Cold Fusion38
SUPER GENIUS
ASKED and NEVER answered.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
As deep as that OP op ed?Wow, that's deep. What part here don't you agree with xeno, and why?
No, what seperates us is people like you who attack it, name call it and marginalize it.
If I behaved as you are doing, you could call every Democrat a far left communist wanna be, as communists routinly show up at any Democratic lead protest.
But I don't play that game, I listen to what the people are saying and why, not try to pick out the freaks and then claim 'that's all of them.'
There you go again, telling me what i am, and what the other people involved in it are.
What the movement is about is stopping the headlong spending spree from both parties, right now it is supporting GoPers because they are opposing Democratic spending, not because we are suddenly in love with the Republican party.
A lot of us have been doing so for nearly a year.Instead of telling everyone how "wrong" they are, why don't you enlighten us on how this Group is going to save our country, and not divide us even more?
Why don't YOU tell us what you hope to gain by posting such stupid shit as that op ed, and then touting it as 'spot on'?
It's stupid to you because you don't agree with it. Others do, what a surprise. And yes, you DO play that game, you do call out the left all the time on here, don't act like you don't xeno. But that's ok, because you're non-partisan.
Why did this Tea Party begin in the last year and not under Bush? It's something I've always wondered? Wasn't Government spending out of control then too?
Who says the tea parties weren't going during the Bush years. They were more than likely drowned out by all the lefty wackos protesting the war and "anything that had to do with "Boooooooosh".
Teabaggers will never start a third party
They would have to conform with election laws then. Not going to happen
As deep as that OP op ed?
No, what seperates us is people like you who attack it, name call it and marginalize it.
If I behaved as you are doing, you could call every Democrat a far left communist wanna be, as communists routinly show up at any Democratic lead protest.
But I don't play that game, I listen to what the people are saying and why, not try to pick out the freaks and then claim 'that's all of them.'
There you go again, telling me what i am, and what the other people involved in it are.
What the movement is about is stopping the headlong spending spree from both parties, right now it is supporting GoPers because they are opposing Democratic spending, not because we are suddenly in love with the Republican party.
A lot of us have been doing so for nearly a year.
Why don't YOU tell us what you hope to gain by posting such stupid shit as that op ed, and then touting it as 'spot on'?
It's stupid to you because you don't agree with it. Others do, what a surprise. And yes, you DO play that game, you do call out the left all the time on here, don't act like you don't xeno. But that's ok, because you're non-partisan.
Why did this Tea Party begin in the last year and not under Bush? It's something I've always wondered? Wasn't Government spending out of control then too?
When exactly did you become such a stupid shit?
I disagree with the article. Whatever you might say about them, I don't think they're "neocons."
Using the phrase 'neocon' invalidates anything about the movement.
The fact remains that the left can't define the tea party movement because they don't understand it and sense its a threat to them, thus they fall back on what they do understand, ridicule and insults.
We all know the funding that the Democrats and Republican have. Anybody trying to start-up a new party doesn't stand a chance.
You think it's 'spot on' or was that mentioned somewhere in the commentary that I missed?
He couldn't be more wrong. The Tea Party movement has attracted people who are angry with not only the Democrats, but the Neoconservative arm of the Republican Party. It's like the poor guy wrote it while drunk. And he's living in Mexico?
Too funny.
The commentary is infantile and a rehash of the non sense that the town halls and tea party movement are astro turf.
Its no wonder we can't get along in this country anymore, some people can't even recognize genuine protest, they reduce everythiung to the insipid nonsense they think the other guy thinks, such as teaparty is 'neocon' and protests were unreal.
The commenatry is actually vile in its implications and ludicrous in its false conclusions.
It appears so many of us wasted our time all year explaining this, as we still see these rediculous threads posted with an obligitory 'spot on' for some thing that has no resemblance to the movement and what it means.
You think it's 'spot on' or was that mentioned somewhere in the commentary that I missed?
He couldn't be more wrong. The Tea Party movement has attracted people who are angry with not only the Democrats, but the Neoconservative arm of the Republican Party. It's like the poor guy wrote it while drunk. And he's living in Mexico?
Too funny.
I doubt there are many Democrats who embrace the Tea Party movement. It's comprised mostly of disgruntled Republicans, right-leaning Independents, and a bunch of yahoos who don't have a clue. If they can weed out the latter, they might have my attention.
The commentary is infantile and a rehash of the non sense that the town halls and tea party movement are astro turf.
Its no wonder we can't get along in this country anymore, some people can't even recognize genuine protest, they reduce everythiung to the insipid nonsense they think the other guy thinks, such as teaparty is 'neocon' and protests were unreal.
The commenatry is actually vile in its implications and ludicrous in its false conclusions.
It appears so many of us wasted our time all year explaining this, as we still see these rediculous threads posted with an obligitory 'spot on' for some thing that has no resemblance to the movement and what it means.
I had little objection to the protesting going on at the Tea Party rallies, but when they tried to take over town hall meetings with shoutdowns and acting like disrespectful thugs, they literally were digging their own graves. Foxfyre is right.
The commentary is infantile and a rehash of the non sense that the town halls and tea party movement are astro turf.
Its no wonder we can't get along in this country anymore, some people can't even recognize genuine protest, they reduce everythiung to the insipid nonsense they think the other guy thinks, such as teaparty is 'neocon' and protests were unreal.
The commenatry is actually vile in its implications and ludicrous in its false conclusions.
It appears so many of us wasted our time all year explaining this, as we still see these rediculous threads posted with an obligitory 'spot on' for some thing that has no resemblance to the movement and what it means.
The TEA Party is a Rorschach Test for most of us. There is a deep and powerful discontent in this country and the TEA party has tapped into it.
EVERYBODY is aware that they are getting screwed and they are also aware that they don't really understand how to avoid it or to fight back. Come the TEA Party. Suddenly here's an outlet. TEA, Taxed Enough Already, to me, seems to be against higher taxes.
To just about anyone else, it seems to be against whatever is currently annoying that individual.
Politicians should watch this group if for no other reason to see what motivates a person to travel miles to hold up a sign. Passion sells.
I listened to the Diane Rehm show yesterday...one of the guests used the word teabagger. Later in the show a quavery voiced man called in to demand an apology because teabagger was a pejorative.
I thought the whole thing was pretty funny. Sensitive guy...and very pc.
Diane is an interesting lady. She is a dyed in the wool Liberal with a capital L goes into attack dog mode whenever a Libral idea is not strongly supported.
I thought she was about 1000 years old from her voice, but this is a medical condition and she fights through it to continue her on-air dialogues. Not to say that she's young, but she looks to be healthy and robust albeit a tad venerable.
The word "teabagger" is a perjorative, is intended by those who use it as a perjorative and is both disrespectful and a word that represents an act that most would find obscene.
If the guest had used the word "cocksucker", would an apology request also have been cause for curious amusement?