Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I didn't say technology will make life perfect. I said it would LIBERATE the world. It's making it harder and harder for oppressive governments to hide the truth from the people.I don't think technology could liberate the world
Technology is not perfect
It solves some problems but not all of them
And some problems are created by technology
Always? Ford in its top days employed 1 million workers. Google in its top days employed 1 thousand workers.Technology will eventually replace every ....The human one, disgraceful as is. Luckily the age of the machines is coming soon, and we will make you history.
Why don't you try making sense first.
Nonsense.
Why nonsense? ....?
History. Technology has always created new work.
Lots of people starved because tractors made them lose the competition to keep their farms. The 1929 depression was already in full swing in the agricultural sector 2 years before 1929. And if we expect to transition again like farmers transitioned into industrial working class, then can everybody become a computer scientists? And if yes, is there a need for 7 billion computer scientists?Really? We're going to become "extinct" by having machines do the work for us? I wonder how many people said that same thing a hundred years ago when the tractor was built. Did we go "extinct"? No. Just the opposite - it helped us thrive.Technology will eventually replace every human work. Too bad, every species on earth survives at the merit that it can work for itself. Once this is taken away from humans, what future will humans get? Extinction, a form of liberation, in a way, I heard.
Your dog also doesn't multiply without your permission, so my statement still stands, your dog is extinct.Yes. My dog. He does absolutely nothing for himself. I provide all food. All water. All healthcare. And I've done that for all of my dogs and they've all lived a full life.Why nonsense? Do you know an animal, or even a plant, that survives by not doing anything for itself?
Always? .....Technology will eventually replace every ....Why don't you try making sense first.
Nonsense.
Why nonsense? ....?
History. Technology has always created new work.
Your dog also doesn't multiply without your permission, so my statement still stands, your dog is extinct.Yes. My dog. He does absolutely nothing for himself. I provide all food. All water. All healthcare. And I've done that for all of my dogs and they've all lived a full life.Why nonsense? Do you know an animal, or even a plant, that survives by not doing anything for itself?
Yeah...and technology is rapidly changing that. Just look at the WikiLeaks hack of the DNC e-mails. And look at the link to the story in my initial post of this thread.I don't agree P@triot. I think governments have no problems to hide the truth from their citizens
They lie all the time and people trust them.... O_O
Nobody "starved" because of tractors. Stop with the drama. It allowed us to harvest more food, faster than ever which allowed more people access to food at a lower price.Lots of people starved because tractors made them lose the competition to keep their farms. The 1929 depression was already in full swing in the agricultural sector 2 years before 1929. And if we expect to transition again like farmers transitioned into industrial working class, then can everybody become a computer scientists? And if yes, is there a need for 7 billion computer scientists?Really? We're going to become "extinct" by having machines do the work for us? I wonder how many people said that same thing a hundred years ago when the tractor was built. Did we go "extinct"? No. Just the opposite - it helped us thrive.Technology will eventually replace every human work. Too bad, every species on earth survives at the merit that it can work for itself. Once this is taken away from humans, what future will humans get? Extinction, a form of liberation, in a way, I heard.
Bullshit. There are TONS of dogs that, while let outside to go to the bathroom, mate with other dogs. Happens all of the time. So your statement still stands as complete nonsense.Your dog also doesn't multiply without your permission, so my statement still stands, your dog is extinct.Yes. My dog. He does absolutely nothing for himself. I provide all food. All water. All healthcare. And I've done that for all of my dogs and they've all lived a full life.Why nonsense? Do you know an animal, or even a plant, that survives by not doing anything for itself?
Lots of people starved because tractors made them lose the competition to keep their farms. The 1929 depression was already in full swing in the agricultural sector 2 years before 1929. And if we expect to transition again like farmers transitioned into industrial working class, then can everybody become a computer scientists? And if yes, is there a need for 7 billion computer scientists?Really? We're going to become "extinct" by having machines do the work for us? I wonder how many people said that same thing a hundred years ago when the tractor was built. Did we go "extinct"? No. Just the opposite - it helped us thrive.Technology will eventually replace every human work. Too bad, every species on earth survives at the merit that it can work for itself. Once this is taken away from humans, what future will humans get? Extinction, a form of liberation, in a way, I heard.
Always? Ford in its top days employed 1 million workers. Google in its top days employed 1 thousand workers.Technology will eventually replace every ....Why don't you try making sense first.
Nonsense.
Why nonsense? ....?
History. Technology has always created new work.
Lots of people starved because tractors made them lose the competition to keep their farms. The 1929 depression was already in full swing in the agricultural sector 2 years before 1929. And if we expect to transition again like farmers transitioned into industrial working class, then can everybody become a computer scientists? And if yes, is there a need for 7 billion computer scientists?Really? We're going to become "extinct" by having machines do the work for us? I wonder how many people said that same thing a hundred years ago when the tractor was built. Did we go "extinct"? No. Just the opposite - it helped us thrive.Technology will eventually replace every human work. Too bad, every species on earth survives at the merit that it can work for itself. Once this is taken away from humans, what future will humans get? Extinction, a form of liberation, in a way, I heard.
Wrong, asshole. No one starved. That's a leftwing myth.
Always? Ford in its top days employed 1 million workers. Google in its top days employed 1 thousand workers.
Why nonsense? ....?
History. Technology has always created new work.
Google employs 57,000 people, moron
Lots of people starved because tractors made them lose the competition to keep their farms. The 1929 depression was already in full swing in the agricultural sector 2 years before 1929. And if we expect to transition again like farmers transitioned into industrial working class, then can everybody become a computer scientists? And if yes, is there a need for 7 billion computer scientists?Really? We're going to become "extinct" by having machines do the work for us? I wonder how many people said that same thing a hundred years ago when the tractor was built. Did we go "extinct"? No. Just the opposite - it helped us thrive.Technology will eventually replace every human work. Too bad, every species on earth survives at the merit that it can work for itself. Once this is taken away from humans, what future will humans get? Extinction, a form of liberation, in a way, I heard.
Wrong, asshole. No one starved. That's a leftwing myth.
Okay, but they should have.
Always? Ford in its top days employed 1 million workers. Google in its top days employed 1 thousand workers.Nonsense.
Why nonsense? ....?
History. Technology has always created new work.
Google employs 57,000 people, moron
The 57000 is still a little short of Ford's 1++ million.
Holy shit is that hilarious. You don't think Ford was "technology". You just proved what machines do for people.Always? Ford in its top days employed 1 million workers. Google in its top days employed 1 thousand workers.
The assembly line was the biggest technological invention of the time.Holy shit is that hilarious. You don't think Ford was "technology". You just proved what machines do for people.Always? Ford in its top days employed 1 million workers. Google in its top days employed 1 thousand workers.
Looks like high tech and automation reduce employment, like basic mechanization reduced employment, and farming reduced "employment" compared to what was before it.Holy shit is that hilarious. You don't think Ford was "technology". You just proved what machines do for people.Always? Ford in its top days employed 1 million workers. Google in its top days employed 1 thousand workers.
Yeah....it "reduced" employment so much that you sit here bragging about how Henry Ford employed over one million people.Looks like high tech and automation reduce employment, like basic mechanization reduced employment, and farming reduced "employment" compared to what was before it.Holy shit is that hilarious. You don't think Ford was "technology". You just proved what machines do for people.Always? Ford in its top days employed 1 million workers. Google in its top days employed 1 thousand workers.
