Speaker Ryan: Country First, or Party First?

[jillian]

I revel in my ability to make you react kid. Now go away you are too stupid to worry about, I'd guess you and Jillian would be a good fit, she is selling and you are buying. (shrug)

Pearls before swine, ignoring.

isn't it cute how the angry braindead twit thinks he matters. my feeling is it's amusing to bat him around like a cat bats around a mouse.

but he's apparently too stupid to realize he's the playtoy

Honey you've never been able to "bat" anyone around on your best day You are simply too brain dead to even know that you aren't any better than Mr. Starkey on here.

And yet all you are able to do is attack those who hold opinions which challenge you; demeaning people who are obviously more intelligent and informed than you.

Clearly you are lost. You aren't able to keep up so if were you I'd just keep out. Occupied did the same thing, butted in midway after poor Jillian tried so desperately to run away.
Go play with the kids son.

no one is running away. you're just useless as boobs on a bull

and do stop projecting. your admitted purpose in being here is trolling. you're not even good at that.

 

[Dale Smith]

That's it, revel in your ignorance for you are the exact sort of voter the republicans want to be able to continue their own special brand of corruption.

I revel in my ability to make you react kid. Now go away you are too stupid to worry about, I'd guess you and Jillian would be a good fit, she is selling and you are buying. (shrug)

Pearls before swine, ignoring.

isn't it cute how the angry braindead twit thinks he matters. my feeling is it's amusing to bat him around like a cat bats around a mouse.

but he's apparently too stupid to realize he's the playtoy

Shillian, you "toy" with no one and your opinion and what comes out of my dog's ass bears such a striking resemblance that it would be easier to tell the Olsen twins apart.....hope this helps, ya knows-nothing fraud.

that's the beauty of you uneducated, uninformed wingers... you're clueless.

but thanks for your typical garbage post. no doubt that passes for intellectual response to your limited little teeny mind.

you might also try learning to spell. although your hatred for people who shatter your little rightwingnuthackworld is amusing but not particularly compelling.

I have no love for either party because both are bought and paid for and if you had ANY common sense or the slightest gift of discernment, you would know that. I don't like neocons but I especially despise and loathe the Fabian socialist left that has been the biggest tool of the banking oligarchs to tear this country down. Useful idiots like you made it all possible. I know more than you...infinitely more.

 

[Grizz]

Pearls before swine, ignoring.

isn't it cute how the angry braindead twit thinks he matters. my feeling is it's amusing to bat him around like a cat bats around a mouse.

but he's apparently too stupid to realize he's the playtoy

Honey you've never been able to "bat" anyone around on your best day You are simply too brain dead to even know that you aren't any better than Mr. Starkey on here.

And yet all you are able to do is attack those who hold opinions which challenge you; demeaning people who are obviously more intelligent and informed than you.

Clearly you are lost. You aren't able to keep up so if were you I'd just keep out. Occupied did the same thing, butted in midway after poor Jillian tried so desperately to run away.
Go play with the kids son.

no one is running away. you're just useless as boobs on a bull

and do stop projecting. your admitted purpose in being here is trolling. you're not even good at that.

Sorry honey, YOU are the Troll. I'll run circles around you every time you engage me on a real subject. As for insults, I surely can play that game too. Are you saying that you don't even get 20 bucks?

 

[Yousaidwhat]

All these people only know what they hear. They may care in some abstract manner but they are mainly concerned with appeasing various lobbyists and large donors. These are the people who get to tell them what America wants. Big money buys access and I am not sure there is any way to reverse the trend that culminated in the citizen's united decision.

the first thing to be done is overturn citizens united and get money out of politics. then congress members don't need to be beholden to big donors.

Only beholden to K. Street

and dumb donald is beholden to russia because no one else will lend him money in the US because he's declared bankruptcy so many times.

so you were saying?

I was saying that our representatives will still be beholden to K St.

I don't care about Trump.

You were saying.

 

[JBond]

All these people only know what they hear. They may care in some abstract manner but they are mainly concerned with appeasing various lobbyists and large donors. These are the people who get to tell them what America wants. Big money buys access and I am not sure there is any way to reverse the trend that culminated in the citizen's united decision.

the first thing to be done is overturn citizens united and get money out of politics. then congress members don't need to be beholden to big donors.

Such a shallow response, but not unexpected. If you want to limit employers you must also limit unions and bundling.

it's so funny when rightwingnuts call obvious solutions "shallow".

if you were able to actually read, you'd see i said all money. or did that escape your limited reading ability?

although it's clear that the koch brothers have brainwashed the uneducated to think unions are a bad thing.

Back peddle your on your bullshit all you want. You said overturn Citizens and nothing about the massive funds funneled by unions or bundling.

 

[Dale Smith]

All these people only know what they hear. They may care in some abstract manner but they are mainly concerned with appeasing various lobbyists and large donors. These are the people who get to tell them what America wants. Big money buys access and I am not sure there is any way to reverse the trend that culminated in the citizen's united decision.

the first thing to be done is overturn citizens united and get money out of politics. then congress members don't need to be beholden to big donors.

Such a shallow response, but not unexpected. If you want to limit employers you must also limit unions and bundling.

it's so funny when rightwingnuts call obvious solutions "shallow".

if you were able to actually read, you'd see i said all money. or did that escape your limited reading ability?

although it's clear that the koch brothers have brainwashed the uneducated to think unions are a bad thing.

Back peddle your on your bullshit all you want. You said overturn Citizens and nothing about the massive funds funneled by unions or bundling.

The left isn't concerned with the massive spending of George Soros and his NGO's.......

 

[Wry Catcher]

i wouldn't know who that is wing nut.

now stay on topic and focus, loser.

Are you really this stupid? Of course you are.
Look bit*h, if don't want certain topics broached don't introduce them.
The Hildabitch is bought and paid for. You are jus too stupid to go look for yourself.

Of course she is but the way you are talking makes you seem like an uneducated rage head with few coherent thoughts. Turn down the rage, use proper grammar, use people's right names and maybe the other posters would respond to you as if you had something of value to say.

Apparently you think I should value what any Lefty thinks...huh.
Nope, piss off kid.

Nice to see an honest post by a willfully ignorant conservative.

And you think Hillary is your "savior".
Dumbass.

Straw Man ^^^. No, I don't believe HRC is my Savior. I wouldn't hire a chiropractor for heart surgery, a brick mason as my dentist or someone whose understanding of foreign policy was learned by watching "24".

Would you?

 

[Wry Catcher]

All these people only know what they hear. They may care in some abstract manner but they are mainly concerned with appeasing various lobbyists and large donors. These are the people who get to tell them what America wants. Big money buys access and I am not sure there is any way to reverse the trend that culminated in the citizen's united decision.

the first thing to be done is overturn citizens united and get money out of politics. then congress members don't need to be beholden to big donors.

Such a shallow response, but not unexpected. If you want to limit employers you must also limit unions and bundling.

it's so funny when rightwingnuts call obvious solutions "shallow".

if you were able to actually read, you'd see i said all money. or did that escape your limited reading ability?

although it's clear that the koch brothers have brainwashed the uneducated to think unions are a bad thing.

Back peddle your on your bullshit all you want. You said overturn Citizens and nothing about the massive funds funneled by unions or bundling.

JBond's ignorance is almost pitiful:

"In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that corporations and unions have the same political speech rights as individuals under the First Amendment.

SUMMARY OF CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

 

[occupied]

Are you really this stupid? Of course you are.
Look bit*h, if don't want certain topics broached don't introduce them.
The Hildabitch is bought and paid for. You are jus too stupid to go look for yourself.

Of course she is but the way you are talking makes you seem like an uneducated rage head with few coherent thoughts. Turn down the rage, use proper grammar, use people's right names and maybe the other posters would respond to you as if you had something of value to say.

Apparently you think I should value what any Lefty thinks...huh.
Nope, piss off kid.

Nice to see an honest post by a willfully ignorant conservative.

And you think Hillary is your "savior".
Dumbass.

Straw Man ^^^. No, I don't believe HRC is my Savior. I wouldn't hire a chiropractor for heart surgery, a brick mason as my dentist or someone whose understanding of foreign policy was learned by watching "24".

Would you?

There is but one candidate who seems to have fanatic acolytes this go around, and it ain't Hillary.

 

[occupied]

All these people only know what they hear. They may care in some abstract manner but they are mainly concerned with appeasing various lobbyists and large donors. These are the people who get to tell them what America wants. Big money buys access and I am not sure there is any way to reverse the trend that culminated in the citizen's united decision.

the first thing to be done is overturn citizens united and get money out of politics. then congress members don't need to be beholden to big donors.

Such a shallow response, but not unexpected. If you want to limit employers you must also limit unions and bundling.

it's so funny when rightwingnuts call obvious solutions "shallow".

if you were able to actually read, you'd see i said all money. or did that escape your limited reading ability?

although it's clear that the koch brothers have brainwashed the uneducated to think unions are a bad thing.

Back peddle your on your bullshit all you want. You said overturn Citizens and nothing about the massive funds funneled by unions or bundling.

JBond's ignorance is almost pitiful:

"In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that corporations and unions have the same political speech rights as individuals under the First Amendment.

SUMMARY OF CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Yes I've seen this before. The idea that Citizen's United was a counter to union political activity rather than a loosening of rules for them as well. I wonder what radio host came up with that shit.

 

[JBond]

All these people only know what they hear. They may care in some abstract manner but they are mainly concerned with appeasing various lobbyists and large donors. These are the people who get to tell them what America wants. Big money buys access and I am not sure there is any way to reverse the trend that culminated in the citizen's united decision.

the first thing to be done is overturn citizens united and get money out of politics. then congress members don't need to be beholden to big donors.

Such a shallow response, but not unexpected. If you want to limit employers you must also limit unions and bundling.

it's so funny when rightwingnuts call obvious solutions "shallow".

if you were able to actually read, you'd see i said all money. or did that escape your limited reading ability?

although it's clear that the koch brothers have brainwashed the uneducated to think unions are a bad thing.

Back peddle your on your bullshit all you want. You said overturn Citizens and nothing about the massive funds funneled by unions or bundling.

JBond's ignorance is almost pitiful:

"In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that corporations and unions have the same political speech rights as individuals under the First Amendment.

SUMMARY OF CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION

Exactly my point. Before Citizens, unions could use general treasury funds for "other political activities" while employers could not.

The whining by the leftists is silly considering unions, through the 14 election, season have bennifitted greatly. More so than employers.

 

[Mac1958]

One might ask the same question of Senate Leader McConnell, Trump, HRC, Gov 's Pense and Kaine too. What do YOU think?

Does ambition drive each of them, or do some (one?) of them really give a damn about you and your family?

Pick one, tell us why or why not you believe he or she deserves to be a member of the power elite.

It really is tough to say. I think all of them have an altruistic element in their heart to some (varying) degree, but certainly ambition, power, ego, money and influence are important to them as well.

Here's what I'd love to know: What would it look like if we had strict, short term limits, a Balanced Budget Amendment, if we got money out of politics, and ended congressional pensions? Who would still be there? Who would then be attracted to it?
.