Ted Cruz just scared the Shiite out of Liberals.....

[kiwiman127]

Cruz/Palin 2016.

Dems dream team.

Republicans have the right to select a presidential candidate that reflects the majority of the party and its goals.

Given the ignorance common to most republicans and their advocacy of reckless, irresponsible, and failed policies, Cruz is the perfect GOP candidate.

Your posts are becoming increasingly ironic.
How many lefties here are getting their asses handed to them when they post nonsense and errors? A lot. Every day.
Reckless, irresponsible, and failed policies? Surely you mean Obama and the Democrats. Every policy or law they have implemented has failed miserably. They achieved nothing of what they promised, and they have lied consistently about it.

If anyone here on USMB knows about getting their ass handed to them, it would be Rabbit!

 

[Disir]

You support handing the Internet over to China?

That's what that stupid fucking moron of a god of yours is doing..

Networks Yawn as Obama Administration Gives Away the Internet | NewsBusters

But you'll worship and praise him anyway. fucking sheep.

Ok, you fucking worthless piece of shit...................I am not a Democrat. Now, grow the fuck up. Welcome to ignore.

NO...just a Statist LIBERAL.

Imagine filing your income taxes in five minutes — and for free. You'd open up a pre-filled return, see what the government thinks you owe, make any needed changes and be done. The miserable annual IRS shuffle, gone.

It's already a reality in Denmark, Sweden and Spain. The government-prepared return would estimate your taxes using information your employer and bank already send it. Advocates say tens of millions of taxpayers could use such a system each year, saving them a collective $2 billion and 225 million hours in prep costs and time, according to one estimate.

The idea, known as "return-free filing," would be a voluntary alternative to hiring a tax preparer or using commercial tax software. The concept has been around for decades and has been endorsed by both President Ronald Reagan and a campaigning President Obama.

"This is not some pie-in-the-sky that's never been done before," said William Gale, co-director of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. "It's doable, feasible, implementable, and at a relatively low cost."

So why hasn't it become a reality?

Well, for one thing, it doesn't help that it's been opposed for years by the company behind the most popular consumer tax software — Intuit, maker of TurboTax. Conservative tax activist Grover Norquist and an influential computer industry group also have fought return-free filing.

Intuit has spent about $11.5 million on federal lobbying in the past five years — more than Apple or Amazon. Although the lobbying spans a range of issues, Intuit's disclosures pointedly note that the company "opposes IRS government tax preparation."

The disclosures show that Intuit as recently as 2011 lobbied on two bills, both of which died, that would have allowed many taxpayers to file pre-filled returns for free. The company also lobbied on bills in 2007 and 2011 that would have barred the Treasury Department, which includes the IRS, from initiating return-free filing.

Intuit argues that allowing the IRS to act as a tax preparer could result in taxpayers paying more money. It is also a member of the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), which sponsors a "STOP IRS TAKEOVER" campaign and a website calling return-free filing a "massive expansion of the U.S. government through a big government program."

In an emailed statement, Intuit spokeswoman Julie Miller said, "Like many other companies, Intuit actively participates in the political process." Return-free programs curtail citizen participation in the tax process, she said, and also have "implications for accuracy and fairness in taxation." (Here is Intuit's full statement.)

In its latest annual report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, however, Intuit also says that free government tax preparation presents a risk to its business.

Roughly 25 million Americans used TurboTax last year, and a recent GAO analysis said the software accounted for more than half of individual returns filed electronically. TurboTax products and services made up 35 percent of Intuit's $4.2 billion in total revenues last year. Versions of TurboTax for individuals and small businesses range in price from free to $150.

(H&R Block, whose tax filing product H&R Block At Home competes with TurboTax, declined to discuss return-free filing with ProPublica. The company's disclosure forms state that it also has lobbied on at least one bill related to return-free filing.)

* * *

Proponents of return-free filing say Intuit and other critics are exaggerating the risks of government involvement. No one would be forced to accept the IRS accounting of their taxes, they say, so there's little to fear.

"It's voluntary," Austan Goolsbee, who served as the chief economist for the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, told ProPublica. "If you don't trust the government, you don't have to do it."

Goolsbee has written in favor of the idea and published the estimate of $2 billion in saved preparation costs in a 2006 paper that also said return-free "could significantly reduce the time lag in resolving disputes and accelerate the time to receive a refund."

Other advocates point out that the IRS would be doing essentially the same work it does now. The agency would simply share its tax calculation before a taxpayer files rather than afterward when it checks a return.

"When you make an appointment for a car to get serviced, the service history is all there. Since the IRS already has all that info anyway, it's not a big challenge to put it in a format where we could see it," said Paul Caron, a tax professor at University of Cincinnati College of Law. "For a big slice of the population, that's 100 percent of what's on their tax return."

Taxpayers would have three options when they receive a pre-filled return: accept it as is; make adjustments, say to filing status or income; or reject it and file a return by other means.

"I've been shocked as a tax person and citizen that this hasn't happened by now," Caron said.

Some conservative activists have sided with Intuit.

In 2005, Norquist testified before the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform arguing against return-free filing. The next year, Norquist and others wrote in a letter to President Bush that getting an official-looking "bill" from the IRS could be "extremely intimidating, particularly for seniors, low-income and non-English speaking citizens."

Norquist, founder of Americans for Tax Reform, declined to comment, but a spokesman pointed to a letter he and other conservatives sent this month to members of Congress. The letter says the IRS wants to "socialize all tax preparation in America" to get higher tax revenues. (Update 4/18: Norquist's spokesman, John Kartch, disputes that "Norquist declined comment." During the course of reporting the story, we contacted Kartch to get a comment from Norquist, to which Kartch simply referred us to the letter.)

A year after Norquist wrote Bush, a bill to limit return-free filing was introduced by a pair of unlikely allies: Reps. Eric Cantor, R-Va., the conservative House majority leader, and Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., a liberal stalwart whose district includes Silicon Valley.

Intuit's political committee and employees have contributed to both. Cantor and his leadership PAC have received $26,100 in the past five years from the company's PAC and employees. In the last two years, the Intuit PAC and employees donated $26,000 to Lofgren.

A spokeswoman said in an email that Cantor "doesn't believe the IRS should be in the business of filling out your tax returns for you," and that the bill was designed to "prevent the IRS from circumventing Congress."

How the Maker of TurboTax Fought Free, Simple Tax Filing - ProPublica

You're a fool.

 

[rightwinger]

Ok, you fucking worthless piece of shit...................I am not a Democrat. Now, grow the fuck up. Welcome to ignore.

NO...just a Statist LIBERAL.

Imagine filing your income taxes in five minutes — and for free. You'd open up a pre-filled return, see what the government thinks you owe, make any needed changes and be done. The miserable annual IRS shuffle, gone.

It's already a reality in Denmark, Sweden and Spain. The government-prepared return would estimate your taxes using information your employer and bank already send it. Advocates say tens of millions of taxpayers could use such a system each year, saving them a collective $2 billion and 225 million hours in prep costs and time, according to one estimate.

The idea, known as "return-free filing," would be a voluntary alternative to hiring a tax preparer or using commercial tax software. The concept has been around for decades and has been endorsed by both President Ronald Reagan and a campaigning President Obama.

"This is not some pie-in-the-sky that's never been done before," said William Gale, co-director of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. "It's doable, feasible, implementable, and at a relatively low cost."

So why hasn't it become a reality?

Well, for one thing, it doesn't help that it's been opposed for years by the company behind the most popular consumer tax software — Intuit, maker of TurboTax. Conservative tax activist Grover Norquist and an influential computer industry group also have fought return-free filing.

Intuit has spent about $11.5 million on federal lobbying in the past five years — more than Apple or Amazon. Although the lobbying spans a range of issues, Intuit's disclosures pointedly note that the company "opposes IRS government tax preparation."

The disclosures show that Intuit as recently as 2011 lobbied on two bills, both of which died, that would have allowed many taxpayers to file pre-filled returns for free. The company also lobbied on bills in 2007 and 2011 that would have barred the Treasury Department, which includes the IRS, from initiating return-free filing.

Intuit argues that allowing the IRS to act as a tax preparer could result in taxpayers paying more money. It is also a member of the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), which sponsors a "STOP IRS TAKEOVER" campaign and a website calling return-free filing a "massive expansion of the U.S. government through a big government program."

In an emailed statement, Intuit spokeswoman Julie Miller said, "Like many other companies, Intuit actively participates in the political process." Return-free programs curtail citizen participation in the tax process, she said, and also have "implications for accuracy and fairness in taxation." (Here is Intuit's full statement.)

In its latest annual report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, however, Intuit also says that free government tax preparation presents a risk to its business.

Roughly 25 million Americans used TurboTax last year, and a recent GAO analysis said the software accounted for more than half of individual returns filed electronically. TurboTax products and services made up 35 percent of Intuit's $4.2 billion in total revenues last year. Versions of TurboTax for individuals and small businesses range in price from free to $150.

(H&R Block, whose tax filing product H&R Block At Home competes with TurboTax, declined to discuss return-free filing with ProPublica. The company's disclosure forms state that it also has lobbied on at least one bill related to return-free filing.)

* * *

Proponents of return-free filing say Intuit and other critics are exaggerating the risks of government involvement. No one would be forced to accept the IRS accounting of their taxes, they say, so there's little to fear.

"It's voluntary," Austan Goolsbee, who served as the chief economist for the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, told ProPublica. "If you don't trust the government, you don't have to do it."

Goolsbee has written in favor of the idea and published the estimate of $2 billion in saved preparation costs in a 2006 paper that also said return-free "could significantly reduce the time lag in resolving disputes and accelerate the time to receive a refund."

Other advocates point out that the IRS would be doing essentially the same work it does now. The agency would simply share its tax calculation before a taxpayer files rather than afterward when it checks a return.

"When you make an appointment for a car to get serviced, the service history is all there. Since the IRS already has all that info anyway, it's not a big challenge to put it in a format where we could see it," said Paul Caron, a tax professor at University of Cincinnati College of Law. "For a big slice of the population, that's 100 percent of what's on their tax return."

Taxpayers would have three options when they receive a pre-filled return: accept it as is; make adjustments, say to filing status or income; or reject it and file a return by other means.

"I've been shocked as a tax person and citizen that this hasn't happened by now," Caron said.

Some conservative activists have sided with Intuit.

In 2005, Norquist testified before the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform arguing against return-free filing. The next year, Norquist and others wrote in a letter to President Bush that getting an official-looking "bill" from the IRS could be "extremely intimidating, particularly for seniors, low-income and non-English speaking citizens."

Norquist, founder of Americans for Tax Reform, declined to comment, but a spokesman pointed to a letter he and other conservatives sent this month to members of Congress. The letter says the IRS wants to "socialize all tax preparation in America" to get higher tax revenues. (Update 4/18: Norquist's spokesman, John Kartch, disputes that "Norquist declined comment." During the course of reporting the story, we contacted Kartch to get a comment from Norquist, to which Kartch simply referred us to the letter.)

A year after Norquist wrote Bush, a bill to limit return-free filing was introduced by a pair of unlikely allies: Reps. Eric Cantor, R-Va., the conservative House majority leader, and Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., a liberal stalwart whose district includes Silicon Valley.

Intuit's political committee and employees have contributed to both. Cantor and his leadership PAC have received $26,100 in the past five years from the company's PAC and employees. In the last two years, the Intuit PAC and employees donated $26,000 to Lofgren.

A spokeswoman said in an email that Cantor "doesn't believe the IRS should be in the business of filling out your tax returns for you," and that the bill was designed to "prevent the IRS from circumventing Congress."

How the Maker of TurboTax Fought Free, Simple Tax Filing - ProPublica

You're a fool.

Most Americans have simple returns that do not change from year to year. Income, wife and two kids, mortgage interest and state taxes

Your plan would put H&R Block and Turbotax out of business

 

[Truthseeker420]

How can he run for President? He was born in Canada.

 

[The Rabbi]

Republicans have the right to select a presidential candidate that reflects the majority of the party and its goals.

Given the ignorance common to most republicans and their advocacy of reckless, irresponsible, and failed policies, Cruz is the perfect GOP candidate.

Your posts are becoming increasingly ironic.
How many lefties here are getting their asses handed to them when they post nonsense and errors? A lot. Every day.
Reckless, irresponsible, and failed policies? Surely you mean Obama and the Democrats. Every policy or law they have implemented has failed miserably. They achieved nothing of what they promised, and they have lied consistently about it.

If anyone here on USMB knows about getting their ass handed to them, it would be Rabbit!

You claim your job involves reading graphs and yet in every thread where this comes up you prove you have no idea how to read one.
What does that say about your credibility?

 

[Disir]

NO...just a Statist LIBERAL.

Imagine filing your income taxes in five minutes — and for free. You'd open up a pre-filled return, see what the government thinks you owe, make any needed changes and be done. The miserable annual IRS shuffle, gone.

It's already a reality in Denmark, Sweden and Spain. The government-prepared return would estimate your taxes using information your employer and bank already send it. Advocates say tens of millions of taxpayers could use such a system each year, saving them a collective $2 billion and 225 million hours in prep costs and time, according to one estimate.

The idea, known as "return-free filing," would be a voluntary alternative to hiring a tax preparer or using commercial tax software. The concept has been around for decades and has been endorsed by both President Ronald Reagan and a campaigning President Obama.

"This is not some pie-in-the-sky that's never been done before," said William Gale, co-director of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. "It's doable, feasible, implementable, and at a relatively low cost."

So why hasn't it become a reality?

Well, for one thing, it doesn't help that it's been opposed for years by the company behind the most popular consumer tax software — Intuit, maker of TurboTax. Conservative tax activist Grover Norquist and an influential computer industry group also have fought return-free filing.

Intuit has spent about $11.5 million on federal lobbying in the past five years — more than Apple or Amazon. Although the lobbying spans a range of issues, Intuit's disclosures pointedly note that the company "opposes IRS government tax preparation."

The disclosures show that Intuit as recently as 2011 lobbied on two bills, both of which died, that would have allowed many taxpayers to file pre-filled returns for free. The company also lobbied on bills in 2007 and 2011 that would have barred the Treasury Department, which includes the IRS, from initiating return-free filing.

Intuit argues that allowing the IRS to act as a tax preparer could result in taxpayers paying more money. It is also a member of the Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA), which sponsors a "STOP IRS TAKEOVER" campaign and a website calling return-free filing a "massive expansion of the U.S. government through a big government program."

In an emailed statement, Intuit spokeswoman Julie Miller said, "Like many other companies, Intuit actively participates in the political process." Return-free programs curtail citizen participation in the tax process, she said, and also have "implications for accuracy and fairness in taxation." (Here is Intuit's full statement.)

In its latest annual report filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, however, Intuit also says that free government tax preparation presents a risk to its business.

Roughly 25 million Americans used TurboTax last year, and a recent GAO analysis said the software accounted for more than half of individual returns filed electronically. TurboTax products and services made up 35 percent of Intuit's $4.2 billion in total revenues last year. Versions of TurboTax for individuals and small businesses range in price from free to $150.

(H&R Block, whose tax filing product H&R Block At Home competes with TurboTax, declined to discuss return-free filing with ProPublica. The company's disclosure forms state that it also has lobbied on at least one bill related to return-free filing.)

* * *

Proponents of return-free filing say Intuit and other critics are exaggerating the risks of government involvement. No one would be forced to accept the IRS accounting of their taxes, they say, so there's little to fear.

"It's voluntary," Austan Goolsbee, who served as the chief economist for the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board, told ProPublica. "If you don't trust the government, you don't have to do it."

Goolsbee has written in favor of the idea and published the estimate of $2 billion in saved preparation costs in a 2006 paper that also said return-free "could significantly reduce the time lag in resolving disputes and accelerate the time to receive a refund."

Other advocates point out that the IRS would be doing essentially the same work it does now. The agency would simply share its tax calculation before a taxpayer files rather than afterward when it checks a return.

"When you make an appointment for a car to get serviced, the service history is all there. Since the IRS already has all that info anyway, it's not a big challenge to put it in a format where we could see it," said Paul Caron, a tax professor at University of Cincinnati College of Law. "For a big slice of the population, that's 100 percent of what's on their tax return."

Taxpayers would have three options when they receive a pre-filled return: accept it as is; make adjustments, say to filing status or income; or reject it and file a return by other means.

"I've been shocked as a tax person and citizen that this hasn't happened by now," Caron said.

Some conservative activists have sided with Intuit.

In 2005, Norquist testified before the President's Advisory Panel on Federal Tax Reform arguing against return-free filing. The next year, Norquist and others wrote in a letter to President Bush that getting an official-looking "bill" from the IRS could be "extremely intimidating, particularly for seniors, low-income and non-English speaking citizens."

Norquist, founder of Americans for Tax Reform, declined to comment, but a spokesman pointed to a letter he and other conservatives sent this month to members of Congress. The letter says the IRS wants to "socialize all tax preparation in America" to get higher tax revenues. (Update 4/18: Norquist's spokesman, John Kartch, disputes that "Norquist declined comment." During the course of reporting the story, we contacted Kartch to get a comment from Norquist, to which Kartch simply referred us to the letter.)

A year after Norquist wrote Bush, a bill to limit return-free filing was introduced by a pair of unlikely allies: Reps. Eric Cantor, R-Va., the conservative House majority leader, and Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., a liberal stalwart whose district includes Silicon Valley.

Intuit's political committee and employees have contributed to both. Cantor and his leadership PAC have received $26,100 in the past five years from the company's PAC and employees. In the last two years, the Intuit PAC and employees donated $26,000 to Lofgren.

A spokeswoman said in an email that Cantor "doesn't believe the IRS should be in the business of filling out your tax returns for you," and that the bill was designed to "prevent the IRS from circumventing Congress."

How the Maker of TurboTax Fought Free, Simple Tax Filing - ProPublica

You're a fool.

Most Americans have simple returns that do not change from year to year. Income, wife and two kids, mortgage interest and state taxes

Your plan would put H&R Block and Turbotax out of business

Most Americans that have simple returns are popping down to library and picking up the forms. Even so, the point is- this is what is actually happening behind the scenes of the IRS scandals. They aren't spending beau-coup bucks here for nothing. In fact, it will be the taxpayers that will be covering any cost. Nothing will be repealed. They are already here:

In an SEC filing, Intuit said it provided about 1.2 million free federal returns for the 2011 tax season. The company and competitors typically advertise free federal filing on the Web but also pitch other paid services, such as filing certain state returns.

We saw this with the deliberate shafting with the Post Office. Issa and UPS. What Frank Luntz would call rightsizing the Post Office. Now, whether we like it or not we have UPS delivering mail that we really don't want them anywhere near.

 

[The Rabbi]

Ok, you fucking worthless piece of shit...................I am not a Democrat. Now, grow the fuck up. Welcome to ignore.

NO...just a Statist LIBERAL.

Imagine filing your income taxes in five minutes — and for free. You'd open up a pre-filled return, see what the government thinks you owe, make any needed changes and be done. The miserable annual IRS shuffle, gone.

.

Perfect! I can see the Democrat tax form for this:
1) How much money did you make last year from wages, interest, investment income or other sources, not counting government handouts"
2) Send it in.

 

[kiwiman127]

Your posts are becoming increasingly ironic.
How many lefties here are getting their asses handed to them when they post nonsense and errors? A lot. Every day.
Reckless, irresponsible, and failed policies? Surely you mean Obama and the Democrats. Every policy or law they have implemented has failed miserably. They achieved nothing of what they promised, and they have lied consistently about it.

If anyone here on USMB knows about getting their ass handed to them, it would be Rabbit!

You claim your job involves reading graphs and yet in every thread where this comes up you prove you have no idea how to read one.
What does that say about your credibility?

Hey loser! Everyone here knows I own you. I don't have to make you look like an ass, you do an excellent job all by yourself.
And yes, my knowledge of graphs is proven, that why I have a job and based on your all day posting, you don't have a job or friends for that matter!

 

[Moonglow]

He scared the shiite out of me, now I'm a sunni.....

 

[The Rabbi]

If anyone here on USMB knows about getting their ass handed to them, it would be Rabbit!

You claim your job involves reading graphs and yet in every thread where this comes up you prove you have no idea how to read one.
What does that say about your credibility?

Hey loser! Everyone here knows I own you. I don't have to make you look like an ass, you do an excellent job all by yourself.
And yes, my knowledge of graphs is proven, that why I have a job and based on your all day posting, you don't have a job or friends for that matter!

/Fail.

 

[rightwinger]

NO...just a Statist LIBERAL.

Imagine filing your income taxes in five minutes — and for free. You'd open up a pre-filled return, see what the government thinks you owe, make any needed changes and be done. The miserable annual IRS shuffle, gone.

.

Perfect! I can see the Democrat tax form for this:
1) How much money did you make last year from wages, interest, investment income or other sources, not counting government handouts"
2) Send it in.

Nor the Republican tax form

1) did you make over $1 million last year
2) Don't worry about it

 

[The Rabbi]

Imagine filing your income taxes in five minutes — and for free. You'd open up a pre-filled return, see what the government thinks you owe, make any needed changes and be done. The miserable annual IRS shuffle, gone.

.

Perfect! I can see the Democrat tax form for this:
1) How much money did you make last year from wages, interest, investment income or other sources, not counting government handouts"
2) Send it in.

Nor the Republican tax form

1) did you make over $1 million last year
2) Don't worry about it

Republicans don't have stupid forms like that, stupid.

 

[rightwinger]

Perfect! I can see the Democrat tax form for this:
1) How much money did you make last year from wages, interest, investment income or other sources, not counting government handouts"
2) Send it in.

Nor the Republican tax form

1) did you make over $1 million last year
2) Don't worry about it

Republicans don't have stupid forms like that, stupid.

Really?

I thought we were just making shit up. Can you show me the Democratic form then?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Ok, you fucking worthless piece of shit...................I am not a Democrat. Now, grow the fuck up. Welcome to ignore.

Tissue, comrade?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Nor the Republican tax form

1) did you make over $1 million last year
2) Don't worry about it

Yes, you democrats have a plan, just let the state handle all your money for you, and worry about nothing.

The difference between what you and this retard disir propose, and the old USSR is what, exactly?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Imagine filing your income taxes in five minutes — and for free. You'd open up a pre-filled return, see what the government thinks you owe, make any needed changes and be done. The miserable annual IRS shuffle, gone.
...

So, what you're suggesting then, is from each according to his ability, and to each according to his need?

Your "ideas" sound strangely familiar.....

 

[Ame®icano]

Nor the Republican tax form

1) did you make over $1 million last year
2) Don't worry about it

Yes, you democrats have a plan, just let the state handle all your money for you, and worry about nothing.

The difference between what you and this retard disir propose, and the old USSR is what, exactly?

Socialism in USSR:
There is no unemployment - yet no one is working.
No one is working - yet the factory quotas are fulfilled.
The factory quotas are fulfilled - yet the stores have nothing to sell.
The stores have nothing to sell - yet people's homes are full of stuff.
People's homes are full of stuff - yet no one is happy.
No one is happy - yet the voting is always unanimous.

Socialism in USA:
America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized.
Half of the population is subsidized - yet they think they are victims.
They think they are victims - yet their representatives run the government.
Their representatives run the government - yet the poor keep getting poorer.
The poor keep getting poorer - yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.
They have things that people in other countries only dream about - yet they want America to be more like those other countries.

 

[bluesman]

Nor the Republican tax form

1) did you make over $1 million last year
2) Don't worry about it

Yes, you democrats have a plan, just let the state handle all your money for you, and worry about nothing.

The difference between what you and this retard disir propose, and the old USSR is what, exactly?

Socialism in USSR:
There is no unemployment - yet no one is working.
No one is working - yet the factory quotas are fulfilled.
The factory quotas are fulfilled - yet the stores have nothing to sell.
The stores have nothing to sell - yet people's homes are full of stuff.
People's homes are full of stuff - yet no one is happy.
No one is happy - yet the voting is always unanimous.

Socialism in USA:
America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized.
Half of the population is subsidized - yet they think they are victims.
They think they are victims - yet their representatives run the government.
Their representatives run the government - yet the poor keep getting poorer.
The poor keep getting poorer - yet they have things that people in other countries only dream about.
They have things that people in other countries only dream about - yet they want America to be more like those other countries.

If you are going to copy-and-paste a response, you should at least list link to the source.

A simple google search shows you copied it from somewhere:

Six Contradictions of Socialism in the U. S. - One Political Plaza



www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-12876-1.html*




2 days ago - The six contradictions of socialism in the United States of America: 1. America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized.


Six Contradictions Of Socialism In America | Grouchy Old Cripple



grouchyoldcripple.com/2014/.../six-contradictions-of-socialism-in-ameri...*




Feb 28, 2014 - America is capitalist and greedy – yet half of the population is subsidized. ... Large corporations receive >$100b annually in subsidies [welfare] ...


MyRightWingDad.net: Fw: contradictions of socialism



myrightwingdad.blogspot.com/2013/.../fw-contradictions-of-socialism.ht...*




Feb 28, 2013 - The six contradictions of socialism in America: America is capitalist and greedy – yet half of the population is subsidized. Half of the population ...


Conundrum | Responsibility-Freedom Demands It



ttoes.wordpress.com/2014/03/27/conundrum/*




6 days ago - Yesterday, he sent me a short description of America today. I thought it ... America is capitalist and greedy – yet half of the population is subsidized. 2. Half of the population is subsidized – yet they think they are victims. 3.


The six contradictions of socialism in the United States of America



rainscountytoday.com/the-six-contradictions-of-socialism-in-the-united-s...*




America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized. Half of the population is subsidized - yet they think they are victims. They think they are ...


The Contradiction That Is Life In America — Dave's Diary



newstalkkit.com/the-contradiction-that-is-life-in-america-daves-diary/*





KIT





Mar 13, 2014 - Six contradictions we are sold in America. 1. America is capitalist and greedy – yet half of the population is subsidized. 2. Half of the population ...


Income gap threatens stability; fix tax code - Columbia Daily Tribune ...



http://www.usmessageboard.com/politics/www.columbiatribune.com/.../article_58092c8a-b9...

Columbia Daily Tribune





21 mins ago - The six contradictions of socialism in the United States of America: 1. America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized.


The six contradictions of socialism in the United States of America ...



conservativepoliticalforum.com › ... › Political Discussion and Debate*




Dec 4, 2013 - 12 posts - *6 authors
America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is subsidized. Half of the population is subsidized - yet they think they are victims.


Conundrum - SodaHead



Conundrum




6 days ago - America is capitalist and greedy - yet half of the population is ..... what they have not earned, hence the 1/2 of the population that is subsidized, ...


Capitalists Against Obama | Facebook



https://www.facebook.com/CapitalistsAgainstObama*







Capitalists Against Obama is a politically intelligent crowd of people who have had it ... America is capitalist and greedy—yet half the population is subsidized. 2.

 

[Ame®icano]

It's been chewed before so I didn't do it, but I see I should've.

Also, what give you reason to think I don't know how to use search. What do you think how did I find where to copy from?