Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Glad you admit you Tards led the charge on RACISM...
It's hard to believe you are straight, your fingers type otherwise....
Glad you admit you Tards led the charge on RACISM...
It's hard to believe you are straight, your fingers type otherwise....
Funny thing. They've done studies, and found that violent homophobes are usually latent homosexuals themselves...
They found the most homophobic guys they could, attached meters tot heir peckers and showed them gay porn, and guess what, they got serious erections...
So a left-wing loon devoid of facts responds to data, links, and facts with “but... but...but...you’re a <insert adjective here> PHOBE”. Gee, haven’t seen that pitiful tactic before.It's you who can't see beyond the end of your homophobic nose.
Uh...the left has been saying that for years, sweetie.And climbs in bed with them? Who besides someone obsessed with gay sex would even say anything like that?
So in other words, you think children should suffer so people like you can get off on sexual deviance. Nice. Classy. Typical selfish leftist.So in other words, you don't want equal rights for all, just the ones you think should have them, right?
But not as “piss-poor” as your reading comprehension and sexism. The article was written by a woman. And she made that abundantly clear in the article.This a pathetically piss poor argument against same sex marriage.
The only threads you are in are faggot threads.You aren't? It's all you ever talk about.I'm not obsessed with gays and the fact that you make that assumption does not speak well for your level of intellectual functioning or emotional maturity. I am obsessed with social justice and human rightsWhy are you so obsessed with gay?'Tennessee Natural Marriage Defense Act' seeks to strip gay marriage rights
I really have to wonder what the fuck is wrong with these people! My only question is, are they so stupid and blindly driven by their bigotry that they don't know that any federal judge will immediately slap on injunction on this- because they would have to given the Obergefell precedent- OR is a a strategy to get the case back to SCOTUS?
My guess is that they are anticipating and provoking a court fight, but even if it gets to SCOTUS there is no certainty that Obergefell will be overturned. Never in our history a right-once established- been revoked. A Roberts, who seems to have become the new swing vote, is aware of the outrage that would insue and the stain on his legacy that it would inflict.
And that is not all
These people have to be, and will be stopped.
i always like to insert the GREED/conservative socialism aspect of these situations;
gays can't marry or adopt means they don't get those tax breaks while heteros DO get those tax breaks.
so gays pay MORE in taxes (to support a hetero culture) while heteros pay less.......is that technically "socialism"?
No it’s not Check out my profile
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
How cute...you turned to two radical wing-nut sources in a sad attempt to discredit the medical community and the world’s most respected think tank.The Daily Signal
Daily Signal - Media Bias/Fact Check
In addition, the findings in this article rely on the so call research of the American College of Pediatrics which has zero credibilityThese media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward conservative causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage conservative causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Right Bias sources.
- Overall, we rate the Daily Signal, Right Biased based on story selection and editorial positions that always favor the right and Mixed for factual reporting due to not aligning with the consensus of science regarding climate change.
The American College of Pediatricians (ACP) is a wingnut collection of pediatricians who espouse a socially conservative and " family values " agenda in opposition to the pediatric mainstream that, in their view, has a liberal bias. The SPLC has described it as a hate group.
American College of Pediatricians - RationalWiki
rationalwiki.org/wiki/American_College_of_Pediatricians
What does that have to do with a state wanting the power of regulating marriage on behalf of its children affected by the definition?Funny thing. They've done studies, and found that violent homophobes are usually latent homosexuals themselves....
What does that have to do with a state wanting the power of regulating marriage on behalf of its children affected by the definition?Funny thing. They've done studies, and found that violent homophobes are usually latent homosexuals themselves....
The only threads you are in are faggot threads.You aren't? It's all you ever talk about.I'm not obsessed with gays and the fact that you make that assumption does not speak well for your level of intellectual functioning or emotional maturity. I am obsessed with social justice and human rightsWhy are you so obsessed with gay?i always like to insert the GREED/conservative socialism aspect of these situations;
gays can't marry or adopt means they don't get those tax breaks while heteros DO get those tax breaks.
so gays pay MORE in taxes (to support a hetero culture) while heteros pay less.......is that technically "socialism"?
No it’s not Check out my profile
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I know so because you are a faggot. A disgusting perverse creature that has no moral character.The only threads you are in are faggot threads.You aren't? It's all you ever talk about.I'm not obsessed with gays and the fact that you make that assumption does not speak well for your level of intellectual functioning or emotional maturity. I am obsessed with social justice and human rightsWhy are you so obsessed with gay?
No it’s not Check out my profile
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You think so because the only treads that your on are “faggot” threats
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So what that it was written by a woman ? That does not change anything and makes no sense! You seem desperate now.But not as “piss-poor” as your reading comprehension and sexism. The article was written by a woman. And she made that abundantly clear in the article.This a pathetically piss poor argument against same sex marriage.
You should have been able to figure out that it's a typo. It should read "to Bar"I'm still trying to figure out what tonBar means.
What language does tonBar come from?
*sigh* Humor is so wasted on Some People.
You should have been able to figure out that it's a typo. It should read "to Bar"I'm still trying to figure out what tonBar means.
What language does tonBar come from?
*sigh* Humor is so wasted on Some People.
That was humor?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If you'd actually read the bible, you know that the "sins" of Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing to do with gays or gay marriage....it had to do with inhospitality.You didn't beat the shit out of anything! Where did you go to school? Trump U? Did you go to school?You don't know that much do youThere is no "gay gene" that's passed on from parents to their children. So that would mean that it's either either a defect or a behavior.
Study Finds Epigenetics, Not Genetics, Underlies Homosexuality
Aside from genetics, there are other factors that can effect sexual orientation
UC Berkeley Psychologist Finds Evidence That Male Hormones In The Womb Affect Sexual Orientation
In any case, this contradicts the "defect of behavior" horseshit
We already beat the shit out of that article last time you posted it UC BERKELY gimme a fucking break ....
I think what you're failing to consider is history. Our President has suggested that the American people become more biblically literate.
If you study the bible, you can see how poorly Gay Marriage and Sodomy worked out for the city of Sodom as well as Gomorrah. Sodom adopted its name, because of the high amount of sodomy being performed within its city limits. The city did not survive.
Yeah Yeah Yeah....we know. The OT doesn't count....except when it does.If you'd actually read the bible, you know that the "sins" of Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing to do with gays or gay marriage....it had to do with inhospitality.I think what you're failing to consider is history. Our President has suggested that the American people become more biblically literate.
If you study the bible, you can see how poorly Gay Marriage and Sodomy worked out for the city of Sodom as well as Gomorrah. Sodom adopted its name, because of the high amount of sodomy being performed within its city limits. The city did not survive.
Sweety - I'm not even a Christian and I know thats a pile of horse shit .... I have studied the bible extensively - which is why I am not a Christian - but you are simply posting false horse feathers
In Leviticus 18.22 it says that it is an abomination for a man to lie with another man as with a woman. In Lev. 20.13 the death penalty is prescribed in Israel for such an act, along with adultery, incest, and bestiality. Now sometimes homosexual advocates make light of these prohibitions by comparing them to prohibitions in the Old Testament against having contact with unclean animals like pigs. Just as Christians today don’t obey all of the Old Testament ceremonial laws, so, they say, we don’t have to obey the prohibitions of homosexual actions. But the problem with this argument is that the New Testament reaffirms the validity of the Old Testament prohibitions of homosexual behavior, as we’ll see below. This shows they were not just part of the ceremonial laws of the Old Testament, which were done away with, but were part of God’s everlasting moral law. Homosexual behavior is in God’s sight a serious sin. The third place where homosexual acts are mentioned in the Old Testament is the horrifying story in Genesis 19 of the attempted gang rape of Lot’s visitors by the men of Sodom, from which our word sodomy derives. God destroyed the city of Sodom because of their wickedness.
Which is why it’s important to understand that the New Testament came along as Jesus’ more reasonable modification of old Jewish laws. Even stil, Jesus reminds his followers in Roman’s 1 & Jude 1 that the particular prohibition (gay culture & behaviors) are in even his eyes, just as calling for God’s wrath.
It's not the "OT" that doesn't count my dear - it's you that don't count .... now run away like a good little cockroach
More CRC talk.I know so because you are a faggot. A disgusting perverse creature that has no moral character.The only threads you are in are faggot threads.You aren't? It's all you ever talk about.I'm not obsessed with gays and the fact that you make that assumption does not speak well for your level of intellectual functioning or emotional maturity. I am obsessed with social justice and human rights
No it’s not Check out my profile
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You think so because the only treads that your on are “faggot” threats
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So, only religious people can get married?Here's to a thumb in your eye big guy
No thumb, no eye. tl;dr. Civil unions were the ticket, all that was needed, but gays just couldn't be satisfied with being equal.
Civil unions are NOT the same as being married. This was pointed out several pages ago.
Who said they should be? Marriage is a holy coupling between man and woman.
Ironically, my wife and I had a church wedding almost 20 years before we could legally marry.
