PratchettFan
Gold Member
- Jun 20, 2012
- 7,238
- 746
- 190
but you won't die because you don't get my blood.....you will die because you have a rare blood disorder.......you won't die because I won't give you my heart.....you will die because your own heart has failed......the fetus isn't going to die because it has a rare blood disorder or has a failing heart.....why is the fetus going to die?.....????.....obviously its the only issue....No. It is not the opposite. Removing a fetus is removing it from its life support system. Denying me blood is the same thing.
no.....for it to be the same thing you would have had to be receiving the blood before and then had it taken away......now, if a fetus comes along and asks to enter a woman's womb, and she refuses, THEN it would be the same thing.....
I am willing to go on record as saying any woman should have the right to say no to any fetus that comes up to them on the street asking for permission to enter their womb......
So much for the right to life being the actual issue.
If it were the only issue then the only thing which would matter would be whether or not the action resulted in the loss of life. If I don't get your blood, I will die. If I can't have the organs from your dead body, I will die. But that clearly doesn't matter. The situation has to be very specific to abortion or it just doesn't apply. If the right to life only applies to abortion, then it is not about the right to life.
All you are doing is narrowing the parameters so it only applies to abortion. The point is I will die. I will not be less dead than an aborted fetus. If the issue actually is right to life, then that is all that should matter. Clearly that is not the deciding factor. So this is not about the right to life. This is about imposing a moral standard upon others you do not want imposed upon you.