i named 5. would you like to add hawley, taylor green, jordan, brooks, tubberville and the other traitors?You are talking five people dude. FIVE. Get an actual argument. Its been long enough.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
i named 5. would you like to add hawley, taylor green, jordan, brooks, tubberville and the other traitors?You are talking five people dude. FIVE. Get an actual argument. Its been long enough.
the plan was idiotic, but that does not mean flynn (with lindell and rfk jr) isn't out recruiting and training "proud boys " for their next putsch..Nobody tried to "overthrow" the government, that's just idiotic.
Really, it should have never really gotten out of the gate in the first place. Even state Democratic leaders have said it is nonsense. The Supreme Court shouldn't have to rule every time someone has a wet dream.Their Decision is expected by October 9. Let's dispense with these Democrat's nonsense once and for all.
Supreme Court to Take up First Fourteenth Amendment Challenge to Trump's Candidacy
"The US Supreme Court is poised to take up the issue of whether the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution bars former president Trump from running for president in 2024. The case originates with alleged GOP write-in candidate John Anthony Castro of Texas. So far, he's filed lawsuits challenging Trump's eligibility for office in eight states: Wyoming, Utah, Oklahoma, North Carolina, West Virginia, Montana, Kansas, and Idaho. A lawsuit by Castro in Florida has already been dismissed.
Castro's lawsuit is a long shot. The bar he has to cross is to prove he is personally injured by Trump's candidacy. He hopes to clear that hurdle by claiming that his candidacy is damaged by Trump's presence "based on a political competitive injury in the form a diminution of votes."
Newsweek says we should have the Supreme Court's decision in about a month."
Supreme Court to Take up First Fourteenth Amendment Challenge to Trump's Candidacy
People that got charged with something major. 5 people. Get a valid argumenti named 5. would you like to add hawley, taylor green, jordan, brooks, tubberville and the other traitors?
The left says they don't need Trump to be found guilty to keep him off the ballot.
How many insurrection convictions you got?
More people might take you seriously about this issue if all you people didnt use hyperbole as your argument.
You are talking about a collective of complete stupidity. So that isnt surprising.The left says they don't need Trump to be found guilty to keep him off the ballot.
What does that have to do with Trump?oh sorry. that 22 year sentence was for "seditious conspiracy" to overthrow an election .
if tarrio (and his co conspirators, bannon, stone, flynn, and lindell, and over 100 congresscritters) had been successful, who would now be president?
The left says they don't need Trump to be found guilty to keep him off the ballot.
Their Decision is expected by October 9. Let's dispense with these Democrat's nonsense once and for all.
Supreme Court to Take up First Fourteenth Amendment Challenge to Trump's Candidacy
"The US Supreme Court is poised to take up the issue of whether the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution bars former president Trump from running for president in 2024. The case originates with alleged GOP write-in candidate John Anthony Castro of Texas. So far, he's filed lawsuits challenging Trump's eligibility for office in eight states: Wyoming, Utah, Oklahoma, North Carolina, West Virginia, Montana, Kansas, and Idaho. A lawsuit by Castro in Florida has already been dismissed.
Castro's lawsuit is a long shot. The bar he has to cross is to prove he is personally injured by Trump's candidacy. He hopes to clear that hurdle by claiming that his candidacy is damaged by Trump's presence "based on a political competitive injury in the form a diminution of votes."
Newsweek says we should have the Supreme Court's decision in about a month."
Supreme Court to Take up First Fourteenth Amendment Challenge to Trump's Candidacy
were you at the dec 23 white house meeting? trump was.What does that have to do with Trump?
Great. The US Supreme Court upholds and defends the US Constitution.. Trump took an oath to do the same.
The left says they don't need Trump to be found guilty to keep him off the ballot.
If the SCOTUS could invent the standing in the student loan forgiveness case, it can do it here as well. They have become very opportunistic like that.Meaningless because Castro has no standing.
When a State Secretary of State takes up the case in a BLUE state, then the issue will be more relevant.
What does that have to do with Trump?
Of course, because everyone knows how those blue state folks like to disregard the US Constitution and Supreme Court decisions. That's how they got "blue" in the first place.
If the SCOTUS could invent the standing in the student loan forgiveness case, it can do it here as well. They have become very opportunistic like that.
Waah waah waah.....American flags and baby carriage crowd is not an insurrection bo matter the opinion of the Reich.castro is a repub. the states where this is an issue are all red states. please change your first paragraph tp remove the word "democrats," unless you can connect this to a non republican party.
i think trump can win this in the supreme court with an "original intent" argument that the 14th applies to confederates only.
arguing that jan 6 was not an insurrection is really not working with most people, and might end up 7-2 against dear leader. .
on edit, the states involved are all red states. texas and florida also
Wyoming, Utah, Oklahoma, North Carolina, West Virginia, Montana, Kansas, and Idaho.