistence that the entire 2010 law must fall because one of its provisions may have been rendered invalid by the 2017 tax overhaul legislation. Had Congress meant to take such radical action, they said, it would have said so at the time.

Legal experts also noted that the Supreme Court, where most people believe the case is headed, historically has been reluctant to strike down federal laws, particularly those that have become ingrained in the lives of millions of citizens.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/health-law-could-be-hard-to-knock-down-despite-judge

In fact, it’s unlikely the case will heard by the Supreme Court if the appellate court’s ruling has the effect of upholding the Act.

So you think the courts will continue to ignore the Constitution? The law should have been stricken the first time it was heard. There was no clause to allow severance if any portion was found unconstitutional. This judge is following the law on that.

.

 

[Wyatt earp]

“Could a federal judge in Texas be the catalyst that finally brings down the Affordable Care Act, a law that has withstood countless assaults from Republicans in Congress and two Supreme Court challenges?

On the morning after Judge Reed O’Connor’s startling ruling that struck down the landmark health law, legal scholars were doubtful.

Lawyers on both sides of previous A.C.A. battles said the reasoning behind this one was badly flawed, notably in its insistence that the entire 2010 law must fall because one of its provisions may have been rendered invalid by the 2017 tax overhaul legislation. Had Congress meant to take such radical action, they said, it would have said so at the time.

Legal experts also noted that the Supreme Court, where most people believe the case is headed, historically has been reluctant to strike down federal laws, particularly those that have become ingrained in the lives of millions of citizens.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/health-law-could-be-hard-to-knock-down-despite-judge

In fact, it’s unlikely the case will heard by the Supreme Court if the appellate court’s ruling has the effect of upholding the Act.

So you think the courts will continue to ignore the Constitution? The law should have been stricken the first time it was heard. There was no clause to allow severance if any portion was found unconstitutional. This judge is following the law on that.

.

You remember how long it took to reverse Chicago gun ban?




This is the same thing and the democrats are going to go nuts .


.

 

[francoHFW]

Actually I DO want for the right wingers to repeal the ACA........As Napoleon is reported to have said......."When your enemy is about to commit suicide.... don't get in his way."

I don't believe they can repeal it but it is great to watch them try with no plan of their own. PopNapoleon was great and he was more than average height etc. Perfidious Albion... Never said England was a nation of shopkeepers he said they were monopolists and Savage capitalists... Franco stands for Francophile don't get me started. LOL

 

[Wyatt earp]

“Could a federal judge in Texas be the catalyst that finally brings down the Affordable Care Act, a law that has withstood countless assaults from Republicans in Congress and two Supreme Court challenges?

On the morning after Judge Reed O’Connor’s startling ruling that struck down the landmark health law, legal scholars were doubtful.

Lawyers on both sides of previous A.C.A. battles said the reasoning behind this one was badly flawed, notably in its insistence that the entire 2010 law must fall because one of its provisions may have been rendered invalid by the 2017 tax overhaul legislation. Had Congress meant to take such radical action, they said, it would have said so at the time.

Legal experts also noted that the Supreme Court, where most people believe the case is headed, historically has been reluctant to strike down federal laws, particularly those that have become ingrained in the lives of millions of citizens.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/health-law-could-be-hard-to-knock-down-despite-judge

In fact, it’s unlikely the case will heard by the Supreme Court if the appellate court’s ruling has the effect of upholding the Act.

Translation~ you still want our money to pay for your fat ass...and poor choices in life .

 

[OKTexas]

“Could a federal judge in Texas be the catalyst that finally brings down the Affordable Care Act, a law that has withstood countless assaults from Republicans in Congress and two Supreme Court challenges?

On the morning after Judge Reed O’Connor’s startling ruling that struck down the landmark health law, legal scholars were doubtful.

Lawyers on both sides of previous A.C.A. battles said the reasoning behind this one was badly flawed, notably in its insistence that the entire 2010 law must fall because one of its provisions may have been rendered invalid by the 2017 tax overhaul legislation. Had Congress meant to take such radical action, they said, it would have said so at the time.

Legal experts also noted that the Supreme Court, where most people believe the case is headed, historically has been reluctant to strike down federal laws, particularly those that have become ingrained in the lives of millions of citizens.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/health-law-could-be-hard-to-knock-down-despite-judge

In fact, it’s unlikely the case will heard by the Supreme Court if the appellate court’s ruling has the effect of upholding the Act.

So you think the courts will continue to ignore the Constitution? The law should have been stricken the first time it was heard. There was no clause to allow severance if any portion was found unconstitutional. This judge is following the law on that.

.

You remember how long it took to reverse Chicago gun ban?




This is the same thing and the democrats are going to go nuts .


.

I don't think Roberts has the balls to admit his mistakes, he'll probably vote with the commies to strike down this decision.

.

 

[Wyatt earp]

“Could a federal judge in Texas be the catalyst that finally brings down the Affordable Care Act, a law that has withstood countless assaults from Republicans in Congress and two Supreme Court challenges?

On the morning after Judge Reed O’Connor’s startling ruling that struck down the landmark health law, legal scholars were doubtful.

Lawyers on both sides of previous A.C.A. battles said the reasoning behind this one was badly flawed, notably in its insistence that the entire 2010 law must fall because one of its provisions may have been rendered invalid by the 2017 tax overhaul legislation. Had Congress meant to take such radical action, they said, it would have said so at the time.

Legal experts also noted that the Supreme Court, where most people believe the case is headed, historically has been reluctant to strike down federal laws, particularly those that have become ingrained in the lives of millions of citizens.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/health-law-could-be-hard-to-knock-down-despite-judge

In fact, it’s unlikely the case will heard by the Supreme Court if the appellate court’s ruling has the effect of upholding the Act.

So you think the courts will continue to ignore the Constitution? The law should have been stricken the first time it was heard. There was no clause to allow severance if any portion was found unconstitutional. This judge is following the law on that.

.

You remember how long it took to reverse Chicago gun ban?




This is the same thing and the democrats are going to go nuts .


.

I don't think Roberts has the balls to admit his mistakes, he'll probably vote with the commies to strike down this decision.

.

I was thinking the same thing after I posted it.


I only 53 but that was messed up ..

 

[OKTexas]

“Could a federal judge in Texas be the catalyst that finally brings down the Affordable Care Act, a law that has withstood countless assaults from Republicans in Congress and two Supreme Court challenges?

On the morning after Judge Reed O’Connor’s startling ruling that struck down the landmark health law, legal scholars were doubtful.

Lawyers on both sides of previous A.C.A. battles said the reasoning behind this one was badly flawed, notably in its insistence that the entire 2010 law must fall because one of its provisions may have been rendered invalid by the 2017 tax overhaul legislation. Had Congress meant to take such radical action, they said, it would have said so at the time.

Legal experts also noted that the Supreme Court, where most people believe the case is headed, historically has been reluctant to strike down federal laws, particularly those that have become ingrained in the lives of millions of citizens.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/health-law-could-be-hard-to-knock-down-despite-judge

In fact, it’s unlikely the case will heard by the Supreme Court if the appellate court’s ruling has the effect of upholding the Act.

So you think the courts will continue to ignore the Constitution? The law should have been stricken the first time it was heard. There was no clause to allow severance if any portion was found unconstitutional. This judge is following the law on that.

.

You remember how long it took to reverse Chicago gun ban?




This is the same thing and the democrats are going to go nuts .


.

I don't think Roberts has the balls to admit his mistakes, he'll probably vote with the commies to strike down this decision.

.

I was thinking the same thing after I posted it.


I only 53 but that was messed up ..

Can you translate that second sentence?

.