Back to the Topic the Forum Flamers want to smokescreen away from:
Awesome. So that explains why the Jews killed Jesus.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Back to the Topic the Forum Flamers want to smokescreen away from:
Questions which were answered many times cordially, even though they were asked in less then sincere terms and in satanic rants by you.
Hence when you are acting as if these things were never discussed you are smokescreening in folly and lying=spiritual darkness while breaking
both the laws and the forum rules.
You still can't refute why you willingly and knowingly believe in asanta and the Easter Bunny, so you try to smokescreen and flame the post instead, but all you manage to do is prove my social behavior points while back slapping yourself trying to swing at me.
Link?Also you guys don't realize Jesus and Paul aren't the only compiled figures....
Meanwhile, some thought: Morning Star, "Son of the Morning Star" is a book about Custer and the events leading up to the Battle of the Little Big Horn.
Since God is all knowing and all powerful, God knew Lucifer would revolt. So why did God create Lucifer? A long topic of debate.
So you agree that it was good thing the Jews had Jesus crucified?
Of course there's no link. Outside of the Bible and a passing comment by historian Flavius Josephus, there is no written evidence of Jesus of Nazareth. Why would there be? He was just one of thousands executed by the powers that be of the time.There's no link, The head priest Shimon is historically recorded as were many important Rabbis. Other combined figures like Paul being combined has proof through accts of "Pol"
Appolonias of Tyana who was from Tarsus
and who's accts of fleeing through a window to Syria is plagiarized in the Paul accts. Book of Acts reveals Sergius Paulus called Paul meeting Saul and it was Paulus who had a friend Maggis(elymas) called Bar(son)Jesus who Saul blasted as the son of the devil.
Jesus being easy to prove as combined through dissecting the many historical christ figures to events in the mythology.
Example: The Christ sentenced to stoning and hanging as per the NT accts of slew and hanged not crucified and Mark and John saying it was at passover is the 100bc era Yeshu son of the Harlot Mary.
But the Galilean in the era of Herod (died 4bc) and Lysanias (died 35bc) was Yehuda who was crucified in 6bc for his tax revolt. The AD era Christ therefore can only be Theudas by the Jordan who's apostles died for their revolt against Rome. Jesus is not only borrowed from Baal and Mithra and admitingly Zoroastrianism(John Apochryphon admission),but also made seemingly real through use of many historical stories and Biblical legends and stolen roles.
Hence why needing new names and birthdates, having more then 1 hometown, profession, blame, death technique, and why eras and figures expose this combination and compilation.
So when you ask why ALLOW (not create) Lucifer to exist that's answered once you recognize his image already existed in the ancient Persian lands (walked the Garden) as Zoroaster, Mithra, Baal. But now that image infused half a Judaic Torah ethos &
Abrahamic Essence bringing people half way to where they could and should be so Moshiach ben David can bring them fully into the fold. Without the fallen ben Joseph they'd be fully Baal, Mithra and other Pagan worshipers. Hence the 2 guardian symbols=the 2 messiahs and the legend in the city is of the overturning the first fallen messiah by the actual Moshiach hence the term Shiloh (meaning one who's right it is).
Yada, yada, yada. Dude, you epitomize the maxim "If you can't dazzle'em with brilliance, baffle'em with bullshit". You're the one making a case that Jesus was either the Devil or a Devil-worshiper, so why run from the "justified" execution of a Satan-worshiper by the Jewish leadership?That right there is a clear cut example of "displaced blame" I was discussing with Hobelim.
A Roman tactic they used on many cultures to become their new keepers of the cultures they subverted's faith.
That displacement blanket terming all Jews for the acts of a few on one criminal punishment (Yeshu of 100bc) of the many figures used for a fictitious character Jesus who's other characters were killed
"by Rome" for their revolts means millions of people were murdered over displaced blame over a fictitious legend created by the murderers of the actual historical martyrs.=nothing more satanic then that.
Christianity has used the blame game yet contradict that game when denouncing blame for the crusades, inquisition, holocaust etc...or when they claim Islamic Radicalism against Christians is unjustified.
You can't have it both ways, either Christians are all collectively to blame for the crusades justifying The Jihaadist or Christians have to admit blaming all Jews and the murders in doing so is the same radical evil. Thus they are seeing a mirror of hate and they are seeing that reflection is basically admission that they hate themselves for what they did and still do, but can't come to admit directly thus displace, as per my lesson to Hobelim.
Does Josephus prove a historical Jesus?Of course there's no link. Outside of the Bible and a passing comment by historian Flavius Josephus, there is no written evidence of Jesus of Nazareth. Why would there be? He was just one of thousands executed by the powers that be of the time.There's no link, The head priest Shimon is historically recorded as were many important Rabbis. Other combined figures like Paul being combined has proof through accts of "Pol"
Appolonias of Tyana who was from Tarsus
and who's accts of fleeing through a window to Syria is plagiarized in the Paul accts. Book of Acts reveals Sergius Paulus called Paul meeting Saul and it was Paulus who had a friend Maggis(elymas) called Bar(son)Jesus who Saul blasted as the son of the devil.
Jesus being easy to prove as combined through dissecting the many historical christ figures to events in the mythology.
Example: The Christ sentenced to stoning and hanging as per the NT accts of slew and hanged not crucified and Mark and John saying it was at passover is the 100bc era Yeshu son of the Harlot Mary.
But the Galilean in the era of Herod (died 4bc) and Lysanias (died 35bc) was Yehuda who was crucified in 6bc for his tax revolt. The AD era Christ therefore can only be Theudas by the Jordan who's apostles died for their revolt against Rome. Jesus is not only borrowed from Baal and Mithra and admitingly Zoroastrianism(John Apochryphon admission),but also made seemingly real through use of many historical stories and Biblical legends and stolen roles.
Hence why needing new names and birthdates, having more then 1 hometown, profession, blame, death technique, and why eras and figures expose this combination and compilation.
So when you ask why ALLOW (not create) Lucifer to exist that's answered once you recognize his image already existed in the ancient Persian lands (walked the Garden) as Zoroaster, Mithra, Baal. But now that image infused half a Judaic Torah ethos &
Abrahamic Essence bringing people half way to where they could and should be so Moshiach ben David can bring them fully into the fold. Without the fallen ben Joseph they'd be fully Baal, Mithra and other Pagan worshipers. Hence the 2 guardian symbols=the 2 messiahs and the legend in the city is of the overturning the first fallen messiah by the actual Moshiach hence the term Shiloh (meaning one who's right it is).
OTOH, your defense of the Christ Killers is interesting.
Yada, yada, yada. Dude, you epitomize the maxim "If you can't dazzle'em with brilliance, baffle'em with bullshit". You're the one making a case that Jesus was either the Devil or a Devil-worshiper, so why run from the "justified" execution of a Satan-worshiper by the Jewish leadership?That right there is a clear cut example of "displaced blame" I was discussing with Hobelim.
A Roman tactic they used on many cultures to become their new keepers of the cultures they subverted's faith.
That displacement blanket terming all Jews for the acts of a few on one criminal punishment (Yeshu of 100bc) of the many figures used for a fictitious character Jesus who's other characters were killed
"by Rome" for their revolts means millions of people were murdered over displaced blame over a fictitious legend created by the murderers of the actual historical martyrs.=nothing more satanic then that.
Christianity has used the blame game yet contradict that game when denouncing blame for the crusades, inquisition, holocaust etc...or when they claim Islamic Radicalism against Christians is unjustified.
You can't have it both ways, either Christians are all collectively to blame for the crusades justifying The Jihaadist or Christians have to admit blaming all Jews and the murders in doing so is the same radical evil. Thus they are seeing a mirror of hate and they are seeing that reflection is basically admission that they hate themselves for what they did and still do, but can't come to admit directly thus displace, as per my lesson to Hobelim.
Yada, yada, yada. You keep harping how Jesus is as Satan worshiper then you run for the hills when anyone says "Then it's a good thing the Jews killed him". Why do I need to know anything about your previous teachings when this one is so flawed?The problem is you keep meshing the mythical figure with the historical figures used for the myth to make him seem historical. The Jewish expectations of the son of perdition is that Lucifer is a CREATED IMAGE of a man not that he is real.-Ezekiel 28
You are coming from a place of not knowing my previous commentary or teachings......
Wow. You're a bigger idiot than I thought. Please quote me where you think I said Jesus never existed?How can you kill someone who even you admit never existed? Busted!
You are arguing over who in South Park killed Kenny even though you know Kenny is a cartoon character.
Wow. You're a bigger idiot than I thought. Please quote me where you think I said Jesus never existed?How can you kill someone who even you admit never existed? Busted!
You are arguing over who in South Park killed Kenny even though you know Kenny is a cartoon character.
You're the "Jewish Scholar" arguing that Jesus was either Satan himself or a Satan worshiper, justifying his execution. Why are you so upset?
You just violated one of the Ten Commandments by bearing false witness. Quoting out of context or a portion of a quote in order to give a distorted view is a deception. A lie. Ergo, you bore false witness against me.Aug 11th 9:45 AM you said quote :
"there is no written evidence of Jesus of Nazareth. Why would there be?"
Of course there's no link. Outside of the Bible and a passing comment by historian Flavius Josephus, there is no written evidence of Jesus of Nazareth. Why would there be? He was just one of thousands executed by the powers that be of the time.
OTOH, your defense of the Christ Killers is interesting.
You just violated one of the Ten Commandments by bearing false witness. Quoting out of context or a portion of a quote in order to give a distorted view is a deception. A lie. Ergo, you bore false witness against me.Aug 11th 9:45 AM you said quote :
"there is no written evidence of Jesus of Nazareth. Why would there be?"
Obviously the post below and several others not only acknowledge the existence of Jesus, but rebuke your constant false and unsubstantiated opinion that he was Satan or a Satan worshiper.
Of course there's no link. Outside of the Bible and a passing comment by historian Flavius Josephus, there is no written evidence of Jesus of Nazareth. Why would there be? He was just one of thousands executed by the powers that be of the time.
OTOH, your defense of the Christ Killers is interesting.