State finds NO GROUNDS for fallacious complaint filed by PP

State: Nampa pharmacist OK in denying drug to woman | KBOI 2 - Boise News, Weather, Sports and Breaking News Boise, Idaho | Local & Regional

"The Idaho State Board of Pharmacy says a Nampa area pharmacist did nothing wrong when they denied filling a woman's prescription medicine last year."

:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:

It sounds as if they reached their decision on procedural grounds, Allie. They sure did not lay out the reasoning behind it.

I dun understand how they could come to this conclusion.

Why are you applauding? Big fan of pharmacists, are ya?
 
I just read the PDF letter and couldn't find where they said she made false claims.

They said the pharmacist didn't violate the Idaho Pharmacy Act, and that they don't address HIPPA issues.

They said "if true..." a couple times, but I didn't see where they said her complaint was bogus.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
State: Nampa pharmacist OK in denying drug to woman | KBOI 2 - Boise News, Weather, Sports and Breaking News Boise, Idaho | Local & Regional

"The Idaho State Board of Pharmacy says a Nampa area pharmacist did nothing wrong when they denied filling a woman's prescription medicine last year."

:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:

It sounds as if they reached their decision on procedural grounds, Allie. They sure did not lay out the reasoning behind it.

I dun understand how they could come to this conclusion.

Why are you applauding? Big fan of pharmacists, are ya?


Nobody has laid out anything in this matter. We have known exactly zip from the beginning. And all the ridiculous theorizing and second-guessing was a waste of time and indicative of nothing except the fact that there are a alot of people who have really good imaginations and can't tell pretend from real.
 
State: Nampa pharmacist OK in denying drug to woman | KBOI 2 - Boise News, Weather, Sports and Breaking News Boise, Idaho | Local & Regional

"The Idaho State Board of Pharmacy says a Nampa area pharmacist did nothing wrong when they denied filling a woman's prescription medicine last year."

:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:

It sounds as if they reached their decision on procedural grounds, Allie. They sure did not lay out the reasoning behind it.

I dun understand how they could come to this conclusion.

Why are you applauding? Big fan of pharmacists, are ya?

We're now demonizing Pharmacists?

Good grief.
 
State: Nampa pharmacist OK in denying drug to woman | KBOI 2 - Boise News, Weather, Sports and Breaking News Boise, Idaho | Local & Regional

"The Idaho State Board of Pharmacy says a Nampa area pharmacist did nothing wrong when they denied filling a woman's prescription medicine last year."

:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:

It sounds as if they reached their decision on procedural grounds, Allie. They sure did not lay out the reasoning behind it.

I dun understand how they could come to this conclusion.

Why are you applauding? Big fan of pharmacists, are ya?


Nobody has laid out anything in this matter. We have known exactly zip from the beginning. And all the ridiculous theorizing and second-guessing was a waste of time and indicative of nothing except the fact that there are a alot of people who have really good imaginations and can't tell pretend from real.

Hey, it's the same bunch that figured a Mien Kampf and Communist Manifesto reading Atheist who hated GWB was driven to madness by Sarah Palin. Critical thinking isn't their strong suit... following the crowd is however.
 
Be interesting to see the complaint. Though it seems foolish to presume that anyone on this message board has information that this state board doesn't.
 
State: Nampa pharmacist OK in denying drug to woman | KBOI 2 - Boise News, Weather, Sports and Breaking News Boise, Idaho | Local & Regional

"The Idaho State Board of Pharmacy says a Nampa area pharmacist did nothing wrong when they denied filling a woman's prescription medicine last year."

:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:

It sounds as if they reached their decision on procedural grounds, Allie. They sure did not lay out the reasoning behind it.

I dun understand how they could come to this conclusion.

Why are you applauding? Big fan of pharmacists, are ya?

As I recall the state law says they can deny the meds, even though their oath would dictate they cannot. File this one with Faith Based Charitys church & state.
 
It sounds as if they reached their decision on procedural grounds, Allie. They sure did not lay out the reasoning behind it.

I dun understand how they could come to this conclusion.

Why are you applauding? Big fan of pharmacists, are ya?


Nobody has laid out anything in this matter. We have known exactly zip from the beginning. And all the ridiculous theorizing and second-guessing was a waste of time and indicative of nothing except the fact that there are a alot of people who have really good imaginations and can't tell pretend from real.

Hey, it's the same bunch that figured a Mien Kampf and Communist Manifesto reading Atheist who hated GWB was driven to madness by Sarah Palin. Critical thinking isn't their strong suit... following the crowd is however.

Hot air.

The Idaho Board of Pharmacy are all appointed by the Governor and all are pharmacists.
Talk about crowd followers.
 
State: Nampa pharmacist OK in denying drug to woman | KBOI 2 - Boise News, Weather, Sports and Breaking News Boise, Idaho | Local & Regional

"The Idaho State Board of Pharmacy says a Nampa area pharmacist did nothing wrong when they denied filling a woman's prescription medicine last year."

:clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2::clap2:

But, I thought Walgreens admitted that the pharmacist was wrong. And that the complaint was proof, and that we were wrong for pointing out that we do not know all the facts.
 
I just read the PDF letter and couldn't find where they said she made false claims.

They said the pharmacist didn't violate the Idaho Pharmacy Act, and that they don't address HIPPA issues.

They said "if true..." a couple times, but I didn't see where they said her complaint was bogus.

They did address the HIPPA issues. The only way the pharmacist, or anyone else, can violate HIPPA is by releasing information, not by asking for it. Since she did not release any information, and was not accused of having done so, she did not violate HIPPA.
 
Nobody has laid out anything in this matter. We have known exactly zip from the beginning. And all the ridiculous theorizing and second-guessing was a waste of time and indicative of nothing except the fact that there are a alot of people who have really good imaginations and can't tell pretend from real.

Hey, it's the same bunch that figured a Mien Kampf and Communist Manifesto reading Atheist who hated GWB was driven to madness by Sarah Palin. Critical thinking isn't their strong suit... following the crowd is however.

Hot air.

The Idaho Board of Pharmacy are all appointed by the Governor and all are pharmacists.
Talk about crowd followers.

Wow.

Aren't you the guy that was saying that the pharmacist was guilty because a complaint was filed?
 
Hey, it's the same bunch that figured a Mien Kampf and Communist Manifesto reading Atheist who hated GWB was driven to madness by Sarah Palin. Critical thinking isn't their strong suit... following the crowd is however.

Hot air.

The Idaho Board of Pharmacy are all appointed by the Governor and all are pharmacists.
Talk about crowd followers.

Wow.

Aren't you the guy that was saying that the pharmacist was guilty because a complaint was filed?

Yup.

Standby for spin.
 
It sounds as if they reached their decision on procedural grounds, Allie. They sure did not lay out the reasoning behind it.

I dun understand how they could come to this conclusion.

Why are you applauding? Big fan of pharmacists, are ya?


Nobody has laid out anything in this matter. We have known exactly zip from the beginning. And all the ridiculous theorizing and second-guessing was a waste of time and indicative of nothing except the fact that there are a alot of people who have really good imaginations and can't tell pretend from real.

Hey, it's the same bunch that figured a Mien Kampf and Communist Manifesto reading Atheist who hated GWB was driven to madness by Sarah Palin. Critical thinking isn't their strong suit... following the crowd is however.

Ah so your politicizing a tragedy aren't ya? Good job but I doubt it will be moved because it is a republican bashing a democrat. Thats allowed on here

BTW, pharamacist should only make a decision about a prescription is if taken will cause severe complications or death. Not if they should be allowed to have a medication. Thats too far.
 
You're full of shit.

They can deny medication based upon a patient's abilty to pay.

So let's hear again how they can't deny for anything....
 
Being able to pay is up to the company policy IYAM. But not the individual to decline certain medication based upon pure speculation.
 
"The Board has no basis to initiate administrative proceedings and will close our investigation without further action," the letter states.

Yup. The Idaho State Board of Pharmacy avoided making any finding and dismissed themselves from the hearing.

(read between the lines that editec thinks the Idaho State Board of Pharmacy acted like cowards)

What they did NOT DO was decide whether the pharmacist had that right to deny the script based on his opinion about the morality of the treatment.

This case is headed for a COURT OF LAW, I expect.

And if it does, and if the court is deciding based on the laws of the land and the logic of the laws, too, I suspect that they will hand down a decision that says that pharmacist's DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT to deny medicine to patients because they don't approve of the patients' morals or the morality of the treatment procribed, either

That drug dealer's license would be lifted were I adjudicating that case.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top