Something Is Fundamentally Wrong with Our Conception of the Universe. Next nonsense

[Frannie]

Tell us then what is known about the universe?

You left out everything you claim is real, likely because you know you can't reference anything without becoming more foolish than u already r.

Where is the missing 85 percent of the u
Is there any mass at all if the u is simulated
What is the big magnet outside the u replacing the 85 percent
Where does space end and the next multiverse begin

Stocks, the best trades are the ones bought and never traded, with no taxes, with splits and dividends and governmental breakups creating new stocks

La la la

Yes, I see you trying futilely to shut out anything that may cause you to learn something. Now go, start your threads about trades and the markets. Try to sound educated.

Have you always been a follower instead of a leader?

Ya know from a purely theoretical perspective, you could start your own thread, instead of childishly demanding that I start the thread you choose and think like the 8th grader that you are.

Here's the deal. You started this thread on astronomy, now you want to talk about stock trading, but instead of starting threads on that, you get upset that I keep talking about, and exposing your ignorance about, astronomy, in this thread debited to astronomy.

Now, have you figured out how spectroscopy allows us to gain an understanding of the elements present in the atmosphere of a hot Jupiter?

Have you figured out that even amateur astronomers can put a motor drive on their telescopes that precisely counter the Earth's rotation and allow them to observe an object for long periods of time?

These are basic fundamentals of modern astronomy that you expressed ignorance of.

This is not an astronomy thread, it is astronomers make up shit to justify Grant's and tuition thread.

You are a spoiled fool who actually thinks in error that you have either the ability or right to tell me what I should think and write.

I have complete freedom of expression, always have. It does not please everyone now or did it ever.

Now you go play with your toys while I consider adding to my defense portfolio, and keep me updated on the multiverse pulling galaxies toward it because 85 percent of gravity exerting mass and energy got lost by your astronomer

CIAO

Let's see if we have this straight. You start a thread on astronomy and your complaints that astronomers are coming up with theories to explain things they don't yet fully understand, you think the fact that other astronomers test those theories, verify some of them and prove some of them wrong means they don't understand anything at all, but you don't want to talk about astronomy any more because I took all your fun away by proving you wrong over and over again. Now you want to talk about stock trading, but don't want to start threads about it so you get upset that people are still talking about astronomy in the thread you started on astronomy.

Is that about the size of it?

And I've noticed that you have a pattern of making dumb statements then refusing to deal with them when they're shown to be ludicrously wrong.

Again stoopid this is an astronomy is nonsense thread, you need to accept reality instead of believing what you were programmed to believe.

However you continue floating around in black hole ville, I will take care of business here on the Earth

CIAO

PS. You can tap out at any time you feel appropriate, your chances of seeing me do such are null

 

[theHawk]

Science has never been easy. Are you upset because it's not easy?

He's upset because he claims 85% of the universe is missing, but doesn't want to admit its dark energy which means its not really missing. Something (dark energy? God?) is continuing to expand the universe..

“Dark energy” is just a fancy way of saying we have no fucking clue. They may as well call it pixie dust.

 

[Frannie]

One Number Shows Something Is Fundamentally Wrong with Our Conception of the Universe

None of the numbers match, why? because as I said no one has even the least clue what they are looking at so every week there is a new universe invented.

There's a puzzling mystery going on in the universe. Measurements of the rate of cosmic expansion using different methods keep turning up disagreeing results. The situation has been called a "crisis."

The problem centers on what's known as the Hubble constant. Named for American astronomer Edwin Hubble, this unit describes how fast the universe is expanding at different distances from Earth. Using data from the European Space Agency's (ESA) Planck satellite, scientists estimate the rate to be 46,200 mph per million light-years (or, using cosmologists' units, 67.4 kilometers/second per megaparsec). But calculations using pulsating stars called Cepheids suggest it is 50,400 mph per million light-years (73.4 km/s/Mpc).

If the first number is right, it means scientists have been measuring distances to faraway objects in the universe wrong for many decades. But if the second is correct, then researchers might have to accept the existence of exotic, new physics. Astronomers, understandably, are pretty worked up about this discrepancy.

What is a layperson supposed to make of this situation? And just how important is this difference, which to outsiders looks minor? In order to get to the bottom of the clash, Live Science called in Barry Madore, an astronomer at the University of Chicago and a member of one of the teams undertaking measurements of the Hubble constant.

The trouble starts with Edwin Hubble himself. Back in 1929, he noticed that more-distant galaxies were moving away from Earth faster than their closer-in counterparts. He found a linear relationship between the distance an object was from our planet and the speed at which it was receding.

"That means something spooky is going on," Madore told Live Science. "Why would we be the center of the universe? The answer, which is not intuitive, is that [distant objects are] not moving. There's more and more space being created between everything."

Hubble realized that the universe was expanding, and it seemed to be doing so at a constant rate — hence, the Hubble constant. He measured the value to be about 342,000 miles per hour per million light years (501 km/s/Mpc) — almost 10 times larger than what is currently measured. Over the years, researchers have refined that rate.

Things got weirder in the late 1990s, when two teams of astronomers noticed that distant supernovas were dimmer, and therefore farther away, than expected, said Madore. This indicated that not only was the universe expanding, but it was also accelerating in its expansion. Astronomers named the cause of this mysterious phenomenon dark energy.

Having accepted that the universe was doing something strange, cosmologists turned to the next obvious task: measuring the acceleration as accurately as possible. By doing this, they hoped to retrace the history and evolution of the cosmos from start to finish.

Madore likened this task to walking into a racetrack and getting a single glimpse of the horses running around the field. From just that bit of information, could somebody deduce where all the horses started and which one of them would win?

That kind of question may sound impossible to answer, but that hasn't stopped scientists from trying. For the last 10 years, the Planck satellite has been measuring the cosmic microwave background, a distant echo of the Big Bang, which provides a snapshot of the infant universe 13 billion years ago. Using the observatory's data, cosmologists could ascertain a number for the Hubble constant with an extraordinarily small degree of uncertainty.

"It's beautiful," Madore said. But, "it contradicts what people have been doing for the last 30 years," said Madore.

Over those three decades, astronomers have also been using telescopes to look at distant Cepheids and calculate the Hubble constant. These stars flicker at a constant rate depending on their brightness, so researchers can tell exactly how bright a Cepheid should be based on its pulsations. By looking at how dim the stars actually are, astronomers can calculate a distance to them. But estimates of the Hubble constant using Cepheids don't match the one from Planck.

The discrepancy might look fairly small, but each data point is quite precise and there is no overlap between their uncertainties. The differing sides have pointed fingers at one another, saying that their opponents have included errors throwing off their results, said Madore.

But, he added, each result also depends on large numbers of assumptions. Going back to the horse-race analogy, Madore likened it to trying to figure out the winner while having to infer which horse will get tired first, which will gain a sudden burst of energy at the end, which will slip a bit on the wet patch of grass from yesterday's rain and many other difficult-to-determine variables.

If the Cepheids teams are wrong, that means astronomers have been measuring distances in the universe incorrectly this whole time, Madore said. But if Planck is wrong, then it's possible that new and exotic physics would have to be introduced into cosmologists' models of the universe, he added. These models include different dials, such as the number of types of subatomic particles known as neutrinos in existence, and they are used to interpret the satellite's data of the cosmic microwave background. To reconcile the Planck value for the Hubble constant with existing models, some of the dials would have to be tweaked, Madore said, but most physicists aren’t quite willing to do so yet.

Hoping to provide another data point that could mediate between the two sides, Madore and his colleagues recently looked at the light of red giant stars. These objects reach the same peak brightness at the end of their lives, meaning that, like with the Cepheids, astronomers can look at how dim they appear from Earth to get a good estimate of their distance and, therefore, calculate the Hubble constant.

The results, released in July, provided a number squarely between the two prior measurements: 47,300 mph per million light-years (69.8 km/s/Mpc). And the uncertainty contained enough overlap to potentially agree with Planck's results.

But researchers aren't popping their champagne corks yet, said Madore. "We wanted to make a tie breaker," he said. "But it didn't say this side or that side is right. It said there was a lot more slop than everybody thought before."

Other teams have weighed in. A group called H0 Lenses in COSMOGRAIL's Wellspring (H0LICOW) is looking at distant bright objects in the early universe called quasars whose light has been gravitationally lensed by massive objects in between us and them. By studying these quasars, the group recently came up with an estimate closer to the astronomers' side. Information from the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), which looks at gravitational waves from crashing neutron stars, could provide another independent data point. But such calculations are still in their early stages, said Madore, and have yet to reach full maturity.

For his part, Madore said he thinks the middle number between Planck and the astronomers' value will eventually prevail, though he wouldn't wager too much on that possibility at the moment. But until some conclusion is found, he would like to see researchers' attitudes toned down a bit.

"A lot of froth has been put on top of this by people who insist they're right," he said. "It's sufficiently important that it needs to be resolved, but it's going to take time."

Well that's a whole lot of words to say, we just don't know...………………..

But you do right?

LOL!..as if you understand one word in three of what you copied and pasted! have you somehow appointed yourself the Science Troll??

He said the universe is expanding at a constant rate. First time I ever heard anybody say that.

Who is he

 

[hadit]

Yes, I see you trying futilely to shut out anything that may cause you to learn something. Now go, start your threads about trades and the markets. Try to sound educated.

Have you always been a follower instead of a leader?

Ya know from a purely theoretical perspective, you could start your own thread, instead of childishly demanding that I start the thread you choose and think like the 8th grader that you are.

Here's the deal. You started this thread on astronomy, now you want to talk about stock trading, but instead of starting threads on that, you get upset that I keep talking about, and exposing your ignorance about, astronomy, in this thread debited to astronomy.

Now, have you figured out how spectroscopy allows us to gain an understanding of the elements present in the atmosphere of a hot Jupiter?

Have you figured out that even amateur astronomers can put a motor drive on their telescopes that precisely counter the Earth's rotation and allow them to observe an object for long periods of time?

These are basic fundamentals of modern astronomy that you expressed ignorance of.

This is not an astronomy thread, it is astronomers make up shit to justify Grant's and tuition thread.

You are a spoiled fool who actually thinks in error that you have either the ability or right to tell me what I should think and write.

I have complete freedom of expression, always have. It does not please everyone now or did it ever.

Now you go play with your toys while I consider adding to my defense portfolio, and keep me updated on the multiverse pulling galaxies toward it because 85 percent of gravity exerting mass and energy got lost by your astronomer

CIAO

Let's see if we have this straight. You start a thread on astronomy and your complaints that astronomers are coming up with theories to explain things they don't yet fully understand, you think the fact that other astronomers test those theories, verify some of them and prove some of them wrong means they don't understand anything at all, but you don't want to talk about astronomy any more because I took all your fun away by proving you wrong over and over again. Now you want to talk about stock trading, but don't want to start threads about it so you get upset that people are still talking about astronomy in the thread you started on astronomy.

Is that about the size of it?

And I've noticed that you have a pattern of making dumb statements then refusing to deal with them when they're shown to be ludicrously wrong.

Again stoopid this is an astronomy is nonsense thread, you need to accept reality instead of believing what you were programmed to believe.

However you continue floating around in black hole ville, I will take care of business here on the Earth

CIAO

PS. You can tap out at any time you feel appropriate, your chances of seeing me do such are null

Oh, I'm quite certain you will insist on continually needing the last word, in fact I'm counting on it. I'm controlling you that way.

Now, about those motor drives that you didn't think could keep a telescope focused on an object for long periods of time. Do you finally accept that even amateur astronomers can get long exposures of distant objects? Remember, you claimed they could not.

About spectroscopy, do you finally accept that we can identify elements present on distant hot Jupiters? Remember again that you claimed we couldn't.

Thus far, your complaint that we know nothing about the universe has only exposed your own gaping ignorance of the subject.

 

[Frannie]

Have you always been a follower instead of a leader?

Ya know from a purely theoretical perspective, you could start your own thread, instead of childishly demanding that I start the thread you choose and think like the 8th grader that you are.

Here's the deal. You started this thread on astronomy, now you want to talk about stock trading, but instead of starting threads on that, you get upset that I keep talking about, and exposing your ignorance about, astronomy, in this thread debited to astronomy.

Now, have you figured out how spectroscopy allows us to gain an understanding of the elements present in the atmosphere of a hot Jupiter?

Have you figured out that even amateur astronomers can put a motor drive on their telescopes that precisely counter the Earth's rotation and allow them to observe an object for long periods of time?

These are basic fundamentals of modern astronomy that you expressed ignorance of.

This is not an astronomy thread, it is astronomers make up shit to justify Grant's and tuition thread.

You are a spoiled fool who actually thinks in error that you have either the ability or right to tell me what I should think and write.

I have complete freedom of expression, always have. It does not please everyone now or did it ever.

Now you go play with your toys while I consider adding to my defense portfolio, and keep me updated on the multiverse pulling galaxies toward it because 85 percent of gravity exerting mass and energy got lost by your astronomer

CIAO

Let's see if we have this straight. You start a thread on astronomy and your complaints that astronomers are coming up with theories to explain things they don't yet fully understand, you think the fact that other astronomers test those theories, verify some of them and prove some of them wrong means they don't understand anything at all, but you don't want to talk about astronomy any more because I took all your fun away by proving you wrong over and over again. Now you want to talk about stock trading, but don't want to start threads about it so you get upset that people are still talking about astronomy in the thread you started on astronomy.

Is that about the size of it?

And I've noticed that you have a pattern of making dumb statements then refusing to deal with them when they're shown to be ludicrously wrong.

Again stoopid this is an astronomy is nonsense thread, you need to accept reality instead of believing what you were programmed to believe.

However you continue floating around in black hole ville, I will take care of business here on the Earth

CIAO

PS. You can tap out at any time you feel appropriate, your chances of seeing me do such are null

Oh, I'm quite certain you will insist on continually needing the last word, in fact I'm counting on it. I'm controlling you that way.

Now, about those motor drives that you didn't think could keep a telescope focused on an object for long periods of time. Do you finally accept that even amateur astronomers can get long exposures of distant objects? Remember, you claimed they could not.

About spectroscopy, do you finally accept that we can identify elements present on distant hot Jupiters? Remember again that you claimed we couldn't.

Thus far, your complaint that we know nothing about the universe has only exposed your own gaping ignorance of the subject.

Triggered, that's an official fail......

Seriously kid you can start your own astronomy thread anytime you know, or are you gonna follow me like a lost puppy for the rest of your life.

As for photography, I actually had a photo published in a calendar once. No motor drive though, handheld Nikon.

PS. Again you could start your own thread detailing how I was wrong, however you already know that you will be verbally ripped apart in front of your peers even more than you are now.

This is you at this point

 

[G.T.]

Here's the deal. You started this thread on astronomy, now you want to talk about stock trading, but instead of starting threads on that, you get upset that I keep talking about, and exposing your ignorance about, astronomy, in this thread debited to astronomy.

Now, have you figured out how spectroscopy allows us to gain an understanding of the elements present in the atmosphere of a hot Jupiter?

Have you figured out that even amateur astronomers can put a motor drive on their telescopes that precisely counter the Earth's rotation and allow them to observe an object for long periods of time?

These are basic fundamentals of modern astronomy that you expressed ignorance of.

This is not an astronomy thread, it is astronomers make up shit to justify Grant's and tuition thread.

You are a spoiled fool who actually thinks in error that you have either the ability or right to tell me what I should think and write.

I have complete freedom of expression, always have. It does not please everyone now or did it ever.

Now you go play with your toys while I consider adding to my defense portfolio, and keep me updated on the multiverse pulling galaxies toward it because 85 percent of gravity exerting mass and energy got lost by your astronomer

CIAO

Let's see if we have this straight. You start a thread on astronomy and your complaints that astronomers are coming up with theories to explain things they don't yet fully understand, you think the fact that other astronomers test those theories, verify some of them and prove some of them wrong means they don't understand anything at all, but you don't want to talk about astronomy any more because I took all your fun away by proving you wrong over and over again. Now you want to talk about stock trading, but don't want to start threads about it so you get upset that people are still talking about astronomy in the thread you started on astronomy.

Is that about the size of it?

And I've noticed that you have a pattern of making dumb statements then refusing to deal with them when they're shown to be ludicrously wrong.

Again stoopid this is an astronomy is nonsense thread, you need to accept reality instead of believing what you were programmed to believe.

However you continue floating around in black hole ville, I will take care of business here on the Earth

CIAO

PS. You can tap out at any time you feel appropriate, your chances of seeing me do such are null

Oh, I'm quite certain you will insist on continually needing the last word, in fact I'm counting on it. I'm controlling you that way.

Now, about those motor drives that you didn't think could keep a telescope focused on an object for long periods of time. Do you finally accept that even amateur astronomers can get long exposures of distant objects? Remember, you claimed they could not.

About spectroscopy, do you finally accept that we can identify elements present on distant hot Jupiters? Remember again that you claimed we couldn't.

Thus far, your complaint that we know nothing about the universe has only exposed your own gaping ignorance of the subject.

Triggered, that's an official fail......

Seriously kid you can start your own astronomy thread anytime you know, or are you gonna follow me like a lost puppy for the rest of your life.

As for photography, I actually had a photo published in a calendar once. No motor drive though, handheld Nikon.

PS. Again you could start your own thread detailing how I was wrong, however you already know that you will be verbally ripped apart in front of your peers even more than you are now.

This is you at this point

^ creepy psycho speak, JR.

 

[Frannie]

This is not an astronomy thread, it is astronomers make up shit to justify Grant's and tuition thread.

You are a spoiled fool who actually thinks in error that you have either the ability or right to tell me what I should think and write.

I have complete freedom of expression, always have. It does not please everyone now or did it ever.

Now you go play with your toys while I consider adding to my defense portfolio, and keep me updated on the multiverse pulling galaxies toward it because 85 percent of gravity exerting mass and energy got lost by your astronomer

CIAO

Let's see if we have this straight. You start a thread on astronomy and your complaints that astronomers are coming up with theories to explain things they don't yet fully understand, you think the fact that other astronomers test those theories, verify some of them and prove some of them wrong means they don't understand anything at all, but you don't want to talk about astronomy any more because I took all your fun away by proving you wrong over and over again. Now you want to talk about stock trading, but don't want to start threads about it so you get upset that people are still talking about astronomy in the thread you started on astronomy.

Is that about the size of it?

And I've noticed that you have a pattern of making dumb statements then refusing to deal with them when they're shown to be ludicrously wrong.

Again stoopid this is an astronomy is nonsense thread, you need to accept reality instead of believing what you were programmed to believe.

However you continue floating around in black hole ville, I will take care of business here on the Earth

CIAO

PS. You can tap out at any time you feel appropriate, your chances of seeing me do such are null

Oh, I'm quite certain you will insist on continually needing the last word, in fact I'm counting on it. I'm controlling you that way.

Now, about those motor drives that you didn't think could keep a telescope focused on an object for long periods of time. Do you finally accept that even amateur astronomers can get long exposures of distant objects? Remember, you claimed they could not.

About spectroscopy, do you finally accept that we can identify elements present on distant hot Jupiters? Remember again that you claimed we couldn't.

Thus far, your complaint that we know nothing about the universe has only exposed your own gaping ignorance of the subject.

Triggered, that's an official fail......

Seriously kid you can start your own astronomy thread anytime you know, or are you gonna follow me like a lost puppy for the rest of your life.

As for photography, I actually had a photo published in a calendar once. No motor drive though, handheld Nikon.

PS. Again you could start your own thread detailing how I was wrong, however you already know that you will be verbally ripped apart in front of your peers even more than you are now.

This is you at this point

^ creepy psycho speak, JR.

This is intelligent to you

Lol

 

[G.T.]

Let's see if we have this straight. You start a thread on astronomy and your complaints that astronomers are coming up with theories to explain things they don't yet fully understand, you think the fact that other astronomers test those theories, verify some of them and prove some of them wrong means they don't understand anything at all, but you don't want to talk about astronomy any more because I took all your fun away by proving you wrong over and over again. Now you want to talk about stock trading, but don't want to start threads about it so you get upset that people are still talking about astronomy in the thread you started on astronomy.

Is that about the size of it?

And I've noticed that you have a pattern of making dumb statements then refusing to deal with them when they're shown to be ludicrously wrong.

Again stoopid this is an astronomy is nonsense thread, you need to accept reality instead of believing what you were programmed to believe.

However you continue floating around in black hole ville, I will take care of business here on the Earth

CIAO

PS. You can tap out at any time you feel appropriate, your chances of seeing me do such are null

Oh, I'm quite certain you will insist on continually needing the last word, in fact I'm counting on it. I'm controlling you that way.

Now, about those motor drives that you didn't think could keep a telescope focused on an object for long periods of time. Do you finally accept that even amateur astronomers can get long exposures of distant objects? Remember, you claimed they could not.

About spectroscopy, do you finally accept that we can identify elements present on distant hot Jupiters? Remember again that you claimed we couldn't.

Thus far, your complaint that we know nothing about the universe has only exposed your own gaping ignorance of the subject.

Triggered, that's an official fail......

Seriously kid you can start your own astronomy thread anytime you know, or are you gonna follow me like a lost puppy for the rest of your life.

As for photography, I actually had a photo published in a calendar once. No motor drive though, handheld Nikon.

PS. Again you could start your own thread detailing how I was wrong, however you already know that you will be verbally ripped apart in front of your peers even more than you are now.

This is you at this point

^ creepy psycho speak, JR.

This is intelligent to you

Lol

As opposed to you being intelligent...I think the Universe takes its chances, Corky

 

[Frannie]

Again stoopid this is an astronomy is nonsense thread, you need to accept reality instead of believing what you were programmed to believe.

However you continue floating around in black hole ville, I will take care of business here on the Earth

CIAO

PS. You can tap out at any time you feel appropriate, your chances of seeing me do such are null

Oh, I'm quite certain you will insist on continually needing the last word, in fact I'm counting on it. I'm controlling you that way.

Now, about those motor drives that you didn't think could keep a telescope focused on an object for long periods of time. Do you finally accept that even amateur astronomers can get long exposures of distant objects? Remember, you claimed they could not.

About spectroscopy, do you finally accept that we can identify elements present on distant hot Jupiters? Remember again that you claimed we couldn't.

Thus far, your complaint that we know nothing about the universe has only exposed your own gaping ignorance of the subject.

Triggered, that's an official fail......

Seriously kid you can start your own astronomy thread anytime you know, or are you gonna follow me like a lost puppy for the rest of your life.

As for photography, I actually had a photo published in a calendar once. No motor drive though, handheld Nikon.

PS. Again you could start your own thread detailing how I was wrong, however you already know that you will be verbally ripped apart in front of your peers even more than you are now.

This is you at this point

^ creepy psycho speak, JR.

This is intelligent to you

Lol

As opposed to you being intelligent...I think the Universe takes its chances, Corky

So you think that emojis make you intelligent?

Yawn, play on junior

 

[G.T.]

Oh, I'm quite certain you will insist on continually needing the last word, in fact I'm counting on it. I'm controlling you that way.

Now, about those motor drives that you didn't think could keep a telescope focused on an object for long periods of time. Do you finally accept that even amateur astronomers can get long exposures of distant objects? Remember, you claimed they could not.

About spectroscopy, do you finally accept that we can identify elements present on distant hot Jupiters? Remember again that you claimed we couldn't.

Thus far, your complaint that we know nothing about the universe has only exposed your own gaping ignorance of the subject.

Triggered, that's an official fail......

Seriously kid you can start your own astronomy thread anytime you know, or are you gonna follow me like a lost puppy for the rest of your life.

As for photography, I actually had a photo published in a calendar once. No motor drive though, handheld Nikon.

PS. Again you could start your own thread detailing how I was wrong, however you already know that you will be verbally ripped apart in front of your peers even more than you are now.

This is you at this point

^ creepy psycho speak, JR.

This is intelligent to you

Lol

As opposed to you being intelligent...I think the Universe takes its chances, Corky

So you think that emojis make you intelligent?

Yawn, play on junior

No, corky. They express something. Be sure to figure it out, Man.

 

[Frannie]

Triggered, that's an official fail......

Seriously kid you can start your own astronomy thread anytime you know, or are you gonna follow me like a lost puppy for the rest of your life.

As for photography, I actually had a photo published in a calendar once. No motor drive though, handheld Nikon.

PS. Again you could start your own thread detailing how I was wrong, however you already know that you will be verbally ripped apart in front of your peers even more than you are now.

This is you at this point

^ creepy psycho speak, JR.

This is intelligent to you

Lol

As opposed to you being intelligent...I think the Universe takes its chances, Corky

So you think that emojis make you intelligent?

Yawn, play on junior

No, corky. They express something. Be sure to figure it out, Man.

Wow that was a lot of info, I bet your mom is proud

 

[G.T.]

^ creepy psycho speak, JR.

This is intelligent to you

Lol

As opposed to you being intelligent...I think the Universe takes its chances, Corky

So you think that emojis make you intelligent?

Yawn, play on junior

No, corky. They express something. Be sure to figure it out, Man.

Wow that was a lot of info, I bet your mom is proud

Chill out dude.

 

[Frannie]

Triggered, that's an official fail......

Seriously kid you can start your own astronomy thread anytime you know, or are you gonna follow me like a lost puppy for the rest of your life.

As for photography, I actually had a photo published in a calendar once. No motor drive though, handheld Nikon.

PS. Again you could start your own thread detailing how I was wrong, however you already know that you will be verbally ripped apart in front of your peers even more than you are now.

This is you at this point

^ creepy psycho speak, JR.

This is intelligent to you

Lol

As opposed to you being intelligent...I think the Universe takes its chances, Corky

So you think that emojis make you intelligent?

Yawn, play on junior

No, corky. They express something. Be sure to figure it out, Man.

True they express your foolishness and inability to use linguistics as a medium

 

[G.T.]

^ creepy psycho speak, JR.

This is intelligent to you

Lol

As opposed to you being intelligent...I think the Universe takes its chances, Corky

So you think that emojis make you intelligent?

Yawn, play on junior

No, corky. They express something. Be sure to figure it out, Man.

True they express your foolishness and inability to use linguistics as a medium

Listen, JR - when you get this worked up, it's important to know your limits and when to step away from the internet. You need a break, my guy. Kirby not doing well, anymore?

 

[Frannie]

This is intelligent to you

Lol

As opposed to you being intelligent...I think the Universe takes its chances, Corky

So you think that emojis make you intelligent?

Yawn, play on junior

No, corky. They express something. Be sure to figure it out, Man.

True they express your foolishness and inability to use linguistics as a medium

Listen, JR - when you get this worked up, it's important to know your limits and when to step away from the internet. You need a break, my guy. Kirby not doing well, anymore?

You talk yourself into that....

Remember I like kittens like you

 

[G.T.]

As opposed to you being intelligent...I think the Universe takes its chances, Corky

So you think that emojis make you intelligent?

Yawn, play on junior

No, corky. They express something. Be sure to figure it out, Man.

True they express your foolishness and inability to use linguistics as a medium

Listen, JR - when you get this worked up, it's important to know your limits and when to step away from the internet. You need a break, my guy. Kirby not doing well, anymore?

You talk yourself into that....

Remember I like kittens like you

Thats cuz you're creepy, JR

 

[Frannie]

So you think that emojis make you intelligent?

Yawn, play on junior

No, corky. They express something. Be sure to figure it out, Man.

True they express your foolishness and inability to use linguistics as a medium

Listen, JR - when you get this worked up, it's important to know your limits and when to step away from the internet. You need a break, my guy. Kirby not doing well, anymore?

You talk yourself into that....

Remember I like kittens like you

Thats cuz you're creepy, JR

Thank you for the complement, my goal is to be just like I am, because you are a complete imbessile, glad you agree

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Here's the deal. You started this thread on astronomy, now you want to talk about stock trading, but instead of starting threads on that, you get upset that I keep talking about, and exposing your ignorance about, astronomy, in this thread debited to astronomy.

Now, have you figured out how spectroscopy allows us to gain an understanding of the elements present in the atmosphere of a hot Jupiter?

Have you figured out that even amateur astronomers can put a motor drive on their telescopes that precisely counter the Earth's rotation and allow them to observe an object for long periods of time?

These are basic fundamentals of modern astronomy that you expressed ignorance of.

This is not an astronomy thread, it is astronomers make up shit to justify Grant's and tuition thread.

You are a spoiled fool who actually thinks in error that you have either the ability or right to tell me what I should think and write.

I have complete freedom of expression, always have. It does not please everyone now or did it ever.

Now you go play with your toys while I consider adding to my defense portfolio, and keep me updated on the multiverse pulling galaxies toward it because 85 percent of gravity exerting mass and energy got lost by your astronomer

CIAO

Let's see if we have this straight. You start a thread on astronomy and your complaints that astronomers are coming up with theories to explain things they don't yet fully understand, you think the fact that other astronomers test those theories, verify some of them and prove some of them wrong means they don't understand anything at all, but you don't want to talk about astronomy any more because I took all your fun away by proving you wrong over and over again. Now you want to talk about stock trading, but don't want to start threads about it so you get upset that people are still talking about astronomy in the thread you started on astronomy.

Is that about the size of it?

And I've noticed that you have a pattern of making dumb statements then refusing to deal with them when they're shown to be ludicrously wrong.

Again stoopid this is an astronomy is nonsense thread, you need to accept reality instead of believing what you were programmed to believe.

However you continue floating around in black hole ville, I will take care of business here on the Earth

CIAO

PS. You can tap out at any time you feel appropriate, your chances of seeing me do such are null

Oh, I'm quite certain you will insist on continually needing the last word, in fact I'm counting on it. I'm controlling you that way.

Now, about those motor drives that you didn't think could keep a telescope focused on an object for long periods of time. Do you finally accept that even amateur astronomers can get long exposures of distant objects? Remember, you claimed they could not.

About spectroscopy, do you finally accept that we can identify elements present on distant hot Jupiters? Remember again that you claimed we couldn't.

Thus far, your complaint that we know nothing about the universe has only exposed your own gaping ignorance of the subject.

Triggered, that's an official fail......

Seriously kid you can start your own astronomy thread anytime you know, or are you gonna follow me like a lost puppy for the rest of your life.

As for photography, I actually had a photo published in a calendar once. No motor drive though, handheld Nikon.

PS. Again you could start your own thread detailing how I was wrong, however you already know that you will be verbally ripped apart in front of your peers even more than you are now.

This is you at this point

Nope..he is making sense..you are not. you contribute nothing but hot air and evasions...I don't give a shit about your puerile rhetoric..you have no facts of your own..and just C&P other people's work...obviously without knowing a thing about it.
Pure Troll...

 

[Frannie]

This is not an astronomy thread, it is astronomers make up shit to justify Grant's and tuition thread.

You are a spoiled fool who actually thinks in error that you have either the ability or right to tell me what I should think and write.

I have complete freedom of expression, always have. It does not please everyone now or did it ever.

Now you go play with your toys while I consider adding to my defense portfolio, and keep me updated on the multiverse pulling galaxies toward it because 85 percent of gravity exerting mass and energy got lost by your astronomer

CIAO

Let's see if we have this straight. You start a thread on astronomy and your complaints that astronomers are coming up with theories to explain things they don't yet fully understand, you think the fact that other astronomers test those theories, verify some of them and prove some of them wrong means they don't understand anything at all, but you don't want to talk about astronomy any more because I took all your fun away by proving you wrong over and over again. Now you want to talk about stock trading, but don't want to start threads about it so you get upset that people are still talking about astronomy in the thread you started on astronomy.

Is that about the size of it?

And I've noticed that you have a pattern of making dumb statements then refusing to deal with them when they're shown to be ludicrously wrong.

Again stoopid this is an astronomy is nonsense thread, you need to accept reality instead of believing what you were programmed to believe.

However you continue floating around in black hole ville, I will take care of business here on the Earth

CIAO

PS. You can tap out at any time you feel appropriate, your chances of seeing me do such are null

Oh, I'm quite certain you will insist on continually needing the last word, in fact I'm counting on it. I'm controlling you that way.

Now, about those motor drives that you didn't think could keep a telescope focused on an object for long periods of time. Do you finally accept that even amateur astronomers can get long exposures of distant objects? Remember, you claimed they could not.

About spectroscopy, do you finally accept that we can identify elements present on distant hot Jupiters? Remember again that you claimed we couldn't.

Thus far, your complaint that we know nothing about the universe has only exposed your own gaping ignorance of the subject.

Triggered, that's an official fail......

Seriously kid you can start your own astronomy thread anytime you know, or are you gonna follow me like a lost puppy for the rest of your life.

As for photography, I actually had a photo published in a calendar once. No motor drive though, handheld Nikon.

PS. Again you could start your own thread detailing how I was wrong, however you already know that you will be verbally ripped apart in front of your peers even more than you are now.

This is you at this point

Nope..he is making sense..you are not. you contribute nothing but hot air and evasions...I don't give a shit about your puerile rhetoric..you have no facts of your own..and just C&P other people's work...obviously without knowing a thing about it.
Pure Troll...

Nope, I have video of retards, are you the relief for the last loser

 

[hadit]

Here's the deal. You started this thread on astronomy, now you want to talk about stock trading, but instead of starting threads on that, you get upset that I keep talking about, and exposing your ignorance about, astronomy, in this thread debited to astronomy.

Now, have you figured out how spectroscopy allows us to gain an understanding of the elements present in the atmosphere of a hot Jupiter?

Have you figured out that even amateur astronomers can put a motor drive on their telescopes that precisely counter the Earth's rotation and allow them to observe an object for long periods of time?

These are basic fundamentals of modern astronomy that you expressed ignorance of.

This is not an astronomy thread, it is astronomers make up shit to justify Grant's and tuition thread.

You are a spoiled fool who actually thinks in error that you have either the ability or right to tell me what I should think and write.

I have complete freedom of expression, always have. It does not please everyone now or did it ever.

Now you go play with your toys while I consider adding to my defense portfolio, and keep me updated on the multiverse pulling galaxies toward it because 85 percent of gravity exerting mass and energy got lost by your astronomer

CIAO

Let's see if we have this straight. You start a thread on astronomy and your complaints that astronomers are coming up with theories to explain things they don't yet fully understand, you think the fact that other astronomers test those theories, verify some of them and prove some of them wrong means they don't understand anything at all, but you don't want to talk about astronomy any more because I took all your fun away by proving you wrong over and over again. Now you want to talk about stock trading, but don't want to start threads about it so you get upset that people are still talking about astronomy in the thread you started on astronomy.

Is that about the size of it?

And I've noticed that you have a pattern of making dumb statements then refusing to deal with them when they're shown to be ludicrously wrong.

Again stoopid this is an astronomy is nonsense thread, you need to accept reality instead of believing what you were programmed to believe.

However you continue floating around in black hole ville, I will take care of business here on the Earth

CIAO

PS. You can tap out at any time you feel appropriate, your chances of seeing me do such are null

Oh, I'm quite certain you will insist on continually needing the last word, in fact I'm counting on it. I'm controlling you that way.

Now, about those motor drives that you didn't think could keep a telescope focused on an object for long periods of time. Do you finally accept that even amateur astronomers can get long exposures of distant objects? Remember, you claimed they could not.

About spectroscopy, do you finally accept that we can identify elements present on distant hot Jupiters? Remember again that you claimed we couldn't.

Thus far, your complaint that we know nothing about the universe has only exposed your own gaping ignorance of the subject.

Triggered, that's an official fail......

Seriously kid you can start your own astronomy thread anytime you know, or are you gonna follow me like a lost puppy for the rest of your life.

As for photography, I actually had a photo published in a calendar once. No motor drive though, handheld Nikon.

PS. Again you could start your own thread detailing how I was wrong, however you already know that you will be verbally ripped apart in front of your peers even more than you are now.

This is you at this point

Here's the thing. You started this thread and made some dumb statements about astronomy. I have methodically dismantled your statements, showing where you were wrong. Now you want to talk about stock trading and other stuff. Fine, go for it and start threads on that. When you make dumb statements about astronomy in a thread that you start that is devoted to astronomy, however, you can expect me to correct you.

Now, about those motor drives. Do you finally acknowledge that even amatuer astronomers can focus on a single object in the sky for long periods of time? You didn't think they could, remember?

And about spectrographic analysis of distant planets. You've had plenty of time to do research, so what did you find out? You thought it was impossible, remember?

As for starting a thread to detail how you are wrong, I don't need to, as I'm doing it right here and now.