Sperm

Discussion in 'Politics' started by OohPooPahDoo, Jan 14, 2013.

  1. OohPooPahDoo
    Offline

    OohPooPahDoo Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    15,342
    Thanks Received:
    976
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    N'Awlins Mid-City
    Ratings:
    +1,320
    Sperm is

    a) alive

    b) human


    thus - by RW logic, it should be illegal to kill one.





    Same applies to unfertilized human eggs.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 18, 2014
  2. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    29,281
    Thanks Received:
    4,000
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,915
    Most pro lifers put the line at conception, therefore what you are stating is hokum.
     
  3. OohPooPahDoo
    Offline

    OohPooPahDoo Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    15,342
    Thanks Received:
    976
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    N'Awlins Mid-City
    Ratings:
    +1,320

    Hence their logical inconsistency.
     
  4. deltex1
    Online

    deltex1 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2012
    Messages:
    18,450
    Thanks Received:
    3,092
    Trophy Points:
    295
    Location:
    Near the Alamo
    Ratings:
    +13,545
    If it's on your lips...it's dead.
     
  5. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    29,281
    Thanks Received:
    4,000
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,915
    How so? Conception is the point where two unique DNA sequences are joined, thus creating a new individual and unique (unless identical twins/trips etc) DNA sequence.
     
  6. OODA_Loop
    Offline

    OODA_Loop Account Terminated

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,953
    Thanks Received:
    468
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +523
    How much of a control freak does one have to be to care what others think about sperm ?
     
  7. g5000
    Offline

    g5000 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2011
    Messages:
    55,976
    Thanks Received:
    9,333
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +24,525
    Okay...no. You have it all wrong, fool.
     
  8. jillian
    Offline

    jillian Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2006
    Messages:
    69,551
    Thanks Received:
    13,012
    Trophy Points:
    2,220
    Location:
    The Other Side of Paradise
    Ratings:
    +22,427
    so an egg is a chicken?

    the logical inconsistency is that the law is that government has no right to intervene until the governmental interest outweighs the interest of the individual.

    i think it's hysterical that all the "don't tell me to wear a seatbelt" types think it's ok to tell women what to do.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. OohPooPahDoo
    Offline

    OohPooPahDoo Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    15,342
    Thanks Received:
    976
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    N'Awlins Mid-City
    Ratings:
    +1,320

    So pro-life doesn't mean pro-ALL human life?
     
  10. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    29,281
    Thanks Received:
    4,000
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,915
    OohPooPahDoo suffers from the same issue many of those with less than stellar intellects suffer from: the inability to find any logic in a viewpoint that is opposite or contrary to thiers. They can't grasp the concept that someone of a differing opinion can come to thier conlcusion logically, hence the need for a) logical inconsistency b) stupidity or c) EEEVVIIILL to let them rationalize a reason for the other person's viewpoints.
     

Share This Page