Supreme Court Blocks Texas Abortion Clinic Rules

[Socialist]

I'm loving the supreme court.

 

[JakeStarkey]

When you are knowledgeable enough to talk about this issue, OKTexas, instead of knee jerking, let the rest of us know, please.

Fuck off asshole, you're the one trying to make this personal, not me. Break my argument if you can, oh that's right, no need to break an argument when you can use alinski rules and just be dismissive. That crap doesn't work with me.

Ooohhh, toughy. You fuckhead. You have not made an argument that is valid. You use the far right rushalinski nonsense and yell at me. Fuck off, bud, you have nothing.

 

[eagle1462010]

Pales in comparison to the shit storm that will happen if this gets through the Senate

H.R.1797 - 113th Congress 2013-2014 Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act Congress.gov Library of Congress

Obama would veto it..........and then they would have to override it.............and they don't have the votes............

Will not happen.......but late term abortion is an ABOMINATION to anyone who has watched the procedure..............

If they can't decide by week 20, then I agree they shouldn't be allowed to abort unless their health is in danger.........5 months and go NOPE is ridiculous.

Hope it passes.............and force Obama to veto it.........at the least........been in Reid's Graveyard for a while.

I say the Senate tables it until our next Republican POTUS moves in

I'd say put it through and make Obama use the Veto............

It can be given a new number...........and pushed through again anyway...........

 

[hazlnut]

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court refused on Monday to allow Texas to enforce restrictions that would force 10 abortion clinics to close.

The justices voted 5-4 to grant an emergency appeal from the clinics after a federal appeals court upheld new regulations, refusing to keep them on hold while the clinics appealed to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court order will remain in effect at least until the court decides whether to hear the clinics' appeal of the lower court ruling, not before the fall.

Supreme Court blocks restrictive Texas abortion-clinic rules - Yahoo News

The SCOTUS is on a roll!

What gets me is that this seems like a 5-4 decision on a procedural matter-- whether or not to grant an appeal should be a simple matter, but the split indicates the "activists" judges are those on the right.

 

[JakeStarkey]

If it is good legislation, make Obama veto it, then use it against the Dems next year.

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[Skylar]

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court refused on Monday to allow Texas to enforce restrictions that would force 10 abortion clinics to close.

The justices voted 5-4 to grant an emergency appeal from the clinics after a federal appeals court upheld new regulations, refusing to keep them on hold while the clinics appealed to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court order will remain in effect at least until the court decides whether to hear the clinics' appeal of the lower court ruling, not before the fall.

Supreme Court blocks restrictive Texas abortion-clinic rules - Yahoo News

The SCOTUS is on a roll!

Just one more step in the destruction of our federal system. States have the exclusive right to regulate the practice of medicine with their borders.

Not when their attempt to regulate medicine is a blatant attempt to close down abortion clinics to try and limit a woman's right to abortion.

It would be like the EPA trying to regulate lead in the environment by banning bullets.

Providing a safe medical environment to everyone is a compelling interest of the State, if abortionist want to operate within the State they can meet those safety standards or take their shyster doctors elsewhere.

And lead is a very dangerous substance in the environment. It never leaves the body once it enters. Banning bullets would remove lead from the environment. And couldn't possibly have any ulterior motives....right?

And its just a coincidence that the Texas bill just 'happens' to shut down 10 abortion clinics in Texas and make some of the poorest women in the State drive more than 250 miles each way to get an abortion.....there couldn't possibly be any ulterior motives. Its just a coincidence.

Sigh...you do realize that folks broke your 'code' a long time ago, right? The Supreme Court certainly did.

 

[eagle1462010]

If it is good legislation, make Obama veto it, then use it against the Dems next year.

fine then..............To me, it's good legislation.............so lets show late term abortions next year in the t.v. ads.............of course how would we screen the barbarity of the procedure..................the last video is polite............

Shall we go to the actual thing..............hmm............

20 weeks the baby is mostly developed via the video...........with exception to areas like the lungs not fully developed.........but early births even at this time live and although they have a rough start............can have very normal lives...............so lets just stick a needle through their skull at 25 weeks and say it's righteous.

 

[mikegriffith1]

Another good one, for now.

You're like the slavery apologists who cheered the Dred Scott decision. If you had any sense of basic decency and morality, you would be outraged by the court's refusal to allow Texas to enforce restrictions on abortion clinics. But, nah, you, a so-called "liberal," would rather see the killing of unborn babies continue.

You rationalize your immoral position by ignoring the victim, just as the slavery apologists refused to recognize the humanity of the slave and focused on the slaveholders' "rights."

 

[Skylar]

Another good one, for now.

You're like the slavery apologists who cheered the Dred Scott decision. If you had any sense of basic decency and morality, you would be outraged by the court's refusal to allow Texas to enforce restrictions on abortion clinics. But, nah, you, a so-called "liberal," would rather see the killing of unborn babies continue.

You rationalize your immoral position by ignoring the victim, just as the slavery apologists refused to recognize the humanity of the slave and focused on the slaveholders' "rights."

Opposing abortion restrictions is like supporting dred scott?

Holy fuck, the meltdown continues.

 

[OKTexas]

When you are knowledgeable enough to talk about this issue, OKTexas, instead of knee jerking, let the rest of us know, please.

Fuck off asshole, you're the one trying to make this personal, not me. Break my argument if you can, oh that's right, no need to break an argument when you can use alinski rules and just be dismissive. That crap doesn't work with me.

Ooohhh, toughy. You fuckhead. You have not made an argument that is valid. You use the far right rushalinski nonsense and yell at me. Fuck off, bud, you have nothing.

Bullshit, you already agreed that a State has every right to regulate medical safety.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Of course a state has that right for the general welfare.

As long as it does not contravene individuals' constitutional rights. Roe?

 

[OKTexas]

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court refused on Monday to allow Texas to enforce restrictions that would force 10 abortion clinics to close.

The justices voted 5-4 to grant an emergency appeal from the clinics after a federal appeals court upheld new regulations, refusing to keep them on hold while the clinics appealed to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court order will remain in effect at least until the court decides whether to hear the clinics' appeal of the lower court ruling, not before the fall.

Supreme Court blocks restrictive Texas abortion-clinic rules - Yahoo News

The SCOTUS is on a roll!

Just one more step in the destruction of our federal system. States have the exclusive right to regulate the practice of medicine with their borders.

Not when their attempt to regulate medicine is a blatant attempt to close down abortion clinics to try and limit a woman's right to abortion.

It would be like the EPA trying to regulate lead in the environment by banning bullets.

Providing a safe medical environment to everyone is a compelling interest of the State, if abortionist want to operate within the State they can meet those safety standards or take their shyster doctors elsewhere.

And lead is a very dangerous substance in the environment. It never leaves the body once it enters. Banning bullets would remove lead from the environment. And couldn't possibly have any ulterior motives....right?

And its just a coincidence that the Texas bill just 'happens' to shut down 10 abortion clinics in Texas and make some of the poorest women in the State drive more than 250 miles each way to get an abortion.....there couldn't possibly be any ulterior motives. Its just a coincidence.

Sigh...you do realize that folks broke your 'code' a long time ago, right? The Supreme Court certainly did.

When people start eating bullets get back to me. Oh BTW what about lead acid batteries, many people discard them instead of paying recycling fees? While your playing games, lets go to the mercury contained in cfl lights that the government is pushing.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The SCOTUS is on a roll!

Just one more step in the destruction of our federal system. States have the exclusive right to regulate the practice of medicine with their borders.

Not when their attempt to regulate medicine is a blatant attempt to close down abortion clinics to try and limit a woman's right to abortion.

It would be like the EPA trying to regulate lead in the environment by banning bullets.

Providing a safe medical environment to everyone is a compelling interest of the State, if abortionist want to operate within the State they can meet those safety standards or take their shyster doctors elsewhere.

And lead is a very dangerous substance in the environment. It never leaves the body once it enters. Banning bullets would remove lead from the environment. And couldn't possibly have any ulterior motives....right?

And its just a coincidence that the Texas bill just 'happens' to shut down 10 abortion clinics in Texas and make some of the poorest women in the State drive more than 250 miles each way to get an abortion.....there couldn't possibly be any ulterior motives. Its just a coincidence.

Sigh...you do realize that folks broke your 'code' a long time ago, right? The Supreme Court certainly did.

When people start eating bullets get back to me. Oh BTW what about lead acid batteries, many people discard them instead of paying recycling fees? While your playing games, lets go to the mercury contained in cfl lights that the government is pushing.

Deflections mean you know you have failed.

 

[OKTexas]

Just one more step in the destruction of our federal system. States have the exclusive right to regulate the practice of medicine with their borders.

Not when their attempt to regulate medicine is a blatant attempt to close down abortion clinics to try and limit a woman's right to abortion.

It would be like the EPA trying to regulate lead in the environment by banning bullets.

Providing a safe medical environment to everyone is a compelling interest of the State, if abortionist want to operate within the State they can meet those safety standards or take their shyster doctors elsewhere.

And lead is a very dangerous substance in the environment. It never leaves the body once it enters. Banning bullets would remove lead from the environment. And couldn't possibly have any ulterior motives....right?

And its just a coincidence that the Texas bill just 'happens' to shut down 10 abortion clinics in Texas and make some of the poorest women in the State drive more than 250 miles each way to get an abortion.....there couldn't possibly be any ulterior motives. Its just a coincidence.

Sigh...you do realize that folks broke your 'code' a long time ago, right? The Supreme Court certainly did.

When people start eating bullets get back to me. Oh BTW what about lead acid batteries, many people discard them instead of paying recycling fees? While your playing games, lets go to the mercury contained in cfl lights that the government is pushing.

Deflections mean you know you have failed.

I'm sorry you feel like you failed, maybe another hit off the bottle will help.

 

[Skylar]

Of course a state has that right for the general welfare.

As long as it does not contravene individuals' constitutional rights. Roe?

Which, unsurprisingly, was also brought to us by Texas. The State motto should be 'Always on the Wrong Side of History!'

 

[OKTexas]

Of course a state has that right for the general welfare.

As long as it does not contravene individuals' constitutional rights. Roe?

Medical safety does not contravene anyone's individual rights, unless you consider protecting ones right to life a contravention. Pregnant women are dying because of shady clinic practices.

 

[Skylar]

Of course a state has that right for the general welfare.

As long as it does not contravene individuals' constitutional rights. Roe?

Medical safety does not contravene anyone's individual rights, unless you consider protecting ones right to life a contravention. Pregnant women are dying because of shady clinic practices.

It does when its a thin veneer for shutting down abortion clinics. Its not a coincidence that its only conservative states that are instituting these remarkably specific 'medical safety' regulations targeted at abortion clinics. To solve problems that aren't.

Again, you can pretend that its just a coincidence that they shut down abortions clinics. But you may have a harder time convincing the SCOTUS to pretend with you.

 

[Coyote]

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court refused on Monday to allow Texas to enforce restrictions that would force 10 abortion clinics to close.

The justices voted 5-4 to grant an emergency appeal from the clinics after a federal appeals court upheld new regulations, refusing to keep them on hold while the clinics appealed to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court order will remain in effect at least until the court decides whether to hear the clinics' appeal of the lower court ruling, not before the fall.

Supreme Court blocks restrictive Texas abortion-clinic rules - Yahoo News

The SCOTUS is on a roll!

Just one more step in the destruction of our federal system. States have the exclusive right to regulate the practice of medicine with their borders.

Not when their attempt to regulate medicine is a blatant attempt to close down abortion clinics to try and limit a woman's right to abortion.

It would be like the EPA trying to regulate lead in the environment by banning bullets.

Providing a safe medical environment to everyone is a compelling interest of the State, if abortionist want to operate within the State they can meet those safety standards or take their shyster doctors elsewhere.

Please lets not pretend it has anything to do with providing a "safe medical environment".

 

[JakeStarkey]

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court refused on Monday to allow Texas to enforce restrictions that would force 10 abortion clinics to close.

The justices voted 5-4 to grant an emergency appeal from the clinics after a federal appeals court upheld new regulations, refusing to keep them on hold while the clinics appealed to the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court order will remain in effect at least until the court decides whether to hear the clinics' appeal of the lower court ruling, not before the fall.

Supreme Court blocks restrictive Texas abortion-clinic rules - Yahoo News

The SCOTUS is on a roll!

Just one more step in the destruction of our federal system. States have the exclusive right to regulate the practice of medicine with their borders.

Not when their attempt to regulate medicine is a blatant attempt to close down abortion clinics to try and limit a woman's right to abortion.

It would be like the EPA trying to regulate lead in the environment by banning bullets.

Providing a safe medical environment to everyone is a compelling interest of the State, if abortionist want to operate within the State they can meet those safety standards or take their shyster doctors elsewhere.

Please lets not pretend it has anything to do with providing a "safe medical environment".

It certainly is nothing of the sort, only a screen behind which to shut down clinics.