Tahoe Late Spring Snow Defies NASA and NOAA

[elektra]

In another blow to those who promote AGW, that is Global Warming, it has snowed a good solid 2 feet in California this late spring.

Too bad NASA ain't got a satellite to see if the Ice grew in the arctic


Squaw Valley - Alpine Meadows Webcams | Weather & Conditions | OnTheSnow

Alpine Meadows: Squaw Valley High Camp Cam
04/23/2016 | 6:35 pm

 

[elektra]

Photo: April Sierra Snow - wunderground.com

 

[theDoctorisIn]

I'm not interested in getting involved in the Global Warming fight, but your argument doesn't make any sense.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

More evidence of climate change.

 

[ScienceRocks]

It is called a anomaly and they will occur from time to time. LOL disproves shit.

 

[1stRambo]

Yo, ""Mother Nature"" will take care of "HER BUSINESS" When She Feels Like It!!! You ""Dumb-Ass Socialist"" need to go to England and push you nonsense!!! We are too smart in America Losers!!!

"GTP"

 

[Billy_Bob]

I'm not interested in getting involved in the Global Warming fight, but your argument doesn't make any sense.

When you have well known people (at NASA and NOAA) making claims that there will be no more snow in 2015 back in 2006 and 2008 its a fun kind of thing to throw back at our alarmists who believed it hook line and sinker..

 

[Old Rocks]

Link with a quote, Silly Billy?

Snow in the Sierras in the spring is hardly something unusual. Elektra or Silly Billy showing a lick of sense would be.

 

[elektra]

Anomaly? Yet one or two years of less Ice in one part of the Arctic is not an anomaly?

 

[Billy_Bob]

More evidence of climate change.

You do realize that this was the normal in the late 60's and early 70's dont you? Failing to know history makes you incapable of knowing what natural variation is ..

 

[Billy_Bob]

Link with a quote, Silly Billy?

Snow in the Sierras in the spring is hardly something unusual. Elektra or Silly Billy showing a lick of sense would be.

And it was repeated by James Hansen, Al Gore, among many others... But hey you just like to scream "link" when your cult belief is challenged..

 

[Billy_Bob]

"Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past

Monday 20 March 2000

the warming is so far manifesting itself more in winters which are less cold than in much hotter summers. According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”. “Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” he said

Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past – Environment – The Independent

 

[Billy_Bob]

Here is a nice chronological order of who said what when...

Al Gore | Climatism

 

[skookerasbil]

More evidence of climate change.

A sentiment shared only amongst the religion.........a gigantic plurality see's it in non-k00k fashion.

 

[skookerasbil]

Link with a quote, Silly Billy?

Snow in the Sierras in the spring is hardly something unusual. Elektra or Silly Billy showing a lick of sense would be.

Cant have it both ways...........that's called intellectual dishonesty!!

Not supposed to be happening according to hard core members of the AGW religion.....supposed to be getting warmer globally.

 

[skookerasbil]

It is called a anomaly and they will occur from time to time. LOL disproves shit.

Whatever you say s0n!!!

[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/Laughing%20gif.gif.html][/URL]

 

[skookerasbil]

Link with a quote, Silly Billy?

Snow in the Sierras in the spring is hardly something unusual. Elektra or Silly Billy showing a lick of sense would be.

Cant have it both ways...........that's called intellectual dishonesty!!

Not supposed to be happening according to hard core members of the AGW religion.....supposed to be getting warmer globally.

Still have many, many places where it is as cold as shit = AGW loSiNg

 

[Old Rocks]

Anomaly? Yet one or two years of less Ice in one part of the Arctic is not an anomaly?

Fig.1 Arctic sea ice volume anomaly from PIOMAS updated once a month. Daily Sea Ice volume anomalies for each day are computed relative to the 1979 to 2014 average for that day of the year. Tickmarks on time axis refer to 1st day of year. The trend for the period 1979- present is shown in blue. Shaded areas show one and two standard deviations from the trend. Error bars indicate the uncertainty of the monthly anomaly plotted once per year.

Now Elektra, you are really showing what a dumbass liar you are. From 1979 to 2016. That is about 37 years of decline. Will you fellows ever learn to debate without telling really big lies?

 

[elektra]

Anomaly? Yet one or two years of less Ice in one part of the Arctic is not an anomaly?

Fig.1 Arctic sea ice volume anomaly from PIOMAS updated once a month. Daily Sea Ice volume anomalies for each day are computed relative to the 1979 to 2014 average for that day of the year. Tickmarks on time axis refer to 1st day of year. The trend for the period 1979- present is shown in blue. Shaded areas show one and two standard deviations from the trend. Error bars indicate the uncertainty of the monthly anomaly plotted once per year.

Now Elektra, you are really showing what a dumbass liar you are. From 1979 to 2016. That is about 37 years of decline. Will you fellows ever learn to debate without telling really big lies?

Your simpleton graph means nothing. The graph represents data from how many satellites? Five? What is the margin of error, of each individual satellite? How come the graph is not showing the gap that exists in the satellite data?

Graphs are for idiots, no matter which side of the debate you are on. If you made that graph to scale, it would be a flat line. But you got this tiny change represented on a huge scale, which distorts the fact that there is no change in the sea ice.

And if we take 1978 into account, Sea Ice has grown.

Sea Ice is different then multi year ice as well, where is the graph for multi year ice?

Dumb is Old Crock, this is not as simple, as PIE, is it you Crock.

 

[jon_berzerk]

I'm not interested in getting involved in the Global Warming fight, but your argument doesn't make any sense.

When you have well known people (at NASA and NOAA) making claims that there will be no more snow in 2015 back in 2006 and 2008 its a fun kind of thing to throw back at our alarmists who believed it hook line and sinker..

When you have well known people (at NASA and NOAA) making claims that there will be no more snow in 2015 back in 2006 and 2008 its a fun kind of thing to throw back at our alarmists who believed it hook line and sinker

yes it is a blast and should be done frequently