catzmeow
Gold Member
- Banned
- #61
Hey .. then there's no problem because everyone knows that Starbucks is so finacially healthy that it doesn't need it's foreign business. It's why they shutdown their stores for three hours months ago .. so they could tell employees how wonderfully their bottom line was looking.
The economic health of Starbucks isn't going to be impacted by this boycott. I'd suggest that the economic losses from that boycott will be minimal, because those who will participate weren't likely to be Starbucks customers in the first place.
You can't swing a cat in a Starbucks cafe without hitting an uber trendy poser douche, but there is a serious dearth of hippies.
Now, if you were boycotting patchouli and hemp products, you might be able to make a dent.
Last edited: