Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He asked the question in a way that tried to escape his duty to give evidence, thus trying and failing to put the burden of proof on RW.
The fact you keep coming back with this demonstrates from now on that you are not professional and you don't care about reality or the welfare of the country. You are trying to pick up political points by lying and acting stupid. Well, maybe you are not acting.
Stop whining, diveboy.
you do know that I have, as a by product of dealing with RWs claim, "answered" your "question" by way of falsifying RW's claim, right?
He asked the question in a way that tried to escape his duty to give evidence,.
keep deflectingHe asked the question in a way that tried to escape his duty to give evidence, thus trying and failing to put the burden of proof on RW.
The fact you keep coming back with this demonstrates from now on that you are not professional and you don't care about reality or the welfare of the country. You are trying to pick up political points by lying and acting stupid. Well, maybe you are not acting.
Stop whining, diveboy.
he already did, you pathetic moronTrajan can't answer his own question? Then he doesn't need an answer. He can accept the word of his betters. And we can thank hinm for proving "There's no limit to stupidity"
but do continue to claim he hasnt
he already did, you pathetic moronTrajan can't answer his own question? Then he doesn't need an answer. He can accept the word of his betters. And we can thank hinm for proving "There's no limit to stupidity"
still waiting for either you or RW to provide proof of your claims
When Trajan asks a question inferring a refutation (which is exactly what he did), the burden of proof is his.
1. Any professional knows this.
2. Thus, either both or one of you are not professional, or one or both of you stepped in it and are trying to put it on the professionals, RW and me.
Don't like it? You can go away.
ah, more of your pathetic dance of false victoryYou are whining yet again, because you and your pals got your asses hand to you.
he asked a question you never answeredhe already did, you pathetic moronTrajan can't answer his own question? Then he doesn't need an answer. He can accept the word of his betters. And we can thank hinm for proving "There's no limit to stupidity"
still waiting for either you or RW to provide proof of your claims
Have to wait for Trajan to post his evidence. Apparently no limit to your stupidity, either.
stupidity like jokeys is specialWhen Trajan asks a question inferring a refutation (which is exactly what he did), the burden of proof is his.
1. Any professional knows this.
2. Thus, either both or one of you are not professional, or one or both of you stepped in it and are trying to put it on the professionals, RW and me.
Don't like it? You can go away.
Like McCain and Lieberman right? Walks in the moon light, holding hands, wishing on stars and all.... You are really starting to choke me up Jake. Cut that out.
I still havent seen a good reason why we need this treaty. Are we having an Arms race with Russia that I didn't know about? How does this treaty deal with the other nations in the world such as Iran and North Korea that have no problem developing more weapons and using them?
You really are slow Avatar.
You are whining yet again, because you and your pals got your asses hand to you.
stupidity like jokeys is specialWhen Trajan asks a question inferring a refutation (which is exactly what he did), the burden of proof is his.
1. Any professional knows this.
2. Thus, either both or one of you are not professional, or one or both of you stepped in it and are trying to put it on the professionals, RW and me.
Don't like it? You can go away.
Like McCain and Lieberman right? Walks in the moon light, holding hands, wishing on stars and all.... You are really starting to choke me up Jake. Cut that out.
you remain an idiotShame on you for wanting to weaken the nation at this moment.
The presidents and secretaries of state and those who voted for the treaty are right, and you rest are wrong.
Get used to it.
calling you an idiot is totally outside the discussion of the START treaty, and its totally trueAs do the presidents and the secretaries of state who support START and whom I support?
Go ahead and have the last word because you are not saying anything other than you are unhappy. OK, you are unhappy. I get that.
As do the presidents and the secretaries of state who support START and whom I support?
calling you an idiot is totally outside the discussion of the START treaty, and its totally true
You are the idiot for willfully rejecting the presidents and secretaries of state and those who voted for the treaty are right, and you rest are wrong.have i now?As do the presidents and the secretaries of state who support START and whom I support?
calling you an idiot is totally outside the discussion of the START treaty, and its totally true
That's the best word you have?
You are projecting your inadequacy on me again, diveboy.
