Tahoe Late Spring Snow Defies NASA and NOAA

[Old Rocks]

Piomas is the Polar Science Center for the University of Washington.

Polar Science Center . Applied Physics Laboratory . University of Washington . 1013 NE 40th Street . Box 355640 . Seattle, WA 98105-6698

Voice: 206-543-6613 . Fax: 206-616-3142 . E-mail: [email protected]

And the chart is a measure of volume, not extant. Learn to read at a third grade level, dumb ass.

 

[Old Rocks]

I'm not interested in getting involved in the Global Warming fight, but your argument doesn't make any sense.

When you have well known people (at NASA and NOAA) making claims that there will be no more snow in 2015 back in 2006 and 2008 its a fun kind of thing to throw back at our alarmists who believed it hook line and sinker..

When you have well known people (at NASA and NOAA) making claims that there will be no more snow in 2015 back in 2006 and 2008 its a fun kind of thing to throw back at our alarmists who believed it hook line and sinker

yes it is a blast and should be done frequently

LOL. Well known people? Who cares about 'well known people'? What matters is the scientists that actually study the climate, and not a single one of those have made such a prediction. In fact, if you bothered to read the articles in the peer reviewed journals, many are predicting colder weather and more snow for some areas while others become much warmer.

But then. to expect the 'Conservatives' to actually read real science is like expecting a three year old to comprehend calculus.

 

[jon_berzerk]

I'm not interested in getting involved in the Global Warming fight, but your argument doesn't make any sense.

When you have well known people (at NASA and NOAA) making claims that there will be no more snow in 2015 back in 2006 and 2008 its a fun kind of thing to throw back at our alarmists who believed it hook line and sinker..

When you have well known people (at NASA and NOAA) making claims that there will be no more snow in 2015 back in 2006 and 2008 its a fun kind of thing to throw back at our alarmists who believed it hook line and sinker

yes it is a blast and should be done frequently

LOL. Well known people? Who cares about 'well known people'? What matters is the scientists that actually study the climate, and not a single one of those have made such a prediction. In fact, if you bothered to read the articles in the peer reviewed journals, many are predicting colder weather and more snow for some areas while others become much warmer.

But then. to expect the 'Conservatives' to actually read real science is like expecting a three year old to comprehend calculus.

bs

the predictions was the craze at the time timmy

you know it

everyone knows it

why lie about it

 

[Old Rocks]

Dumb fuck, Jon, your bunch made all kinds of predictions prior to the 2012 election, and some professional politicians and pollsters said otherwise. Who turned out to be correct.

A bunch of people on both sides of the global warming issue who are not scientists have made innumerable predictions concerning the outcome of the warming. They simply do not have the background to make predictions, and those scientists who do, realize the uncertainties in a chaotic climate change, and are loathe to say a certain something is going to happen at certain time in a certain place. What they are saying is that there is going to be an overall warming, and things in many places are going to change.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Dumb fuck, Jon, your bunch made all kinds of predictions prior to the 2012 election, and some professional politicians and pollsters said otherwise. Who turned out to be correct.

A bunch of people on both sides of the global warming issue who are not scientists have made innumerable predictions concerning the outcome of the warming. They simply do not have the background to make predictions, and those scientists who do, realize the uncertainties in a chaotic climate change, and are loathe to say a certain something is going to happen at certain time in a certain place. What they are saying is that there is going to be an overall warming, and things in many places are going to change.

--LOL

so your falling off topic is a sign that you lost that one

--LOL

 

[jon_berzerk]

the only global warming / climate change model that has been correct

a 100 percent correct

is that the gullible will continue to believe no matter what

--LOL

 

[elektra]

Looks more or less, even to me, I guess it just depends on how you manipulate the pretty picture.

 

[Old Rocks]

A spring snow in the upper Sierra's is simply another spring snow in the Sierras. Nothing at all unusual. However, three record years in a row is rather unusual.

1998, a record year, surpassing anything previous to that. 7 years later, 2005, another record year, close to 1998. Then 5 years later, 2010, another record year, close to 1998. 4 years later, 2014, another record year, close to 1998,. following that, 2015, far surpassing 1998. And now 2016 looks like it will at least match 1998. And in the meantime, all you idiots blather on about a late snow in the high mountains.

 

[elektra]

A spring snow in the upper Sierra's is simply another spring snow in the Sierras. Nothing at all unusual. However, three record years in a row is rather unusual.

1998, a record year, surpassing anything previous to that. 7 years later, 2005, another record year, close to 1998. Then 5 years later, 2010, another record year, close to 1998. 4 years later, 2014, another record year, close to 1998,. following that, 2015, far surpassing 1998. And now 2016 looks like it will at least match 1998. And in the meantime, all you idiots blather on about a late snow in the high mountains.

Record years of snowfall, how is there global warming and catastrophy with record snow?

 

[jc456]

I'm not interested in getting involved in the Global Warming fight, but your argument doesn't make any sense.

good thing you're not jumping in. hahhahahahahahahaahhahaha too funny gene.

 

[jc456]

More evidence of climate change.

it is? How? Don't they get snow there? I'll bet there are ski resorts in the area. how much?

 

[jc456]

Link with a quote, Silly Billy?

Snow in the Sierras in the spring is hardly something unusual. Elektra or Silly Billy showing a lick of sense would be.

tell nuttie that she's a goof for thinking the climate changed. I see you know it hasn't like I know it hasn't.

 

[jc456]

Anomaly? Yet one or two years of less Ice in one part of the Arctic is not an anomaly?

Fig.1 Arctic sea ice volume anomaly from PIOMAS updated once a month. Daily Sea Ice volume anomalies for each day are computed relative to the 1979 to 2014 average for that day of the year. Tickmarks on time axis refer to 1st day of year. The trend for the period 1979- present is shown in blue. Shaded areas show one and two standard deviations from the trend. Error bars indicate the uncertainty of the monthly anomaly plotted once per year.

Now Elektra, you are really showing what a dumbass liar you are. From 1979 to 2016. That is about 37 years of decline. Will you fellows ever learn to debate without telling really big lies?

you do know the satellites were broken right? Please tell me you know this. Please,

 

[jc456]

I'm not interested in getting involved in the Global Warming fight, but your argument doesn't make any sense.

When you have well known people (at NASA and NOAA) making claims that there will be no more snow in 2015 back in 2006 and 2008 its a fun kind of thing to throw back at our alarmists who believed it hook line and sinker..

When you have well known people (at NASA and NOAA) making claims that there will be no more snow in 2015 back in 2006 and 2008 its a fun kind of thing to throw back at our alarmists who believed it hook line and sinker

yes it is a blast and should be done frequently

LOL. Well known people? Who cares about 'well known people'? What matters is the scientists that actually study the climate, and not a single one of those have made such a prediction. In fact, if you bothered to read the articles in the peer reviewed journals, many are predicting colder weather and more snow for some areas while others become much warmer.

But then. to expect the 'Conservatives' to actually read real science is like expecting a three year old to comprehend calculus.

real science? Why don't you post real science, post the experiment that science is supposed to do showing the tests on CO2 increases and temperature changes. Post that real science up there alfred. I know you won't and then you'll again post up how you do real science. What you post is junk science. And we all know that.

 

[jc456]

Dumb fuck, Jon, your bunch made all kinds of predictions prior to the 2012 election, and some professional politicians and pollsters said otherwise. Who turned out to be correct.

A bunch of people on both sides of the global warming issue who are not scientists have made innumerable predictions concerning the outcome of the warming. They simply do not have the background to make predictions, and those scientists who do, realize the uncertainties in a chaotic climate change, and are loathe to say a certain something is going to happen at certain time in a certain place. What they are saying is that there is going to be an overall warming, and things in many places are going to change.

and then reality comes along and whissssssssssssssssssssssshhhhhhhh nothing happened. NO change, no warming, then a great big ooopppss comes out and the ocean ate the excess heat. Yep real science. Dude, you got anymore?

 

[jc456]

A spring snow in the upper Sierra's is simply another spring snow in the Sierras. Nothing at all unusual. However, three record years in a row is rather unusual.

1998, a record year, surpassing anything previous to that. 7 years later, 2005, another record year, close to 1998. Then 5 years later, 2010, another record year, close to 1998. 4 years later, 2014, another record year, close to 1998,. following that, 2015, far surpassing 1998. And now 2016 looks like it will at least match 1998. And in the meantime, all you idiots blather on about a late snow in the high mountains.

since when is weather climate? Did you just post that? You?

 

[ClosedCaption]

I'm not interested in getting involved in the Global Warming fight, but your argument doesn't make any sense.

Its easy, it snowed somewhere so it cant be warm in other places of the world.


...you're right, it doesnt make sense at all

 

[jc456]

I'm not interested in getting involved in the Global Warming fight, but your argument doesn't make any sense.

Its easy, it snowed somewhere so it cant be warm in other places of the world.


...you're right, it doesnt make sense at all

can you explain why the temperature has varied 20 degrees in Chicago from day to day? please, please pretty please

 

[ClosedCaption]

I'm not interested in getting involved in the Global Warming fight, but your argument doesn't make any sense.

Its easy, it snowed somewhere so it cant be warm in other places of the world.


...you're right, it doesnt make sense at all

can you explain why the temperature has varied 20 degrees in Chicago from day to day?

To you?

Impossible.

 

[bodecea]

In another blow to those who promote AGW, that is Global Warming, it has snowed a good solid 2 feet in California this late spring.

Too bad NASA ain't got a satellite to see if the Ice grew in the arctic


Squaw Valley - Alpine Meadows Webcams | Weather & Conditions | OnTheSnow

Alpine Meadows: Squaw Valley High Camp Cam
04/23/2016 | 6:35 pmView attachment 72669

Are you asserting that one weather incident equals climate?